The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness

The Senate of the United States, we are told, is a “club.” The image, while hopelessly imprecise and occasionally quite misleading, does have at least one advantage: it underscores the fact that there are unwritten but generally accepted and informally enforced norms of conduct in the chamber. These...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American political science review 1959-12, Vol.53 (4), p.1064-1089
1. Verfasser: Matthews, Donald R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1089
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1064
container_title The American political science review
container_volume 53
creator Matthews, Donald R.
description The Senate of the United States, we are told, is a “club.” The image, while hopelessly imprecise and occasionally quite misleading, does have at least one advantage: it underscores the fact that there are unwritten but generally accepted and informally enforced norms of conduct in the chamber. These folkways influence the behavior of senators to a degree and in directions not yet fully understood. “There is great pressure for conformity in the Senate,” one member (mercifully varying the simile) has recently said. “It's just like living in a small town.” And, as in small-town life, so too in the Senate there are occasional careers to be made out of deliberate nonconformity, sometimes only skin-deep, but sometimes quite thorough-going.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1952075
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60628649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_1952075</cupid><jstor_id>1952075</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1952075</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-48942a7dfa9bff1205c4fbee36a88c3c6f9c791244990e26016c75a19d4e6fed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuEzEUhi0EEiEgXoCFJSQQiwF7fGeHojZcIlDVVmJnOZ7jMulkHGwHmrevo0QFddPVufyfzhWhl5S8bxlRH6gRLVHiEZpQwVQjDGeP0YQQwhoiBH-KnuW8qiGhRE-Qu_gF-DQO13_dLuMYcKnx5dgX6PB5cQUyPoex2o94FscQ07ovO1winqe43eDvNZGxGzu8gKs-D670fwCfhAB-742Q83P0JLghw4ujnaLL05OL2edm8WP-ZfZp0XjOVGm4Nrx1qgvOLEOgLRGehyUAk05rz7wMxitDW86NIdBKQqVXwlHTcZABOjZFbw51Nyn-3kIudt1nD8PgRojbbCWRrZbcPAgKQ7RWhD4IMlUpVe87Ra_vgau4TWPd1lJGuNJS6j319kD5FHNOEOwm9WuXdpYSu3-dPb6ukq8O5CqXmP5hd3JzkPtc4OZOdunaSsWUsHJ-Zr-1P-ul5Jn9Wvl3x8ZuvUx9dwX_zXev9S1aR68H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1304786684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Matthews, Donald R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><description>The Senate of the United States, we are told, is a “club.” The image, while hopelessly imprecise and occasionally quite misleading, does have at least one advantage: it underscores the fact that there are unwritten but generally accepted and informally enforced norms of conduct in the chamber. These folkways influence the behavior of senators to a degree and in directions not yet fully understood. “There is great pressure for conformity in the Senate,” one member (mercifully varying the simile) has recently said. “It's just like living in a small town.” And, as in small-town life, so too in the Senate there are occasional careers to be made out of deliberate nonconformity, sometimes only skin-deep, but sometimes quite thorough-going.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0554</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5943</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1952075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Codes of Conduct ; Conformity ; Conservatism ; Folkways ; Governors ; Legislative Bodies ; Legislative power ; Legislators ; Liberalism ; Organizational Behavior ; Peer Relations ; Political behaviour ; Senate ; Senators ; Seniority ; U.S.A ; United States ; United States Senate ; Upper houses ; Voting</subject><ispartof>The American political science review, 1959-12, Vol.53 (4), p.1064-1089</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Political Science Association 1959</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-48942a7dfa9bff1205c4fbee36a88c3c6f9c791244990e26016c75a19d4e6fed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-48942a7dfa9bff1205c4fbee36a88c3c6f9c791244990e26016c75a19d4e6fed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1952075$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1952075$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27869,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness</title><title>The American political science review</title><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><description>The Senate of the United States, we are told, is a “club.” The image, while hopelessly imprecise and occasionally quite misleading, does have at least one advantage: it underscores the fact that there are unwritten but generally accepted and informally enforced norms of conduct in the chamber. These folkways influence the behavior of senators to a degree and in directions not yet fully understood. “There is great pressure for conformity in the Senate,” one member (mercifully varying the simile) has recently said. “It's just like living in a small town.” And, as in small-town life, so too in the Senate there are occasional careers to be made out of deliberate nonconformity, sometimes only skin-deep, but sometimes quite thorough-going.</description><subject>Codes of Conduct</subject><subject>Conformity</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Folkways</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Legislative Bodies</subject><subject>Legislative power</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Organizational Behavior</subject><subject>Peer Relations</subject><subject>Political behaviour</subject><subject>Senate</subject><subject>Senators</subject><subject>Seniority</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Senate</subject><subject>Upper houses</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0003-0554</issn><issn>1537-5943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1959</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuEzEUhi0EEiEgXoCFJSQQiwF7fGeHojZcIlDVVmJnOZ7jMulkHGwHmrevo0QFddPVufyfzhWhl5S8bxlRH6gRLVHiEZpQwVQjDGeP0YQQwhoiBH-KnuW8qiGhRE-Qu_gF-DQO13_dLuMYcKnx5dgX6PB5cQUyPoex2o94FscQ07ovO1winqe43eDvNZGxGzu8gKs-D670fwCfhAB-742Q83P0JLghw4ujnaLL05OL2edm8WP-ZfZp0XjOVGm4Nrx1qgvOLEOgLRGehyUAk05rz7wMxitDW86NIdBKQqVXwlHTcZABOjZFbw51Nyn-3kIudt1nD8PgRojbbCWRrZbcPAgKQ7RWhD4IMlUpVe87Ra_vgau4TWPd1lJGuNJS6j319kD5FHNOEOwm9WuXdpYSu3-dPb6ukq8O5CqXmP5hd3JzkPtc4OZOdunaSsWUsHJ-Zr-1P-ul5Jn9Wvl3x8ZuvUx9dwX_zXev9S1aR68H</recordid><startdate>19591201</startdate><enddate>19591201</enddate><creator>Matthews, Donald R.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>The American Political Science Association</general><general>American Political Science Association</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHXMH</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TP</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHW</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19591201</creationdate><title>The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness</title><author>Matthews, Donald R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-48942a7dfa9bff1205c4fbee36a88c3c6f9c791244990e26016c75a19d4e6fed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1959</creationdate><topic>Codes of Conduct</topic><topic>Conformity</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Folkways</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Legislative Bodies</topic><topic>Legislative power</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Organizational Behavior</topic><topic>Peer Relations</topic><topic>Political behaviour</topic><topic>Senate</topic><topic>Senators</topic><topic>Seniority</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Senate</topic><topic>Upper houses</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 09</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Archive</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS Archive</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matthews, Donald R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness</atitle><jtitle>The American political science review</jtitle><addtitle>Am Polit Sci Rev</addtitle><date>1959-12-01</date><risdate>1959</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1064</spage><epage>1089</epage><pages>1064-1089</pages><issn>0003-0554</issn><eissn>1537-5943</eissn><abstract>The Senate of the United States, we are told, is a “club.” The image, while hopelessly imprecise and occasionally quite misleading, does have at least one advantage: it underscores the fact that there are unwritten but generally accepted and informally enforced norms of conduct in the chamber. These folkways influence the behavior of senators to a degree and in directions not yet fully understood. “There is great pressure for conformity in the Senate,” one member (mercifully varying the simile) has recently said. “It's just like living in a small town.” And, as in small-town life, so too in the Senate there are occasional careers to be made out of deliberate nonconformity, sometimes only skin-deep, but sometimes quite thorough-going.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/1952075</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0554
ispartof The American political science review, 1959-12, Vol.53 (4), p.1064-1089
issn 0003-0554
1537-5943
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60628649
source PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Codes of Conduct
Conformity
Conservatism
Folkways
Governors
Legislative Bodies
Legislative power
Legislators
Liberalism
Organizational Behavior
Peer Relations
Political behaviour
Senate
Senators
Seniority
U.S.A
United States
United States Senate
Upper houses
Voting
title The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A05%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Folkways%20of%20the%20United%20States%20Senate:%20Conformity%20to%20Group%20Norms%20and%20Legislative%20Effectiveness&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=Matthews,%20Donald%20R.&rft.date=1959-12-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1064&rft.epage=1089&rft.pages=1064-1089&rft.issn=0003-0554&rft.eissn=1537-5943&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1952075&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1952075%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1304786684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_1952075&rft_jstor_id=1952075&rfr_iscdi=true