Evaluation Decentralized Policies: A Method to Compare the Performance of Economic Development Programmes across Different Regions or States
This article proposes an empirical method to evaluate decentralized economic development programmes with heterogeneous characteristics implemented in different regions or states. The evaluation design developed in the article is a comparative analysis that operationalizes differences in regional pol...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation (London, England. 1995) England. 1995), 2002-01, Vol.8 (1), p.101-124 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 124 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 101 |
| container_title | Evaluation (London, England. 1995) |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Bondonio, Daniele |
| description | This article proposes an empirical method to evaluate decentralized economic development programmes with heterogeneous characteristics implemented in different regions or states. The evaluation design developed in the article is a comparative analysis that operationalizes differences in regional policy features & controls for exogenous factors that may affect outcomes independently from the programme intervention. The proposed method is illustrated & tested through the evaluation of the US Enterprise Zone programmes. The results of the analysis show that the proposed evaluation design is an effective tool for turning the heterogeneity of decentralized economic development programmes from a threat to the validity of the analysis into a great opportunity for testing the effectiveness of a variety of region- (or state-)specific policy implementation features. 6 Tables, 24 References. [Copyright 2002 Sage Publications Ltd.] |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60650303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60650303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_606503033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjTFOAzEQRV2AlAC5w1R0kbxYuwI6lCyiQVpB-mjkjBMj27PMeFNwBg7NInEAql-8p_cvzLJxbbd29w92Ya5UP6xturu2WZrv_oxpwhq5wJY8lSqY4hcdYOAUfSR9hCd4pXriA1SGDecRhaCeCAaSwJKxeAIO0HsunKOfO2dKPOY5BoPwUTBnUkAvrArbGALJL3uj43yrwALvFSvpjbkMmJRWf3ttbp_73eZlPQp_TqR1n6N6SgkL8aT7znatdda5f4s_795X0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60650303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation Decentralized Policies: A Method to Compare the Performance of Economic Development Programmes across Different Regions or States</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Bondonio, Daniele</creator><creatorcontrib>Bondonio, Daniele</creatorcontrib><description>This article proposes an empirical method to evaluate decentralized economic development programmes with heterogeneous characteristics implemented in different regions or states. The evaluation design developed in the article is a comparative analysis that operationalizes differences in regional policy features & controls for exogenous factors that may affect outcomes independently from the programme intervention. The proposed method is illustrated & tested through the evaluation of the US Enterprise Zone programmes. The results of the analysis show that the proposed evaluation design is an effective tool for turning the heterogeneity of decentralized economic development programmes from a threat to the validity of the analysis into a great opportunity for testing the effectiveness of a variety of region- (or state-)specific policy implementation features. 6 Tables, 24 References. [Copyright 2002 Sage Publications Ltd.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-3890</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVALFR</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Comparative Analysis ; Decentralization ; Development Policy ; Development Programs ; Economic Development ; Economic Policy ; Evaluation Research ; Program Evaluation ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>Evaluation (London, England. 1995), 2002-01, Vol.8 (1), p.101-124</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bondonio, Daniele</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation Decentralized Policies: A Method to Compare the Performance of Economic Development Programmes across Different Regions or States</title><title>Evaluation (London, England. 1995)</title><description>This article proposes an empirical method to evaluate decentralized economic development programmes with heterogeneous characteristics implemented in different regions or states. The evaluation design developed in the article is a comparative analysis that operationalizes differences in regional policy features & controls for exogenous factors that may affect outcomes independently from the programme intervention. The proposed method is illustrated & tested through the evaluation of the US Enterprise Zone programmes. The results of the analysis show that the proposed evaluation design is an effective tool for turning the heterogeneity of decentralized economic development programmes from a threat to the validity of the analysis into a great opportunity for testing the effectiveness of a variety of region- (or state-)specific policy implementation features. 6 Tables, 24 References. [Copyright 2002 Sage Publications Ltd.]</description><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Development Policy</subject><subject>Development Programs</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Evaluation Research</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>1356-3890</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjTFOAzEQRV2AlAC5w1R0kbxYuwI6lCyiQVpB-mjkjBMj27PMeFNwBg7NInEAql-8p_cvzLJxbbd29w92Ya5UP6xturu2WZrv_oxpwhq5wJY8lSqY4hcdYOAUfSR9hCd4pXriA1SGDecRhaCeCAaSwJKxeAIO0HsunKOfO2dKPOY5BoPwUTBnUkAvrArbGALJL3uj43yrwALvFSvpjbkMmJRWf3ttbp_73eZlPQp_TqR1n6N6SgkL8aT7znatdda5f4s_795X0g</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Bondonio, Daniele</creator><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Evaluation Decentralized Policies: A Method to Compare the Performance of Economic Development Programmes across Different Regions or States</title><author>Bondonio, Daniele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_606503033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Development Policy</topic><topic>Development Programs</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Evaluation Research</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bondonio, Daniele</creatorcontrib><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Evaluation (London, England. 1995)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bondonio, Daniele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation Decentralized Policies: A Method to Compare the Performance of Economic Development Programmes across Different Regions or States</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation (London, England. 1995)</jtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>101-124</pages><issn>1356-3890</issn><coden>EVALFR</coden><abstract>This article proposes an empirical method to evaluate decentralized economic development programmes with heterogeneous characteristics implemented in different regions or states. The evaluation design developed in the article is a comparative analysis that operationalizes differences in regional policy features & controls for exogenous factors that may affect outcomes independently from the programme intervention. The proposed method is illustrated & tested through the evaluation of the US Enterprise Zone programmes. The results of the analysis show that the proposed evaluation design is an effective tool for turning the heterogeneity of decentralized economic development programmes from a threat to the validity of the analysis into a great opportunity for testing the effectiveness of a variety of region- (or state-)specific policy implementation features. 6 Tables, 24 References. [Copyright 2002 Sage Publications Ltd.]</abstract></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1356-3890 |
| ispartof | Evaluation (London, England. 1995), 2002-01, Vol.8 (1), p.101-124 |
| issn | 1356-3890 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60650303 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete |
| subjects | Comparative Analysis Decentralization Development Policy Development Programs Economic Development Economic Policy Evaluation Research Program Evaluation United States of America |
| title | Evaluation Decentralized Policies: A Method to Compare the Performance of Economic Development Programmes across Different Regions or States |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A54%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20Decentralized%20Policies:%20A%20Method%20to%20Compare%20the%20Performance%20of%20Economic%20Development%20Programmes%20across%20Different%20Regions%20or%20States&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20(London,%20England.%201995)&rft.au=Bondonio,%20Daniele&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=101-124&rft.issn=1356-3890&rft.coden=EVALFR&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60650303%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60650303&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |