Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons

Editorial cartoons contribute to candidate image development by offering condensed & simplified metaphoric portrayals. This study identifies the rhetorical fantasia advanced by cartoonists in their metaphors about Al Gore & George Bush through five themes of leadership during the early month...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) 2001-08, Vol.44 (12), p.2040-2151
1. Verfasser: Edwards, Janis L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2151
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2040
container_title The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)
container_volume 44
creator Edwards, Janis L
description Editorial cartoons contribute to candidate image development by offering condensed & simplified metaphoric portrayals. This study identifies the rhetorical fantasia advanced by cartoonists in their metaphors about Al Gore & George Bush through five themes of leadership during the early months of Campaign 2000: character, competence, viability, independence, & charisma. The cartoons reflected overall campaign strategies by attaching character issues to Gore & competence issues to Bush. However, the campaign was overshadowed by the outside influence of preceding presidents, calling into question the independence of the candidates, which may have fueled the ambivalent results of the election. 66 References. Adapted from the source document.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60543623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60402777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p623-e6d27e17c17a0849340d34ef768a474b186a1ae5b7bf27385b8c3551b27237e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzctKxDAUxvEsFBxH36Erd4U0txPdSRkvMCKMsx9Om9NppJPUJsXXt14ewNXhDz--c8ZWnHNRglHigl2m9L4kBy1WbLebQ_DhWPhQ5J6Ktx5d_EzfWeNpRH8MhVjw3ZLBeYeZihfKOPZx-lEb53OcPA4LmHKMIV2x8w6HRNd_d832D5t9_VRuXx-f6_ttORohSzJOAFXQVoDcqlupuJOKOjAWFaimsgYrJN1A0wmQVje2lVpXjQAhgZRcs5vf2XGKHzOlfDj51NIwYKA4p4PhWsnl0z-g4gIA5Bc1J1co</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60402777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Edwards, Janis L</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Janis L</creatorcontrib><description>Editorial cartoons contribute to candidate image development by offering condensed &amp; simplified metaphoric portrayals. This study identifies the rhetorical fantasia advanced by cartoonists in their metaphors about Al Gore &amp; George Bush through five themes of leadership during the early months of Campaign 2000: character, competence, viability, independence, &amp; charisma. The cartoons reflected overall campaign strategies by attaching character issues to Gore &amp; competence issues to Bush. However, the campaign was overshadowed by the outside influence of preceding presidents, calling into question the independence of the candidates, which may have fueled the ambivalent results of the election. 66 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7642</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Candidates ; Cartoons ; Elections ; Metaphors ; Political Campaigns ; Presidents ; Rhetoric ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills), 2001-08, Vol.44 (12), p.2040-2151</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Janis L</creatorcontrib><title>Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons</title><title>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</title><description>Editorial cartoons contribute to candidate image development by offering condensed &amp; simplified metaphoric portrayals. This study identifies the rhetorical fantasia advanced by cartoonists in their metaphors about Al Gore &amp; George Bush through five themes of leadership during the early months of Campaign 2000: character, competence, viability, independence, &amp; charisma. The cartoons reflected overall campaign strategies by attaching character issues to Gore &amp; competence issues to Bush. However, the campaign was overshadowed by the outside influence of preceding presidents, calling into question the independence of the candidates, which may have fueled the ambivalent results of the election. 66 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Cartoons</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Metaphors</subject><subject>Political Campaigns</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0002-7642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzctKxDAUxvEsFBxH36Erd4U0txPdSRkvMCKMsx9Om9NppJPUJsXXt14ewNXhDz--c8ZWnHNRglHigl2m9L4kBy1WbLebQ_DhWPhQ5J6Ktx5d_EzfWeNpRH8MhVjw3ZLBeYeZihfKOPZx-lEb53OcPA4LmHKMIV2x8w6HRNd_d832D5t9_VRuXx-f6_ttORohSzJOAFXQVoDcqlupuJOKOjAWFaimsgYrJN1A0wmQVje2lVpXjQAhgZRcs5vf2XGKHzOlfDj51NIwYKA4p4PhWsnl0z-g4gIA5Bc1J1co</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Edwards, Janis L</creator><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons</title><author>Edwards, Janis L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p623-e6d27e17c17a0849340d34ef768a474b186a1ae5b7bf27385b8c3551b27237e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Cartoons</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Metaphors</topic><topic>Political Campaigns</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Janis L</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Janis L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons</atitle><jtitle>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</jtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2040</spage><epage>2151</epage><pages>2040-2151</pages><issn>0002-7642</issn><abstract>Editorial cartoons contribute to candidate image development by offering condensed &amp; simplified metaphoric portrayals. This study identifies the rhetorical fantasia advanced by cartoonists in their metaphors about Al Gore &amp; George Bush through five themes of leadership during the early months of Campaign 2000: character, competence, viability, independence, &amp; charisma. The cartoons reflected overall campaign strategies by attaching character issues to Gore &amp; competence issues to Bush. However, the campaign was overshadowed by the outside influence of preceding presidents, calling into question the independence of the candidates, which may have fueled the ambivalent results of the election. 66 References. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><tpages>112</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7642
ispartof The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills), 2001-08, Vol.44 (12), p.2040-2151
issn 0002-7642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60543623
source Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Candidates
Cartoons
Elections
Metaphors
Political Campaigns
Presidents
Rhetoric
United States of America
title Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A02%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Running%20in%20the%20Shadows%20in%20Campaign%202000:%20Candidate%20Metaphors%20in%20Editorial%20Cartoons&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20behavioral%20scientist%20(Beverly%20Hills)&rft.au=Edwards,%20Janis%20L&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2040&rft.epage=2151&rft.pages=2040-2151&rft.issn=0002-7642&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60402777%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60402777&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true