A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science

This paper, while acknowledging the academic excitement caused by respective intellectual efforts of various scholars in their analytical discussions of the history of political science & its growth, specifically focused on the behavioural approach. Our analysis shows that the behavioural approa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India) India), 2005-01, Vol.10 (1), p.61-64
Hauptverfasser: Akindele, S T, Adebo, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 64
container_issue 1
container_start_page 61
container_title Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India)
container_volume 10
creator Akindele, S T
Adebo, A
description This paper, while acknowledging the academic excitement caused by respective intellectual efforts of various scholars in their analytical discussions of the history of political science & its growth, specifically focused on the behavioural approach. Our analysis shows that the behavioural approach has consistently sought to make political science very quantitative & scientific. And, that, it places emphasis on micro politics (i.e. the study of political actors & processes) -- rather than the formal institutions of government. In the process, the paper highlights the history of the approach paying deserved attention to the debate that characterised its growth as well as its features. The paper contends that in spite of various criticisms against the approach, it has had & will continue to have an enduring impact on political science as a discipline that studies the wherewithal of our political existence as political animals. 10 References. Adapted from the source document.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60714913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60714913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_607149133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi7EOgjAURTtoIor_0MmNpEgFGdFoHA2yk6Z5hGdKi7zC9wuJH-B0T07OXbFA5FkcnfNjsmFborcQMpXyFLCq4CVMSOiVR2eV4QUREHVgPXcN9y3wEgkWvkCrJnTjsFR9PzilW46WP51Bj3q2L41gNYRs3ShDsP_tjh3ut-r6iObPZwTydYekwRhlwY1UpyKLZR4nyd_hF5PCQsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60714913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Akindele, S T ; Adebo, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Akindele, S T ; Adebo, A</creatorcontrib><description>This paper, while acknowledging the academic excitement caused by respective intellectual efforts of various scholars in their analytical discussions of the history of political science &amp; its growth, specifically focused on the behavioural approach. Our analysis shows that the behavioural approach has consistently sought to make political science very quantitative &amp; scientific. And, that, it places emphasis on micro politics (i.e. the study of political actors &amp; processes) -- rather than the formal institutions of government. In the process, the paper highlights the history of the approach paying deserved attention to the debate that characterised its growth as well as its features. The paper contends that in spite of various criticisms against the approach, it has had &amp; will continue to have an enduring impact on political science as a discipline that studies the wherewithal of our political existence as political animals. 10 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0971-8923</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Behaviorism ; History of Political Science ; Methodology (Data Analysis) ; Political Science</subject><ispartof>Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India), 2005-01, Vol.10 (1), p.61-64</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akindele, S T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adebo, A</creatorcontrib><title>A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science</title><title>Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India)</title><description>This paper, while acknowledging the academic excitement caused by respective intellectual efforts of various scholars in their analytical discussions of the history of political science &amp; its growth, specifically focused on the behavioural approach. Our analysis shows that the behavioural approach has consistently sought to make political science very quantitative &amp; scientific. And, that, it places emphasis on micro politics (i.e. the study of political actors &amp; processes) -- rather than the formal institutions of government. In the process, the paper highlights the history of the approach paying deserved attention to the debate that characterised its growth as well as its features. The paper contends that in spite of various criticisms against the approach, it has had &amp; will continue to have an enduring impact on political science as a discipline that studies the wherewithal of our political existence as political animals. 10 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Behaviorism</subject><subject>History of Political Science</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Analysis)</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><issn>0971-8923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi7EOgjAURTtoIor_0MmNpEgFGdFoHA2yk6Z5hGdKi7zC9wuJH-B0T07OXbFA5FkcnfNjsmFborcQMpXyFLCq4CVMSOiVR2eV4QUREHVgPXcN9y3wEgkWvkCrJnTjsFR9PzilW46WP51Bj3q2L41gNYRs3ShDsP_tjh3ut-r6iObPZwTydYekwRhlwY1UpyKLZR4nyd_hF5PCQsQ</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Akindele, S T</creator><creator>Adebo, A</creator><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science</title><author>Akindele, S T ; Adebo, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_607149133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Behaviorism</topic><topic>History of Political Science</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Analysis)</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akindele, S T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adebo, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akindele, S T</au><au>Adebo, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India)</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>61-64</pages><issn>0971-8923</issn><abstract>This paper, while acknowledging the academic excitement caused by respective intellectual efforts of various scholars in their analytical discussions of the history of political science &amp; its growth, specifically focused on the behavioural approach. Our analysis shows that the behavioural approach has consistently sought to make political science very quantitative &amp; scientific. And, that, it places emphasis on micro politics (i.e. the study of political actors &amp; processes) -- rather than the formal institutions of government. In the process, the paper highlights the history of the approach paying deserved attention to the debate that characterised its growth as well as its features. The paper contends that in spite of various criticisms against the approach, it has had &amp; will continue to have an enduring impact on political science as a discipline that studies the wherewithal of our political existence as political animals. 10 References. Adapted from the source document.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0971-8923
ispartof Journal of social sciences (Delhi, India), 2005-01, Vol.10 (1), p.61-64
issn 0971-8923
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60714913
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Behaviorism
History of Political Science
Methodology (Data Analysis)
Political Science
title A Revisitational Assessment of the Rise of Behavioural Approach in Political Science
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T16%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Revisitational%20Assessment%20of%20the%20Rise%20of%20Behavioural%20Approach%20in%20Political%20Science&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20sciences%20(Delhi,%20India)&rft.au=Akindele,%20S%20T&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=61-64&rft.issn=0971-8923&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60714913%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60714913&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true