Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Mental Illness Research
In undertaking interdisciplinary research, a team of behavioral scientists anticipated that the principal problems of collaboration would be due to their conceptual diffences. However, methodological differences, here characterized in terms of "clinical" and "quantitative" points...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sociology 1957-11, Vol.63 (3), p.297-303 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 303 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 297 |
container_title | The American journal of sociology |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Simmons, Ozzie G. Davis, James A. |
description | In undertaking interdisciplinary research, a team of behavioral scientists anticipated that the principal problems of collaboration would be due to their conceptual diffences. However, methodological differences, here characterized in terms of "clinical" and "quantitative" points of view, turned out to be the major barriers to collaborative effort and generated issues regarding such operations as choice of research problem, sampling procedures, kinds of data, and techniques for collecting them. Other problems arose due due to the adjustements in role required by team research. The conceptual framework and methodological strategy in process of development by the team seeks to take systematic account of these differences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/222222 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60523119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2773999</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2773999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-a9d3df37674fba9215733ab2f2714c4391714d79a616af020dd76b5ee5c0a71f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLxDAUhIMoWFf9BR568lZ9SZrEeJPiamFFED2HtEmwSzapSffgv7da0bkMAx-PeYPQOYYrDDf8mvzoABWYUVExKuEQFQBAKsmBHKOTnLdzBAykQLdtmGwyQ-6H0Q9Bp8-yid7rLiY9DTGUQyifbJi0L1vvg825fLHZ6tS_n6Ijp322Z7--Qm_r-9fmsdo8P7TN3abqCbCp0tJQ46jgonadlgQzQanuiCMC131NJZ7dCKk55toBAWME75i1rActsKMrdLncHVP82Ns8qd1c184lg437rDgwQjGW_2CfYs7JOjWmYTe_pDCo72nUMs0MXizgNk8x_VFECCqlpF8Wml37</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60523119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Mental Illness Research</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Simmons, Ozzie G. ; Davis, James A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Ozzie G. ; Davis, James A.</creatorcontrib><description>In undertaking interdisciplinary research, a team of behavioral scientists anticipated that the principal problems of collaboration would be due to their conceptual diffences. However, methodological differences, here characterized in terms of "clinical" and "quantitative" points of view, turned out to be the major barriers to collaborative effort and generated issues regarding such operations as choice of research problem, sampling procedures, kinds of data, and techniques for collecting them. Other problems arose due due to the adjustements in role required by team research. The conceptual framework and methodological strategy in process of development by the team seeks to take systematic account of these differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/222222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Behavioral Sciences ; Clinical Social Work ; Interdisciplinary Approach ; Interdisciplinary research ; Mental illness ; Methodological Problems ; Psychiatric Research ; Psychological stress ; Quantitative Methods ; Research methods ; Research papers ; Social interaction ; Standardization ; Team fieldwork</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sociology, 1957-11, Vol.63 (3), p.297-303</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-a9d3df37674fba9215733ab2f2714c4391714d79a616af020dd76b5ee5c0a71f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2773999$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2773999$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,33774,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Ozzie G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, James A.</creatorcontrib><title>Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Mental Illness Research</title><title>The American journal of sociology</title><description>In undertaking interdisciplinary research, a team of behavioral scientists anticipated that the principal problems of collaboration would be due to their conceptual diffences. However, methodological differences, here characterized in terms of "clinical" and "quantitative" points of view, turned out to be the major barriers to collaborative effort and generated issues regarding such operations as choice of research problem, sampling procedures, kinds of data, and techniques for collecting them. Other problems arose due due to the adjustements in role required by team research. The conceptual framework and methodological strategy in process of development by the team seeks to take systematic account of these differences.</description><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Social Work</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary research</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Psychiatric Research</subject><subject>Psychological stress</subject><subject>Quantitative Methods</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Research papers</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Team fieldwork</subject><issn>0002-9602</issn><issn>1537-5390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1957</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLxDAUhIMoWFf9BR568lZ9SZrEeJPiamFFED2HtEmwSzapSffgv7da0bkMAx-PeYPQOYYrDDf8mvzoABWYUVExKuEQFQBAKsmBHKOTnLdzBAykQLdtmGwyQ-6H0Q9Bp8-yid7rLiY9DTGUQyifbJi0L1vvg825fLHZ6tS_n6Ijp322Z7--Qm_r-9fmsdo8P7TN3abqCbCp0tJQ46jgonadlgQzQanuiCMC131NJZ7dCKk55toBAWME75i1rActsKMrdLncHVP82Ns8qd1c184lg437rDgwQjGW_2CfYs7JOjWmYTe_pDCo72nUMs0MXizgNk8x_VFECCqlpF8Wml37</recordid><startdate>19571101</startdate><enddate>19571101</enddate><creator>Simmons, Ozzie G.</creator><creator>Davis, James A.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19571101</creationdate><title>Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Mental Illness Research</title><author>Simmons, Ozzie G. ; Davis, James A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-a9d3df37674fba9215733ab2f2714c4391714d79a616af020dd76b5ee5c0a71f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1957</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Social Work</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Approach</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary research</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Psychiatric Research</topic><topic>Psychological stress</topic><topic>Quantitative Methods</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Research papers</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Team fieldwork</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Ozzie G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, James A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simmons, Ozzie G.</au><au>Davis, James A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Mental Illness Research</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sociology</jtitle><date>1957-11-01</date><risdate>1957</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>297-303</pages><issn>0002-9602</issn><eissn>1537-5390</eissn><abstract>In undertaking interdisciplinary research, a team of behavioral scientists anticipated that the principal problems of collaboration would be due to their conceptual diffences. However, methodological differences, here characterized in terms of "clinical" and "quantitative" points of view, turned out to be the major barriers to collaborative effort and generated issues regarding such operations as choice of research problem, sampling procedures, kinds of data, and techniques for collecting them. Other problems arose due due to the adjustements in role required by team research. The conceptual framework and methodological strategy in process of development by the team seeks to take systematic account of these differences.</abstract><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/222222</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9602 |
ispartof | The American journal of sociology, 1957-11, Vol.63 (3), p.297-303 |
issn | 0002-9602 1537-5390 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60523119 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Behavioral Sciences Clinical Social Work Interdisciplinary Approach Interdisciplinary research Mental illness Methodological Problems Psychiatric Research Psychological stress Quantitative Methods Research methods Research papers Social interaction Standardization Team fieldwork |
title | Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Mental Illness Research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A43%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interdisciplinary%20Collaboration%20in%20Mental%20Illness%20Research&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Simmons,%20Ozzie%20G.&rft.date=1957-11-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=297-303&rft.issn=0002-9602&rft.eissn=1537-5390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/222222&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2773999%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60523119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2773999&rfr_iscdi=true |