Auditor Independence, Accounting Firms, and the Securities and Exchange Commission: Application of the Issue Life Cycle Model
The authors apply the issue life cycle model to analyze the 1999 through 2001 dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the accounting profession concerning auditor independence. The analysis also brings additional insights that extend understanding of the issue life cycle and issue...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Business & society 2003-03, Vol.42 (1), p.83-114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 114 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 83 |
container_title | Business & society |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Gerde, Virginia W. White, Craig G. |
description | The authors apply the issue life cycle model to analyze the 1999 through 2001 dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the accounting profession concerning auditor independence. The analysis also brings additional insights that extend understanding of the issue life cycle and issues development. This analysis highlights the roles of a trigger event, the shift of an issue from a technical concern to a public debate, and likely recurrence. The reappearance of the auditor independence issue in 2002 with accounting scandals is consistent with the article’s findings and highlights the use of the issue life cycle model and issue evolution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0007650302250504 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60556838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0007650302250504</sage_id><sourcerecordid>60465546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1414-18573456bd559c843629fbd24eaa918c4ed2c2ab873d4009ba275e9220eb4dbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3j3vy1NVJNh-7x1KqFgqCH-clm0zblG5Sk13Q_96t9SQIXmZg3u8NM4-Qawq3lCp1BwBKCiiAMQEC-AkZUSFYzhmIUzI6yPlBPycXKW0BKGNSjcjztLeuCzFbeIt7HIo3OMmmxoTed86vs3sX2zTJtLdZt8HsBU0fXecwfY_mH2aj_RqzWWhbl5IL_pKcrfQu4dVPH5O3-_nr7DFfPj0sZtNlbiinPKelUAUXsrFCVKbkhWTVqrGMo9YVLQ1HywzTTakKywGqRjMlsGIMsOG2scWY3Bz37mN47zF19XCAwd1Oewx9qiUIIcui_AfIpRBcDiAcQRNDShFX9T66VsfPmkJ9SLn-nfJgyY-WpNdYb0Mf_fDz3_wXd1d68g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60465546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Auditor Independence, Accounting Firms, and the Securities and Exchange Commission: Application of the Issue Life Cycle Model</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Gerde, Virginia W. ; White, Craig G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gerde, Virginia W. ; White, Craig G.</creatorcontrib><description>The authors apply the issue life cycle model to analyze the 1999 through 2001 dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the accounting profession concerning auditor independence. The analysis also brings additional insights that extend understanding of the issue life cycle and issues development. This analysis highlights the roles of a trigger event, the shift of an issue from a technical concern to a public debate, and likely recurrence. The reappearance of the auditor independence issue in 2002 with accounting scandals is consistent with the article’s findings and highlights the use of the issue life cycle model and issue evolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6503</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0007650302250504</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BUSOBE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Government Regulation ; Scandals</subject><ispartof>Business & society, 2003-03, Vol.42 (1), p.83-114</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1414-18573456bd559c843629fbd24eaa918c4ed2c2ab873d4009ba275e9220eb4dbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0007650302250504$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0007650302250504$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,33754,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gerde, Virginia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Craig G.</creatorcontrib><title>Auditor Independence, Accounting Firms, and the Securities and Exchange Commission: Application of the Issue Life Cycle Model</title><title>Business & society</title><description>The authors apply the issue life cycle model to analyze the 1999 through 2001 dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the accounting profession concerning auditor independence. The analysis also brings additional insights that extend understanding of the issue life cycle and issues development. This analysis highlights the roles of a trigger event, the shift of an issue from a technical concern to a public debate, and likely recurrence. The reappearance of the auditor independence issue in 2002 with accounting scandals is consistent with the article’s findings and highlights the use of the issue life cycle model and issue evolution.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><issn>0007-6503</issn><issn>1552-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3j3vy1NVJNh-7x1KqFgqCH-clm0zblG5Sk13Q_96t9SQIXmZg3u8NM4-Qawq3lCp1BwBKCiiAMQEC-AkZUSFYzhmIUzI6yPlBPycXKW0BKGNSjcjztLeuCzFbeIt7HIo3OMmmxoTed86vs3sX2zTJtLdZt8HsBU0fXecwfY_mH2aj_RqzWWhbl5IL_pKcrfQu4dVPH5O3-_nr7DFfPj0sZtNlbiinPKelUAUXsrFCVKbkhWTVqrGMo9YVLQ1HywzTTakKywGqRjMlsGIMsOG2scWY3Bz37mN47zF19XCAwd1Oewx9qiUIIcui_AfIpRBcDiAcQRNDShFX9T66VsfPmkJ9SLn-nfJgyY-WpNdYb0Mf_fDz3_wXd1d68g</recordid><startdate>200303</startdate><enddate>200303</enddate><creator>Gerde, Virginia W.</creator><creator>White, Craig G.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200303</creationdate><title>Auditor Independence, Accounting Firms, and the Securities and Exchange Commission</title><author>Gerde, Virginia W. ; White, Craig G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1414-18573456bd559c843629fbd24eaa918c4ed2c2ab873d4009ba275e9220eb4dbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gerde, Virginia W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Craig G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Business & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gerde, Virginia W.</au><au>White, Craig G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Auditor Independence, Accounting Firms, and the Securities and Exchange Commission: Application of the Issue Life Cycle Model</atitle><jtitle>Business & society</jtitle><date>2003-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>83-114</pages><issn>0007-6503</issn><eissn>1552-4205</eissn><coden>BUSOBE</coden><abstract>The authors apply the issue life cycle model to analyze the 1999 through 2001 dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the accounting profession concerning auditor independence. The analysis also brings additional insights that extend understanding of the issue life cycle and issues development. This analysis highlights the roles of a trigger event, the shift of an issue from a technical concern to a public debate, and likely recurrence. The reappearance of the auditor independence issue in 2002 with accounting scandals is consistent with the article’s findings and highlights the use of the issue life cycle model and issue evolution.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0007650302250504</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-6503 |
ispartof | Business & society, 2003-03, Vol.42 (1), p.83-114 |
issn | 0007-6503 1552-4205 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60556838 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Accounting Government Regulation Scandals |
title | Auditor Independence, Accounting Firms, and the Securities and Exchange Commission: Application of the Issue Life Cycle Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Auditor%20Independence,%20Accounting%20Firms,%20and%20the%20Securities%20and%20Exchange%20Commission:%20Application%20of%20the%20Issue%20Life%20Cycle%20Model&rft.jtitle=Business%20&%20society&rft.au=Gerde,%20Virginia%20W.&rft.date=2003-03&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=83-114&rft.issn=0007-6503&rft.eissn=1552-4205&rft.coden=BUSOBE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0007650302250504&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60465546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60465546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0007650302250504&rfr_iscdi=true |