Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change
The view of institutions as coercion rather than as contracts dominates the comparative politics literature on both institutional creation and the politics of economic reform. The emergence of a collectively optimal tax code in Russia demonstrates the limitations of this emphasis on coercion. This n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American political science review 2004-02, Vol.98 (1), p.139-152 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 152 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | The American political science review |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | LUONG, PAULINE JONES WEINTHAL, ERIKA |
description | The view of institutions as coercion rather than as contracts dominates the comparative politics literature on both institutional creation and the politics of economic reform. The emergence of a collectively optimal tax code in Russia demonstrates the limitations of this emphasis on coercion. This new tax code was not imposed by a strong central leader, mandated by international institutions, or the result of state capture by powerful economic interest groups. Rather, it is the product of a mutually beneficial exchange between the Russian government and the Russian oil companies. Russia's ability to negotiate an effective tax regime also suggests the conditions under which and the microcausal mechanism whereby exogenous shocks promote institutional change and economic reform. Owing to their mutual vulnerability and interdependence, the August 1998 financial crisis generated widely shared perceptions among these actors that the payoffs of cooperation had changed. Yet the economic reform institution that resulted required a series of incremental strategic moves that established common knowledge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0003055404001054 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60695852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0003055404001054</cupid><jstor_id>4145302</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4145302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-57c3e26ae90aa86dda5319d2e9cdf42bdc59791a9be3276d0d88d91331b524293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkOp0K32BxS8CL3olaP5zqR37eAXiKJre-FNODvJrrPuTmySgfXfm2VFQRHhQDi8z3t4Tw5C3ynZp4TqgzEhhBMpBRGEUCLFJzSikutKGsE_o9Fartb6F_Q1pXlpC1WP0E0T-hwBN8HHtgv9L3w1pNRBj69hha_8NMTlHj5chZnvw5Dw-Da0d2kPQ-_wuZ-F3EH2Dp_2KXd5yGUCLHBzC_3M76CtKSyS__b0bqO_R4fXzUl1dnF82vw-q1opZK6kbrlnCrwhALVyDiSnxjFvWjcVbOJaabShYCaeM60ccXXtDOWcTiQTzPBt9HMz9z6G_4NP2S671PrFAnpfIltFlJG1ZB-CXNea1Yp_CFKjShFdwB-vwHkYYvmCZBkVgpfkskB0A7UxpBT91N7HbgnxwVJi18ezb45XPLsbzzzlEJ8NggrJyXqTaiN3KfvVswzxzirNtbTq-NKe_Bs3f8QNteeF508RYDmJnZv5l6Dvh3gEqUGyKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214435975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection</source><creator>LUONG, PAULINE JONES ; WEINTHAL, ERIKA</creator><creatorcontrib>LUONG, PAULINE JONES ; WEINTHAL, ERIKA</creatorcontrib><description>The view of institutions as coercion rather than as contracts dominates the comparative politics literature on both institutional creation and the politics of economic reform. The emergence of a collectively optimal tax code in Russia demonstrates the limitations of this emphasis on coercion. This new tax code was not imposed by a strong central leader, mandated by international institutions, or the result of state capture by powerful economic interest groups. Rather, it is the product of a mutually beneficial exchange between the Russian government and the Russian oil companies. Russia's ability to negotiate an effective tax regime also suggests the conditions under which and the microcausal mechanism whereby exogenous shocks promote institutional change and economic reform. Owing to their mutual vulnerability and interdependence, the August 1998 financial crisis generated widely shared perceptions among these actors that the payoffs of cooperation had changed. Yet the economic reform institution that resulted required a series of incremental strategic moves that established common knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0003055404001054</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APORBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Coercion ; Comparative politics ; Competitive Selection ; Contract negotiations ; Cooperation ; Economic Crises ; Economic crisis ; Economic policy ; Economic Problems ; Economic reform ; Economic shock ; Energy industry ; Finance Reform ; Financial crisis ; Financial performance ; Fiscal Policy ; Government (Administrative Body) ; Institutionalism ; Institutions ; Interest groups ; Investment ; Leaders ; Organizational Change ; Personal income taxes ; Political change ; Political science ; Politics ; Proportional taxes ; Reform ; Revenue sharing ; Russia ; Russian Federation ; Russian government ; Studies ; Tax rates ; Tax reform ; Taxation ; Taxes</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 2004-02, Vol.98 (1), p.139-152</ispartof><rights>2004 by the American Political Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 American Political Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Feb 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-57c3e26ae90aa86dda5319d2e9cdf42bdc59791a9be3276d0d88d91331b524293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-57c3e26ae90aa86dda5319d2e9cdf42bdc59791a9be3276d0d88d91331b524293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4145302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055404001054/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,801,12834,27913,27914,55617,58006,58239</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LUONG, PAULINE JONES</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEINTHAL, ERIKA</creatorcontrib><title>Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change</title><title>The American political science review</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>The view of institutions as coercion rather than as contracts dominates the comparative politics literature on both institutional creation and the politics of economic reform. The emergence of a collectively optimal tax code in Russia demonstrates the limitations of this emphasis on coercion. This new tax code was not imposed by a strong central leader, mandated by international institutions, or the result of state capture by powerful economic interest groups. Rather, it is the product of a mutually beneficial exchange between the Russian government and the Russian oil companies. Russia's ability to negotiate an effective tax regime also suggests the conditions under which and the microcausal mechanism whereby exogenous shocks promote institutional change and economic reform. Owing to their mutual vulnerability and interdependence, the August 1998 financial crisis generated widely shared perceptions among these actors that the payoffs of cooperation had changed. Yet the economic reform institution that resulted required a series of incremental strategic moves that established common knowledge.</description><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Competitive Selection</subject><subject>Contract negotiations</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economic Crises</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Economic Problems</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Economic shock</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Finance Reform</subject><subject>Financial crisis</subject><subject>Financial performance</subject><subject>Fiscal Policy</subject><subject>Government (Administrative Body)</subject><subject>Institutionalism</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Leaders</subject><subject>Organizational Change</subject><subject>Personal income taxes</subject><subject>Political change</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Proportional taxes</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Revenue sharing</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Russian Federation</subject><subject>Russian government</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkOp0K32BxS8CL3olaP5zqR37eAXiKJre-FNODvJrrPuTmySgfXfm2VFQRHhQDi8z3t4Tw5C3ynZp4TqgzEhhBMpBRGEUCLFJzSikutKGsE_o9Fartb6F_Q1pXlpC1WP0E0T-hwBN8HHtgv9L3w1pNRBj69hha_8NMTlHj5chZnvw5Dw-Da0d2kPQ-_wuZ-F3EH2Dp_2KXd5yGUCLHBzC_3M76CtKSyS__b0bqO_R4fXzUl1dnF82vw-q1opZK6kbrlnCrwhALVyDiSnxjFvWjcVbOJaabShYCaeM60ccXXtDOWcTiQTzPBt9HMz9z6G_4NP2S671PrFAnpfIltFlJG1ZB-CXNea1Yp_CFKjShFdwB-vwHkYYvmCZBkVgpfkskB0A7UxpBT91N7HbgnxwVJi18ezb45XPLsbzzzlEJ8NggrJyXqTaiN3KfvVswzxzirNtbTq-NKe_Bs3f8QNteeF508RYDmJnZv5l6Dvh3gEqUGyKQ</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>LUONG, PAULINE JONES</creator><creator>WEINTHAL, ERIKA</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>American Political Science Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change</title><author>LUONG, PAULINE JONES ; WEINTHAL, ERIKA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-57c3e26ae90aa86dda5319d2e9cdf42bdc59791a9be3276d0d88d91331b524293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Competitive Selection</topic><topic>Contract negotiations</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economic Crises</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Economic Problems</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Economic shock</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Finance Reform</topic><topic>Financial crisis</topic><topic>Financial performance</topic><topic>Fiscal Policy</topic><topic>Government (Administrative Body)</topic><topic>Institutionalism</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Leaders</topic><topic>Organizational Change</topic><topic>Personal income taxes</topic><topic>Political change</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Proportional taxes</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Revenue sharing</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Russian Federation</topic><topic>Russian government</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LUONG, PAULINE JONES</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEINTHAL, ERIKA</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LUONG, PAULINE JONES</au><au>WEINTHAL, ERIKA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>139-152</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><coden>APORBP</coden><abstract>The view of institutions as coercion rather than as contracts dominates the comparative politics literature on both institutional creation and the politics of economic reform. The emergence of a collectively optimal tax code in Russia demonstrates the limitations of this emphasis on coercion. This new tax code was not imposed by a strong central leader, mandated by international institutions, or the result of state capture by powerful economic interest groups. Rather, it is the product of a mutually beneficial exchange between the Russian government and the Russian oil companies. Russia's ability to negotiate an effective tax regime also suggests the conditions under which and the microcausal mechanism whereby exogenous shocks promote institutional change and economic reform. Owing to their mutual vulnerability and interdependence, the August 1998 financial crisis generated widely shared perceptions among these actors that the payoffs of cooperation had changed. Yet the economic reform institution that resulted required a series of incremental strategic moves that established common knowledge.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0003055404001054</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0554 |
ispartof | The American political science review, 2004-02, Vol.98 (1), p.139-152 |
issn | 0003-0554 1537-5943 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60695852 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge Journals - CAUL Collection |
subjects | Coercion Comparative politics Competitive Selection Contract negotiations Cooperation Economic Crises Economic crisis Economic policy Economic Problems Economic reform Economic shock Energy industry Finance Reform Financial crisis Financial performance Fiscal Policy Government (Administrative Body) Institutionalism Institutions Interest groups Investment Leaders Organizational Change Personal income taxes Political change Political science Politics Proportional taxes Reform Revenue sharing Russia Russian Federation Russian government Studies Tax rates Tax reform Taxation Taxes |
title | Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contra%20Coercion:%20Russian%20Tax%20Reform,%20Exogenous%20Shocks,%20and%20Negotiated%20Institutional%20Change&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=LUONG,%20PAULINE%20JONES&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=139-152&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft.coden=APORBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0003055404001054&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4145302%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214435975&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0003055404001054&rft_jstor_id=4145302&rfr_iscdi=true |