Mission Completed — Democracy Safe? The Tanzanian Union, International Election Monitoring and the General Elections 2000

Starting with the killings of 30-40 civilians through the Tanzanian Field Force Unit on Zanzibar in January 2001, the article argues that this outbreak of violence should not be regarded as a problem limited solely to "Zanzibar" or "Pemba" as embedded in the history of the Tanzan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociologus 2002-01, Vol.52 (2), p.191-214
1. Verfasser: Dilger, Hansjörg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 214
container_issue 2
container_start_page 191
container_title Sociologus
container_volume 52
creator Dilger, Hansjörg
description Starting with the killings of 30-40 civilians through the Tanzanian Field Force Unit on Zanzibar in January 2001, the article argues that this outbreak of violence should not be regarded as a problem limited solely to "Zanzibar" or "Pemba" as embedded in the history of the Tanzanian Union and the special status of the islands. The events should, at the same time, be understood as a symptom of the difficulties Tanzania is experiencing in its transition to democracy and which were condensed in the General Elections of 2000. Differing from a more abstract political analysis this article deals with complaints and irregularities during the elections as they were expressed through rumours and statements from the public, as well as in the local print media. The voices from parts of the population and from some domestic observers are then contrasted with the reports of international election monitors who attested to free and fair proceedings. In comparing the still existing power relations and networks of the former single party CCM with the actual democratic features and actions of opposition parties and of an emerging civil society, the authors critically discuss the role and responsibilities of international election monitoring. It is argued that election monitoring is engaged in promoting the picture of a democratic state as preferred by the donor community while neglecting its task as a trust-building measure for political parties and the general population.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60648713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43645504</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43645504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1993-56d43d16c97c12d8972e45f2f229a61bf5e398f13e08fb1e35d646dc1c210dfb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb9OwzAQhyMEEqXwCEheYCKSHf-JPSFUSqnUioF2jlz7XFIlTrHTobDwEDwhT0KqVogNprvTfb9vuDtKekQKnnKCxXHSw5jKFNM8P03OYlxhLAgVpJe8T8sYy8ajQVOvK2jBoq-PT3QPdWOCNlv0rB3cotkLoJn2b9qX2qO57xI3aOxbCF633aArNKzA7Fo0bXzZNqH0S6S9RW0XHYGH8IuJKMMYnycnTlcRLg61n8wfhrPBYzp5Go0Hd5N0SZSiKReWUUuEUbkhmZUqz4Bxl7ksU1qQheNAlXSEApZuQYByK5iwhpiMYOsWtJ9c773r0LxuILZFXUYDVaU9NJtYCCyYzAn9B8g6cy7_BKlkinGxM14dQB2NrlzQ3pSxWIey1mFbEJZ371Gk4y733Cp2p_vZMyoY55jRby1sjaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38494563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mission Completed — Democracy Safe? The Tanzanian Union, International Election Monitoring and the General Elections 2000</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Dilger, Hansjörg</creator><creatorcontrib>Dilger, Hansjörg</creatorcontrib><description>Starting with the killings of 30-40 civilians through the Tanzanian Field Force Unit on Zanzibar in January 2001, the article argues that this outbreak of violence should not be regarded as a problem limited solely to "Zanzibar" or "Pemba" as embedded in the history of the Tanzanian Union and the special status of the islands. The events should, at the same time, be understood as a symptom of the difficulties Tanzania is experiencing in its transition to democracy and which were condensed in the General Elections of 2000. Differing from a more abstract political analysis this article deals with complaints and irregularities during the elections as they were expressed through rumours and statements from the public, as well as in the local print media. The voices from parts of the population and from some domestic observers are then contrasted with the reports of international election monitors who attested to free and fair proceedings. In comparing the still existing power relations and networks of the former single party CCM with the actual democratic features and actions of opposition parties and of an emerging civil society, the authors critically discuss the role and responsibilities of international election monitoring. It is argued that election monitoring is engaged in promoting the picture of a democratic state as preferred by the donor community while neglecting its task as a trust-building measure for political parties and the general population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-5106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Duncker &amp; Humblot</publisher><subject>Africa ; Civil Society ; Democracy ; Elections ; Electoral behaviour ; Ethnology ; International observers ; Local elections ; Monitoring ; Opposition parties ; Parliamentary elections ; Political campaigns ; Political candidates ; Political elections ; Political Parties ; Political Violence ; Regime transition ; Social organization, political organization and power, relations with the State ; Social structure and social relations ; Sociology ; State elections ; Tanzania ; Violence ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Sociologus, 2002-01, Vol.52 (2), p.191-214</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43645504$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43645504$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14710691$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dilger, Hansjörg</creatorcontrib><title>Mission Completed — Democracy Safe? The Tanzanian Union, International Election Monitoring and the General Elections 2000</title><title>Sociologus</title><description>Starting with the killings of 30-40 civilians through the Tanzanian Field Force Unit on Zanzibar in January 2001, the article argues that this outbreak of violence should not be regarded as a problem limited solely to "Zanzibar" or "Pemba" as embedded in the history of the Tanzanian Union and the special status of the islands. The events should, at the same time, be understood as a symptom of the difficulties Tanzania is experiencing in its transition to democracy and which were condensed in the General Elections of 2000. Differing from a more abstract political analysis this article deals with complaints and irregularities during the elections as they were expressed through rumours and statements from the public, as well as in the local print media. The voices from parts of the population and from some domestic observers are then contrasted with the reports of international election monitors who attested to free and fair proceedings. In comparing the still existing power relations and networks of the former single party CCM with the actual democratic features and actions of opposition parties and of an emerging civil society, the authors critically discuss the role and responsibilities of international election monitoring. It is argued that election monitoring is engaged in promoting the picture of a democratic state as preferred by the donor community while neglecting its task as a trust-building measure for political parties and the general population.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Civil Society</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral behaviour</subject><subject>Ethnology</subject><subject>International observers</subject><subject>Local elections</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Opposition parties</subject><subject>Parliamentary elections</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>Political elections</subject><subject>Political Parties</subject><subject>Political Violence</subject><subject>Regime transition</subject><subject>Social organization, political organization and power, relations with the State</subject><subject>Social structure and social relations</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>State elections</subject><subject>Tanzania</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0038-0377</issn><issn>1865-5106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb9OwzAQhyMEEqXwCEheYCKSHf-JPSFUSqnUioF2jlz7XFIlTrHTobDwEDwhT0KqVogNprvTfb9vuDtKekQKnnKCxXHSw5jKFNM8P03OYlxhLAgVpJe8T8sYy8ajQVOvK2jBoq-PT3QPdWOCNlv0rB3cotkLoJn2b9qX2qO57xI3aOxbCF633aArNKzA7Fo0bXzZNqH0S6S9RW0XHYGH8IuJKMMYnycnTlcRLg61n8wfhrPBYzp5Go0Hd5N0SZSiKReWUUuEUbkhmZUqz4Bxl7ksU1qQheNAlXSEApZuQYByK5iwhpiMYOsWtJ9c773r0LxuILZFXUYDVaU9NJtYCCyYzAn9B8g6cy7_BKlkinGxM14dQB2NrlzQ3pSxWIey1mFbEJZ371Gk4y733Cp2p_vZMyoY55jRby1sjaI</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Dilger, Hansjörg</creator><general>Duncker &amp; Humblot</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Mission Completed — Democracy Safe? The Tanzanian Union, International Election Monitoring and the General Elections 2000</title><author>Dilger, Hansjörg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1993-56d43d16c97c12d8972e45f2f229a61bf5e398f13e08fb1e35d646dc1c210dfb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Civil Society</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral behaviour</topic><topic>Ethnology</topic><topic>International observers</topic><topic>Local elections</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Opposition parties</topic><topic>Parliamentary elections</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>Political elections</topic><topic>Political Parties</topic><topic>Political Violence</topic><topic>Regime transition</topic><topic>Social organization, political organization and power, relations with the State</topic><topic>Social structure and social relations</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>State elections</topic><topic>Tanzania</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dilger, Hansjörg</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sociologus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dilger, Hansjörg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mission Completed — Democracy Safe? The Tanzanian Union, International Election Monitoring and the General Elections 2000</atitle><jtitle>Sociologus</jtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>191-214</pages><issn>0038-0377</issn><eissn>1865-5106</eissn><abstract>Starting with the killings of 30-40 civilians through the Tanzanian Field Force Unit on Zanzibar in January 2001, the article argues that this outbreak of violence should not be regarded as a problem limited solely to "Zanzibar" or "Pemba" as embedded in the history of the Tanzanian Union and the special status of the islands. The events should, at the same time, be understood as a symptom of the difficulties Tanzania is experiencing in its transition to democracy and which were condensed in the General Elections of 2000. Differing from a more abstract political analysis this article deals with complaints and irregularities during the elections as they were expressed through rumours and statements from the public, as well as in the local print media. The voices from parts of the population and from some domestic observers are then contrasted with the reports of international election monitors who attested to free and fair proceedings. In comparing the still existing power relations and networks of the former single party CCM with the actual democratic features and actions of opposition parties and of an emerging civil society, the authors critically discuss the role and responsibilities of international election monitoring. It is argued that election monitoring is engaged in promoting the picture of a democratic state as preferred by the donor community while neglecting its task as a trust-building measure for political parties and the general population.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Duncker &amp; Humblot</pub><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0377
ispartof Sociologus, 2002-01, Vol.52 (2), p.191-214
issn 0038-0377
1865-5106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60648713
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Africa
Civil Society
Democracy
Elections
Electoral behaviour
Ethnology
International observers
Local elections
Monitoring
Opposition parties
Parliamentary elections
Political campaigns
Political candidates
Political elections
Political Parties
Political Violence
Regime transition
Social organization, political organization and power, relations with the State
Social structure and social relations
Sociology
State elections
Tanzania
Violence
Voting
title Mission Completed — Democracy Safe? The Tanzanian Union, International Election Monitoring and the General Elections 2000
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T23%3A36%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mission%20Completed%20%E2%80%94%20Democracy%20Safe?%20The%20Tanzanian%20Union,%20International%20Election%20Monitoring%20and%20the%20General%20Elections%202000&rft.jtitle=Sociologus&rft.au=Dilger,%20Hansj%C3%B6rg&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=191-214&rft.issn=0038-0377&rft.eissn=1865-5106&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43645504%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38494563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43645504&rfr_iscdi=true