Regulation and Signaling: When a Tax Is Not Just a Tax
Excise taxes are popular as regulatory policy. This popularity stems in part from their simple disincentive mechanism: higher prices mean less consumption of the regulated item. The size of the disincentive, however, may not be the whole story since governments rarely regulate without sending signal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of politics 2000-08, Vol.62 (3), p.875-885 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 885 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 875 |
container_title | The Journal of politics |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Licari, Michael J. Meier, Kenneth J. |
description | Excise taxes are popular as regulatory policy. This popularity stems in part from their simple disincentive mechanism: higher prices mean less consumption of the regulated item. The size of the disincentive, however, may not be the whole story since governments rarely regulate without sending signals about why the regulation is necessary. This paper integrates signaling into a model designed to test the effectiveness of regulatory policies. By focusing on how signaling can be used in conjunction with more traditional policy analysis models, we offer a more complete understanding of regulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/0022-3816.00037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60591500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1111_0022_3816_00037</cupid><jstor_id>2647964</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2647964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4057-44720f94231e29016b37b2b87b2229c7f52d89df2a29845787896c4fbf59b1b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdnLx6KB2_dkjQ_vcmYujGc6MRjSNu0dnTtTFp0_72ZHRME8R3y4L3vJ3zfF4BzBAfI1xBCjMNIIDaAEEb8APQQYSLEFIpD0Ntvj8GJc0svgUySHmBPJm9L3RR1FegqDZ6LvNJlUeXXweub8bNgoT-DiQse6iaYtq7pJqfgKNOlM2e73gcvt-PF6D6cze8mo5tZmBBIeUgIxzCTBEfIYAkRiyMe41j4B2OZ8IziVMg0wxpLQSgXXEiWkCzOqIxRTKM-uOr-Xdv6vTWuUavCJaYsdWXq1ikGqUTU39sHl7-Ey7q1_hSnMCKScigiLxp2osTWzlmTqbUtVtpuFIJqG6LaxqS2ManvED1BOuKjKM3mP7mazh_nHXbRYUvX1HaPYUa4ZMSv0c6HXsW2SHPz4_YvJ1_opocc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214957083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regulation and Signaling: When a Tax Is Not Just a Tax</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Licari, Michael J. ; Meier, Kenneth J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Licari, Michael J. ; Meier, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><description>Excise taxes are popular as regulatory policy. This popularity stems in part from their simple disincentive mechanism: higher prices mean less consumption of the regulated item. The size of the disincentive, however, may not be the whole story since governments rarely regulate without sending signals about why the regulation is necessary. This paper integrates signaling into a model designed to test the effectiveness of regulatory policies. By focusing on how signaling can be used in conjunction with more traditional policy analysis models, we offer a more complete understanding of regulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3816</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/0022-3816.00037</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPOLA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cigarette smoking ; Cigarettes ; Commercial regulation ; Consumption ; Economic policy ; Excise taxes ; Government Regulation ; Incentives ; Original Articles ; Policy Analysis ; Political regulation ; Price increases ; Regulation ; Research Notes ; Tax policy ; Taxation ; Tobacco taxes</subject><ispartof>The Journal of politics, 2000-08, Vol.62 (3), p.875-885</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Southern Political Science Association 2000</rights><rights>Copyright 2000 Southern Political Science Association</rights><rights>Southern Political Science Association 2000</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Aug 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4057-44720f94231e29016b37b2b87b2229c7f52d89df2a29845787896c4fbf59b1b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4057-44720f94231e29016b37b2b87b2229c7f52d89df2a29845787896c4fbf59b1b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2647964$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2647964$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Licari, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><title>Regulation and Signaling: When a Tax Is Not Just a Tax</title><title>The Journal of politics</title><addtitle>J of Pol</addtitle><description>Excise taxes are popular as regulatory policy. This popularity stems in part from their simple disincentive mechanism: higher prices mean less consumption of the regulated item. The size of the disincentive, however, may not be the whole story since governments rarely regulate without sending signals about why the regulation is necessary. This paper integrates signaling into a model designed to test the effectiveness of regulatory policies. By focusing on how signaling can be used in conjunction with more traditional policy analysis models, we offer a more complete understanding of regulation.</description><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Commercial regulation</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Excise taxes</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Policy Analysis</subject><subject>Political regulation</subject><subject>Price increases</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Research Notes</subject><subject>Tax policy</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Tobacco taxes</subject><issn>0022-3816</issn><issn>1468-2508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdnLx6KB2_dkjQ_vcmYujGc6MRjSNu0dnTtTFp0_72ZHRME8R3y4L3vJ3zfF4BzBAfI1xBCjMNIIDaAEEb8APQQYSLEFIpD0Ntvj8GJc0svgUySHmBPJm9L3RR1FegqDZ6LvNJlUeXXweub8bNgoT-DiQse6iaYtq7pJqfgKNOlM2e73gcvt-PF6D6cze8mo5tZmBBIeUgIxzCTBEfIYAkRiyMe41j4B2OZ8IziVMg0wxpLQSgXXEiWkCzOqIxRTKM-uOr-Xdv6vTWuUavCJaYsdWXq1ikGqUTU39sHl7-Ey7q1_hSnMCKScigiLxp2osTWzlmTqbUtVtpuFIJqG6LaxqS2ManvED1BOuKjKM3mP7mazh_nHXbRYUvX1HaPYUa4ZMSv0c6HXsW2SHPz4_YvJ1_opocc</recordid><startdate>200008</startdate><enddate>200008</enddate><creator>Licari, Michael J.</creator><creator>Meier, Kenneth J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>University of Texas Press</general><general>Blackwell Publishers, Inc</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200008</creationdate><title>Regulation and Signaling: When a Tax Is Not Just a Tax</title><author>Licari, Michael J. ; Meier, Kenneth J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4057-44720f94231e29016b37b2b87b2229c7f52d89df2a29845787896c4fbf59b1b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Commercial regulation</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Excise taxes</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Policy Analysis</topic><topic>Political regulation</topic><topic>Price increases</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Research Notes</topic><topic>Tax policy</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Tobacco taxes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Licari, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Licari, Michael J.</au><au>Meier, Kenneth J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regulation and Signaling: When a Tax Is Not Just a Tax</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of politics</jtitle><addtitle>J of Pol</addtitle><date>2000-08</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>875</spage><epage>885</epage><pages>875-885</pages><issn>0022-3816</issn><eissn>1468-2508</eissn><coden>JPOLA3</coden><abstract>Excise taxes are popular as regulatory policy. This popularity stems in part from their simple disincentive mechanism: higher prices mean less consumption of the regulated item. The size of the disincentive, however, may not be the whole story since governments rarely regulate without sending signals about why the regulation is necessary. This paper integrates signaling into a model designed to test the effectiveness of regulatory policies. By focusing on how signaling can be used in conjunction with more traditional policy analysis models, we offer a more complete understanding of regulation.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1111/0022-3816.00037</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3816 |
ispartof | The Journal of politics, 2000-08, Vol.62 (3), p.875-885 |
issn | 0022-3816 1468-2508 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60591500 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Cigarette smoking Cigarettes Commercial regulation Consumption Economic policy Excise taxes Government Regulation Incentives Original Articles Policy Analysis Political regulation Price increases Regulation Research Notes Tax policy Taxation Tobacco taxes |
title | Regulation and Signaling: When a Tax Is Not Just a Tax |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A03%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regulation%20and%20Signaling:%20When%20a%20Tax%20Is%20Not%20Just%20a%20Tax&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20politics&rft.au=Licari,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2000-08&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=875&rft.epage=885&rft.pages=875-885&rft.issn=0022-3816&rft.eissn=1468-2508&rft.coden=JPOLA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/0022-3816.00037&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2647964%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214957083&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1111_0022_3816_00037&rft_jstor_id=2647964&rfr_iscdi=true |