No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda
Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of modern African studies 2002-12, Vol.40 (4), p.549-575 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 575 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 549 |
container_title | The Journal of modern African studies |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Goetz, Anne Marie |
description | Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article offers an assessment of the impact of these measures on women's political effectiveness, examining how far women in Parliament have been able to advance gender equity concerns in key new legislation. The article suggests that the political value of specially created new seats has been eroded by their exploitation as currency for the NRM's patronage system, undermining women's effectiveness as representatives of women's interests once in office. This is because the gate-keepers of access to reserved political space are not the women's movement, or even women voters, but Movement elites. The women's movement in Uganda, though a beneficiary of the NRM's patronage, has become increasingly critical of the deepening authoritarianism of the NRM, pointing out that the lack of internal democracy in the Movement accounts for its failure to follow constitutional commitments to gender equity through to changes in key new pieces of legislation affecting women's rights. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0022278X02004032 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60663790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022278X02004032</cupid><jstor_id>3876025</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3876025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d14e9322f5df2c0d841f52c3797ba7d1a06147cc4f93d1ed5c608639d26cde523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFvFCEYhomxiWvbH2DiYeLBepn2AwYYvDUbbY1NW6NNeyMUmMo6C1tgrf57mWzTGE2VCwnP8715yYfQCwz7GLA4-AxACBH9FRCADih5gma447IV9TxFswm3E3-Gnue8AICeiX6Gzk5jk7_GVMy65KbEZhXvXHrbmBhySdqH-hpDcxeXLuzlSkdfvNFj44bBmeK_u-BybnxoLm50sHoHbQ16zG73_t5GF-_ffZkftydnRx_mhyetYZiX1uLOSUrIwOxADNi-wwMjhgoprrWwWAPHnTCmGyS12FlmOPScSku4sY4Ruo1eb3JXKd6uXS5q6bNx46iDi-usOHBe0-C_IpW4NiJdFd_8U8RAWU8kFVPmqz_URVynUP-rsOQdiJ5NEt5IJsWckxvUKvmlTj9rkpp2pv7aWZ15uZlZ5BLTwwDtBQfCKm432Ofifjxgnb4pLqhgih99UoA_ivnl-bGS1af3FfTyOnl7434r-miJX2h-r9c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196407850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Goetz, Anne Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Goetz, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><description>Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article offers an assessment of the impact of these measures on women's political effectiveness, examining how far women in Parliament have been able to advance gender equity concerns in key new legislation. The article suggests that the political value of specially created new seats has been eroded by their exploitation as currency for the NRM's patronage system, undermining women's effectiveness as representatives of women's interests once in office. This is because the gate-keepers of access to reserved political space are not the women's movement, or even women voters, but Movement elites. The women's movement in Uganda, though a beneficiary of the NRM's patronage, has become increasingly critical of the deepening authoritarianism of the NRM, pointing out that the lack of internal democracy in the Movement accounts for its failure to follow constitutional commitments to gender equity through to changes in key new pieces of legislation affecting women's rights.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-278X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022278X02004032</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMAFAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Affirmative action ; African studies ; Councils ; Effectiveness ; Equality ; Females ; Gender equity ; Legislators ; Local government ; Parliaments ; Patronage ; Policy Making ; Political candidates ; Political elections ; Political Movements ; Political parties ; Political power ; Political Representation ; Political Systems ; Politics ; Power ; Regional studies ; Resistance ; Sex discrimination ; Uganda ; Women ; Womens rights ; Womens rights movements</subject><ispartof>The Journal of modern African studies, 2002-12, Vol.40 (4), p.549-575</ispartof><rights>2002 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Dec 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d14e9322f5df2c0d841f52c3797ba7d1a06147cc4f93d1ed5c608639d26cde523</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3876025$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022278X02004032/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,800,12826,27905,27906,55609,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goetz, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><title>No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda</title><title>The Journal of modern African studies</title><addtitle>J. Mod. Afr. Stud</addtitle><description>Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article offers an assessment of the impact of these measures on women's political effectiveness, examining how far women in Parliament have been able to advance gender equity concerns in key new legislation. The article suggests that the political value of specially created new seats has been eroded by their exploitation as currency for the NRM's patronage system, undermining women's effectiveness as representatives of women's interests once in office. This is because the gate-keepers of access to reserved political space are not the women's movement, or even women voters, but Movement elites. The women's movement in Uganda, though a beneficiary of the NRM's patronage, has become increasingly critical of the deepening authoritarianism of the NRM, pointing out that the lack of internal democracy in the Movement accounts for its failure to follow constitutional commitments to gender equity through to changes in key new pieces of legislation affecting women's rights.</description><subject>Affirmative action</subject><subject>African studies</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Patronage</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>Political elections</subject><subject>Political Movements</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Political Representation</subject><subject>Political Systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Regional studies</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Sex discrimination</subject><subject>Uganda</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens rights</subject><subject>Womens rights movements</subject><issn>0022-278X</issn><issn>1469-7777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFvFCEYhomxiWvbH2DiYeLBepn2AwYYvDUbbY1NW6NNeyMUmMo6C1tgrf57mWzTGE2VCwnP8715yYfQCwz7GLA4-AxACBH9FRCADih5gma447IV9TxFswm3E3-Gnue8AICeiX6Gzk5jk7_GVMy65KbEZhXvXHrbmBhySdqH-hpDcxeXLuzlSkdfvNFj44bBmeK_u-BybnxoLm50sHoHbQ16zG73_t5GF-_ffZkftydnRx_mhyetYZiX1uLOSUrIwOxADNi-wwMjhgoprrWwWAPHnTCmGyS12FlmOPScSku4sY4Ruo1eb3JXKd6uXS5q6bNx46iDi-usOHBe0-C_IpW4NiJdFd_8U8RAWU8kFVPmqz_URVynUP-rsOQdiJ5NEt5IJsWckxvUKvmlTj9rkpp2pv7aWZ15uZlZ5BLTwwDtBQfCKm432Ofifjxgnb4pLqhgih99UoA_ivnl-bGS1af3FfTyOnl7434r-miJX2h-r9c</recordid><startdate>200212</startdate><enddate>200212</enddate><creator>Goetz, Anne Marie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BSCPQ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>UXAQP</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200212</creationdate><title>No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda</title><author>Goetz, Anne Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d14e9322f5df2c0d841f52c3797ba7d1a06147cc4f93d1ed5c608639d26cde523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Affirmative action</topic><topic>African studies</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Patronage</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>Political elections</topic><topic>Political Movements</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Political Representation</topic><topic>Political Systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Regional studies</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Sex discrimination</topic><topic>Uganda</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens rights</topic><topic>Womens rights movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goetz, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Black Studies Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ProQuest Black Studies</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>The Journal of modern African studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goetz, Anne Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of modern African studies</jtitle><addtitle>J. Mod. Afr. Stud</addtitle><date>2002-12</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>575</epage><pages>549-575</pages><issn>0022-278X</issn><eissn>1469-7777</eissn><coden>JMAFAU</coden><abstract>Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article offers an assessment of the impact of these measures on women's political effectiveness, examining how far women in Parliament have been able to advance gender equity concerns in key new legislation. The article suggests that the political value of specially created new seats has been eroded by their exploitation as currency for the NRM's patronage system, undermining women's effectiveness as representatives of women's interests once in office. This is because the gate-keepers of access to reserved political space are not the women's movement, or even women voters, but Movement elites. The women's movement in Uganda, though a beneficiary of the NRM's patronage, has become increasingly critical of the deepening authoritarianism of the NRM, pointing out that the lack of internal democracy in the Movement accounts for its failure to follow constitutional commitments to gender equity through to changes in key new pieces of legislation affecting women's rights.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022278X02004032</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-278X |
ispartof | The Journal of modern African studies, 2002-12, Vol.40 (4), p.549-575 |
issn | 0022-278X 1469-7777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60663790 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Affirmative action African studies Councils Effectiveness Equality Females Gender equity Legislators Local government Parliaments Patronage Policy Making Political candidates Political elections Political Movements Political parties Political power Political Representation Political Systems Politics Power Regional studies Resistance Sex discrimination Uganda Women Womens rights Womens rights movements |
title | No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T09%3A50%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20shortcuts%20to%20power:%20constraints%20on%20women's%20political%20effectiveness%20in%20Uganda&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20modern%20African%20studies&rft.au=Goetz,%20Anne%20Marie&rft.date=2002-12&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=575&rft.pages=549-575&rft.issn=0022-278X&rft.eissn=1469-7777&rft.coden=JMAFAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022278X02004032&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3876025%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196407850&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022278X02004032&rft_jstor_id=3876025&rfr_iscdi=true |