Terrorism, Morality, and Supreme Emergency
Coady examines one element in common responses to and fears about terrorism-the idea that it involves innocent victims. This element features in various ways, in many definitional proposals, and in much of the heated debate about the evils of terrorism. Coady argues that terrorism should be condemne...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ethics 2004-07, Vol.114 (4), p.772-789 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 789 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 772 |
| container_title | Ethics |
| container_volume | 114 |
| creator | Coady, C. A. J. |
| description | Coady examines one element in common responses to and fears about terrorism-the idea that it involves innocent victims. This element features in various ways, in many definitional proposals, and in much of the heated debate about the evils of terrorism. Coady argues that terrorism should be condemned with no leeway for exemptions, be they for states, revolutionaries, or religious and ideological zealots of any persuasion. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1086/383440 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60690656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/383440</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/383440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2d7d17492c1c97db43ea146886bfcdb173d33a7fd104a4dcb65d91197d7023943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0D1PwzAQBmALgUQp8AsYIgYG1IAv5_hjRFX5kIoYKBKb5dgOSpWPYidD_z2pikBiYbrl0Xt3LyHnQG-ASn6LEhmjB2QCOao0U-L9kEwoBZaCoOyYnMS4ppSqHOSEXK98CF2oYjNLnrtg6qrfzhLTuuR12ATf-GTR-PDhW7s9JUelqaM_-55T8na_WM0f0-XLw9P8bplaROjTzAkHgqnMglXCFQy9Acal5EVpXQECHaIRpQPKDHO24LlTACMVNEPFcEqu9rmb0H0OPva6qaL1dW1a3w1Rc8oV5Tn_F6JQnHHcwcs_cN0NoR2f0DAuHE_L1G-aDV2MwZd6E6rGhK0GqnfF6n2xI7zYw3Xsu_CjMJcqkwq_APwbcJ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194388629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Terrorism, Morality, and Supreme Emergency</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Coady, C. A. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coady, C. A. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Coady examines one element in common responses to and fears about terrorism-the idea that it involves innocent victims. This element features in various ways, in many definitional proposals, and in much of the heated debate about the evils of terrorism. Coady argues that terrorism should be condemned with no leeway for exemptions, be they for states, revolutionaries, or religious and ideological zealots of any persuasion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-1704</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-297X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/383440</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETHIAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Bombings ; Criminals ; Ethics ; Ideology ; Innocence ; Just war ; Just War Theory ; Justice ; Legitimation ; Morality ; Political Violence ; State Power ; Terrorism ; Victims ; Victims of crime ; Violence ; Violent crimes ; War ; World wars</subject><ispartof>Ethics, 2004-07, Vol.114 (4), p.772-789</ispartof><rights>2004 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Jul 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2d7d17492c1c97db43ea146886bfcdb173d33a7fd104a4dcb65d91197d7023943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2d7d17492c1c97db43ea146886bfcdb173d33a7fd104a4dcb65d91197d7023943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coady, C. A. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Terrorism, Morality, and Supreme Emergency</title><title>Ethics</title><description>Coady examines one element in common responses to and fears about terrorism-the idea that it involves innocent victims. This element features in various ways, in many definitional proposals, and in much of the heated debate about the evils of terrorism. Coady argues that terrorism should be condemned with no leeway for exemptions, be they for states, revolutionaries, or religious and ideological zealots of any persuasion.</description><subject>Bombings</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Innocence</subject><subject>Just war</subject><subject>Just War Theory</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Legitimation</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Political Violence</subject><subject>State Power</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Victims of crime</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violent crimes</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>World wars</subject><issn>0014-1704</issn><issn>1539-297X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0D1PwzAQBmALgUQp8AsYIgYG1IAv5_hjRFX5kIoYKBKb5dgOSpWPYidD_z2pikBiYbrl0Xt3LyHnQG-ASn6LEhmjB2QCOao0U-L9kEwoBZaCoOyYnMS4ppSqHOSEXK98CF2oYjNLnrtg6qrfzhLTuuR12ATf-GTR-PDhW7s9JUelqaM_-55T8na_WM0f0-XLw9P8bplaROjTzAkHgqnMglXCFQy9Acal5EVpXQECHaIRpQPKDHO24LlTACMVNEPFcEqu9rmb0H0OPva6qaL1dW1a3w1Rc8oV5Tn_F6JQnHHcwcs_cN0NoR2f0DAuHE_L1G-aDV2MwZd6E6rGhK0GqnfF6n2xI7zYw3Xsu_CjMJcqkwq_APwbcJ4</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Coady, C. A. J.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Terrorism, Morality, and Supreme Emergency</title><author>Coady, C. A. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-2d7d17492c1c97db43ea146886bfcdb173d33a7fd104a4dcb65d91197d7023943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Bombings</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Innocence</topic><topic>Just war</topic><topic>Just War Theory</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Legitimation</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Political Violence</topic><topic>State Power</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Victims of crime</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violent crimes</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>World wars</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coady, C. A. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coady, C. A. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Terrorism, Morality, and Supreme Emergency</atitle><jtitle>Ethics</jtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>772</spage><epage>789</epage><pages>772-789</pages><issn>0014-1704</issn><eissn>1539-297X</eissn><coden>ETHIAY</coden><abstract>Coady examines one element in common responses to and fears about terrorism-the idea that it involves innocent victims. This element features in various ways, in many definitional proposals, and in much of the heated debate about the evils of terrorism. Coady argues that terrorism should be condemned with no leeway for exemptions, be they for states, revolutionaries, or religious and ideological zealots of any persuasion.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/383440</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-1704 |
| ispartof | Ethics, 2004-07, Vol.114 (4), p.772-789 |
| issn | 0014-1704 1539-297X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60690656 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Bombings Criminals Ethics Ideology Innocence Just war Just War Theory Justice Legitimation Morality Political Violence State Power Terrorism Victims Victims of crime Violence Violent crimes War World wars |
| title | Terrorism, Morality, and Supreme Emergency |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A07%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Terrorism,%20Morality,%20and%20Supreme%20Emergency&rft.jtitle=Ethics&rft.au=Coady,%20C.%C2%A0A.%C2%A0J.&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=772&rft.epage=789&rft.pages=772-789&rft.issn=0014-1704&rft.eissn=1539-297X&rft.coden=ETHIAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/383440&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/383440%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194388629&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/383440&rfr_iscdi=true |