A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science
This paper, while acknowledging the academic excitement caused by respective intellectual efforts of various scholars in their analytical discussions of the history of political science & its growth, specifically focused on the behavioural approach. Our analysis shows that the behavioural approa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India) India), 2005-01, Vol.10 (1), p.61-64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 64 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 61 |
container_title | Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India) |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Akindele, S T Adebo, A |
description | This paper, while acknowledging the academic excitement caused by respective intellectual efforts of various scholars in their analytical discussions of the history of political science & its growth, specifically focused on the behavioural approach. Our analysis shows that the behavioural approach has consistently sought to make political science very quantitative & scientific. And, that, it places emphasis on micro politics (i.e. the study of political actors & processes) -- rather than the formal institutions of government. In the process, the paper highlights the history of the approach paying deserved attention to the debate that characterised its growth as well as its features. The paper contends that in spite of various criticisms against the approach, it has had & will continue to have an enduring impact on political science as a discipline that studies the wherewithal of our political existence as political animals. 10 References. Adapted from the source document. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60714913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60714913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_607149133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi7EOgjAURTtoIor_0MmNpEgFGdFoHA2yk6Z5hGdKi7zC9wuJH-B0T07OXbFA5FkcnfNjsmFborcQMpXyFLCq4CVMSOiVR2eV4QUREHVgPXcN9y3wEgkWvkCrJnTjsFR9PzilW46WP51Bj3q2L41gNYRs3ShDsP_tjh3ut-r6iObPZwTydYekwRhlwY1UpyKLZR4nyd_hF5PCQsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60714913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Akindele, S T ; Adebo, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Akindele, S T ; Adebo, A</creatorcontrib><description>This paper, while acknowledging the academic excitement caused by respective intellectual efforts of various scholars in their analytical discussions of the history of political science & its growth, specifically focused on the behavioural approach. Our analysis shows that the behavioural approach has consistently sought to make political science very quantitative & scientific. And, that, it places emphasis on micro politics (i.e. the study of political actors & processes) -- rather than the formal institutions of government. In the process, the paper highlights the history of the approach paying deserved attention to the debate that characterised its growth as well as its features. The paper contends that in spite of various criticisms against the approach, it has had & will continue to have an enduring impact on political science as a discipline that studies the wherewithal of our political existence as political animals. 10 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0971-8923</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Behaviorism ; History of Political Science ; Methodology (Data Analysis) ; Political Science</subject><ispartof>Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India), 2005-01, Vol.10 (1), p.61-64</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akindele, S T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adebo, A</creatorcontrib><title>A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science</title><title>Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India)</title><description>This paper, while acknowledging the academic excitement caused by respective intellectual efforts of various scholars in their analytical discussions of the history of political science & its growth, specifically focused on the behavioural approach. Our analysis shows that the behavioural approach has consistently sought to make political science very quantitative & scientific. And, that, it places emphasis on micro politics (i.e. the study of political actors & processes) -- rather than the formal institutions of government. In the process, the paper highlights the history of the approach paying deserved attention to the debate that characterised its growth as well as its features. The paper contends that in spite of various criticisms against the approach, it has had & will continue to have an enduring impact on political science as a discipline that studies the wherewithal of our political existence as political animals. 10 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Behaviorism</subject><subject>History of Political Science</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Analysis)</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><issn>0971-8923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi7EOgjAURTtoIor_0MmNpEgFGdFoHA2yk6Z5hGdKi7zC9wuJH-B0T07OXbFA5FkcnfNjsmFborcQMpXyFLCq4CVMSOiVR2eV4QUREHVgPXcN9y3wEgkWvkCrJnTjsFR9PzilW46WP51Bj3q2L41gNYRs3ShDsP_tjh3ut-r6iObPZwTydYekwRhlwY1UpyKLZR4nyd_hF5PCQsQ</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Akindele, S T</creator><creator>Adebo, A</creator><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science</title><author>Akindele, S T ; Adebo, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_607149133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Behaviorism</topic><topic>History of Political Science</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Analysis)</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akindele, S T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adebo, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akindele, S T</au><au>Adebo, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India)</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>61-64</pages><issn>0971-8923</issn><abstract>This paper, while acknowledging the academic excitement caused by respective intellectual efforts of various scholars in their analytical discussions of the history of political science & its growth, specifically focused on the behavioural approach. Our analysis shows that the behavioural approach has consistently sought to make political science very quantitative & scientific. And, that, it places emphasis on micro politics (i.e. the study of political actors & processes) -- rather than the formal institutions of government. In the process, the paper highlights the history of the approach paying deserved attention to the debate that characterised its growth as well as its features. The paper contends that in spite of various criticisms against the approach, it has had & will continue to have an enduring impact on political science as a discipline that studies the wherewithal of our political existence as political animals. 10 References. Adapted from the source document.</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0971-8923 |
ispartof | Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India), 2005-01, Vol.10 (1), p.61-64 |
issn | 0971-8923 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60714913 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Behaviorism History of Political Science Methodology (Data Analysis) Political Science |
title | A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T16%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Revisitational%20Assessment%20of%20the%20Rise%20of%20Behavioural%20Approach%20in%20Political%20Science&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20sciences%20(Delhi,%20India)&rft.au=Akindele,%20S%20T&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=61-64&rft.issn=0971-8923&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60714913%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60714913&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |