Neoliberalism, Gender, and Development: Institutionalizing "Post-Feminism" in Medellín, Colombia
Like all theoretical tools and discourses, the theory of gender is always interpreted by persons within particular social contexts and with particular orientations to the social world. In the context of an increasing neoliberal hegemony, states are shrinking their development budgets, seeking new wa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Women's studies quarterly 2003-10, Vol.31 (3/4), p.129-153 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 153 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3/4 |
| container_start_page | 129 |
| container_title | Women's studies quarterly |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Murdock, Donna F. |
| description | Like all theoretical tools and discourses, the theory of gender is always interpreted by persons within particular social contexts and with particular orientations to the social world. In the context of an increasing neoliberal hegemony, states are shrinking their development budgets, seeking new ways to economize, and gender policies are of course implicated in these changes. Here, Murdock discusses how both state officials and local feminist organizations in Medellin, Colombia used the gender perspective discourse, which although has some positive associations, has also evidence that under neoliberal regimes, it could justify a hostile reception to subversive feminist politics. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60497849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40003324</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40003324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j809-d37e2930991bdfbdb95360f1027978d1960a798a177fbae2e262f5bf89bdf9163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0EtOwzAQBmALgUQpHAHJ6oJVI_mR2DE7VGipVB6L7iObTJCjxC6xgwR36im4GK7KitXM4ptfM3OCJlTxPKMFI6doQiRnqRfsHF2E0BJCuBDlBOln8J01MOjOhn6OV-BqGOZYuxrfwyd0fteDi7d47UK0cYzWu0S_rXvHs1cfYraE3ro0O8PW4Seooet-9m6OF77zvbH6Ep01ugtw9VenaLt82C4es83Lar2422RtSVRWcwlMcaIUNXVjaqMKLkhDCZNKljVVgmipSk2lbIwGBkywpjBNqRJXVPApujnG7gb_MUKIVW_DW1pGO_BjqATJU1CuEpz9g60fh3RUqBjnojgskdD1EbUh-qHaDbbXw1eVH_7GWc5_AWUfaIU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233659309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neoliberalism, Gender, and Development: Institutionalizing "Post-Feminism" in Medellín, Colombia</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Murdock, Donna F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murdock, Donna F.</creatorcontrib><description>Like all theoretical tools and discourses, the theory of gender is always interpreted by persons within particular social contexts and with particular orientations to the social world. In the context of an increasing neoliberal hegemony, states are shrinking their development budgets, seeking new ways to economize, and gender policies are of course implicated in these changes. Here, Murdock discusses how both state officials and local feminist organizations in Medellin, Colombia used the gender perspective discourse, which although has some positive associations, has also evidence that under neoliberal regimes, it could justify a hostile reception to subversive feminist politics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-1562</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-1520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Feminist Press</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Colombia ; Development Policy ; Development Programs ; Discourse ; Economic liberalism ; Female homosexuality ; Females ; Feminism ; Gender ; Gender Issues ; Gender roles ; Homosexuality ; Lesbianism ; Liberalism ; Males ; Men ; Neoliberalism ; Nongovernmental Organizations ; Political discourse ; Politics ; Progress ; Reconceptualizing Social Development Practice: Women and (Re)Productive Labor ; Rhetoric ; Sex ; Sexual Inequality ; State Agencies ; Women ; Womens Rights ; Womens studies</subject><ispartof>Women's studies quarterly, 2003-10, Vol.31 (3/4), p.129-153</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 The Feminist Press</rights><rights>Copyright Feminist Press Fall 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40003324$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40003324$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27321,33751,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murdock, Donna F.</creatorcontrib><title>Neoliberalism, Gender, and Development: Institutionalizing "Post-Feminism" in Medellín, Colombia</title><title>Women's studies quarterly</title><description>Like all theoretical tools and discourses, the theory of gender is always interpreted by persons within particular social contexts and with particular orientations to the social world. In the context of an increasing neoliberal hegemony, states are shrinking their development budgets, seeking new ways to economize, and gender policies are of course implicated in these changes. Here, Murdock discusses how both state officials and local feminist organizations in Medellin, Colombia used the gender perspective discourse, which although has some positive associations, has also evidence that under neoliberal regimes, it could justify a hostile reception to subversive feminist politics.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Colombia</subject><subject>Development Policy</subject><subject>Development Programs</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Economic liberalism</subject><subject>Female homosexuality</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender Issues</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Homosexuality</subject><subject>Lesbianism</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Nongovernmental Organizations</subject><subject>Political discourse</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Progress</subject><subject>Reconceptualizing Social Development Practice: Women and (Re)Productive Labor</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexual Inequality</subject><subject>State Agencies</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens Rights</subject><subject>Womens studies</subject><issn>0732-1562</issn><issn>1934-1520</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0EtOwzAQBmALgUQpHAHJ6oJVI_mR2DE7VGipVB6L7iObTJCjxC6xgwR36im4GK7KitXM4ptfM3OCJlTxPKMFI6doQiRnqRfsHF2E0BJCuBDlBOln8J01MOjOhn6OV-BqGOZYuxrfwyd0fteDi7d47UK0cYzWu0S_rXvHs1cfYraE3ro0O8PW4Seooet-9m6OF77zvbH6Ep01ugtw9VenaLt82C4es83Lar2422RtSVRWcwlMcaIUNXVjaqMKLkhDCZNKljVVgmipSk2lbIwGBkywpjBNqRJXVPApujnG7gb_MUKIVW_DW1pGO_BjqATJU1CuEpz9g60fh3RUqBjnojgskdD1EbUh-qHaDbbXw1eVH_7GWc5_AWUfaIU</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>Murdock, Donna F.</creator><general>Feminist Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Neoliberalism, Gender, and Development: Institutionalizing "Post-Feminism" in Medellín, Colombia</title><author>Murdock, Donna F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j809-d37e2930991bdfbdb95360f1027978d1960a798a177fbae2e262f5bf89bdf9163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Colombia</topic><topic>Development Policy</topic><topic>Development Programs</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Economic liberalism</topic><topic>Female homosexuality</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender Issues</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Homosexuality</topic><topic>Lesbianism</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Nongovernmental Organizations</topic><topic>Political discourse</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Progress</topic><topic>Reconceptualizing Social Development Practice: Women and (Re)Productive Labor</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexual Inequality</topic><topic>State Agencies</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens Rights</topic><topic>Womens studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murdock, Donna F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Women's studies quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murdock, Donna F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neoliberalism, Gender, and Development: Institutionalizing "Post-Feminism" in Medellín, Colombia</atitle><jtitle>Women's studies quarterly</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3/4</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>129-153</pages><issn>0732-1562</issn><eissn>1934-1520</eissn><abstract>Like all theoretical tools and discourses, the theory of gender is always interpreted by persons within particular social contexts and with particular orientations to the social world. In the context of an increasing neoliberal hegemony, states are shrinking their development budgets, seeking new ways to economize, and gender policies are of course implicated in these changes. Here, Murdock discusses how both state officials and local feminist organizations in Medellin, Colombia used the gender perspective discourse, which although has some positive associations, has also evidence that under neoliberal regimes, it could justify a hostile reception to subversive feminist politics.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Feminist Press</pub><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0732-1562 |
| ispartof | Women's studies quarterly, 2003-10, Vol.31 (3/4), p.129-153 |
| issn | 0732-1562 1934-1520 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60497849 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Abortion Colombia Development Policy Development Programs Discourse Economic liberalism Female homosexuality Females Feminism Gender Gender Issues Gender roles Homosexuality Lesbianism Liberalism Males Men Neoliberalism Nongovernmental Organizations Political discourse Politics Progress Reconceptualizing Social Development Practice: Women and (Re)Productive Labor Rhetoric Sex Sexual Inequality State Agencies Women Womens Rights Womens studies |
| title | Neoliberalism, Gender, and Development: Institutionalizing "Post-Feminism" in Medellín, Colombia |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A21%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neoliberalism,%20Gender,%20and%20Development:%20Institutionalizing%20%22Post-Feminism%22%20in%20Medell%C3%ADn,%20Colombia&rft.jtitle=Women's%20studies%20quarterly&rft.au=Murdock,%20Donna%20F.&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3/4&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=129-153&rft.issn=0732-1562&rft.eissn=1934-1520&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40003324%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233659309&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40003324&rfr_iscdi=true |