The Sublime Object of Entrepreneurship
This paper engages with debates on enterprise culture and one of its key subjects—the entrepreneur. Enlisting the work of Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek, we attempt to explain the continuing failure of entrepreneurship discourse to assign the character of the entrepreneur a positive identity. Shifti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organization (London, England) England), 2005-03, Vol.12 (2), p.223-246 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 246 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Organization (London, England) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Jones, Campbell Spicer, André |
description | This paper engages with debates on enterprise culture and one of its key subjects—the entrepreneur. Enlisting the work of Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek, we attempt to explain the continuing failure of entrepreneurship discourse to assign the character of the entrepreneur a positive identity. Shifting away from stable categories such as ‘the entrepreneur’, we describe entrepreneurship in terms of Lacan’s concept of the Real and Žižek’s concept of the sublime object. This allows us to critically scrutinize the operation of the phantasmic category of the entrepreneur. In addition to indicating some prospects for the future of psychoanalytic cultural criticism in organization studies, we make a case for a continual questioning of the subject, a questioning that is today being foreclosed by those critics who were first to call the subject into question. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1350508405051189 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60505467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1350508405051189</sage_id><sourcerecordid>826025211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8710009c956719b777e76f0315b43fb52731c4f4c96807f3badea470e4795a373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFbvHoOH3qKz2c1O9iilVqHQg_UcNuusTUmTuJsc_PduqSAUxMvMwPvegzeM3XK45xzxgYsccihkHDnnhT5jEy4VT1Fk4jzeUU4P-iW7CmEHAEJINWGzzZaS17Fq6j0l62pHdkg6lyzawVPvqaXRh23dX7MLZ5pANz97yt6eFpv5c7paL1_mj6vUCoQhLZDHZG11rpDrChEJlQPB80oKV-UZCm6lk1arAtCJyryTkQgkUedGoJiy2TG3993nSGEo93Ww1DSmpW4MpTrUk-p_UBQgMp3JCN6dgLtu9G0sUWa8UFlWgI4QHCHruxA8ubL39d74r5JDeXhvefreaEmPlmA-6DfzT_4bB1l1zA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218622809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Sublime Object of Entrepreneurship</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Jones, Campbell ; Spicer, André</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Campbell ; Spicer, André</creatorcontrib><description>This paper engages with debates on enterprise culture and one of its key subjects—the entrepreneur. Enlisting the work of Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek, we attempt to explain the continuing failure of entrepreneurship discourse to assign the character of the entrepreneur a positive identity. Shifting away from stable categories such as ‘the entrepreneur’, we describe entrepreneurship in terms of Lacan’s concept of the Real and Žižek’s concept of the sublime object. This allows us to critically scrutinize the operation of the phantasmic category of the entrepreneur. In addition to indicating some prospects for the future of psychoanalytic cultural criticism in organization studies, we make a case for a continual questioning of the subject, a questioning that is today being foreclosed by those critics who were first to call the subject into question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-5084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1350508405051189</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OGANF4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Determinism ; Discourse ; Discourse analysis ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; Identity ; Ideology ; Lacan, Jacques Marie Emile ; Organization studies ; Organization theory ; Studies ; Subjectivity</subject><ispartof>Organization (London, England), 2005-03, Vol.12 (2), p.223-246</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Mar 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8710009c956719b777e76f0315b43fb52731c4f4c96807f3badea470e4795a373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8710009c956719b777e76f0315b43fb52731c4f4c96807f3badea470e4795a373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1350508405051189$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1350508405051189$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27344,27924,27925,33774,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spicer, André</creatorcontrib><title>The Sublime Object of Entrepreneurship</title><title>Organization (London, England)</title><description>This paper engages with debates on enterprise culture and one of its key subjects—the entrepreneur. Enlisting the work of Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek, we attempt to explain the continuing failure of entrepreneurship discourse to assign the character of the entrepreneur a positive identity. Shifting away from stable categories such as ‘the entrepreneur’, we describe entrepreneurship in terms of Lacan’s concept of the Real and Žižek’s concept of the sublime object. This allows us to critically scrutinize the operation of the phantasmic category of the entrepreneur. In addition to indicating some prospects for the future of psychoanalytic cultural criticism in organization studies, we make a case for a continual questioning of the subject, a questioning that is today being foreclosed by those critics who were first to call the subject into question.</description><subject>Determinism</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Lacan, Jacques Marie Emile</subject><subject>Organization studies</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subjectivity</subject><issn>1350-5084</issn><issn>1461-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFbvHoOH3qKz2c1O9iilVqHQg_UcNuusTUmTuJsc_PduqSAUxMvMwPvegzeM3XK45xzxgYsccihkHDnnhT5jEy4VT1Fk4jzeUU4P-iW7CmEHAEJINWGzzZaS17Fq6j0l62pHdkg6lyzawVPvqaXRh23dX7MLZ5pANz97yt6eFpv5c7paL1_mj6vUCoQhLZDHZG11rpDrChEJlQPB80oKV-UZCm6lk1arAtCJyryTkQgkUedGoJiy2TG3993nSGEo93Ww1DSmpW4MpTrUk-p_UBQgMp3JCN6dgLtu9G0sUWa8UFlWgI4QHCHruxA8ubL39d74r5JDeXhvefreaEmPlmA-6DfzT_4bB1l1zA</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Jones, Campbell</creator><creator>Spicer, André</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>The Sublime Object of Entrepreneurship</title><author>Jones, Campbell ; Spicer, André</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-8710009c956719b777e76f0315b43fb52731c4f4c96807f3badea470e4795a373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Determinism</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Lacan, Jacques Marie Emile</topic><topic>Organization studies</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subjectivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spicer, André</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Organization (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Campbell</au><au>Spicer, André</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Sublime Object of Entrepreneurship</atitle><jtitle>Organization (London, England)</jtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>223-246</pages><issn>1350-5084</issn><eissn>1461-7323</eissn><coden>OGANF4</coden><abstract>This paper engages with debates on enterprise culture and one of its key subjects—the entrepreneur. Enlisting the work of Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek, we attempt to explain the continuing failure of entrepreneurship discourse to assign the character of the entrepreneur a positive identity. Shifting away from stable categories such as ‘the entrepreneur’, we describe entrepreneurship in terms of Lacan’s concept of the Real and Žižek’s concept of the sublime object. This allows us to critically scrutinize the operation of the phantasmic category of the entrepreneur. In addition to indicating some prospects for the future of psychoanalytic cultural criticism in organization studies, we make a case for a continual questioning of the subject, a questioning that is today being foreclosed by those critics who were first to call the subject into question.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1350508405051189</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-5084 |
ispartof | Organization (London, England), 2005-03, Vol.12 (2), p.223-246 |
issn | 1350-5084 1461-7323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60505467 |
source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Determinism Discourse Discourse analysis Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship Identity Ideology Lacan, Jacques Marie Emile Organization studies Organization theory Studies Subjectivity |
title | The Sublime Object of Entrepreneurship |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A19%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Sublime%20Object%20of%20Entrepreneurship&rft.jtitle=Organization%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Jones,%20Campbell&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=223-246&rft.issn=1350-5084&rft.eissn=1461-7323&rft.coden=OGANF4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1350508405051189&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E826025211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218622809&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1350508405051189&rfr_iscdi=true |