Is There a Third Way for Industrial Relations?
There has been little systematic analysis of what the ‘Third Way’ means in the sphere of industrial relations. This paper examines the record of the New Labour government in order to evaluate the distinctiveness, innovation and coherence of its industrial relations policy. It argues that many of the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of industrial relations 2004-03, Vol.42 (1), p.1-22 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 22 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | British journal of industrial relations |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Howell, Chris |
| description | There has been little systematic analysis of what the ‘Third Way’ means in the sphere of industrial relations. This paper examines the record of the New Labour government in order to evaluate the distinctiveness, innovation and coherence of its industrial relations policy. It argues that many of the limitations of this policy result from the institutional context within which it was introduced. In comparative perspective, Third Way industrial relations can be thought of as a policy adaptation specific to centre–left governments in weakly co‐ordinated liberal market economies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00302.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60693844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60693844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5322-1c53b0b9339936147134b84d74251a6b2033819add16b0b93c93e10c3593c4553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9LwzAUxYMoOKffoQiKL603vUmTPIio6Jz4B6Yi-BKyNsPO2s5kw-3bmzpR8EHNy70hv3O4uYeQiEJCw9kfJ5RlIpacYZICsAQAIU3mK6Tz9bBKOgAgYgoS1smG9-Nw5VyqDkn6Prp7ss5GJtTSFdGDWUSjxkX9upj5qStNFQ1sZaZlU_vDTbI2MpW3W5-1S-7PTu9OzuPLm17_5OgyzjmmaUxDGcJQISqFGWWCIhtKVgiWcmqyYQqIkipTFDT74HKFlkKOPLSMc-yS3aXvxDWvM-un-qX0ua0qU9tm5nUGmULJ2J8gCsl4FnbSJXu_ghSQCxY2KgK6_QMdNzNXh_9qqjgCVUIGSC6h3DXeOzvSE1e-GLcITrpNRo91G4BuA9BtMvojGT0P0p1Pf-NzU42cqfPSf-s5ZzxN2zkOltxbWdnFv_318UV_ELqgj5f60k_t_Etv3LPOBAquH657Gh977ArFrR7gOyZWqq8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195301978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is There a Third Way for Industrial Relations?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Howell, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Howell, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>There has been little systematic analysis of what the ‘Third Way’ means in the sphere of industrial relations. This paper examines the record of the New Labour government in order to evaluate the distinctiveness, innovation and coherence of its industrial relations policy. It argues that many of the limitations of this policy result from the institutional context within which it was introduced. In comparative perspective, Third Way industrial relations can be thought of as a policy adaptation specific to centre–left governments in weakly co‐ordinated liberal market economies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00302.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJIRAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Government ; Government Policy ; Great Britain ; Industrial sociology ; Labor Parties ; Labor Policy ; Labor Relations ; Labour ; Labour relations ; Liberalism ; Management Styles ; Market ; Neoliberalism ; Policy implementation ; Public policy ; Sociology ; Sociology of work ; Sociology of work and sociology of organizations ; Theory ; Third Way ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>British journal of industrial relations, 2004-03, Vol.42 (1), p.1-22</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Mar 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5322-1c53b0b9339936147134b84d74251a6b2033819add16b0b93c93e10c3593c4553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5322-1c53b0b9339936147134b84d74251a6b2033819add16b0b93c93e10c3593c4553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8543.2004.00302.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8543.2004.00302.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15545227$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howell, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Is There a Third Way for Industrial Relations?</title><title>British journal of industrial relations</title><description>There has been little systematic analysis of what the ‘Third Way’ means in the sphere of industrial relations. This paper examines the record of the New Labour government in order to evaluate the distinctiveness, innovation and coherence of its industrial relations policy. It argues that many of the limitations of this policy result from the institutional context within which it was introduced. In comparative perspective, Third Way industrial relations can be thought of as a policy adaptation specific to centre–left governments in weakly co‐ordinated liberal market economies.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government Policy</subject><subject>Great Britain</subject><subject>Industrial sociology</subject><subject>Labor Parties</subject><subject>Labor Policy</subject><subject>Labor Relations</subject><subject>Labour</subject><subject>Labour relations</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Management Styles</subject><subject>Market</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of work</subject><subject>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Third Way</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0007-1080</issn><issn>1467-8543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9LwzAUxYMoOKffoQiKL603vUmTPIio6Jz4B6Yi-BKyNsPO2s5kw-3bmzpR8EHNy70hv3O4uYeQiEJCw9kfJ5RlIpacYZICsAQAIU3mK6Tz9bBKOgAgYgoS1smG9-Nw5VyqDkn6Prp7ss5GJtTSFdGDWUSjxkX9upj5qStNFQ1sZaZlU_vDTbI2MpW3W5-1S-7PTu9OzuPLm17_5OgyzjmmaUxDGcJQISqFGWWCIhtKVgiWcmqyYQqIkipTFDT74HKFlkKOPLSMc-yS3aXvxDWvM-un-qX0ua0qU9tm5nUGmULJ2J8gCsl4FnbSJXu_ghSQCxY2KgK6_QMdNzNXh_9qqjgCVUIGSC6h3DXeOzvSE1e-GLcITrpNRo91G4BuA9BtMvojGT0P0p1Pf-NzU42cqfPSf-s5ZzxN2zkOltxbWdnFv_318UV_ELqgj5f60k_t_Etv3LPOBAquH657Gh977ArFrR7gOyZWqq8</recordid><startdate>200403</startdate><enddate>200403</enddate><creator>Howell, Chris</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200403</creationdate><title>Is There a Third Way for Industrial Relations?</title><author>Howell, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5322-1c53b0b9339936147134b84d74251a6b2033819add16b0b93c93e10c3593c4553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government Policy</topic><topic>Great Britain</topic><topic>Industrial sociology</topic><topic>Labor Parties</topic><topic>Labor Policy</topic><topic>Labor Relations</topic><topic>Labour</topic><topic>Labour relations</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Management Styles</topic><topic>Market</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of work</topic><topic>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Third Way</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howell, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>British journal of industrial relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howell, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is There a Third Way for Industrial Relations?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of industrial relations</jtitle><date>2004-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1-22</pages><issn>0007-1080</issn><eissn>1467-8543</eissn><coden>BJIRAV</coden><abstract>There has been little systematic analysis of what the ‘Third Way’ means in the sphere of industrial relations. This paper examines the record of the New Labour government in order to evaluate the distinctiveness, innovation and coherence of its industrial relations policy. It argues that many of the limitations of this policy result from the institutional context within which it was introduced. In comparative perspective, Third Way industrial relations can be thought of as a policy adaptation specific to centre–left governments in weakly co‐ordinated liberal market economies.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00302.x</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-1080 |
| ispartof | British journal of industrial relations, 2004-03, Vol.42 (1), p.1-22 |
| issn | 0007-1080 1467-8543 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60693844 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Comparative analysis Government Government Policy Great Britain Industrial sociology Labor Parties Labor Policy Labor Relations Labour Labour relations Liberalism Management Styles Market Neoliberalism Policy implementation Public policy Sociology Sociology of work Sociology of work and sociology of organizations Theory Third Way United Kingdom |
| title | Is There a Third Way for Industrial Relations? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20There%20a%20Third%20Way%20for%20Industrial%20Relations?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20industrial%20relations&rft.au=Howell,%20Chris&rft.date=2004-03&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1-22&rft.issn=0007-1080&rft.eissn=1467-8543&rft.coden=BJIRAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2004.00302.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60693844%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195301978&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |