Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons
Editorial cartoons contribute to candidate image development by offering condensed & simplified metaphoric portrayals. This study identifies the rhetorical fantasia advanced by cartoonists in their metaphors about Al Gore & George Bush through five themes of leadership during the early month...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) 2001-08, Vol.44 (12), p.2040-2151 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2151 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2040 |
container_title | The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Edwards, Janis L |
description | Editorial cartoons contribute to candidate image development by offering condensed & simplified metaphoric portrayals. This study identifies the rhetorical fantasia advanced by cartoonists in their metaphors about Al Gore & George Bush through five themes of leadership during the early months of Campaign 2000: character, competence, viability, independence, & charisma. The cartoons reflected overall campaign strategies by attaching character issues to Gore & competence issues to Bush. However, the campaign was overshadowed by the outside influence of preceding presidents, calling into question the independence of the candidates, which may have fueled the ambivalent results of the election. 66 References. Adapted from the source document. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60543623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60402777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p623-e6d27e17c17a0849340d34ef768a474b186a1ae5b7bf27385b8c3551b27237e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzctKxDAUxvEsFBxH36Erd4U0txPdSRkvMCKMsx9Om9NppJPUJsXXt14ewNXhDz--c8ZWnHNRglHigl2m9L4kBy1WbLebQ_DhWPhQ5J6Ktx5d_EzfWeNpRH8MhVjw3ZLBeYeZihfKOPZx-lEb53OcPA4LmHKMIV2x8w6HRNd_d832D5t9_VRuXx-f6_ttORohSzJOAFXQVoDcqlupuJOKOjAWFaimsgYrJN1A0wmQVje2lVpXjQAhgZRcs5vf2XGKHzOlfDj51NIwYKA4p4PhWsnl0z-g4gIA5Bc1J1co</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60402777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Edwards, Janis L</creator><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Janis L</creatorcontrib><description>Editorial cartoons contribute to candidate image development by offering condensed & simplified metaphoric portrayals. This study identifies the rhetorical fantasia advanced by cartoonists in their metaphors about Al Gore & George Bush through five themes of leadership during the early months of Campaign 2000: character, competence, viability, independence, & charisma. The cartoons reflected overall campaign strategies by attaching character issues to Gore & competence issues to Bush. However, the campaign was overshadowed by the outside influence of preceding presidents, calling into question the independence of the candidates, which may have fueled the ambivalent results of the election. 66 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7642</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Candidates ; Cartoons ; Elections ; Metaphors ; Political Campaigns ; Presidents ; Rhetoric ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills), 2001-08, Vol.44 (12), p.2040-2151</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Janis L</creatorcontrib><title>Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons</title><title>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</title><description>Editorial cartoons contribute to candidate image development by offering condensed & simplified metaphoric portrayals. This study identifies the rhetorical fantasia advanced by cartoonists in their metaphors about Al Gore & George Bush through five themes of leadership during the early months of Campaign 2000: character, competence, viability, independence, & charisma. The cartoons reflected overall campaign strategies by attaching character issues to Gore & competence issues to Bush. However, the campaign was overshadowed by the outside influence of preceding presidents, calling into question the independence of the candidates, which may have fueled the ambivalent results of the election. 66 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Cartoons</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Metaphors</subject><subject>Political Campaigns</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0002-7642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzctKxDAUxvEsFBxH36Erd4U0txPdSRkvMCKMsx9Om9NppJPUJsXXt14ewNXhDz--c8ZWnHNRglHigl2m9L4kBy1WbLebQ_DhWPhQ5J6Ktx5d_EzfWeNpRH8MhVjw3ZLBeYeZihfKOPZx-lEb53OcPA4LmHKMIV2x8w6HRNd_d832D5t9_VRuXx-f6_ttORohSzJOAFXQVoDcqlupuJOKOjAWFaimsgYrJN1A0wmQVje2lVpXjQAhgZRcs5vf2XGKHzOlfDj51NIwYKA4p4PhWsnl0z-g4gIA5Bc1J1co</recordid><startdate>20010801</startdate><enddate>20010801</enddate><creator>Edwards, Janis L</creator><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010801</creationdate><title>Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons</title><author>Edwards, Janis L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p623-e6d27e17c17a0849340d34ef768a474b186a1ae5b7bf27385b8c3551b27237e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Cartoons</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Metaphors</topic><topic>Political Campaigns</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Janis L</creatorcontrib><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edwards, Janis L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons</atitle><jtitle>The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills)</jtitle><date>2001-08-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2040</spage><epage>2151</epage><pages>2040-2151</pages><issn>0002-7642</issn><abstract>Editorial cartoons contribute to candidate image development by offering condensed & simplified metaphoric portrayals. This study identifies the rhetorical fantasia advanced by cartoonists in their metaphors about Al Gore & George Bush through five themes of leadership during the early months of Campaign 2000: character, competence, viability, independence, & charisma. The cartoons reflected overall campaign strategies by attaching character issues to Gore & competence issues to Bush. However, the campaign was overshadowed by the outside influence of preceding presidents, calling into question the independence of the candidates, which may have fueled the ambivalent results of the election. 66 References. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><tpages>112</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7642 |
ispartof | The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills), 2001-08, Vol.44 (12), p.2040-2151 |
issn | 0002-7642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60543623 |
source | Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Candidates Cartoons Elections Metaphors Political Campaigns Presidents Rhetoric United States of America |
title | Running in the Shadows in Campaign 2000: Candidate Metaphors in Editorial Cartoons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A02%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Running%20in%20the%20Shadows%20in%20Campaign%202000:%20Candidate%20Metaphors%20in%20Editorial%20Cartoons&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20behavioral%20scientist%20(Beverly%20Hills)&rft.au=Edwards,%20Janis%20L&rft.date=2001-08-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2040&rft.epage=2151&rft.pages=2040-2151&rft.issn=0002-7642&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60402777%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60402777&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |