Continuous dependent variables and organizational ecology: Toward a more perfect union

In this paper, I review all previously published organizational ecology research which utilizes continuous dependent variables. I unearth twenty-one such studies, half of which were published within the past four years. The broadening array of dependent variables in this field is a most welcome deve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality & quantity 2003-11, Vol.37 (4), p.435-442
1. Verfasser: RUDIN, Joel P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 442
container_issue 4
container_start_page 435
container_title Quality & quantity
container_volume 37
creator RUDIN, Joel P
description In this paper, I review all previously published organizational ecology research which utilizes continuous dependent variables. I unearth twenty-one such studies, half of which were published within the past four years. The broadening array of dependent variables in this field is a most welcome development. However, each of these papers has at least one methodological limitation, in specification of cross-unit effects and/or controls for autocorrelation. Perhaps the most serious problem is the assertion that the fixed effects research design solves the problem of autocorrelation. I demonstrate that this assertion is untrue. I conclude with advice on the proper way to model continuous dependent variables in organizational ecology research, as follows: (1) Consider omitting all organizations which do not exist for more time periods than the number of independent variables. (2) Test for autocorrelation, report the results, and correct for autocorrelation if the test indicates that it is a problem. (3) Use a fixed effects model, and justify it based on the nonrandomness of the data.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1027366213374
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60476168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2189994351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p241t-5049fda113c7a12bc7e4c703ded103b4709072a24929b5d1551fab260e93b4e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdz0tLAzEUhuEgCtbL2m0QdDeak2unOyneoOCmuh3OTDJlyjQZkxml_noDduXqW5yHAy8hV8DugHFx_7DIY4TWHIQw8ojMQBlRmLlUx2TGmBCFAmNOyVlKW8aAMWlm5GMZ_Nj5KUyJWjc4b50f6RfGDuveJYre0hA36LsfHLvgsaeuCX3Y7Bd0Hb4xWop0F6Kjg4uta0Y6-cwuyEmLfXKXhz0n70-P6-VLsXp7fl0-rIqBSxgLxWTZWgQQjUHgdWOcbAwT1llgopaGlcxw5LLkZa0sKAUt1lwzV-arU-Kc3P79HWL4nFwaq12XGtf36F1OqnSO1KDnGV7_g9swxZyTKjPXWkpesoxuDghTg30b0TddqobY7TDuK1AClNZG_AIx0G0P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>786644290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuous dependent variables and organizational ecology: Toward a more perfect union</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>RUDIN, Joel P</creator><creatorcontrib>RUDIN, Joel P</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, I review all previously published organizational ecology research which utilizes continuous dependent variables. I unearth twenty-one such studies, half of which were published within the past four years. The broadening array of dependent variables in this field is a most welcome development. However, each of these papers has at least one methodological limitation, in specification of cross-unit effects and/or controls for autocorrelation. Perhaps the most serious problem is the assertion that the fixed effects research design solves the problem of autocorrelation. I demonstrate that this assertion is untrue. I conclude with advice on the proper way to model continuous dependent variables in organizational ecology research, as follows: (1) Consider omitting all organizations which do not exist for more time periods than the number of independent variables. (2) Test for autocorrelation, report the results, and correct for autocorrelation if the test indicates that it is a problem. (3) Use a fixed effects model, and justify it based on the nonrandomness of the data.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-5177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1027366213374</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QQEJAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Correlation ; Dependent variables ; History, theory and methodology ; Literature Reviews ; Methodological Problems ; Methodology ; Organizational Research ; Sociology ; Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration ; Sociology of work and sociology of organizations ; Studies ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Quality &amp; quantity, 2003-11, Vol.37 (4), p.435-442</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27342,27922,27923,33772,33773</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15315667$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RUDIN, Joel P</creatorcontrib><title>Continuous dependent variables and organizational ecology: Toward a more perfect union</title><title>Quality &amp; quantity</title><description>In this paper, I review all previously published organizational ecology research which utilizes continuous dependent variables. I unearth twenty-one such studies, half of which were published within the past four years. The broadening array of dependent variables in this field is a most welcome development. However, each of these papers has at least one methodological limitation, in specification of cross-unit effects and/or controls for autocorrelation. Perhaps the most serious problem is the assertion that the fixed effects research design solves the problem of autocorrelation. I demonstrate that this assertion is untrue. I conclude with advice on the proper way to model continuous dependent variables in organizational ecology research, as follows: (1) Consider omitting all organizations which do not exist for more time periods than the number of independent variables. (2) Test for autocorrelation, report the results, and correct for autocorrelation if the test indicates that it is a problem. (3) Use a fixed effects model, and justify it based on the nonrandomness of the data.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Dependent variables</subject><subject>History, theory and methodology</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Organizational Research</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</subject><subject>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0033-5177</issn><issn>1573-7845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdz0tLAzEUhuEgCtbL2m0QdDeak2unOyneoOCmuh3OTDJlyjQZkxml_noDduXqW5yHAy8hV8DugHFx_7DIY4TWHIQw8ojMQBlRmLlUx2TGmBCFAmNOyVlKW8aAMWlm5GMZ_Nj5KUyJWjc4b50f6RfGDuveJYre0hA36LsfHLvgsaeuCX3Y7Bd0Hb4xWop0F6Kjg4uta0Y6-cwuyEmLfXKXhz0n70-P6-VLsXp7fl0-rIqBSxgLxWTZWgQQjUHgdWOcbAwT1llgopaGlcxw5LLkZa0sKAUt1lwzV-arU-Kc3P79HWL4nFwaq12XGtf36F1OqnSO1KDnGV7_g9swxZyTKjPXWkpesoxuDghTg30b0TddqobY7TDuK1AClNZG_AIx0G0P</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>RUDIN, Joel P</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>Continuous dependent variables and organizational ecology: Toward a more perfect union</title><author>RUDIN, Joel P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p241t-5049fda113c7a12bc7e4c703ded103b4709072a24929b5d1551fab260e93b4e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Dependent variables</topic><topic>History, theory and methodology</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Organizational Research</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</topic><topic>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RUDIN, Joel P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Quality &amp; quantity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RUDIN, Joel P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuous dependent variables and organizational ecology: Toward a more perfect union</atitle><jtitle>Quality &amp; quantity</jtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>435-442</pages><issn>0033-5177</issn><eissn>1573-7845</eissn><coden>QQEJAV</coden><abstract>In this paper, I review all previously published organizational ecology research which utilizes continuous dependent variables. I unearth twenty-one such studies, half of which were published within the past four years. The broadening array of dependent variables in this field is a most welcome development. However, each of these papers has at least one methodological limitation, in specification of cross-unit effects and/or controls for autocorrelation. Perhaps the most serious problem is the assertion that the fixed effects research design solves the problem of autocorrelation. I demonstrate that this assertion is untrue. I conclude with advice on the proper way to model continuous dependent variables in organizational ecology research, as follows: (1) Consider omitting all organizations which do not exist for more time periods than the number of independent variables. (2) Test for autocorrelation, report the results, and correct for autocorrelation if the test indicates that it is a problem. (3) Use a fixed effects model, and justify it based on the nonrandomness of the data.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1027366213374</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-5177
ispartof Quality & quantity, 2003-11, Vol.37 (4), p.435-442
issn 0033-5177
1573-7845
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60476168
source Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Correlation
Dependent variables
History, theory and methodology
Literature Reviews
Methodological Problems
Methodology
Organizational Research
Sociology
Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration
Sociology of work and sociology of organizations
Studies
Variables
title Continuous dependent variables and organizational ecology: Toward a more perfect union
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A48%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuous%20dependent%20variables%20and%20organizational%20ecology:%20Toward%20a%20more%20perfect%20union&rft.jtitle=Quality%20&%20quantity&rft.au=RUDIN,%20Joel%20P&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=435-442&rft.issn=0033-5177&rft.eissn=1573-7845&rft.coden=QQEJAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1027366213374&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E2189994351%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=786644290&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true