The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses
Considered are income differences in the Netherlands, the criteria for attributing income position, & their justification. Dutch income attribution is largely based on a highly institutionalized function-evaluation system that recognizes five criteria: responsibility, social importance, knowledg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mens en maatschappij 1978-01, Vol.53, p.144-157 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | dut |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 157 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 144 |
container_title | Mens en maatschappij |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Hermkens, Piet |
description | Considered are income differences in the Netherlands, the criteria for attributing income position, & their justification. Dutch income attribution is largely based on a highly institutionalized function-evaluation system that recognizes five criteria: responsibility, social importance, knowledge, drawbacks, & special skills (mainly manual). Whether existing function evaluation is legitimate, ie, whether it matches community members' evaluation, is studied based on P. Hermkens & P. van Wijngaarden's 'Inkomensongelijkheid en rechtvaardigings kriteria' ([Income Differences and Justification Criteria], Verslagen en Rappor ten Sociale Zaken, 1977, 3). That investigation, based on interviews with 755 respondents, concluded that present income attribution criteria were largely justified. Agreement with existing income attribution criteria does not result from a self-serving ideology. 3 Tables. A. Orianne. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60692450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60692450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_606924503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNy70OgjAUQOEOmog_73AnN5IGKAY3oxjiZJSdNHgrNaXFXojx7cXEB3A6y3cmLOA8EmGWiGTG5kQPztNYbHjAzmWDcBqo10rXstfOglNwwZf0NzhopdCjrZG2sLOQt532IzNQ4njY-9deXYtQvDvXN0hISzZV0hCufl2w9TEv90XYefccxq1qNdVojLToBqpSnmZRInj8N_wATqZBGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60692450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hermkens, Piet</creator><creatorcontrib>Hermkens, Piet</creatorcontrib><description>Considered are income differences in the Netherlands, the criteria for attributing income position, & their justification. Dutch income attribution is largely based on a highly institutionalized function-evaluation system that recognizes five criteria: responsibility, social importance, knowledge, drawbacks, & special skills (mainly manual). Whether existing function evaluation is legitimate, ie, whether it matches community members' evaluation, is studied based on P. Hermkens & P. van Wijngaarden's 'Inkomensongelijkheid en rechtvaardigings kriteria' ([Income Differences and Justification Criteria], Verslagen en Rappor ten Sociale Zaken, 1977, 3). That investigation, based on interviews with 755 respondents, concluded that present income attribution criteria were largely justified. Agreement with existing income attribution criteria does not result from a self-serving ideology. 3 Tables. A. Orianne.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-9454</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MMPJBF</identifier><language>dut</language><subject>Criteria/Criterion ; Difference/Differences/Differential/ Differentials/ Differentiation ; Dutch ; Income/Incomes</subject><ispartof>Mens en maatschappij, 1978-01, Vol.53, p.144-157</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hermkens, Piet</creatorcontrib><title>The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses</title><title>Mens en maatschappij</title><description>Considered are income differences in the Netherlands, the criteria for attributing income position, & their justification. Dutch income attribution is largely based on a highly institutionalized function-evaluation system that recognizes five criteria: responsibility, social importance, knowledge, drawbacks, & special skills (mainly manual). Whether existing function evaluation is legitimate, ie, whether it matches community members' evaluation, is studied based on P. Hermkens & P. van Wijngaarden's 'Inkomensongelijkheid en rechtvaardigings kriteria' ([Income Differences and Justification Criteria], Verslagen en Rappor ten Sociale Zaken, 1977, 3). That investigation, based on interviews with 755 respondents, concluded that present income attribution criteria were largely justified. Agreement with existing income attribution criteria does not result from a self-serving ideology. 3 Tables. A. Orianne.</description><subject>Criteria/Criterion</subject><subject>Difference/Differences/Differential/ Differentials/ Differentiation</subject><subject>Dutch</subject><subject>Income/Incomes</subject><issn>0025-9454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1978</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNy70OgjAUQOEOmog_73AnN5IGKAY3oxjiZJSdNHgrNaXFXojx7cXEB3A6y3cmLOA8EmGWiGTG5kQPztNYbHjAzmWDcBqo10rXstfOglNwwZf0NzhopdCjrZG2sLOQt532IzNQ4njY-9deXYtQvDvXN0hISzZV0hCufl2w9TEv90XYefccxq1qNdVojLToBqpSnmZRInj8N_wATqZBGA</recordid><startdate>19780101</startdate><enddate>19780101</enddate><creator>Hermkens, Piet</creator><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19780101</creationdate><title>The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses</title><author>Hermkens, Piet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_606924503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>dut</language><creationdate>1978</creationdate><topic>Criteria/Criterion</topic><topic>Difference/Differences/Differential/ Differentials/ Differentiation</topic><topic>Dutch</topic><topic>Income/Incomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hermkens, Piet</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Mens en maatschappij</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hermkens, Piet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses</atitle><jtitle>Mens en maatschappij</jtitle><date>1978-01-01</date><risdate>1978</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>144</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>144-157</pages><issn>0025-9454</issn><coden>MMPJBF</coden><abstract>Considered are income differences in the Netherlands, the criteria for attributing income position, & their justification. Dutch income attribution is largely based on a highly institutionalized function-evaluation system that recognizes five criteria: responsibility, social importance, knowledge, drawbacks, & special skills (mainly manual). Whether existing function evaluation is legitimate, ie, whether it matches community members' evaluation, is studied based on P. Hermkens & P. van Wijngaarden's 'Inkomensongelijkheid en rechtvaardigings kriteria' ([Income Differences and Justification Criteria], Verslagen en Rappor ten Sociale Zaken, 1977, 3). That investigation, based on interviews with 755 respondents, concluded that present income attribution criteria were largely justified. Agreement with existing income attribution criteria does not result from a self-serving ideology. 3 Tables. A. Orianne.</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-9454 |
ispartof | Mens en maatschappij, 1978-01, Vol.53, p.144-157 |
issn | 0025-9454 |
language | dut |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60692450 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Criteria/Criterion Difference/Differences/Differential/ Differentials/ Differentiation Dutch Income/Incomes |
title | The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A58%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Justification%20of%20Reward%20Differences:%20An%20Empirical%20Testing%20of%20Some%20Hypotheses&rft.jtitle=Mens%20en%20maatschappij&rft.au=Hermkens,%20Piet&rft.date=1978-01-01&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=144-157&rft.issn=0025-9454&rft.coden=MMPJBF&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60692450%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60692450&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |