No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda

Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of modern African studies 2002-12, Vol.40 (4), p.549-575
1. Verfasser: Goetz, Anne Marie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 575
container_issue 4
container_start_page 549
container_title The Journal of modern African studies
container_volume 40
creator Goetz, Anne Marie
description Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article offers an assessment of the impact of these measures on women's political effectiveness, examining how far women in Parliament have been able to advance gender equity concerns in key new legislation. The article suggests that the political value of specially created new seats has been eroded by their exploitation as currency for the NRM's patronage system, undermining women's effectiveness as representatives of women's interests once in office. This is because the gate-keepers of access to reserved political space are not the women's movement, or even women voters, but Movement elites. The women's movement in Uganda, though a beneficiary of the NRM's patronage, has become increasingly critical of the deepening authoritarianism of the NRM, pointing out that the lack of internal democracy in the Movement accounts for its failure to follow constitutional commitments to gender equity through to changes in key new pieces of legislation affecting women's rights.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022278X02004032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60663790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022278X02004032</cupid><jstor_id>3876025</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3876025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d14e9322f5df2c0d841f52c3797ba7d1a06147cc4f93d1ed5c608639d26cde523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFvFCEYhomxiWvbH2DiYeLBepn2AwYYvDUbbY1NW6NNeyMUmMo6C1tgrf57mWzTGE2VCwnP8715yYfQCwz7GLA4-AxACBH9FRCADih5gma447IV9TxFswm3E3-Gnue8AICeiX6Gzk5jk7_GVMy65KbEZhXvXHrbmBhySdqH-hpDcxeXLuzlSkdfvNFj44bBmeK_u-BybnxoLm50sHoHbQ16zG73_t5GF-_ffZkftydnRx_mhyetYZiX1uLOSUrIwOxADNi-wwMjhgoprrWwWAPHnTCmGyS12FlmOPScSku4sY4Ruo1eb3JXKd6uXS5q6bNx46iDi-usOHBe0-C_IpW4NiJdFd_8U8RAWU8kFVPmqz_URVynUP-rsOQdiJ5NEt5IJsWckxvUKvmlTj9rkpp2pv7aWZ15uZlZ5BLTwwDtBQfCKm432Ofifjxgnb4pLqhgih99UoA_ivnl-bGS1af3FfTyOnl7434r-miJX2h-r9c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196407850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Goetz, Anne Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Goetz, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><description>Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article offers an assessment of the impact of these measures on women's political effectiveness, examining how far women in Parliament have been able to advance gender equity concerns in key new legislation. The article suggests that the political value of specially created new seats has been eroded by their exploitation as currency for the NRM's patronage system, undermining women's effectiveness as representatives of women's interests once in office. This is because the gate-keepers of access to reserved political space are not the women's movement, or even women voters, but Movement elites. The women's movement in Uganda, though a beneficiary of the NRM's patronage, has become increasingly critical of the deepening authoritarianism of the NRM, pointing out that the lack of internal democracy in the Movement accounts for its failure to follow constitutional commitments to gender equity through to changes in key new pieces of legislation affecting women's rights.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-278X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022278X02004032</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMAFAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Affirmative action ; African studies ; Councils ; Effectiveness ; Equality ; Females ; Gender equity ; Legislators ; Local government ; Parliaments ; Patronage ; Policy Making ; Political candidates ; Political elections ; Political Movements ; Political parties ; Political power ; Political Representation ; Political Systems ; Politics ; Power ; Regional studies ; Resistance ; Sex discrimination ; Uganda ; Women ; Womens rights ; Womens rights movements</subject><ispartof>The Journal of modern African studies, 2002-12, Vol.40 (4), p.549-575</ispartof><rights>2002 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division Dec 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d14e9322f5df2c0d841f52c3797ba7d1a06147cc4f93d1ed5c608639d26cde523</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3876025$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022278X02004032/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,800,12826,27905,27906,55609,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goetz, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><title>No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda</title><title>The Journal of modern African studies</title><addtitle>J. Mod. Afr. Stud</addtitle><description>Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article offers an assessment of the impact of these measures on women's political effectiveness, examining how far women in Parliament have been able to advance gender equity concerns in key new legislation. The article suggests that the political value of specially created new seats has been eroded by their exploitation as currency for the NRM's patronage system, undermining women's effectiveness as representatives of women's interests once in office. This is because the gate-keepers of access to reserved political space are not the women's movement, or even women voters, but Movement elites. The women's movement in Uganda, though a beneficiary of the NRM's patronage, has become increasingly critical of the deepening authoritarianism of the NRM, pointing out that the lack of internal democracy in the Movement accounts for its failure to follow constitutional commitments to gender equity through to changes in key new pieces of legislation affecting women's rights.</description><subject>Affirmative action</subject><subject>African studies</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Patronage</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>Political elections</subject><subject>Political Movements</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Political Representation</subject><subject>Political Systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Regional studies</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Sex discrimination</subject><subject>Uganda</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens rights</subject><subject>Womens rights movements</subject><issn>0022-278X</issn><issn>1469-7777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFvFCEYhomxiWvbH2DiYeLBepn2AwYYvDUbbY1NW6NNeyMUmMo6C1tgrf57mWzTGE2VCwnP8715yYfQCwz7GLA4-AxACBH9FRCADih5gma447IV9TxFswm3E3-Gnue8AICeiX6Gzk5jk7_GVMy65KbEZhXvXHrbmBhySdqH-hpDcxeXLuzlSkdfvNFj44bBmeK_u-BybnxoLm50sHoHbQ16zG73_t5GF-_ffZkftydnRx_mhyetYZiX1uLOSUrIwOxADNi-wwMjhgoprrWwWAPHnTCmGyS12FlmOPScSku4sY4Ruo1eb3JXKd6uXS5q6bNx46iDi-usOHBe0-C_IpW4NiJdFd_8U8RAWU8kFVPmqz_URVynUP-rsOQdiJ5NEt5IJsWckxvUKvmlTj9rkpp2pv7aWZ15uZlZ5BLTwwDtBQfCKm432Ofifjxgnb4pLqhgih99UoA_ivnl-bGS1af3FfTyOnl7434r-miJX2h-r9c</recordid><startdate>200212</startdate><enddate>200212</enddate><creator>Goetz, Anne Marie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BSCPQ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>UXAQP</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200212</creationdate><title>No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda</title><author>Goetz, Anne Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d14e9322f5df2c0d841f52c3797ba7d1a06147cc4f93d1ed5c608639d26cde523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Affirmative action</topic><topic>African studies</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Patronage</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>Political elections</topic><topic>Political Movements</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Political Representation</topic><topic>Political Systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Regional studies</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Sex discrimination</topic><topic>Uganda</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens rights</topic><topic>Womens rights movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goetz, Anne Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Black Studies Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ProQuest Black Studies</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>The Journal of modern African studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goetz, Anne Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of modern African studies</jtitle><addtitle>J. Mod. Afr. Stud</addtitle><date>2002-12</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>575</epage><pages>549-575</pages><issn>0022-278X</issn><eissn>1469-7777</eissn><coden>JMAFAU</coden><abstract>Numbers of women in public representative office have increased dramatically in Uganda since the introduction of the National Resistance Movement's ‘no party’ system, because affirmative action measures have been taken to reserve seats for them in Parliament and local government. This article offers an assessment of the impact of these measures on women's political effectiveness, examining how far women in Parliament have been able to advance gender equity concerns in key new legislation. The article suggests that the political value of specially created new seats has been eroded by their exploitation as currency for the NRM's patronage system, undermining women's effectiveness as representatives of women's interests once in office. This is because the gate-keepers of access to reserved political space are not the women's movement, or even women voters, but Movement elites. The women's movement in Uganda, though a beneficiary of the NRM's patronage, has become increasingly critical of the deepening authoritarianism of the NRM, pointing out that the lack of internal democracy in the Movement accounts for its failure to follow constitutional commitments to gender equity through to changes in key new pieces of legislation affecting women's rights.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022278X02004032</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-278X
ispartof The Journal of modern African studies, 2002-12, Vol.40 (4), p.549-575
issn 0022-278X
1469-7777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60663790
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Affirmative action
African studies
Councils
Effectiveness
Equality
Females
Gender equity
Legislators
Local government
Parliaments
Patronage
Policy Making
Political candidates
Political elections
Political Movements
Political parties
Political power
Political Representation
Political Systems
Politics
Power
Regional studies
Resistance
Sex discrimination
Uganda
Women
Womens rights
Womens rights movements
title No shortcuts to power: constraints on women's political effectiveness in Uganda
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T09%3A50%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20shortcuts%20to%20power:%20constraints%20on%20women's%20political%20effectiveness%20in%20Uganda&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20modern%20African%20studies&rft.au=Goetz,%20Anne%20Marie&rft.date=2002-12&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=575&rft.pages=549-575&rft.issn=0022-278X&rft.eissn=1469-7777&rft.coden=JMAFAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022278X02004032&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3876025%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196407850&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022278X02004032&rft_jstor_id=3876025&rfr_iscdi=true