Measuring Religion: Two Methods Compared

Measuring Religion: Two Methods Compared

Measurement of religion is very difficult. Usual measurement by answer to predetermined questions is compared with a subjective technique called TST, where a person is evaluated for religious factors among other rapid responses to a very subjective question. Very little relation between the 2 tests...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review of religious research 1962-01, Vol.3 (4), p.159-165
1. Verfasser: Vernon, Glen M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Christianity
Church attendance
College students
Measure/Measures/Measuring/ Measurement
Method/Methods (see also Methodology)
On campus students
Religion
Religion/Religions/Religious
Religiosity
Research methods
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 4
container_start_page 159
container_title Review of religious research
container_volume 3
creator Vernon, Glen M.
description Measurement of religion is very difficult. Usual measurement by answer to predetermined questions is compared with a subjective technique called TST, where a person is evaluated for religious factors among other rapid responses to a very subjective question. Very little relation between the 2 tests was found, possibly because of a distinction between private & public religion. RTA.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3510446
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60582518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3510446</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3510446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1308-446656cb03830fb3ab91c30e213d7e42b3564458f9869e76557cfc8474403a2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1z81KxDAUBeAsFBxH8RW6EHVTvclN0tSdlPEHZhBkBHclTdOxQ9vUpEV8eyudrauz-TiHQ8gFhVuGkNyhoMC5PCILAOSxTPDjhJyGsAdgyDlbkJuN1WH0dbeL3mxT72rX3Ufbbxdt7PDpyhBlru21t-UZOa50E-z5IZfk_XG1zZ7j9evTS_awjg1FUPG0JoU0BaBCqArURUoNgmUUy8RyVqCQnAtVpUqmNpFCJKYyiiecA2pW4pJczb29d1-jDUPe1sHYptGddWPIJQjFBFUTvJ6h8S4Eb6u893Wr_U9OIf97nx_eT_JylvswOP8v-wVQd1Yj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60582518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Religion: Two Methods Compared</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Vernon, Glen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Glen M.</creatorcontrib><description>Measurement of religion is very difficult. Usual measurement by answer to predetermined questions is compared with a subjective technique called TST, where a person is evaluated for religious factors among other rapid responses to a very subjective question. Very little relation between the 2 tests was found, possibly because of a distinction between private &amp; public religion. RTA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-673X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3510446</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RVRRAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Religious Research Association</publisher><subject>Christianity ; Church attendance ; College students ; Measure/Measures/Measuring/ Measurement ; Method/Methods (see also Methodology) ; On campus students ; Religion ; Religion/Religions/Religious ; Religiosity ; Research methods</subject><ispartof>Review of religious research, 1962-01, Vol.3 (4), p.159-165</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1962 Religious Research Association, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1308-446656cb03830fb3ab91c30e213d7e42b3564458f9869e76557cfc8474403a2d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3510446$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3510446$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,33756,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Glen M.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Religion: Two Methods Compared</title><title>Review of religious research</title><description>Measurement of religion is very difficult. Usual measurement by answer to predetermined questions is compared with a subjective technique called TST, where a person is evaluated for religious factors among other rapid responses to a very subjective question. Very little relation between the 2 tests was found, possibly because of a distinction between private &amp; public religion. RTA.</description><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Church attendance</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Measure/Measures/Measuring/ Measurement</subject><subject>Method/Methods (see also Methodology)</subject><subject>On campus students</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion/Religions/Religious</subject><subject>Religiosity</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><issn>0034-673X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1962</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1z81KxDAUBeAsFBxH8RW6EHVTvclN0tSdlPEHZhBkBHclTdOxQ9vUpEV8eyudrauz-TiHQ8gFhVuGkNyhoMC5PCILAOSxTPDjhJyGsAdgyDlbkJuN1WH0dbeL3mxT72rX3Ufbbxdt7PDpyhBlru21t-UZOa50E-z5IZfk_XG1zZ7j9evTS_awjg1FUPG0JoU0BaBCqArURUoNgmUUy8RyVqCQnAtVpUqmNpFCJKYyiiecA2pW4pJczb29d1-jDUPe1sHYptGddWPIJQjFBFUTvJ6h8S4Eb6u893Wr_U9OIf97nx_eT_JylvswOP8v-wVQd1Yj</recordid><startdate>19620101</startdate><enddate>19620101</enddate><creator>Vernon, Glen M.</creator><general>Religious Research Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19620101</creationdate><title>Measuring Religion: Two Methods Compared</title><author>Vernon, Glen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1308-446656cb03830fb3ab91c30e213d7e42b3564458f9869e76557cfc8474403a2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1962</creationdate><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Church attendance</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Measure/Measures/Measuring/ Measurement</topic><topic>Method/Methods (see also Methodology)</topic><topic>On campus students</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion/Religions/Religious</topic><topic>Religiosity</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Glen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Review of religious research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vernon, Glen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Religion: Two Methods Compared</atitle><jtitle>Review of religious research</jtitle><date>1962-01-01</date><risdate>1962</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>159-165</pages><issn>0034-673X</issn><coden>RVRRAU</coden><abstract>Measurement of religion is very difficult. Usual measurement by answer to predetermined questions is compared with a subjective technique called TST, where a person is evaluated for religious factors among other rapid responses to a very subjective question. Very little relation between the 2 tests was found, possibly because of a distinction between private &amp; public religion. RTA.</abstract><pub>Religious Research Association</pub><doi>10.2307/3510446</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-673X
ispartof Review of religious research, 1962-01, Vol.3 (4), p.159-165
issn 0034-673X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60582518
source Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR
subjects Christianity
Church attendance
College students
Measure/Measures/Measuring/ Measurement
Method/Methods (see also Methodology)
On campus students
Religion
Religion/Religions/Religious
Religiosity
Research methods
title Measuring Religion: Two Methods Compared
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T15%3A11%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Religion:%20Two%20Methods%20Compared&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20religious%20research&rft.au=Vernon,%20Glen%20M.&rft.date=1962-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=159-165&rft.issn=0034-673X&rft.coden=RVRRAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3510446&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3510446%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60582518&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3510446&rfr_iscdi=true