Interstate Peacekeeping: Causal Mechanisms and Empirical Effects
Peacekeeping is perhaps the international community's most important tool for maintaining peace in the aftermath of war. Its practice has evolved significantly in the past ten or fifteen years as it has been used increasingly in civil wars. However, traditional peacekeeping between states is no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World politics 2004-07, Vol.56 (4), p.481-519 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 519 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 481 |
container_title | World politics |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Page Fortna, Virginia |
description | Peacekeeping is perhaps the international community's most important tool for maintaining peace in the aftermath of war. Its practice has evolved significantly in the past ten or fifteen years as it has been used increasingly in civil wars. However, traditional peacekeeping between states is not well understood. Its operation is undertheorized and its effects undertested. This article explores the causal mechanisms through which peacekeepers keep peace and examines its empirical effects after interstate wars. To take the endogeneity of peacekeeping into account, it also examines where peacekeepers tend to be deployed. Duration analysis shows that, all else equal, peacekeeping significantly increases the chances that peace will last. Peacekeepers can help adversaries to maintain peace by making surprise attack more difficult, by reducing uncertainty about enemy intentions, and by preventing and controlling accidents and incidents that can spiral back to war. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/wp.2005.0004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60680733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1353_wp_2005_0004</cupid><jstor_id>25054273</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25054273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55730e6438fb2e9dedfaa2c60a84f7e3461179d3c9ebf1701d217315dd5abefa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1vEzEQxS0EEqFw44q04sCJDeNvLydQGkpRK4gKXC3HOy6bZj-wd1X47_EqVUAIiZOlmd-M33tDyFMKS8olf3U7LBmAXAKAuEcWFIwqOefmPlnkCi-N0fQheZTSDoBSxfSCvDnvRoxpdCMWn9B5vEEcmu76dbFyU3L74hL9N9c1qU2F6-pi3Q5NbHxurENAP6bH5EFw-4RP7t4T8uXd-vPqfXnx8ex89fai9EKZsZRSc0AluAlbhlWNdXCOeQXOiKCRC0WprmruK9wGqoHWjGpOZV1Lt8Xg-Al5cdg7xP77hGm0bZM87veuw35KVoEyoLPb_4Hc5FiMlhl8_he466fYZROW6SyUGcUy9PIA-dinFDHYITatiz8tBTuHbm8HO4du59AzLo47dzmedkr4ey01UDFhr-bDzHcBIUAYavLYs8PYLo19PH7BJEjB9OypPPSbNOKPY9_FG6s019Kqs42tNpdfN6cfruxp5pd3ql27jU19_aeIf-n-BZDAq0U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>274382862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interstate Peacekeeping: Causal Mechanisms and Empirical Effects</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Page Fortna, Virginia</creator><creatorcontrib>Page Fortna, Virginia</creatorcontrib><description>Peacekeeping is perhaps the international community's most important tool for maintaining peace in the aftermath of war. Its practice has evolved significantly in the past ten or fifteen years as it has been used increasingly in civil wars. However, traditional peacekeeping between states is not well understood. Its operation is undertheorized and its effects undertested. This article explores the causal mechanisms through which peacekeepers keep peace and examines its empirical effects after interstate wars. To take the endogeneity of peacekeeping into account, it also examines where peacekeepers tend to be deployed. Duration analysis shows that, all else equal, peacekeeping significantly increases the chances that peace will last. Peacekeepers can help adversaries to maintain peace by making surprise attack more difficult, by reducing uncertainty about enemy intentions, and by preventing and controlling accidents and incidents that can spiral back to war.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-8871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1086-3338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/wp.2005.0004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WOPOBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Causality ; Ceasefires ; Civil War ; Civil wars ; Control ; Effects ; International community ; International cooperation ; International politics ; International relations ; Military ; Peace ; Peace keeping ; Peace keeping forces ; Peace treaties ; Peacekeeping ; Peacekeeping forces ; Peacetime ; War ; War conflict ; World politics</subject><ispartof>World politics, 2004-07, Vol.56 (4), p.481-519</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2004</rights><rights>Copyright 2004 The Johns Hopkins University Press</rights><rights>Copyright © 2004 The Johns Hopkins University Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press Jul 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55730e6438fb2e9dedfaa2c60a84f7e3461179d3c9ebf1701d217315dd5abefa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55730e6438fb2e9dedfaa2c60a84f7e3461179d3c9ebf1701d217315dd5abefa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25054273$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0043887100017494/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,12845,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Page Fortna, Virginia</creatorcontrib><title>Interstate Peacekeeping: Causal Mechanisms and Empirical Effects</title><title>World politics</title><addtitle>World Pol</addtitle><description>Peacekeeping is perhaps the international community's most important tool for maintaining peace in the aftermath of war. Its practice has evolved significantly in the past ten or fifteen years as it has been used increasingly in civil wars. However, traditional peacekeeping between states is not well understood. Its operation is undertheorized and its effects undertested. This article explores the causal mechanisms through which peacekeepers keep peace and examines its empirical effects after interstate wars. To take the endogeneity of peacekeeping into account, it also examines where peacekeepers tend to be deployed. Duration analysis shows that, all else equal, peacekeeping significantly increases the chances that peace will last. Peacekeepers can help adversaries to maintain peace by making surprise attack more difficult, by reducing uncertainty about enemy intentions, and by preventing and controlling accidents and incidents that can spiral back to war.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Ceasefires</subject><subject>Civil War</subject><subject>Civil wars</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>International community</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International politics</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Military</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Peace keeping</subject><subject>Peace keeping forces</subject><subject>Peace treaties</subject><subject>Peacekeeping</subject><subject>Peacekeeping forces</subject><subject>Peacetime</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>War conflict</subject><subject>World politics</subject><issn>0043-8871</issn><issn>1086-3338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1vEzEQxS0EEqFw44q04sCJDeNvLydQGkpRK4gKXC3HOy6bZj-wd1X47_EqVUAIiZOlmd-M33tDyFMKS8olf3U7LBmAXAKAuEcWFIwqOefmPlnkCi-N0fQheZTSDoBSxfSCvDnvRoxpdCMWn9B5vEEcmu76dbFyU3L74hL9N9c1qU2F6-pi3Q5NbHxurENAP6bH5EFw-4RP7t4T8uXd-vPqfXnx8ex89fai9EKZsZRSc0AluAlbhlWNdXCOeQXOiKCRC0WprmruK9wGqoHWjGpOZV1Lt8Xg-Al5cdg7xP77hGm0bZM87veuw35KVoEyoLPb_4Hc5FiMlhl8_he466fYZROW6SyUGcUy9PIA-dinFDHYITatiz8tBTuHbm8HO4du59AzLo47dzmedkr4ey01UDFhr-bDzHcBIUAYavLYs8PYLo19PH7BJEjB9OypPPSbNOKPY9_FG6s019Kqs42tNpdfN6cfruxp5pd3ql27jU19_aeIf-n-BZDAq0U</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Page Fortna, Virginia</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Interstate Peacekeeping: Causal Mechanisms and Empirical Effects</title><author>Page Fortna, Virginia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-55730e6438fb2e9dedfaa2c60a84f7e3461179d3c9ebf1701d217315dd5abefa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Ceasefires</topic><topic>Civil War</topic><topic>Civil wars</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>International community</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International politics</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Military</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Peace keeping</topic><topic>Peace keeping forces</topic><topic>Peace treaties</topic><topic>Peacekeeping</topic><topic>Peacekeeping forces</topic><topic>Peacetime</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>War conflict</topic><topic>World politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Page Fortna, Virginia</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>World politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Page Fortna, Virginia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interstate Peacekeeping: Causal Mechanisms and Empirical Effects</atitle><jtitle>World politics</jtitle><addtitle>World Pol</addtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>481</spage><epage>519</epage><pages>481-519</pages><issn>0043-8871</issn><eissn>1086-3338</eissn><coden>WOPOBI</coden><abstract>Peacekeeping is perhaps the international community's most important tool for maintaining peace in the aftermath of war. Its practice has evolved significantly in the past ten or fifteen years as it has been used increasingly in civil wars. However, traditional peacekeeping between states is not well understood. Its operation is undertheorized and its effects undertested. This article explores the causal mechanisms through which peacekeepers keep peace and examines its empirical effects after interstate wars. To take the endogeneity of peacekeeping into account, it also examines where peacekeepers tend to be deployed. Duration analysis shows that, all else equal, peacekeeping significantly increases the chances that peace will last. Peacekeepers can help adversaries to maintain peace by making surprise attack more difficult, by reducing uncertainty about enemy intentions, and by preventing and controlling accidents and incidents that can spiral back to war.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/wp.2005.0004</doi><tpages>39</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-8871 |
ispartof | World politics, 2004-07, Vol.56 (4), p.481-519 |
issn | 0043-8871 1086-3338 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60680733 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Case studies Causality Ceasefires Civil War Civil wars Control Effects International community International cooperation International politics International relations Military Peace Peace keeping Peace keeping forces Peace treaties Peacekeeping Peacekeeping forces Peacetime War War conflict World politics |
title | Interstate Peacekeeping: Causal Mechanisms and Empirical Effects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A42%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interstate%20Peacekeeping:%20Causal%20Mechanisms%20and%20Empirical%20Effects&rft.jtitle=World%20politics&rft.au=Page%20Fortna,%20Virginia&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=519&rft.pages=481-519&rft.issn=0043-8871&rft.eissn=1086-3338&rft.coden=WOPOBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/wp.2005.0004&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25054273%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=274382862&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1353_wp_2005_0004&rft_jstor_id=25054273&rfr_iscdi=true |