Admission of Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification
Grounds on which judges may exclude such evidence after the California Supreme Court decision in People v. McDonald. Basic split between scholars and courts in their treatment of this problem; path of the McDonald court's reasoning; guidelines for interpreting McDonald through the California Ev...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | California law review 1985-07, Vol.73 (4), p.1402-1430 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1430 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1402 |
| container_title | California law review |
| container_volume | 73 |
| creator | Walters, Christopher M. |
| description | Grounds on which judges may exclude such evidence after the California Supreme Court decision in People v. McDonald. Basic split between scholars and courts in their treatment of this problem; path of the McDonald court's reasoning; guidelines for interpreting McDonald through the California Evidence Code. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3480433 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60698939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3480433</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3480433</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-5667a7e649ad2c32fac1fb0d51d9f2933f2f89ad8b0e1446070b877dc7f8ccae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oUFRU-rk4_Nh7dSqhYKXuo5pNkEUtpNTXbR_nsj7UkQT2Eyz4Q3g9A1hgdCQTxSJoFReoJGWDFS84aRUzQCAFljQvA5ush5XUrMBIzQ06TdhpxD7Kroq9nXzqW-Wrrch23s9lW5nu3dZ-g7l3M1b13XBx-s6cvAJTrzZpPd1fEco_fn2XL6Wi_eXubTyaK2JU5fN5wLIxxnyrTEUuKNxX4FbYNb5Ymi1BMvS0-uwGHGOAhYSSFaK7y01jg6RneHd3cpfgwlmi6JrdtsTOfikDUHrqSi6l_YFCShgQJvfsF1HFJXPqExkUpxwqUs6v6gbIo5J-f1LoWtSXuNQf-sWh9XXeTtQa5zH9Of7BvOt3pb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1289962688</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Admission of Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Walters, Christopher M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Walters, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><description>Grounds on which judges may exclude such evidence after the California Supreme Court decision in People v. McDonald. Basic split between scholars and courts in their treatment of this problem; path of the McDonald court's reasoning; guidelines for interpreting McDonald through the California Evidence Code.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-1221</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-6542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3480433</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley, Calif: School of Law, University of California, Berkeley</publisher><subject>Appellate courts ; California ; Comments ; Crime and criminals ; Criminal prosecution ; Decisions ; Defendants ; Evidence, Expert ; Eyewitness identification ; Eyewitness testimony ; Identification ; Judges ; Juries ; Jurors ; Legal evidence ; Supreme court ; Trials ; Witnesses</subject><ispartof>California law review, 1985-07, Vol.73 (4), p.1402-1430</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 California Law Review, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-5667a7e649ad2c32fac1fb0d51d9f2933f2f89ad8b0e1446070b877dc7f8ccae3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3480433$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3480433$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27864,27868,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walters, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><title>Admission of Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification</title><title>California law review</title><description>Grounds on which judges may exclude such evidence after the California Supreme Court decision in People v. McDonald. Basic split between scholars and courts in their treatment of this problem; path of the McDonald court's reasoning; guidelines for interpreting McDonald through the California Evidence Code.</description><subject>Appellate courts</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Comments</subject><subject>Crime and criminals</subject><subject>Criminal prosecution</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Evidence, Expert</subject><subject>Eyewitness identification</subject><subject>Eyewitness testimony</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Juries</subject><subject>Jurors</subject><subject>Legal evidence</subject><subject>Supreme court</subject><subject>Trials</subject><subject>Witnesses</subject><issn>0008-1221</issn><issn>1942-6542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtYq_oUFRU-rk4_Nh7dSqhYKXuo5pNkEUtpNTXbR_nsj7UkQT2Eyz4Q3g9A1hgdCQTxSJoFReoJGWDFS84aRUzQCAFljQvA5ush5XUrMBIzQ06TdhpxD7Kroq9nXzqW-Wrrch23s9lW5nu3dZ-g7l3M1b13XBx-s6cvAJTrzZpPd1fEco_fn2XL6Wi_eXubTyaK2JU5fN5wLIxxnyrTEUuKNxX4FbYNb5Ymi1BMvS0-uwGHGOAhYSSFaK7y01jg6RneHd3cpfgwlmi6JrdtsTOfikDUHrqSi6l_YFCShgQJvfsF1HFJXPqExkUpxwqUs6v6gbIo5J-f1LoWtSXuNQf-sWh9XXeTtQa5zH9Of7BvOt3pb</recordid><startdate>19850701</startdate><enddate>19850701</enddate><creator>Walters, Christopher M.</creator><general>School of Law, University of California, Berkeley</general><general>University of California, School of Jurisprudence</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850701</creationdate><title>Admission of Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification</title><author>Walters, Christopher M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-5667a7e649ad2c32fac1fb0d51d9f2933f2f89ad8b0e1446070b877dc7f8ccae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Appellate courts</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Comments</topic><topic>Crime and criminals</topic><topic>Criminal prosecution</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Evidence, Expert</topic><topic>Eyewitness identification</topic><topic>Eyewitness testimony</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Juries</topic><topic>Jurors</topic><topic>Legal evidence</topic><topic>Supreme court</topic><topic>Trials</topic><topic>Witnesses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walters, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>California law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walters, Christopher M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Admission of Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification</atitle><jtitle>California law review</jtitle><date>1985-07-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1402</spage><epage>1430</epage><pages>1402-1430</pages><issn>0008-1221</issn><eissn>1942-6542</eissn><abstract>Grounds on which judges may exclude such evidence after the California Supreme Court decision in People v. McDonald. Basic split between scholars and courts in their treatment of this problem; path of the McDonald court's reasoning; guidelines for interpreting McDonald through the California Evidence Code.</abstract><cop>Berkeley, Calif</cop><pub>School of Law, University of California, Berkeley</pub><doi>10.2307/3480433</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0008-1221 |
| ispartof | California law review, 1985-07, Vol.73 (4), p.1402-1430 |
| issn | 0008-1221 1942-6542 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60698939 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Appellate courts California Comments Crime and criminals Criminal prosecution Decisions Defendants Evidence, Expert Eyewitness identification Eyewitness testimony Identification Judges Juries Jurors Legal evidence Supreme court Trials Witnesses |
| title | Admission of Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A54%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Admission%20of%20Expert%20Testimony%20on%20Eyewitness%20Identification&rft.jtitle=California%20law%20review&rft.au=Walters,%20Christopher%20M.&rft.date=1985-07-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1402&rft.epage=1430&rft.pages=1402-1430&rft.issn=0008-1221&rft.eissn=1942-6542&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3480433&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3480433%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1289962688&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3480433&rfr_iscdi=true |