The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses

Considered are income differences in the Netherlands, the criteria for attributing income position, & their justification. Dutch income attribution is largely based on a highly institutionalized function-evaluation system that recognizes five criteria: responsibility, social importance, knowledg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mens en maatschappij 1978-01, Vol.53, p.144-157
1. Verfasser: Hermkens, Piet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:dut
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 157
container_issue
container_start_page 144
container_title Mens en maatschappij
container_volume 53
creator Hermkens, Piet
description Considered are income differences in the Netherlands, the criteria for attributing income position, & their justification. Dutch income attribution is largely based on a highly institutionalized function-evaluation system that recognizes five criteria: responsibility, social importance, knowledge, drawbacks, & special skills (mainly manual). Whether existing function evaluation is legitimate, ie, whether it matches community members' evaluation, is studied based on P. Hermkens & P. van Wijngaarden's 'Inkomensongelijkheid en rechtvaardigings kriteria' ([Income Differences and Justification Criteria], Verslagen en Rappor ten Sociale Zaken, 1977, 3). That investigation, based on interviews with 755 respondents, concluded that present income attribution criteria were largely justified. Agreement with existing income attribution criteria does not result from a self-serving ideology. 3 Tables. A. Orianne.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60692450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60692450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_606924503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNy70OgjAUQOEOmog_73AnN5IGKAY3oxjiZJSdNHgrNaXFXojx7cXEB3A6y3cmLOA8EmGWiGTG5kQPztNYbHjAzmWDcBqo10rXstfOglNwwZf0NzhopdCjrZG2sLOQt532IzNQ4njY-9deXYtQvDvXN0hISzZV0hCufl2w9TEv90XYefccxq1qNdVojLToBqpSnmZRInj8N_wATqZBGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60692450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hermkens, Piet</creator><creatorcontrib>Hermkens, Piet</creatorcontrib><description>Considered are income differences in the Netherlands, the criteria for attributing income position, &amp; their justification. Dutch income attribution is largely based on a highly institutionalized function-evaluation system that recognizes five criteria: responsibility, social importance, knowledge, drawbacks, &amp; special skills (mainly manual). Whether existing function evaluation is legitimate, ie, whether it matches community members' evaluation, is studied based on P. Hermkens &amp; P. van Wijngaarden's 'Inkomensongelijkheid en rechtvaardigings kriteria' ([Income Differences and Justification Criteria], Verslagen en Rappor ten Sociale Zaken, 1977, 3). That investigation, based on interviews with 755 respondents, concluded that present income attribution criteria were largely justified. Agreement with existing income attribution criteria does not result from a self-serving ideology. 3 Tables. A. Orianne.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-9454</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MMPJBF</identifier><language>dut</language><subject>Criteria/Criterion ; Difference/Differences/Differential/ Differentials/ Differentiation ; Dutch ; Income/Incomes</subject><ispartof>Mens en maatschappij, 1978-01, Vol.53, p.144-157</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hermkens, Piet</creatorcontrib><title>The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses</title><title>Mens en maatschappij</title><description>Considered are income differences in the Netherlands, the criteria for attributing income position, &amp; their justification. Dutch income attribution is largely based on a highly institutionalized function-evaluation system that recognizes five criteria: responsibility, social importance, knowledge, drawbacks, &amp; special skills (mainly manual). Whether existing function evaluation is legitimate, ie, whether it matches community members' evaluation, is studied based on P. Hermkens &amp; P. van Wijngaarden's 'Inkomensongelijkheid en rechtvaardigings kriteria' ([Income Differences and Justification Criteria], Verslagen en Rappor ten Sociale Zaken, 1977, 3). That investigation, based on interviews with 755 respondents, concluded that present income attribution criteria were largely justified. Agreement with existing income attribution criteria does not result from a self-serving ideology. 3 Tables. A. Orianne.</description><subject>Criteria/Criterion</subject><subject>Difference/Differences/Differential/ Differentials/ Differentiation</subject><subject>Dutch</subject><subject>Income/Incomes</subject><issn>0025-9454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1978</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNy70OgjAUQOEOmog_73AnN5IGKAY3oxjiZJSdNHgrNaXFXojx7cXEB3A6y3cmLOA8EmGWiGTG5kQPztNYbHjAzmWDcBqo10rXstfOglNwwZf0NzhopdCjrZG2sLOQt532IzNQ4njY-9deXYtQvDvXN0hISzZV0hCufl2w9TEv90XYefccxq1qNdVojLToBqpSnmZRInj8N_wATqZBGA</recordid><startdate>19780101</startdate><enddate>19780101</enddate><creator>Hermkens, Piet</creator><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19780101</creationdate><title>The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses</title><author>Hermkens, Piet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_606924503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>dut</language><creationdate>1978</creationdate><topic>Criteria/Criterion</topic><topic>Difference/Differences/Differential/ Differentials/ Differentiation</topic><topic>Dutch</topic><topic>Income/Incomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hermkens, Piet</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Mens en maatschappij</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hermkens, Piet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses</atitle><jtitle>Mens en maatschappij</jtitle><date>1978-01-01</date><risdate>1978</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>144</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>144-157</pages><issn>0025-9454</issn><coden>MMPJBF</coden><abstract>Considered are income differences in the Netherlands, the criteria for attributing income position, &amp; their justification. Dutch income attribution is largely based on a highly institutionalized function-evaluation system that recognizes five criteria: responsibility, social importance, knowledge, drawbacks, &amp; special skills (mainly manual). Whether existing function evaluation is legitimate, ie, whether it matches community members' evaluation, is studied based on P. Hermkens &amp; P. van Wijngaarden's 'Inkomensongelijkheid en rechtvaardigings kriteria' ([Income Differences and Justification Criteria], Verslagen en Rappor ten Sociale Zaken, 1977, 3). That investigation, based on interviews with 755 respondents, concluded that present income attribution criteria were largely justified. Agreement with existing income attribution criteria does not result from a self-serving ideology. 3 Tables. A. Orianne.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-9454
ispartof Mens en maatschappij, 1978-01, Vol.53, p.144-157
issn 0025-9454
language dut
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60692450
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Criteria/Criterion
Difference/Differences/Differential/ Differentials/ Differentiation
Dutch
Income/Incomes
title The Justification of Reward Differences: An Empirical Testing of Some Hypotheses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A58%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Justification%20of%20Reward%20Differences:%20An%20Empirical%20Testing%20of%20Some%20Hypotheses&rft.jtitle=Mens%20en%20maatschappij&rft.au=Hermkens,%20Piet&rft.date=1978-01-01&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=144-157&rft.issn=0025-9454&rft.coden=MMPJBF&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60692450%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60692450&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true