From Doxa to Experience: Issues in Bourdieu’s Adoption of Husserlian Phenomenology
This article examines Bourdieu’s adoption of Husserl’s concept of ‘doxa’ and argues that Bourdieu’s reading of Husserl overpolarizes doxa (or sens pratique) and reflexivity. The article argues that there is a need for Bourdieusian sociology to adopt a more complex interpretation of Husserlian phenom...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Theory, culture & society culture & society, 2004-04, Vol.21 (2), p.91-107 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 107 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 91 |
| container_title | Theory, culture & society |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Myles, John F. |
| description | This article examines Bourdieu’s adoption of Husserl’s concept of ‘doxa’ and argues that Bourdieu’s reading of Husserl overpolarizes doxa (or sens pratique) and reflexivity. The article argues that there is a need for Bourdieusian sociology to adopt a more complex interpretation of Husserlian phenomenology in order to understand the potential range of states of consciousness between doxa and reflexivity. In contrast to Bourdieu’s reading of Husserl, this article argues that the philosophical underlabouring for an adequate understanding of doxa is now available within recent Husserlian studies which marks a radical development from earlier readings in the ‘sociology of consciousness’. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0263276404042136 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60490886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0263276404042136</sage_id><sourcerecordid>37889450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-fa33ae732f2ca6b6daa2f4c3b56f6a9b249b60b19e5d92a4bef94d8bb22eeadd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtaPsx57Ubys5muTzVFqq0LBi56XSXYiW7abmrRQ_71ZWhAElRzmMM-8hJeQS0ZvGdP6jnIluFaS5seZUAdkxKSihVBMHZLRsC6G_TE5SWlBKeVSiRG5mMWwHD-ELYzXYTzdrjC22Ds8I0ceuoTn-3lK3mbT18lTMX95fJ7czwsnSr0uPAgBqAX33IGyqgHgXjphS-UVGMulsYpaZrBsDAdp0RvZVNZyjghNI07J9S53FcPHBtO6XrbJYddBj2GTakWloVWl_oVCV5WRJc3w5k_IaP4551wOlO6oiyGliL5exXYJ8TOjemi1_tlqPrnap0Ny0PkIvWvT912pS2aEzq7YuQTvWC_CJva5xt9zvwCF6YGB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035722240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Doxa to Experience: Issues in Bourdieu’s Adoption of Husserlian Phenomenology</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Myles, John F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Myles, John F.</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines Bourdieu’s adoption of Husserl’s concept of ‘doxa’ and argues that Bourdieu’s reading of Husserl overpolarizes doxa (or sens pratique) and reflexivity. The article argues that there is a need for Bourdieusian sociology to adopt a more complex interpretation of Husserlian phenomenology in order to understand the potential range of states of consciousness between doxa and reflexivity. In contrast to Bourdieu’s reading of Husserl, this article argues that the philosophical underlabouring for an adequate understanding of doxa is now available within recent Husserlian studies which marks a radical development from earlier readings in the ‘sociology of consciousness’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-2764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0263276404042136</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TCSUD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bourdieu, Pierre ; Cultural studies ; Embodiment ; History and organization of sociology ; History, theory and methodology ; Husserl, Edmund ; Knowledge ; Organization of profession, research and teaching. Deontology. Sociology of sociology. Epistemology ; Phenomenology ; Philosophy ; Reflexivity ; Social theory ; Sociology ; Theoretical Problems</subject><ispartof>Theory, culture & society, 2004-04, Vol.21 (2), p.91-107</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-fa33ae732f2ca6b6daa2f4c3b56f6a9b249b60b19e5d92a4bef94d8bb22eeadd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0263276404042136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263276404042136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15751937$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Myles, John F.</creatorcontrib><title>From Doxa to Experience: Issues in Bourdieu’s Adoption of Husserlian Phenomenology</title><title>Theory, culture & society</title><description>This article examines Bourdieu’s adoption of Husserl’s concept of ‘doxa’ and argues that Bourdieu’s reading of Husserl overpolarizes doxa (or sens pratique) and reflexivity. The article argues that there is a need for Bourdieusian sociology to adopt a more complex interpretation of Husserlian phenomenology in order to understand the potential range of states of consciousness between doxa and reflexivity. In contrast to Bourdieu’s reading of Husserl, this article argues that the philosophical underlabouring for an adequate understanding of doxa is now available within recent Husserlian studies which marks a radical development from earlier readings in the ‘sociology of consciousness’.</description><subject>Bourdieu, Pierre</subject><subject>Cultural studies</subject><subject>Embodiment</subject><subject>History and organization of sociology</subject><subject>History, theory and methodology</subject><subject>Husserl, Edmund</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Organization of profession, research and teaching. Deontology. Sociology of sociology. Epistemology</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Social theory</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Theoretical Problems</subject><issn>0263-2764</issn><issn>1460-3616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LAzEQBuAgCtaPsx57Ubys5muTzVFqq0LBi56XSXYiW7abmrRQ_71ZWhAElRzmMM-8hJeQS0ZvGdP6jnIluFaS5seZUAdkxKSihVBMHZLRsC6G_TE5SWlBKeVSiRG5mMWwHD-ELYzXYTzdrjC22Ds8I0ceuoTn-3lK3mbT18lTMX95fJ7czwsnSr0uPAgBqAX33IGyqgHgXjphS-UVGMulsYpaZrBsDAdp0RvZVNZyjghNI07J9S53FcPHBtO6XrbJYddBj2GTakWloVWl_oVCV5WRJc3w5k_IaP4551wOlO6oiyGliL5exXYJ8TOjemi1_tlqPrnap0Ny0PkIvWvT912pS2aEzq7YuQTvWC_CJva5xt9zvwCF6YGB</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Myles, John F.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>From Doxa to Experience</title><author>Myles, John F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-fa33ae732f2ca6b6daa2f4c3b56f6a9b249b60b19e5d92a4bef94d8bb22eeadd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Bourdieu, Pierre</topic><topic>Cultural studies</topic><topic>Embodiment</topic><topic>History and organization of sociology</topic><topic>History, theory and methodology</topic><topic>Husserl, Edmund</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Organization of profession, research and teaching. Deontology. Sociology of sociology. Epistemology</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Social theory</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Theoretical Problems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Myles, John F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Theory, culture & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Myles, John F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Doxa to Experience: Issues in Bourdieu’s Adoption of Husserlian Phenomenology</atitle><jtitle>Theory, culture & society</jtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>91-107</pages><issn>0263-2764</issn><eissn>1460-3616</eissn><coden>TCSUD4</coden><abstract>This article examines Bourdieu’s adoption of Husserl’s concept of ‘doxa’ and argues that Bourdieu’s reading of Husserl overpolarizes doxa (or sens pratique) and reflexivity. The article argues that there is a need for Bourdieusian sociology to adopt a more complex interpretation of Husserlian phenomenology in order to understand the potential range of states of consciousness between doxa and reflexivity. In contrast to Bourdieu’s reading of Husserl, this article argues that the philosophical underlabouring for an adequate understanding of doxa is now available within recent Husserlian studies which marks a radical development from earlier readings in the ‘sociology of consciousness’.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Thousand Oaks</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0263276404042136</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0263-2764 |
| ispartof | Theory, culture & society, 2004-04, Vol.21 (2), p.91-107 |
| issn | 0263-2764 1460-3616 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60490886 |
| source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Bourdieu, Pierre Cultural studies Embodiment History and organization of sociology History, theory and methodology Husserl, Edmund Knowledge Organization of profession, research and teaching. Deontology. Sociology of sociology. Epistemology Phenomenology Philosophy Reflexivity Social theory Sociology Theoretical Problems |
| title | From Doxa to Experience: Issues in Bourdieu’s Adoption of Husserlian Phenomenology |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A57%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Doxa%20to%20Experience:%20Issues%20in%20Bourdieu%E2%80%99s%20Adoption%20of%20Husserlian%20Phenomenology&rft.jtitle=Theory,%20culture%20&%20society&rft.au=Myles,%20John%20F.&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=91-107&rft.issn=0263-2764&rft.eissn=1460-3616&rft.coden=TCSUD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0263276404042136&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37889450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035722240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0263276404042136&rfr_iscdi=true |