Distributed Public Governance in Britain
The structure of the British state is growing increasingly complex. This trend raises a number of questions that focus on the forces stimulating this complexity and its implications both for society‐state relationships and the design and implementation of public policy. This article focuses on one s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public administration (London) 2004-12, Vol.82 (4), p.883-909 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 909 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 883 |
container_title | Public administration (London) |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Flinders, Matthew |
description | The structure of the British state is growing increasingly complex. This trend raises a number of questions that focus on the forces stimulating this complexity and its implications both for society‐state relationships and the design and implementation of public policy. This article focuses on one specific element or strand of these debates: the growth in the number and role of quasi‐autonomous public bodies within Britain. It seeks to analyse and reflect upon the distinctive approach taken by the Labour government, since winning office in May 1997, in relation to the sphere of ‘distributed public governance’ in Britain. Moreover, the article seeks to locate this analysis within broader debates surrounding the future of the British state and the Labour government's approach to statecraft through a thematic framework based around: growth, co‐ordination, accountability, depoliticization and power. The central argument of this article is that the Labour government has increased considerably the sphere of distributed public governance in Britain. This process has been largely devoid of an underpinning rationale and this may have significant implications for successful policy delivery, the public's trust in government and the future trajectory of the British state. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00423.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60711051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1035690841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-359e4530afb90134ffb5de23ab1429ff0e61075ee2324f73954b22fef97067e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkTtPwzAYRS0EEuXxHyIG1CXl8zseGKClBalAh0pILFYSbMklTYrdQPn3OBQxMABe_NA519L9EEowDHBcZ4sBAKUpJSobEAAWr4zQwWYH9TATMlVEqV3U-4b20UEIC4iU4KyH-iMX1t4V7do8JbO2qFyZTJpX4-u8Lk3i6uTSu3Xu6iO0Z_MqmOOv_RDNx1fz4XU6vZ_cDC-mackkjl9wZRinkNtCAabM2oI_GULzAjOirAUjMEhu4hNhVlLFWUGINVZJENLQQ3S6jV355qU1Ya2XLpSmqvLaNG3QAiTGwPGfIM2AcMmzCPZ_BTFQLhRkrMs8-YEumjY2UQUdq5UcqKARyrZQ6ZsQvLF65d0y9-8xSXcj0Qvdta27tjuP6c-R6E1Uz7fqm6vM-789PbsY3cZT9NOtH2dmNt9-7p-1kFRy_XA30Y_jqRC3Y6oZ_QBHdJ1a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200750363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distributed Public Governance in Britain</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Political science complete</source><creator>Flinders, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Flinders, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>The structure of the British state is growing increasingly complex. This trend raises a number of questions that focus on the forces stimulating this complexity and its implications both for society‐state relationships and the design and implementation of public policy. This article focuses on one specific element or strand of these debates: the growth in the number and role of quasi‐autonomous public bodies within Britain. It seeks to analyse and reflect upon the distinctive approach taken by the Labour government, since winning office in May 1997, in relation to the sphere of ‘distributed public governance’ in Britain. Moreover, the article seeks to locate this analysis within broader debates surrounding the future of the British state and the Labour government's approach to statecraft through a thematic framework based around: growth, co‐ordination, accountability, depoliticization and power. The central argument of this article is that the Labour government has increased considerably the sphere of distributed public governance in Britain. This process has been largely devoid of an underpinning rationale and this may have significant implications for successful policy delivery, the public's trust in government and the future trajectory of the British state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00423.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PUADDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Civil Society ; Depoliticization ; Governance ; Government agencies ; Great Britain ; Labor Parties ; Labour parties ; Nongovernmental Organizations ; Policy making ; Political parties ; Public administration ; Public Policy ; QUANGOs ; State Society Relationship ; State-society relations ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Public administration (London), 2004-12, Vol.82 (4), p.883-909</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-359e4530afb90134ffb5de23ab1429ff0e61075ee2324f73954b22fef97067e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-359e4530afb90134ffb5de23ab1429ff0e61075ee2324f73954b22fef97067e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.0033-3298.2004.00423.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.0033-3298.2004.00423.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27845,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flinders, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Distributed Public Governance in Britain</title><title>Public administration (London)</title><description>The structure of the British state is growing increasingly complex. This trend raises a number of questions that focus on the forces stimulating this complexity and its implications both for society‐state relationships and the design and implementation of public policy. This article focuses on one specific element or strand of these debates: the growth in the number and role of quasi‐autonomous public bodies within Britain. It seeks to analyse and reflect upon the distinctive approach taken by the Labour government, since winning office in May 1997, in relation to the sphere of ‘distributed public governance’ in Britain. Moreover, the article seeks to locate this analysis within broader debates surrounding the future of the British state and the Labour government's approach to statecraft through a thematic framework based around: growth, co‐ordination, accountability, depoliticization and power. The central argument of this article is that the Labour government has increased considerably the sphere of distributed public governance in Britain. This process has been largely devoid of an underpinning rationale and this may have significant implications for successful policy delivery, the public's trust in government and the future trajectory of the British state.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Civil Society</subject><subject>Depoliticization</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Great Britain</subject><subject>Labor Parties</subject><subject>Labour parties</subject><subject>Nongovernmental Organizations</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>QUANGOs</subject><subject>State Society Relationship</subject><subject>State-society relations</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0033-3298</issn><issn>1467-9299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkTtPwzAYRS0EEuXxHyIG1CXl8zseGKClBalAh0pILFYSbMklTYrdQPn3OBQxMABe_NA519L9EEowDHBcZ4sBAKUpJSobEAAWr4zQwWYH9TATMlVEqV3U-4b20UEIC4iU4KyH-iMX1t4V7do8JbO2qFyZTJpX4-u8Lk3i6uTSu3Xu6iO0Z_MqmOOv_RDNx1fz4XU6vZ_cDC-mackkjl9wZRinkNtCAabM2oI_GULzAjOirAUjMEhu4hNhVlLFWUGINVZJENLQQ3S6jV355qU1Ya2XLpSmqvLaNG3QAiTGwPGfIM2AcMmzCPZ_BTFQLhRkrMs8-YEumjY2UQUdq5UcqKARyrZQ6ZsQvLF65d0y9-8xSXcj0Qvdta27tjuP6c-R6E1Uz7fqm6vM-789PbsY3cZT9NOtH2dmNt9-7p-1kFRy_XA30Y_jqRC3Y6oZ_QBHdJ1a</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Flinders, Matthew</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Distributed Public Governance in Britain</title><author>Flinders, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4713-359e4530afb90134ffb5de23ab1429ff0e61075ee2324f73954b22fef97067e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Civil Society</topic><topic>Depoliticization</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Great Britain</topic><topic>Labor Parties</topic><topic>Labour parties</topic><topic>Nongovernmental Organizations</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>QUANGOs</topic><topic>State Society Relationship</topic><topic>State-society relations</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flinders, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Public administration (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flinders, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distributed Public Governance in Britain</atitle><jtitle>Public administration (London)</jtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>883-909</pages><issn>0033-3298</issn><eissn>1467-9299</eissn><coden>PUADDD</coden><abstract>The structure of the British state is growing increasingly complex. This trend raises a number of questions that focus on the forces stimulating this complexity and its implications both for society‐state relationships and the design and implementation of public policy. This article focuses on one specific element or strand of these debates: the growth in the number and role of quasi‐autonomous public bodies within Britain. It seeks to analyse and reflect upon the distinctive approach taken by the Labour government, since winning office in May 1997, in relation to the sphere of ‘distributed public governance’ in Britain. Moreover, the article seeks to locate this analysis within broader debates surrounding the future of the British state and the Labour government's approach to statecraft through a thematic framework based around: growth, co‐ordination, accountability, depoliticization and power. The central argument of this article is that the Labour government has increased considerably the sphere of distributed public governance in Britain. This process has been largely devoid of an underpinning rationale and this may have significant implications for successful policy delivery, the public's trust in government and the future trajectory of the British state.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00423.x</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-3298 |
ispartof | Public administration (London), 2004-12, Vol.82 (4), p.883-909 |
issn | 0033-3298 1467-9299 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60711051 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Political science complete |
subjects | Accountability Civil Society Depoliticization Governance Government agencies Great Britain Labor Parties Labour parties Nongovernmental Organizations Policy making Political parties Public administration Public Policy QUANGOs State Society Relationship State-society relations United Kingdom |
title | Distributed Public Governance in Britain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A28%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distributed%20Public%20Governance%20in%20Britain&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20(London)&rft.au=Flinders,%20Matthew&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=883-909&rft.issn=0033-3298&rft.eissn=1467-9299&rft.coden=PUADDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00423.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1035690841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200750363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |