A test between deindividuation and emergent norm theories of crowd aggression
In groups of 6-8, 89 female undergraduates who were either anonymous or identifiable to each other acted as an audience to a pair of discussants. Ss were given the opportunity to administer loud noise to the discussants. The response displayed to each group as an alleged average was manipulated so t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 1982-02, Vol.42 (2), p.260-272 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 272 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 260 |
| container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Mann, Leon Newton, James W Innes, J. M |
| description | In groups of 6-8, 89 female undergraduates who were either anonymous or identifiable to each other acted as an audience to a pair of discussants. Ss were given the opportunity to administer loud noise to the discussants. The response displayed to each group as an alleged average was manipulated so that Ss were led to believe that either an aggressive or a lenient norm had developed. As predicted by deindividuation theory, anonymous Ss administered significantly higher levels of noise than identifiable Ss. Anonymous Ss used equally loud noise regardless of group norm. Self-ratings provided evidence that the effects of anonymity were mediated by a psychological state of deindividuation, in addition to freedom from accountability for individual acts. There was no support for the crucial emergent norm theory prediction that aggression will be greatest when Ss who are identifiable to each other are exposed to an aggressive norm. (26 ref) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.260 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60705765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>614368279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-31c8eb3273be142af0c7cafbe60269878a2f0189d4c3b4fbd3fcd1af1bde4a253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10UlLxDAUAOAgCo7LH_AUVLx1zNa0PQ6DG4x40XNIk5exQzeT1mH-vSkjCoK8wyPwvfAWhC4omVPCs1tCGEt4SsVcsHkMSQ7QjBa8SCin6SGa_YBjdBLChhAiUsZm6HmBBwgDLmHYArTYQtXa6rOyox6qrsW6tRga8GtoB9x2vsHDO3S-goA7h43vthbr9dpDCJGfoSOn6wDn3_kUvd3fvS4fk9XLw9NysUo0l2RIODU5lJxlvAQqmHbEZEa7EiRhssizXDNHaF5YYXgpXGm5M5ZqR0sLQrOUn6Kb_b-97z7G2L9qqmCgrnUL3RiUJBlJMznByz9w042-jb0pSQWXOcuKiK7-Q5QVacGkpFlUbK_i0CF4cKr3VaP9TlGipiOoacdq2rESTMWQJBZd74t0r1Ufdkb7oTI1hPjof9kXIsaGRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614368279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A test between deindividuation and emergent norm theories of crowd aggression</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Mann, Leon ; Newton, James W ; Innes, J. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Mann, Leon ; Newton, James W ; Innes, J. M</creatorcontrib><description>In groups of 6-8, 89 female undergraduates who were either anonymous or identifiable to each other acted as an audience to a pair of discussants. Ss were given the opportunity to administer loud noise to the discussants. The response displayed to each group as an alleged average was manipulated so that Ss were led to believe that either an aggressive or a lenient norm had developed. As predicted by deindividuation theory, anonymous Ss administered significantly higher levels of noise than identifiable Ss. Anonymous Ss used equally loud noise regardless of group norm. Self-ratings provided evidence that the effects of anonymity were mediated by a psychological state of deindividuation, in addition to freedom from accountability for individual acts. There was no support for the crucial emergent norm theory prediction that aggression will be greatest when Ss who are identifiable to each other are exposed to an aggressive norm. (26 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.260</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>AGGRESSION ; Aggressive Behavior ; Anonymity ; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN ; Group Dynamics ; Human ; PERSONALITY AND HUMAN NATURE ; POLITICAL THEORY ; PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY ; Theories</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1982-02, Vol.42 (2), p.260-272</ispartof><rights>1982 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1982, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-31c8eb3273be142af0c7cafbe60269878a2f0189d4c3b4fbd3fcd1af1bde4a253</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27868,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mann, Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, J. M</creatorcontrib><title>A test between deindividuation and emergent norm theories of crowd aggression</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><description>In groups of 6-8, 89 female undergraduates who were either anonymous or identifiable to each other acted as an audience to a pair of discussants. Ss were given the opportunity to administer loud noise to the discussants. The response displayed to each group as an alleged average was manipulated so that Ss were led to believe that either an aggressive or a lenient norm had developed. As predicted by deindividuation theory, anonymous Ss administered significantly higher levels of noise than identifiable Ss. Anonymous Ss used equally loud noise regardless of group norm. Self-ratings provided evidence that the effects of anonymity were mediated by a psychological state of deindividuation, in addition to freedom from accountability for individual acts. There was no support for the crucial emergent norm theory prediction that aggression will be greatest when Ss who are identifiable to each other are exposed to an aggressive norm. (26 ref)</description><subject>AGGRESSION</subject><subject>Aggressive Behavior</subject><subject>Anonymity</subject><subject>EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>PERSONALITY AND HUMAN NATURE</subject><subject>POLITICAL THEORY</subject><subject>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY</subject><subject>Theories</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp10UlLxDAUAOAgCo7LH_AUVLx1zNa0PQ6DG4x40XNIk5exQzeT1mH-vSkjCoK8wyPwvfAWhC4omVPCs1tCGEt4SsVcsHkMSQ7QjBa8SCin6SGa_YBjdBLChhAiUsZm6HmBBwgDLmHYArTYQtXa6rOyox6qrsW6tRga8GtoB9x2vsHDO3S-goA7h43vthbr9dpDCJGfoSOn6wDn3_kUvd3fvS4fk9XLw9NysUo0l2RIODU5lJxlvAQqmHbEZEa7EiRhssizXDNHaF5YYXgpXGm5M5ZqR0sLQrOUn6Kb_b-97z7G2L9qqmCgrnUL3RiUJBlJMznByz9w042-jb0pSQWXOcuKiK7-Q5QVacGkpFlUbK_i0CF4cKr3VaP9TlGipiOoacdq2rESTMWQJBZd74t0r1Ufdkb7oTI1hPjof9kXIsaGRw</recordid><startdate>198202</startdate><enddate>198202</enddate><creator>Mann, Leon</creator><creator>Newton, James W</creator><creator>Innes, J. M</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198202</creationdate><title>A test between deindividuation and emergent norm theories of crowd aggression</title><author>Mann, Leon ; Newton, James W ; Innes, J. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-31c8eb3273be142af0c7cafbe60269878a2f0189d4c3b4fbd3fcd1af1bde4a253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>AGGRESSION</topic><topic>Aggressive Behavior</topic><topic>Anonymity</topic><topic>EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>PERSONALITY AND HUMAN NATURE</topic><topic>POLITICAL THEORY</topic><topic>PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY</topic><topic>Theories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mann, Leon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Innes, J. M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mann, Leon</au><au>Newton, James W</au><au>Innes, J. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A test between deindividuation and emergent norm theories of crowd aggression</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><date>1982-02</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>260-272</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><abstract>In groups of 6-8, 89 female undergraduates who were either anonymous or identifiable to each other acted as an audience to a pair of discussants. Ss were given the opportunity to administer loud noise to the discussants. The response displayed to each group as an alleged average was manipulated so that Ss were led to believe that either an aggressive or a lenient norm had developed. As predicted by deindividuation theory, anonymous Ss administered significantly higher levels of noise than identifiable Ss. Anonymous Ss used equally loud noise regardless of group norm. Self-ratings provided evidence that the effects of anonymity were mediated by a psychological state of deindividuation, in addition to freedom from accountability for individual acts. There was no support for the crucial emergent norm theory prediction that aggression will be greatest when Ss who are identifiable to each other are exposed to an aggressive norm. (26 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, D.C</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.260</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
| ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 1982-02, Vol.42 (2), p.260-272 |
| issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60705765 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | AGGRESSION Aggressive Behavior Anonymity EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Group Dynamics Human PERSONALITY AND HUMAN NATURE POLITICAL THEORY PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY Theories |
| title | A test between deindividuation and emergent norm theories of crowd aggression |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A50%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20test%20between%20deindividuation%20and%20emergent%20norm%20theories%20of%20crowd%20aggression&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Mann,%20Leon&rft.date=1982-02&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=260-272&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614368279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614368279&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |