An Evaluation of “Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Conflict?” Studies
Contradictory findings, that economic inequality may have a positive, negative, or no impact on political conflict, are a puzzle for conflict studies. Three approaches have been used t o explain the inconsistent findings of the EI-PC (Economic Inequality-Political Conflict) nexus: statistical modeli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World politics 1989-07, Vol.41 (4), p.431-470 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 470 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 431 |
container_title | World politics |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Lichbach, Mark Irving |
description | Contradictory findings, that economic inequality may have a positive, negative, or no impact on political conflict, are a puzzle for conflict studies. Three approaches have been used t o explain the inconsistent findings of the EI-PC (Economic Inequality-Political Conflict) nexus: statistical modeling, formal modeling, and theory building. Because analysts have tended to possess different research skills, these three approaches have been employed in isolation from one another. Singly, however, all three approaches have proved deficient and are unlikely to solve the EI-PC puzzle. The most fruitful approach is to combine the assumptions of the theory builders and the deductive approach of the formal modelers with the various empirical tests of the statistical modelers. Such an approach to the EI-PC puzzle produces a crucial test of the Deprived Actor and Rational Actor theories of conflict. The approach is also our best hope for solving the other long-standing puzzles in conflict studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2010526 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60714179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_2010526</cupid><jstor_id>2010526</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2010526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-eecd7c7d9e8429f215e407791c0d58e51c7c3249d2387d6f6f75f24fd749d3fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90N1KHDEUB_AgLbhV8RWCLS1ejOZrkpmrouu6FQQ_e9ObkCYnku3sRJOZonc-iL6cT-LILkWEenU4hx-HP3-ENinZYZyoXUYoKZlcQSNKKllwzqsPaESI4EVVKbqKPuU8I4RSydQIne21ePLXNL3pQmxx9Pjp_uEgQsYTG9s4DxYftXDTmyZ0d3g_ATh8GoclWNPgcWx9E2z3_en-EV90vQuQ19FHb5oMG8u5hn4eTi7HP4rjk-nReO-4sIKyrgCwTlnlaqgEqz2jJQiiVE0tcWUFJbXKciZqx3ilnPTSq9Iz4Z0abtwDX0NfF3-vU7zpIXd6HrKFpjEtxD5rSRQVVNUD3HoDZ7FP7ZBNMyU4IVy8oM__Q5QTKuTQnRzUt4WyKeacwOvrFOYm3WlK9Ev7etn-IL8s5Cx3Mb3DigULuYPbf8ykP1oqrkotp2d6KvgFP_-1r8vBby8DmPnvFNwVvMr55vczEo2dIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301468876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Evaluation of “Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Conflict?” Studies</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Lichbach, Mark Irving</creator><creatorcontrib>Lichbach, Mark Irving</creatorcontrib><description>Contradictory findings, that economic inequality may have a positive, negative, or no impact on political conflict, are a puzzle for conflict studies. Three approaches have been used t o explain the inconsistent findings of the EI-PC (Economic Inequality-Political Conflict) nexus: statistical modeling, formal modeling, and theory building. Because analysts have tended to possess different research skills, these three approaches have been employed in isolation from one another. Singly, however, all three approaches have proved deficient and are unlikely to solve the EI-PC puzzle. The most fruitful approach is to combine the assumptions of the theory builders and the deductive approach of the formal modelers with the various empirical tests of the statistical modelers. Such an approach to the EI-PC puzzle produces a crucial test of the Deprived Actor and Rational Actor theories of conflict. The approach is also our best hope for solving the other long-standing puzzles in conflict studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-8871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1086-3338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2010526</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WOPOBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Dissent ; Economic Conditions ; Economic research ; Economic theory ; Equality ; Evaluation ; Income inequality ; International politics ; Political conflict ; Political revolutions ; Political violence ; Politics ; Social inequality ; Statistical models ; Statistics</subject><ispartof>World politics, 1989-07, Vol.41 (4), p.431-470</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1989</rights><rights>Copyright 1989 The Trustees of Princeton University</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Jul 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-eecd7c7d9e8429f215e407791c0d58e51c7c3249d2387d6f6f75f24fd749d3fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-eecd7c7d9e8429f215e407791c0d58e51c7c3249d2387d6f6f75f24fd749d3fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2010526$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0043887100010789/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27846,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lichbach, Mark Irving</creatorcontrib><title>An Evaluation of “Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Conflict?” Studies</title><title>World politics</title><addtitle>World Pol</addtitle><description>Contradictory findings, that economic inequality may have a positive, negative, or no impact on political conflict, are a puzzle for conflict studies. Three approaches have been used t o explain the inconsistent findings of the EI-PC (Economic Inequality-Political Conflict) nexus: statistical modeling, formal modeling, and theory building. Because analysts have tended to possess different research skills, these three approaches have been employed in isolation from one another. Singly, however, all three approaches have proved deficient and are unlikely to solve the EI-PC puzzle. The most fruitful approach is to combine the assumptions of the theory builders and the deductive approach of the formal modelers with the various empirical tests of the statistical modelers. Such an approach to the EI-PC puzzle produces a crucial test of the Deprived Actor and Rational Actor theories of conflict. The approach is also our best hope for solving the other long-standing puzzles in conflict studies.</description><subject>Dissent</subject><subject>Economic Conditions</subject><subject>Economic research</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>International politics</subject><subject>Political conflict</subject><subject>Political revolutions</subject><subject>Political violence</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social inequality</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><issn>0043-8871</issn><issn>1086-3338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90N1KHDEUB_AgLbhV8RWCLS1ejOZrkpmrouu6FQQ_e9ObkCYnku3sRJOZonc-iL6cT-LILkWEenU4hx-HP3-ENinZYZyoXUYoKZlcQSNKKllwzqsPaESI4EVVKbqKPuU8I4RSydQIne21ePLXNL3pQmxx9Pjp_uEgQsYTG9s4DxYftXDTmyZ0d3g_ATh8GoclWNPgcWx9E2z3_en-EV90vQuQ19FHb5oMG8u5hn4eTi7HP4rjk-nReO-4sIKyrgCwTlnlaqgEqz2jJQiiVE0tcWUFJbXKciZqx3ilnPTSq9Iz4Z0abtwDX0NfF3-vU7zpIXd6HrKFpjEtxD5rSRQVVNUD3HoDZ7FP7ZBNMyU4IVy8oM__Q5QTKuTQnRzUt4WyKeacwOvrFOYm3WlK9Ev7etn-IL8s5Cx3Mb3DigULuYPbf8ykP1oqrkotp2d6KvgFP_-1r8vBby8DmPnvFNwVvMr55vczEo2dIA</recordid><startdate>19890701</startdate><enddate>19890701</enddate><creator>Lichbach, Mark Irving</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Princeton University Press</general><general>Princeton University Press, etc</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890701</creationdate><title>An Evaluation of “Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Conflict?” Studies</title><author>Lichbach, Mark Irving</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-eecd7c7d9e8429f215e407791c0d58e51c7c3249d2387d6f6f75f24fd749d3fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Dissent</topic><topic>Economic Conditions</topic><topic>Economic research</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>International politics</topic><topic>Political conflict</topic><topic>Political revolutions</topic><topic>Political violence</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social inequality</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lichbach, Mark Irving</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>World politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lichbach, Mark Irving</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Evaluation of “Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Conflict?” Studies</atitle><jtitle>World politics</jtitle><addtitle>World Pol</addtitle><date>1989-07-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>431-470</pages><issn>0043-8871</issn><eissn>1086-3338</eissn><coden>WOPOBI</coden><abstract>Contradictory findings, that economic inequality may have a positive, negative, or no impact on political conflict, are a puzzle for conflict studies. Three approaches have been used t o explain the inconsistent findings of the EI-PC (Economic Inequality-Political Conflict) nexus: statistical modeling, formal modeling, and theory building. Because analysts have tended to possess different research skills, these three approaches have been employed in isolation from one another. Singly, however, all three approaches have proved deficient and are unlikely to solve the EI-PC puzzle. The most fruitful approach is to combine the assumptions of the theory builders and the deductive approach of the formal modelers with the various empirical tests of the statistical modelers. Such an approach to the EI-PC puzzle produces a crucial test of the Deprived Actor and Rational Actor theories of conflict. The approach is also our best hope for solving the other long-standing puzzles in conflict studies.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/2010526</doi><tpages>40</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-8871 |
ispartof | World politics, 1989-07, Vol.41 (4), p.431-470 |
issn | 0043-8871 1086-3338 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60714179 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Dissent Economic Conditions Economic research Economic theory Equality Evaluation Income inequality International politics Political conflict Political revolutions Political violence Politics Social inequality Statistical models Statistics |
title | An Evaluation of “Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Conflict?” Studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T08%3A22%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Evaluation%20of%20%E2%80%9CDoes%20Economic%20Inequality%20Breed%20Political%20Conflict?%E2%80%9D%20Studies&rft.jtitle=World%20politics&rft.au=Lichbach,%20Mark%20Irving&rft.date=1989-07-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=431-470&rft.issn=0043-8871&rft.eissn=1086-3338&rft.coden=WOPOBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2010526&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2010526%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301468876&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_2010526&rft_jstor_id=2010526&rfr_iscdi=true |