Intergroup Competition, Attitudinal Projection, and Opinion Certainty: Capitalizing on Conflict
Competitive or cooperative relations were imposed between the two experimentally created art discussion groups in each session. Group members indicated their own attitudes and estimated the positions held either by other in-group members or by out-group members in order to assess the effects of targ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Group processes & intergroup relations 2001-01, Vol.4 (1), p.61-73 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 73 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 61 |
| container_title | Group processes & intergroup relations |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Holtz, Rolf Miller, Norman |
| description | Competitive or cooperative relations were imposed between the two experimentally created art discussion groups in each session. Group members indicated their own attitudes and estimated the positions held either by other in-group members or by out-group members in order to assess the effects of target of projection on attitude certainty. As expected, participants assumed greater attitudinal disagreement with competitive compared to cooperative out-groups on the 10 art appreciation issues relevant to their group task. They also assumed more similarity to in-group than to out-group members. Assumed similarity/dissimilarity mediated the effect of projection target on mean increments in attitude certainty, which were greatest in the competitive out-group target condition regardless of issue importance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1368430201041005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60433648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1368430201041005</sage_id><sourcerecordid>60433648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3087868992223623f63d6a928084174ace2a50c67858784d8afa4fd6edeba3193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePfaiJ6uTj01Tb0vxCwQ96LmMabpk6SY1SQ_615tlBUEQT_Nm3m_e4RFySuGS0qq6olwqwYEBBUEBFntkRoWkZUWV2s862-XWPyRHMa4BgFEBM9I-uGTCKvhpLBq_GU2yyXp3USxTVlNnHQ7Fc_Bro3d3dF3xNFqXl6IxIaF16eO6aHC0CQf7ad2q2Fre9YPV6Zgc9DhEc_I95-T19ualuS8fn-4emuVjqflCpZKDqpRUdc0Y45LxXvJOYs0UKEErgdowXICWlVpkUHQKexR9J01n3pDTms_J-S53DP59MjG1Gxu1GQZ0xk-xlSA4l0L9C3JVK-CZnhPYgTr4GIPp2zHYDYaPlkK7rbz9XXl-OfvOxqhx6AM6bePPn2BQUckzV-64iCvTrv0Ucsvx79wvJzeMtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38980304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intergroup Competition, Attitudinal Projection, and Opinion Certainty: Capitalizing on Conflict</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Holtz, Rolf ; Miller, Norman</creator><creatorcontrib>Holtz, Rolf ; Miller, Norman</creatorcontrib><description>Competitive or cooperative relations were imposed between the two experimentally created art discussion groups in each session. Group members indicated their own attitudes and estimated the positions held either by other in-group members or by out-group members in order to assess the effects of target of projection on attitude certainty. As expected, participants assumed greater attitudinal disagreement with competitive compared to cooperative out-groups on the 10 art appreciation issues relevant to their group task. They also assumed more similarity to in-group than to out-group members. Assumed similarity/dissimilarity mediated the effect of projection target on mean increments in attitude certainty, which were greatest in the competitive out-group target condition regardless of issue importance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-4302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7188</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1368430201041005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Competition ; Conflict ; Cooperation ; Group decision making ; Group Dynamics ; Intergroup Relations ; Interpersonal relationships. Groups. Leadership ; Opinions ; Social psychology ; Sociology ; Task Oriented Groups ; Teamwork</subject><ispartof>Group processes & intergroup relations, 2001-01, Vol.4 (1), p.61-73</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3087868992223623f63d6a928084174ace2a50c67858784d8afa4fd6edeba3193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3087868992223623f63d6a928084174ace2a50c67858784d8afa4fd6edeba3193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1368430201041005$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1368430201041005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,21824,27928,27929,27930,33780,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14207163$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holtz, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Norman</creatorcontrib><title>Intergroup Competition, Attitudinal Projection, and Opinion Certainty: Capitalizing on Conflict</title><title>Group processes & intergroup relations</title><description>Competitive or cooperative relations were imposed between the two experimentally created art discussion groups in each session. Group members indicated their own attitudes and estimated the positions held either by other in-group members or by out-group members in order to assess the effects of target of projection on attitude certainty. As expected, participants assumed greater attitudinal disagreement with competitive compared to cooperative out-groups on the 10 art appreciation issues relevant to their group task. They also assumed more similarity to in-group than to out-group members. Assumed similarity/dissimilarity mediated the effect of projection target on mean increments in attitude certainty, which were greatest in the competitive out-group target condition regardless of issue importance.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Group decision making</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Intergroup Relations</subject><subject>Interpersonal relationships. Groups. Leadership</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Task Oriented Groups</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><issn>1368-4302</issn><issn>1461-7188</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LxDAQxYMouK7ePfaiJ6uTj01Tb0vxCwQ96LmMabpk6SY1SQ_615tlBUEQT_Nm3m_e4RFySuGS0qq6olwqwYEBBUEBFntkRoWkZUWV2s862-XWPyRHMa4BgFEBM9I-uGTCKvhpLBq_GU2yyXp3USxTVlNnHQ7Fc_Bro3d3dF3xNFqXl6IxIaF16eO6aHC0CQf7ad2q2Fre9YPV6Zgc9DhEc_I95-T19ualuS8fn-4emuVjqflCpZKDqpRUdc0Y45LxXvJOYs0UKEErgdowXICWlVpkUHQKexR9J01n3pDTms_J-S53DP59MjG1Gxu1GQZ0xk-xlSA4l0L9C3JVK-CZnhPYgTr4GIPp2zHYDYaPlkK7rbz9XXl-OfvOxqhx6AM6bePPn2BQUckzV-64iCvTrv0Ucsvx79wvJzeMtQ</recordid><startdate>200101</startdate><enddate>200101</enddate><creator>Holtz, Rolf</creator><creator>Miller, Norman</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200101</creationdate><title>Intergroup Competition, Attitudinal Projection, and Opinion Certainty: Capitalizing on Conflict</title><author>Holtz, Rolf ; Miller, Norman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-3087868992223623f63d6a928084174ace2a50c67858784d8afa4fd6edeba3193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Group decision making</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Intergroup Relations</topic><topic>Interpersonal relationships. Groups. Leadership</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Task Oriented Groups</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holtz, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Norman</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Group processes & intergroup relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holtz, Rolf</au><au>Miller, Norman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intergroup Competition, Attitudinal Projection, and Opinion Certainty: Capitalizing on Conflict</atitle><jtitle>Group processes & intergroup relations</jtitle><date>2001-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>61-73</pages><issn>1368-4302</issn><eissn>1461-7188</eissn><abstract>Competitive or cooperative relations were imposed between the two experimentally created art discussion groups in each session. Group members indicated their own attitudes and estimated the positions held either by other in-group members or by out-group members in order to assess the effects of target of projection on attitude certainty. As expected, participants assumed greater attitudinal disagreement with competitive compared to cooperative out-groups on the 10 art appreciation issues relevant to their group task. They also assumed more similarity to in-group than to out-group members. Assumed similarity/dissimilarity mediated the effect of projection target on mean increments in attitude certainty, which were greatest in the competitive out-group target condition regardless of issue importance.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1368430201041005</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1368-4302 |
| ispartof | Group processes & intergroup relations, 2001-01, Vol.4 (1), p.61-73 |
| issn | 1368-4302 1461-7188 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60433648 |
| source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Attitudes Competition Conflict Cooperation Group decision making Group Dynamics Intergroup Relations Interpersonal relationships. Groups. Leadership Opinions Social psychology Sociology Task Oriented Groups Teamwork |
| title | Intergroup Competition, Attitudinal Projection, and Opinion Certainty: Capitalizing on Conflict |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T02%3A05%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intergroup%20Competition,%20Attitudinal%20Projection,%20and%20Opinion%20Certainty:%20Capitalizing%20on%20Conflict&rft.jtitle=Group%20processes%20&%20intergroup%20relations&rft.au=Holtz,%20Rolf&rft.date=2001-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=61-73&rft.issn=1368-4302&rft.eissn=1461-7188&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1368430201041005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60433648%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38980304&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1368430201041005&rfr_iscdi=true |