When does gender count? Further insights into gender schematic processing of female candidates' political advertisements
In this study we explored viewers' responses to advertising by female political candidates. Gender schema theory provided the basis for developing a better understanding of the circumstances when voters evaluate female candidates & how cognitive representations of what women are like influe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sex roles 2004-08, Vol.51 (3-4), p.197-208 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 208 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 197 |
container_title | Sex roles |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | CHINGCHING CHANG HITCHON, Jacqueline C |
description | In this study we explored viewers' responses to advertising by female political candidates. Gender schema theory provided the basis for developing a better understanding of the circumstances when voters evaluate female candidates & how cognitive representations of what women are like influence viewer responses. Results showed general support for the predictions derived from gender schema theory. That is, participants did seem to rely on gender schema in making judgments, a form of inference making known as "default processing," when information was absent. Results also indicated that participants relied more on gender schematic processing when the advertisement elicited positive emotions & less on gender schematic processing when exposed to an attack ad. For comparison, viewers' responses to male candidates' political advertising were also examined. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for political campaigns. 58 References. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/B:SERS.0000037763.47986.c2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60636857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60517246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f679a89bdd28761365a958fe8d0bec1d279b4be0f08f51c13c219fde085f6ce23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtrFDEUx4MouFa_QyioT7PmMpNk-iK2tCoUBKv4GLLJyW7KbGbNyYh-e7O2UvDF83Iu_Di3PyGnnK05E_LN-dnN5eebNTua1FrJda9Ho9ZePCIrPmjZCa3EY7JiUrGOMTE8Jc8QbxvOGetX5Oe3HWQaZkC6hRygUD8vub6lV0upu5amjGm7q9iCOv9l0O9g72ry9FBmD4gpb-kcaWzVCah3OaTgKuBrepin1EA3URd-QKkJYQ-54nPyJLoJ4cW9PyFfry6_XHzorj-9_3jx7rrz0rDaRaVHZ8ZNCMJoxaUa3DiYCCawDXgehB43_QZYZCYO3HPpBR9jAGaGqDwIeUJe3fVtm35fAKvdJ_QwTS7DvKBVTEll2qf-Dw5ci1418PQf8HZeSm5HWCEGqaXshwad3UG-zIgFoj2UtHfll-XMHqWz5_YonX2Qzv6Rzvrjzi_vJzhsn4vFZZ_woYPiXPR9L38DHtScdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225373345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When does gender count? Further insights into gender schematic processing of female candidates' political advertisements</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>CHINGCHING CHANG ; HITCHON, Jacqueline C</creator><creatorcontrib>CHINGCHING CHANG ; HITCHON, Jacqueline C</creatorcontrib><description>In this study we explored viewers' responses to advertising by female political candidates. Gender schema theory provided the basis for developing a better understanding of the circumstances when voters evaluate female candidates & how cognitive representations of what women are like influence viewer responses. Results showed general support for the predictions derived from gender schema theory. That is, participants did seem to rely on gender schema in making judgments, a form of inference making known as "default processing," when information was absent. Results also indicated that participants relied more on gender schematic processing when the advertisement elicited positive emotions & less on gender schematic processing when exposed to an attack ad. For comparison, viewers' responses to male candidates' political advertising were also examined. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for political campaigns. 58 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-0025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000037763.47986.c2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SROLDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Biological and medical sciences ; Candidates ; Cognition & reasoning ; Departments ; Females ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Inferences ; Males ; Political advertising ; Political Campaigns ; Political Candidates ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sex ; Sex Stereotypes ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social psychology ; Voting Behavior ; Women</subject><ispartof>Sex roles, 2004-08, Vol.51 (3-4), p.197-208</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f679a89bdd28761365a958fe8d0bec1d279b4be0f08f51c13c219fde085f6ce23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27901,27902,33751,33752</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16112444$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CHINGCHING CHANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HITCHON, Jacqueline C</creatorcontrib><title>When does gender count? Further insights into gender schematic processing of female candidates' political advertisements</title><title>Sex roles</title><description>In this study we explored viewers' responses to advertising by female political candidates. Gender schema theory provided the basis for developing a better understanding of the circumstances when voters evaluate female candidates & how cognitive representations of what women are like influence viewer responses. Results showed general support for the predictions derived from gender schema theory. That is, participants did seem to rely on gender schema in making judgments, a form of inference making known as "default processing," when information was absent. Results also indicated that participants relied more on gender schematic processing when the advertisement elicited positive emotions & less on gender schematic processing when exposed to an attack ad. For comparison, viewers' responses to male candidates' political advertising were also examined. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for political campaigns. 58 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Inferences</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Political advertising</subject><subject>Political Campaigns</subject><subject>Political Candidates</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex Stereotypes</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0360-0025</issn><issn>1573-2762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtrFDEUx4MouFa_QyioT7PmMpNk-iK2tCoUBKv4GLLJyW7KbGbNyYh-e7O2UvDF83Iu_Di3PyGnnK05E_LN-dnN5eebNTua1FrJda9Ho9ZePCIrPmjZCa3EY7JiUrGOMTE8Jc8QbxvOGetX5Oe3HWQaZkC6hRygUD8vub6lV0upu5amjGm7q9iCOv9l0O9g72ry9FBmD4gpb-kcaWzVCah3OaTgKuBrepin1EA3URd-QKkJYQ-54nPyJLoJ4cW9PyFfry6_XHzorj-9_3jx7rrz0rDaRaVHZ8ZNCMJoxaUa3DiYCCawDXgehB43_QZYZCYO3HPpBR9jAGaGqDwIeUJe3fVtm35fAKvdJ_QwTS7DvKBVTEll2qf-Dw5ci1418PQf8HZeSm5HWCEGqaXshwad3UG-zIgFoj2UtHfll-XMHqWz5_YonX2Qzv6Rzvrjzi_vJzhsn4vFZZ_woYPiXPR9L38DHtScdw</recordid><startdate>20040801</startdate><enddate>20040801</enddate><creator>CHINGCHING CHANG</creator><creator>HITCHON, Jacqueline C</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040801</creationdate><title>When does gender count? Further insights into gender schematic processing of female candidates' political advertisements</title><author>CHINGCHING CHANG ; HITCHON, Jacqueline C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f679a89bdd28761365a958fe8d0bec1d279b4be0f08f51c13c219fde085f6ce23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Inferences</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Political advertising</topic><topic>Political Campaigns</topic><topic>Political Candidates</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex Stereotypes</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CHINGCHING CHANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HITCHON, Jacqueline C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sex roles</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CHINGCHING CHANG</au><au>HITCHON, Jacqueline C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When does gender count? Further insights into gender schematic processing of female candidates' political advertisements</atitle><jtitle>Sex roles</jtitle><date>2004-08-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>197-208</pages><issn>0360-0025</issn><eissn>1573-2762</eissn><coden>SROLDH</coden><abstract>In this study we explored viewers' responses to advertising by female political candidates. Gender schema theory provided the basis for developing a better understanding of the circumstances when voters evaluate female candidates & how cognitive representations of what women are like influence viewer responses. Results showed general support for the predictions derived from gender schema theory. That is, participants did seem to rely on gender schema in making judgments, a form of inference making known as "default processing," when information was absent. Results also indicated that participants relied more on gender schematic processing when the advertisement elicited positive emotions & less on gender schematic processing when exposed to an attack ad. For comparison, viewers' responses to male candidates' political advertising were also examined. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for political campaigns. 58 References. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/B:SERS.0000037763.47986.c2</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-0025 |
ispartof | Sex roles, 2004-08, Vol.51 (3-4), p.197-208 |
issn | 0360-0025 1573-2762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60636857 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Education Source; Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Advertising Biological and medical sciences Candidates Cognition & reasoning Departments Females Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Inferences Males Political advertising Political Campaigns Political Candidates Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Sex Sex Stereotypes Social attribution, perception and cognition Social psychology Voting Behavior Women |
title | When does gender count? Further insights into gender schematic processing of female candidates' political advertisements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T13%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20does%20gender%20count?%20Further%20insights%20into%20gender%20schematic%20processing%20of%20female%20candidates'%20political%20advertisements&rft.jtitle=Sex%20roles&rft.au=CHINGCHING%20CHANG&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=197-208&rft.issn=0360-0025&rft.eissn=1573-2762&rft.coden=SROLDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037763.47986.c2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60517246%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225373345&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |