Obstacles to desegregating public housing: Lessons learned from implementing eight consent decrees
Between 1992 and 1996 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) settled a number of legal cases involving housing authorities and agreed to take remedial action as part of court-enforced consent decrees entered into with plaintiffs. These housing authorities faced significant obstac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of policy analysis and management 2003-04, Vol.22 (2), p.179-199 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 199 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | Journal of policy analysis and management |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Popkin, Susan J. Galster, George C. Temkin, Kenneth Herbig, Carla Levy, Diane K. Richer, Elise K. |
description | Between 1992 and 1996 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) settled a number of legal cases involving housing authorities and agreed to take remedial action as part of court-enforced consent decrees entered into with plaintiffs. These housing authorities faced significant obstacles that impaired their ability to comply swiftly and fully with all of the elements in the desegregation consent decrees. The obstacles fell into two broad categories: contextual obstacles (racial composition of waiting lists and resident populations, lack of affordable rental housing, and inadequate public transportation), and capacity and coordination obstacles (conflict among implementing agencies and ineffective monitoring by HUD). Findings presented here highlight the sizable potential delay between the time a legal remedy is imposed and when plaintiffs in public housing segregation disputes realize any benefits. They also reinforce the argument that implementation problems will be legion when policies impose a significant scope of required changes on a large number of actors who must collaborate, yet are not uniformly capable or sympathetic to the goals being promoted. © 2003 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pam.10112 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60646953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ772848</ericid><jstor_id>3325820</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3325820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5342-c8254e829e78ee154372d1a1bec4e0b63eeb8917cd5c47c781aa15a3642b6a903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EEqFw4M7B4oDEYam_7eVWlbaQhpYDqEfL60w2DvuFvaHNv8fpliAhIQ7jGXueeTXjQeglJe8oIex4cG0OKGWP0IxKRgqljHmMZoRpVRjNy6foWUobQogkJZ2h6rpKo_MNJDz2eAkJ6gi1G0NX42FbNcHjdb9N-foeLyClvku4ARc7WOJV7Fsc2qGBFrr7Cgj1esQ-Q_khq_kIkJ6jJyvXJHjx4I_Qt_Ozr6cfi8X1xafTk0XhJRes8IZJAYaVoA0AlYJrtqSOVuAFkEpxgMqUVPul9EJ7bahzVDquBKuUKwk_Qm8m3SH2P7aQRtuG5KFpXAd5BKuIEqqU_L8gN0JoKkQGX_8Fbvpt7PIQljEmuKKcZujtBPnYpxRhZYcYWhd3lhK734nNO7H3O8nsfGIjDOAP4G2z22SoHu1Pyx1j-djtA0J4dmEfZhuyUV1aWpZ2PbZZ7NUkBjH80Tqba82MMDl9PKVvQwO7fzdlv5x8_t3dg-AmjX08VHDOpGH7_y2mdEgj3B3SLn63SnMt7c3Vhb35IC75JZvbK_4LPJzIpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222436131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Obstacles to desegregating public housing: Lessons learned from implementing eight consent decrees</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Popkin, Susan J. ; Galster, George C. ; Temkin, Kenneth ; Herbig, Carla ; Levy, Diane K. ; Richer, Elise K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Popkin, Susan J. ; Galster, George C. ; Temkin, Kenneth ; Herbig, Carla ; Levy, Diane K. ; Richer, Elise K.</creatorcontrib><description>Between 1992 and 1996 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) settled a number of legal cases involving housing authorities and agreed to take remedial action as part of court-enforced consent decrees entered into with plaintiffs. These housing authorities faced significant obstacles that impaired their ability to comply swiftly and fully with all of the elements in the desegregation consent decrees. The obstacles fell into two broad categories: contextual obstacles (racial composition of waiting lists and resident populations, lack of affordable rental housing, and inadequate public transportation), and capacity and coordination obstacles (conflict among implementing agencies and ineffective monitoring by HUD). Findings presented here highlight the sizable potential delay between the time a legal remedy is imposed and when plaintiffs in public housing segregation disputes realize any benefits. They also reinforce the argument that implementation problems will be legion when policies impose a significant scope of required changes on a large number of actors who must collaborate, yet are not uniformly capable or sympathetic to the goals being promoted. © 2003 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-8739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pam.10112</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPAMD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Affordable housing ; African Americans ; Agency Cooperation ; Case Studies ; Community Attitudes ; Community Change ; Compliance (Legal) ; Conflict ; Connecticut ; Consent decrees ; Consent judgments ; Court Litigation ; Desegregation ; Housing ; Housing discrimination ; Housing Needs ; Housing Policy ; Legal Cases ; Local government ; Minnesota ; Minority Groups ; Mobility ; Nebraska ; Neighborhood Integration ; Neighborhoods ; New York ; Pennsylvania ; Plaintiffs ; Policy Analysis ; Policy Implementation ; Policy studies ; Public Agencies ; Public Housing ; Public Policy ; Racial Composition ; Racial Relations ; Racial Segregation ; Residential Segregation ; Resistance to Change ; Social housing ; Tenants ; Texas ; Transportation ; U.S.A ; United States of America ; Urban development ; Vouchers</subject><ispartof>Journal of policy analysis and management, 2003-04, Vol.22 (2), p.179-199</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><rights>2003 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><rights>Copyright (C) 2003 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5342-c8254e829e78ee154372d1a1bec4e0b63eeb8917cd5c47c781aa15a3642b6a903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5342-c8254e829e78ee154372d1a1bec4e0b63eeb8917cd5c47c781aa15a3642b6a903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3325820$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3325820$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,3994,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ772848$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/wlyjpamgt/v_3a22_3ay_3a2003_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a179-199.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Popkin, Susan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galster, George C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temkin, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbig, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Diane K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richer, Elise K.</creatorcontrib><title>Obstacles to desegregating public housing: Lessons learned from implementing eight consent decrees</title><title>Journal of policy analysis and management</title><addtitle>J. Pol. Anal. Manage</addtitle><description>Between 1992 and 1996 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) settled a number of legal cases involving housing authorities and agreed to take remedial action as part of court-enforced consent decrees entered into with plaintiffs. These housing authorities faced significant obstacles that impaired their ability to comply swiftly and fully with all of the elements in the desegregation consent decrees. The obstacles fell into two broad categories: contextual obstacles (racial composition of waiting lists and resident populations, lack of affordable rental housing, and inadequate public transportation), and capacity and coordination obstacles (conflict among implementing agencies and ineffective monitoring by HUD). Findings presented here highlight the sizable potential delay between the time a legal remedy is imposed and when plaintiffs in public housing segregation disputes realize any benefits. They also reinforce the argument that implementation problems will be legion when policies impose a significant scope of required changes on a large number of actors who must collaborate, yet are not uniformly capable or sympathetic to the goals being promoted. © 2003 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.</description><subject>Affordable housing</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Agency Cooperation</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Community Attitudes</subject><subject>Community Change</subject><subject>Compliance (Legal)</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Connecticut</subject><subject>Consent decrees</subject><subject>Consent judgments</subject><subject>Court Litigation</subject><subject>Desegregation</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing discrimination</subject><subject>Housing Needs</subject><subject>Housing Policy</subject><subject>Legal Cases</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Minority Groups</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Nebraska</subject><subject>Neighborhood Integration</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Plaintiffs</subject><subject>Policy Analysis</subject><subject>Policy Implementation</subject><subject>Policy studies</subject><subject>Public Agencies</subject><subject>Public Housing</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Racial Composition</subject><subject>Racial Relations</subject><subject>Racial Segregation</subject><subject>Residential Segregation</subject><subject>Resistance to Change</subject><subject>Social housing</subject><subject>Tenants</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Vouchers</subject><issn>0276-8739</issn><issn>1520-6688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vEzEQhi0EEqFw4M7B4oDEYam_7eVWlbaQhpYDqEfL60w2DvuFvaHNv8fpliAhIQ7jGXueeTXjQeglJe8oIex4cG0OKGWP0IxKRgqljHmMZoRpVRjNy6foWUobQogkJZ2h6rpKo_MNJDz2eAkJ6gi1G0NX42FbNcHjdb9N-foeLyClvku4ARc7WOJV7Fsc2qGBFrr7Cgj1esQ-Q_khq_kIkJ6jJyvXJHjx4I_Qt_Ozr6cfi8X1xafTk0XhJRes8IZJAYaVoA0AlYJrtqSOVuAFkEpxgMqUVPul9EJ7bahzVDquBKuUKwk_Qm8m3SH2P7aQRtuG5KFpXAd5BKuIEqqU_L8gN0JoKkQGX_8Fbvpt7PIQljEmuKKcZujtBPnYpxRhZYcYWhd3lhK734nNO7H3O8nsfGIjDOAP4G2z22SoHu1Pyx1j-djtA0J4dmEfZhuyUV1aWpZ2PbZZ7NUkBjH80Tqba82MMDl9PKVvQwO7fzdlv5x8_t3dg-AmjX08VHDOpGH7_y2mdEgj3B3SLn63SnMt7c3Vhb35IC75JZvbK_4LPJzIpw</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Popkin, Susan J.</creator><creator>Galster, George C.</creator><creator>Temkin, Kenneth</creator><creator>Herbig, Carla</creator><creator>Levy, Diane K.</creator><creator>Richer, Elise K.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscriptions Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>Obstacles to desegregating public housing: Lessons learned from implementing eight consent decrees</title><author>Popkin, Susan J. ; Galster, George C. ; Temkin, Kenneth ; Herbig, Carla ; Levy, Diane K. ; Richer, Elise K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5342-c8254e829e78ee154372d1a1bec4e0b63eeb8917cd5c47c781aa15a3642b6a903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Affordable housing</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Agency Cooperation</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Community Attitudes</topic><topic>Community Change</topic><topic>Compliance (Legal)</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Connecticut</topic><topic>Consent decrees</topic><topic>Consent judgments</topic><topic>Court Litigation</topic><topic>Desegregation</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing discrimination</topic><topic>Housing Needs</topic><topic>Housing Policy</topic><topic>Legal Cases</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Minority Groups</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Nebraska</topic><topic>Neighborhood Integration</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Plaintiffs</topic><topic>Policy Analysis</topic><topic>Policy Implementation</topic><topic>Policy studies</topic><topic>Public Agencies</topic><topic>Public Housing</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Racial Composition</topic><topic>Racial Relations</topic><topic>Racial Segregation</topic><topic>Residential Segregation</topic><topic>Resistance to Change</topic><topic>Social housing</topic><topic>Tenants</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Vouchers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Popkin, Susan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galster, George C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temkin, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbig, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Diane K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richer, Elise K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of policy analysis and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Popkin, Susan J.</au><au>Galster, George C.</au><au>Temkin, Kenneth</au><au>Herbig, Carla</au><au>Levy, Diane K.</au><au>Richer, Elise K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ772848</ericid><atitle>Obstacles to desegregating public housing: Lessons learned from implementing eight consent decrees</atitle><jtitle>Journal of policy analysis and management</jtitle><addtitle>J. Pol. Anal. Manage</addtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>179-199</pages><issn>0276-8739</issn><eissn>1520-6688</eissn><coden>JPAMD7</coden><abstract>Between 1992 and 1996 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) settled a number of legal cases involving housing authorities and agreed to take remedial action as part of court-enforced consent decrees entered into with plaintiffs. These housing authorities faced significant obstacles that impaired their ability to comply swiftly and fully with all of the elements in the desegregation consent decrees. The obstacles fell into two broad categories: contextual obstacles (racial composition of waiting lists and resident populations, lack of affordable rental housing, and inadequate public transportation), and capacity and coordination obstacles (conflict among implementing agencies and ineffective monitoring by HUD). Findings presented here highlight the sizable potential delay between the time a legal remedy is imposed and when plaintiffs in public housing segregation disputes realize any benefits. They also reinforce the argument that implementation problems will be legion when policies impose a significant scope of required changes on a large number of actors who must collaborate, yet are not uniformly capable or sympathetic to the goals being promoted. © 2003 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/pam.10112</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0276-8739 |
ispartof | Journal of policy analysis and management, 2003-04, Vol.22 (2), p.179-199 |
issn | 0276-8739 1520-6688 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60646953 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; RePEc; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Affordable housing African Americans Agency Cooperation Case Studies Community Attitudes Community Change Compliance (Legal) Conflict Connecticut Consent decrees Consent judgments Court Litigation Desegregation Housing Housing discrimination Housing Needs Housing Policy Legal Cases Local government Minnesota Minority Groups Mobility Nebraska Neighborhood Integration Neighborhoods New York Pennsylvania Plaintiffs Policy Analysis Policy Implementation Policy studies Public Agencies Public Housing Public Policy Racial Composition Racial Relations Racial Segregation Residential Segregation Resistance to Change Social housing Tenants Texas Transportation U.S.A United States of America Urban development Vouchers |
title | Obstacles to desegregating public housing: Lessons learned from implementing eight consent decrees |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A38%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Obstacles%20to%20desegregating%20public%20housing:%20Lessons%20learned%20from%20implementing%20eight%20consent%20decrees&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20policy%20analysis%20and%20management&rft.au=Popkin,%20Susan%20J.&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=179-199&rft.issn=0276-8739&rft.eissn=1520-6688&rft.coden=JPAMD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pam.10112&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3325820%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222436131&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ772848&rft_jstor_id=3325820&rfr_iscdi=true |