Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems
Whereas traditional institutions used to be seen as an international complement to a dominantly national paradigm, today's international institutions are an expression of political denationalization. The new international institutions are much more intrusive into national societies than the tra...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Government and opposition (London) 2004-04, Vol.39 (2), p.260-287 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 287 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 260 |
| container_title | Government and opposition (London) |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Zurn, Michael |
| description | Whereas traditional institutions used to be seen as an international complement to a dominantly national paradigm, today's international institutions are an expression of political denationalization. The new international institutions are much more intrusive into national societies than the traditional ones. They increasingly contain supranational and transnational features and thus undermine the consensus principle of international cooperation. When society and political actors begin to comprehend this change, they begin to reflect on the features of a legitimate and effective political order beyond national borders. As a result, denationalization becomes reflexive and thus politicized. At the same time, the politicization of international politics harbours the potential for resistance to political denationalization, which increases the need – both from a normative and descriptive perspective – for the legitimation of such international institutions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00123.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60689112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1111_j_1477_7053_2004_00123_x</cupid><jstor_id>44483070</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44483070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5353-e91b2d337896804fc52bbceb9c4f7f9277d161accdf18fe65ec072af492c791e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QSheiF605qtNI3ghQ6sw2C4UvAtpmo6WdJ3Jptu_N7VjghfOc5OP87w5J-cFIEAwQj5u6ghRxkIGYxJhCGkEIcIkWh-AwS5xCAb-loU4Zm_H4MS52h8JTfgAXGemzaUJsvZD27mcKx3IeRGM9axaVo1Um2Bq29zoxp2Co1Iap8-26xC8Pj68jJ7C8SR7Ht2PQxWTmISaoxwXhLCUJymkpYpxniudc0VLVnLMWIESJJUqSpSWOom1ggzLknKsGEeaDMFl_-7Ctu8r7ZaiqZzSxsi5bldOJDBJOfJ_3Af6FtKY-BiCqz9BBEnMGKE88ejFL7RuV34uxgmMUuI5P7g9EEYMdUXTHlK2dc7qUiysH6jd-HKic07UojNIdAaJzjnx7ZxYe-ldL_2sjN78WyeyyWTqd15_3utrt2ztTk8pTQlk0Odvt63JJrdVMdM_H9jb3BdtyLcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218321713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Zurn, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Zurn, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Whereas traditional institutions used to be seen as an international complement to a dominantly national paradigm, today's international institutions are an expression of political denationalization. The new international institutions are much more intrusive into national societies than the traditional ones. They increasingly contain supranational and transnational features and thus undermine the consensus principle of international cooperation. When society and political actors begin to comprehend this change, they begin to reflect on the features of a legitimate and effective political order beyond national borders. As a result, denationalization becomes reflexive and thus politicized. At the same time, the politicization of international politics harbours the potential for resistance to political denationalization, which increases the need – both from a normative and descriptive perspective – for the legitimation of such international institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-257X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-7053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00123.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GVOPBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Cooperation ; Democracy ; Executive branch ; Globalization ; Governance ; Government ; International ; International governance ; International Organizations ; International politics ; Legitimacy ; Liberalism ; Multilateralism ; Nation states ; Political protests ; Political science ; Resistance ; Society</subject><ispartof>Government and opposition (London), 2004-04, Vol.39 (2), p.260-287</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2004</rights><rights>2004 Government and Opposition Ltd</rights><rights>Government and Opposition Ltd 2004</rights><rights>Copyright London School of Economics and Political Science Spring 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5353-e91b2d337896804fc52bbceb9c4f7f9277d161accdf18fe65ec072af492c791e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5353-e91b2d337896804fc52bbceb9c4f7f9277d161accdf18fe65ec072af492c791e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44483070$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44483070$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zurn, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems</title><title>Government and opposition (London)</title><description>Whereas traditional institutions used to be seen as an international complement to a dominantly national paradigm, today's international institutions are an expression of political denationalization. The new international institutions are much more intrusive into national societies than the traditional ones. They increasingly contain supranational and transnational features and thus undermine the consensus principle of international cooperation. When society and political actors begin to comprehend this change, they begin to reflect on the features of a legitimate and effective political order beyond national borders. As a result, denationalization becomes reflexive and thus politicized. At the same time, the politicization of international politics harbours the potential for resistance to political denationalization, which increases the need – both from a normative and descriptive perspective – for the legitimation of such international institutions.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Executive branch</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>International governance</subject><subject>International Organizations</subject><subject>International politics</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Multilateralism</subject><subject>Nation states</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Society</subject><issn>0017-257X</issn><issn>1477-7053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QSheiF605qtNI3ghQ6sw2C4UvAtpmo6WdJ3Jptu_N7VjghfOc5OP87w5J-cFIEAwQj5u6ghRxkIGYxJhCGkEIcIkWh-AwS5xCAb-loU4Zm_H4MS52h8JTfgAXGemzaUJsvZD27mcKx3IeRGM9axaVo1Um2Bq29zoxp2Co1Iap8-26xC8Pj68jJ7C8SR7Ht2PQxWTmISaoxwXhLCUJymkpYpxniudc0VLVnLMWIESJJUqSpSWOom1ggzLknKsGEeaDMFl_-7Ctu8r7ZaiqZzSxsi5bldOJDBJOfJ_3Af6FtKY-BiCqz9BBEnMGKE88ejFL7RuV34uxgmMUuI5P7g9EEYMdUXTHlK2dc7qUiysH6jd-HKic07UojNIdAaJzjnx7ZxYe-ldL_2sjN78WyeyyWTqd15_3utrt2ztTk8pTQlk0Odvt63JJrdVMdM_H9jb3BdtyLcI</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Zurn, Michael</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems</title><author>Zurn, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5353-e91b2d337896804fc52bbceb9c4f7f9277d161accdf18fe65ec072af492c791e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Executive branch</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>International governance</topic><topic>International Organizations</topic><topic>International politics</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Multilateralism</topic><topic>Nation states</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Society</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zurn, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Government and opposition (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zurn, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems</atitle><jtitle>Government and opposition (London)</jtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>260-287</pages><issn>0017-257X</issn><eissn>1477-7053</eissn><coden>GVOPBP</coden><abstract>Whereas traditional institutions used to be seen as an international complement to a dominantly national paradigm, today's international institutions are an expression of political denationalization. The new international institutions are much more intrusive into national societies than the traditional ones. They increasingly contain supranational and transnational features and thus undermine the consensus principle of international cooperation. When society and political actors begin to comprehend this change, they begin to reflect on the features of a legitimate and effective political order beyond national borders. As a result, denationalization becomes reflexive and thus politicized. At the same time, the politicization of international politics harbours the potential for resistance to political denationalization, which increases the need – both from a normative and descriptive perspective – for the legitimation of such international institutions.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00123.x</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0017-257X |
| ispartof | Government and opposition (London), 2004-04, Vol.39 (2), p.260-287 |
| issn | 0017-257X 1477-7053 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60689112 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Accountability Cooperation Democracy Executive branch Globalization Governance Government International International governance International Organizations International politics Legitimacy Liberalism Multilateralism Nation states Political protests Political science Resistance Society |
| title | Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A50%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Governance%20and%20Legitimacy%20Problems&rft.jtitle=Government%20and%20opposition%20(London)&rft.au=Zurn,%20Michael&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=260-287&rft.issn=0017-257X&rft.eissn=1477-7053&rft.coden=GVOPBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00123.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44483070%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218321713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1111_j_1477_7053_2004_00123_x&rft_jstor_id=44483070&rfr_iscdi=true |