Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index
In this paper, we develop a discourse quality index (DQI) that serves as a quantitative measure of discourse in deliberation. The DQI is rooted in Habermas' discourse ethics and provides an accurate representation of the most important principles underlying deliberation. At the same time, the D...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) Basingstoke, England), 2003-03, Vol.1 (1), p.21-48 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 48 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 21 |
| container_title | Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) |
| container_volume | 1 |
| creator | Steenbergen, Marco R Bächtiger, André Spörndli, Markus Steiner, Jürg |
| description | In this paper, we develop a discourse quality index (DQI) that serves as a quantitative measure of discourse in deliberation. The DQI is rooted in Habermas' discourse ethics and provides an accurate representation of the most important principles underlying deliberation. At the same time, the DQI can be shown to be a reliable measurement instrument due to its focus on observable behavior and its detailed coding instructions. We illustrate the DQI for a parliamentary debate in the British House of Commons. We show that the DQI yields reliable data and we discuss how these data could be used in subsequent analysis. We conclude by discussing some limitations of the DQI and by identifying some areas in which it could prove useful. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60622215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38481714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-488ed65081e586c02a817fcc82c3d3e3b1c6e70db5001b96bad6a77379815a4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wMPiwVvrJNl8rJ5K6xdUVFDwFrLZadmy3V2Trth_b0orggc9ZQ7P-07mIeSUwpCCUBetrebefuDQYTuUlAIA2yM9qlIYcK3f9uOcKjZIVQaH5CiERQQYCOiRqwe0ofNlPU-emqpclc5WyQSrMkdvV2VTXyajZFIG13Q-YPLc2Qitk_u6wM9jcjCzVcCT3dsnrzfXL-O7wfTx9n48mg4cyzZbtcZCCtAUhZYOmNVUzZzTzPGCI8-pk6igyAUAzTOZ20JapbjKNBU2dbxPzre9rW_eOwwrs4wfwqqyNTZdMBIkY4yKf0Gu07iaphE8-wUu4n11PMLEJialpjxC6RZyvgnB48y0vlxavzYUzMa7-fZuonez8x5jYhsL7UYr-p_uP3NfaluJ8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222266813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Steenbergen, Marco R ; Bächtiger, André ; Spörndli, Markus ; Steiner, Jürg</creator><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Marco R ; Bächtiger, André ; Spörndli, Markus ; Steiner, Jürg</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we develop a discourse quality index (DQI) that serves as a quantitative measure of discourse in deliberation. The DQI is rooted in Habermas' discourse ethics and provides an accurate representation of the most important principles underlying deliberation. At the same time, the DQI can be shown to be a reliable measurement instrument due to its focus on observable behavior and its detailed coding instructions. We illustrate the DQI for a parliamentary debate in the British House of Commons. We show that the DQI yields reliable data and we discuss how these data could be used in subsequent analysis. We conclude by discussing some limitations of the DQI and by identifying some areas in which it could prove useful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-388X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Comparative Politics ; Data analysis ; Debate ; Decision making ; Discourse ; Discourse analysis ; Ethics ; European Politics ; Great Britain ; Indexes (Measures) ; International Relations ; Legislative Bodies ; Legislators ; Methodology ; Original Article ; Parliament ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Political theory ; Political thought ; Politics ; Public Finance ; Quantitative Methods ; Studies ; United Kingdom ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2003-03, Vol.1 (1), p.21-48</ispartof><rights>Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2003</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2003 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-488ed65081e586c02a817fcc82c3d3e3b1c6e70db5001b96bad6a77379815a4c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27845,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Marco R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bächtiger, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spörndli, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Jürg</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index</title><title>Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)</title><addtitle>Comp Eur Polit</addtitle><description>In this paper, we develop a discourse quality index (DQI) that serves as a quantitative measure of discourse in deliberation. The DQI is rooted in Habermas' discourse ethics and provides an accurate representation of the most important principles underlying deliberation. At the same time, the DQI can be shown to be a reliable measurement instrument due to its focus on observable behavior and its detailed coding instructions. We illustrate the DQI for a parliamentary debate in the British House of Commons. We show that the DQI yields reliable data and we discuss how these data could be used in subsequent analysis. We conclude by discussing some limitations of the DQI and by identifying some areas in which it could prove useful.</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Comparative Politics</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Debate</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>European Politics</subject><subject>Great Britain</subject><subject>Indexes (Measures)</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>Legislative Bodies</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parliament</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Political thought</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Quantitative Methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1472-4790</issn><issn>1740-388X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_wMPiwVvrJNl8rJ5K6xdUVFDwFrLZadmy3V2Trth_b0orggc9ZQ7P-07mIeSUwpCCUBetrebefuDQYTuUlAIA2yM9qlIYcK3f9uOcKjZIVQaH5CiERQQYCOiRqwe0ofNlPU-emqpclc5WyQSrMkdvV2VTXyajZFIG13Q-YPLc2Qitk_u6wM9jcjCzVcCT3dsnrzfXL-O7wfTx9n48mg4cyzZbtcZCCtAUhZYOmNVUzZzTzPGCI8-pk6igyAUAzTOZ20JapbjKNBU2dbxPzre9rW_eOwwrs4wfwqqyNTZdMBIkY4yKf0Gu07iaphE8-wUu4n11PMLEJialpjxC6RZyvgnB48y0vlxavzYUzMa7-fZuonez8x5jYhsL7UYr-p_uP3NfaluJ8A</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Steenbergen, Marco R</creator><creator>Bächtiger, André</creator><creator>Spörndli, Markus</creator><creator>Steiner, Jürg</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index</title><author>Steenbergen, Marco R ; Bächtiger, André ; Spörndli, Markus ; Steiner, Jürg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-488ed65081e586c02a817fcc82c3d3e3b1c6e70db5001b96bad6a77379815a4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Comparative Politics</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Debate</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>European Politics</topic><topic>Great Britain</topic><topic>Indexes (Measures)</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>Legislative Bodies</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parliament</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Political thought</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Quantitative Methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steenbergen, Marco R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bächtiger, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spörndli, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Jürg</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steenbergen, Marco R</au><au>Bächtiger, André</au><au>Spörndli, Markus</au><au>Steiner, Jürg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index</atitle><jtitle>Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)</jtitle><stitle>Comp Eur Polit</stitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>21-48</pages><issn>1472-4790</issn><eissn>1740-388X</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we develop a discourse quality index (DQI) that serves as a quantitative measure of discourse in deliberation. The DQI is rooted in Habermas' discourse ethics and provides an accurate representation of the most important principles underlying deliberation. At the same time, the DQI can be shown to be a reliable measurement instrument due to its focus on observable behavior and its detailed coding instructions. We illustrate the DQI for a parliamentary debate in the British House of Commons. We show that the DQI yields reliable data and we discuss how these data could be used in subsequent analysis. We conclude by discussing some limitations of the DQI and by identifying some areas in which it could prove useful.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1472-4790 |
| ispartof | Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2003-03, Vol.1 (1), p.21-48 |
| issn | 1472-4790 1740-388X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60622215 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Bargaining Comparative Politics Data analysis Debate Decision making Discourse Discourse analysis Ethics European Politics Great Britain Indexes (Measures) International Relations Legislative Bodies Legislators Methodology Original Article Parliament Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Political theory Political thought Politics Public Finance Quantitative Methods Studies United Kingdom Validity |
| title | Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A06%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Political%20Deliberation:%20A%20Discourse%20Quality%20Index&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20European%20politics%20(Houndmills,%20Basingstoke,%20England)&rft.au=Steenbergen,%20Marco%20R&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=21-48&rft.issn=1472-4790&rft.eissn=1740-388X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38481714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222266813&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |