Political Competition and Voter Mobility

The existing model of political competition is extended to allow voters to live in different regions and to migrate between regions in response to an inter-regional transfer policy. We then show that regions have a different "weight" in the expected vote function of political parties. This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public choice 2000-12, Vol.105 (3/4), p.231-243
1. Verfasser: Petchey, Jeffrey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 243
container_issue 3/4
container_start_page 231
container_title Public choice
container_volume 105
creator Petchey, Jeffrey
description The existing model of political competition is extended to allow voters to live in different regions and to migrate between regions in response to an inter-regional transfer policy. We then show that regions have a different "weight" in the expected vote function of political parties. This gives parties an incentive to bias the transfer policy in favour of relatively high weight regions, with potentially adverse efficiency and equity effects. However, we then show that parties always propose efficient and equitable regional transfers, regardless of whether regions have different weights, if there is some mobility of citizens across regions. Mobility constrains parties to act efficiently and equitably even though they face an incentive to act otherwise. However, when voters are immobile political competition leads to inequitable though efficient outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1005189715272
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60551360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>30026393</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30026393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-956bf04933669547014f1fed95b1b409a911a5d6d43c0982be64b5849c36c7af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0L1LxEAQBfBFFDxPayshWIhNdGZnP-2Owy840UJtwybZQI5cNmZzxf33t3BWNlbDgx8P3jB2iXCHwOl-8YAAEo3VKLnmR2yGUlOuEfCYzQCEyaXh9pSdxbgGAFJGztjtR-jaqa1cly3DZvBTCqHPXF9n32HyY_YWyjaJ3Tk7aVwX_cXvnbOvp8fP5Uu-en9-XS5WeUWaT7mVqmxAWCKlrBQaUDTY-NrKEksB1llEJ2tVC6rAGl56JUpphK1IVdo1NGc3h95hDD9bH6di08bKd53rfdjGQoGUSAr-hWSsAsN1gtd_4Dpsxz6NKDhotOkRPKGrA1rHKYzFMLYbN-4KAuCK0po9q75lOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207193682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Political Competition and Voter Mobility</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Petchey, Jeffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Petchey, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><description>The existing model of political competition is extended to allow voters to live in different regions and to migrate between regions in response to an inter-regional transfer policy. We then show that regions have a different "weight" in the expected vote function of political parties. This gives parties an incentive to bias the transfer policy in favour of relatively high weight regions, with potentially adverse efficiency and equity effects. However, we then show that parties always propose efficient and equitable regional transfers, regardless of whether regions have different weights, if there is some mobility of citizens across regions. Mobility constrains parties to act efficiently and equitably even though they face an incentive to act otherwise. However, when voters are immobile political competition leads to inequitable though efficient outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1005189715272</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PUCHBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Candidates ; Competition ; Economic competition ; Economic models ; Economic regions ; Efficiency ; Elections ; Electoral systems ; Equilibrium ; Equity ; Federalism ; Game Theory ; Geographic Mobility ; Geographic regions ; Government ; Mobility ; Per capita ; Political behavior ; Political candidates ; Political Parties ; Political theory ; Politics ; Preferences ; Provincial government ; Public Policy ; Rational choice ; Regional government ; Regions ; Regulatory competition ; Studies ; Utility functions ; Voters ; Voting ; Voting Behavior ; Voting behaviour</subject><ispartof>Public choice, 2000-12, Vol.105 (3/4), p.231-243</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-956bf04933669547014f1fed95b1b409a911a5d6d43c0982be64b5849c36c7af3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30026393$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30026393$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12845,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petchey, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><title>Political Competition and Voter Mobility</title><title>Public choice</title><description>The existing model of political competition is extended to allow voters to live in different regions and to migrate between regions in response to an inter-regional transfer policy. We then show that regions have a different "weight" in the expected vote function of political parties. This gives parties an incentive to bias the transfer policy in favour of relatively high weight regions, with potentially adverse efficiency and equity effects. However, we then show that parties always propose efficient and equitable regional transfers, regardless of whether regions have different weights, if there is some mobility of citizens across regions. Mobility constrains parties to act efficiently and equitably even though they face an incentive to act otherwise. However, when voters are immobile political competition leads to inequitable though efficient outcomes.</description><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Economic competition</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic regions</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral systems</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Federalism</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Geographic Mobility</subject><subject>Geographic regions</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>Political Parties</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Provincial government</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Rational choice</subject><subject>Regional government</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Regulatory competition</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Utility functions</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting Behavior</subject><subject>Voting behaviour</subject><issn>0048-5829</issn><issn>1573-7101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0L1LxEAQBfBFFDxPayshWIhNdGZnP-2Owy840UJtwybZQI5cNmZzxf33t3BWNlbDgx8P3jB2iXCHwOl-8YAAEo3VKLnmR2yGUlOuEfCYzQCEyaXh9pSdxbgGAFJGztjtR-jaqa1cly3DZvBTCqHPXF9n32HyY_YWyjaJ3Tk7aVwX_cXvnbOvp8fP5Uu-en9-XS5WeUWaT7mVqmxAWCKlrBQaUDTY-NrKEksB1llEJ2tVC6rAGl56JUpphK1IVdo1NGc3h95hDD9bH6di08bKd53rfdjGQoGUSAr-hWSsAsN1gtd_4Dpsxz6NKDhotOkRPKGrA1rHKYzFMLYbN-4KAuCK0po9q75lOQ</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Petchey, Jeffrey</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>Political Competition and Voter Mobility</title><author>Petchey, Jeffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-956bf04933669547014f1fed95b1b409a911a5d6d43c0982be64b5849c36c7af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Economic competition</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic regions</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral systems</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Federalism</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Geographic Mobility</topic><topic>Geographic regions</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>Political Parties</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Provincial government</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Rational choice</topic><topic>Regional government</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Regulatory competition</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Utility functions</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting Behavior</topic><topic>Voting behaviour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petchey, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petchey, Jeffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Political Competition and Voter Mobility</atitle><jtitle>Public choice</jtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>3/4</issue><spage>231</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>231-243</pages><issn>0048-5829</issn><eissn>1573-7101</eissn><coden>PUCHBX</coden><abstract>The existing model of political competition is extended to allow voters to live in different regions and to migrate between regions in response to an inter-regional transfer policy. We then show that regions have a different "weight" in the expected vote function of political parties. This gives parties an incentive to bias the transfer policy in favour of relatively high weight regions, with potentially adverse efficiency and equity effects. However, we then show that parties always propose efficient and equitable regional transfers, regardless of whether regions have different weights, if there is some mobility of citizens across regions. Mobility constrains parties to act efficiently and equitably even though they face an incentive to act otherwise. However, when voters are immobile political competition leads to inequitable though efficient outcomes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1005189715272</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5829
ispartof Public choice, 2000-12, Vol.105 (3/4), p.231-243
issn 0048-5829
1573-7101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60551360
source SpringerLink Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Political Science Complete
subjects Candidates
Competition
Economic competition
Economic models
Economic regions
Efficiency
Elections
Electoral systems
Equilibrium
Equity
Federalism
Game Theory
Geographic Mobility
Geographic regions
Government
Mobility
Per capita
Political behavior
Political candidates
Political Parties
Political theory
Politics
Preferences
Provincial government
Public Policy
Rational choice
Regional government
Regions
Regulatory competition
Studies
Utility functions
Voters
Voting
Voting Behavior
Voting behaviour
title Political Competition and Voter Mobility
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A16%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Political%20Competition%20and%20Voter%20Mobility&rft.jtitle=Public%20choice&rft.au=Petchey,%20Jeffrey&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=3/4&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=231-243&rft.issn=0048-5829&rft.eissn=1573-7101&rft.coden=PUCHBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1005189715272&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30026393%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207193682&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=30026393&rfr_iscdi=true