Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict Within Interdependent Teams
The purpose of this study was to examine perceptions of role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent sport teams from a multidimensional perspective. Role ambiguity and role conflict corresponding to offensive and defensive functions were assessed in relation to role-related efficacy belie...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Small group research 2001-04, Vol.32 (2), p.133-157 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 157 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 133 |
| container_title | Small group research |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Beauchamp, Mark R. Bray, Steven R. |
| description | The purpose of this study was to examine perceptions of role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent sport teams from a multidimensional perspective. Role ambiguity and role conflict corresponding to offensive and defensive functions were assessed in relation to role-related efficacy beliefs as well as starting status. Results of a principal components analysis supported the multidimensionality of role ambiguity but indicated that role conflict was unidimensional with regard to offensive and defensive role functions. Consistent with self-efficacy theory (discussed by Bandura in 1997), role ambiguity was negatively associated with role-related efficacy beliefs. Furthermore, consistent with theorizing by Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, and Rosenthal in 1964, a negative relationship between role conflict and role-related efficacy was mediated by role ambiguity. Nonstarters reported greater role ambiguity than starters; however, no differences were observed with regard to role conflict. The findings have implications for the future study of role ambiguity as a multidimensional construct and the relationship between role ambiguity and performance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/104649640103200202 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60429710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_104649640103200202</sage_id><sourcerecordid>60429710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-7aff21f320dbe7995cd7fad863bcf1467cf8c2cb079c4c6bb044cdb16253c1513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wNOi4G01yeZjA15K8aNQEKTicclmk5qym61J9tB_b2qLiCKeZhieeWfeF4BzBK8R4vwGQcKIYAQiWGAIMcQHYIQoxXmJeXmY-gTkW-IYnISwghBSRIoRuH3uW51NutouBxs3mXRN9jma9s60VsXs1cY367KZi9o3eq1do13MFlp24RQcGdkGfbavY_Byf7eYPubzp4fZdDLPFYE45lwag5FJjzW15kJQ1XAjm5IVtTKIMK5MqbCqIReKKFbXkBDV1IhhWihEUTEGVzvdte_fBx1i1dmgdNtKp_shVAwSLHiy_h9IeUGIIDiBFz_AVT94l0xUaBsjQ1gkCO8g5fsQvDbV2ttO-k2FYLWNvfode1q63CvLoGRrvHTKhq9NQQQVJFE3OyrIpf52-2_dD6UrjQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196406129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict Within Interdependent Teams</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Beauchamp, Mark R. ; Bray, Steven R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, Mark R. ; Bray, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to examine perceptions of role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent sport teams from a multidimensional perspective. Role ambiguity and role conflict corresponding to offensive and defensive functions were assessed in relation to role-related efficacy beliefs as well as starting status. Results of a principal components analysis supported the multidimensionality of role ambiguity but indicated that role conflict was unidimensional with regard to offensive and defensive role functions. Consistent with self-efficacy theory (discussed by Bandura in 1997), role ambiguity was negatively associated with role-related efficacy beliefs. Furthermore, consistent with theorizing by Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, and Rosenthal in 1964, a negative relationship between role conflict and role-related efficacy was mediated by role ambiguity. Nonstarters reported greater role ambiguity than starters; however, no differences were observed with regard to role conflict. The findings have implications for the future study of role ambiguity as a multidimensional construct and the relationship between role ambiguity and performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-4964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8278</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/104649640103200202</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SGREE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conflict resolution ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Group dynamics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Role Ambiguity ; Role Conflict ; Social interactions. Communication. Group processes ; Social psychology ; Sports ; Sports Teams ; Sports. Leisure ; Team sports</subject><ispartof>Small group research, 2001-04, Vol.32 (2), p.133-157</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Apr 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-7aff21f320dbe7995cd7fad863bcf1467cf8c2cb079c4c6bb044cdb16253c1513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-7aff21f320dbe7995cd7fad863bcf1467cf8c2cb079c4c6bb044cdb16253c1513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/104649640103200202$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/104649640103200202$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,31000,33774,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=949594$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bray, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><title>Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict Within Interdependent Teams</title><title>Small group research</title><description>The purpose of this study was to examine perceptions of role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent sport teams from a multidimensional perspective. Role ambiguity and role conflict corresponding to offensive and defensive functions were assessed in relation to role-related efficacy beliefs as well as starting status. Results of a principal components analysis supported the multidimensionality of role ambiguity but indicated that role conflict was unidimensional with regard to offensive and defensive role functions. Consistent with self-efficacy theory (discussed by Bandura in 1997), role ambiguity was negatively associated with role-related efficacy beliefs. Furthermore, consistent with theorizing by Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, and Rosenthal in 1964, a negative relationship between role conflict and role-related efficacy was mediated by role ambiguity. Nonstarters reported greater role ambiguity than starters; however, no differences were observed with regard to role conflict. The findings have implications for the future study of role ambiguity as a multidimensional construct and the relationship between role ambiguity and performance.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Role Ambiguity</subject><subject>Role Conflict</subject><subject>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Sports</subject><subject>Sports Teams</subject><subject>Sports. Leisure</subject><subject>Team sports</subject><issn>1046-4964</issn><issn>1552-8278</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wNOi4G01yeZjA15K8aNQEKTicclmk5qym61J9tB_b2qLiCKeZhieeWfeF4BzBK8R4vwGQcKIYAQiWGAIMcQHYIQoxXmJeXmY-gTkW-IYnISwghBSRIoRuH3uW51NutouBxs3mXRN9jma9s60VsXs1cY367KZi9o3eq1do13MFlp24RQcGdkGfbavY_Byf7eYPubzp4fZdDLPFYE45lwag5FJjzW15kJQ1XAjm5IVtTKIMK5MqbCqIReKKFbXkBDV1IhhWihEUTEGVzvdte_fBx1i1dmgdNtKp_shVAwSLHiy_h9IeUGIIDiBFz_AVT94l0xUaBsjQ1gkCO8g5fsQvDbV2ttO-k2FYLWNvfode1q63CvLoGRrvHTKhq9NQQQVJFE3OyrIpf52-2_dD6UrjQA</recordid><startdate>20010401</startdate><enddate>20010401</enddate><creator>Beauchamp, Mark R.</creator><creator>Bray, Steven R.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010401</creationdate><title>Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict Within Interdependent Teams</title><author>Beauchamp, Mark R. ; Bray, Steven R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-7aff21f320dbe7995cd7fad863bcf1467cf8c2cb079c4c6bb044cdb16253c1513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Role Ambiguity</topic><topic>Role Conflict</topic><topic>Social interactions. Communication. Group processes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Sports</topic><topic>Sports Teams</topic><topic>Sports. Leisure</topic><topic>Team sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, Mark R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bray, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Small group research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beauchamp, Mark R.</au><au>Bray, Steven R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict Within Interdependent Teams</atitle><jtitle>Small group research</jtitle><date>2001-04-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>133-157</pages><issn>1046-4964</issn><eissn>1552-8278</eissn><coden>SGREE3</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to examine perceptions of role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent sport teams from a multidimensional perspective. Role ambiguity and role conflict corresponding to offensive and defensive functions were assessed in relation to role-related efficacy beliefs as well as starting status. Results of a principal components analysis supported the multidimensionality of role ambiguity but indicated that role conflict was unidimensional with regard to offensive and defensive role functions. Consistent with self-efficacy theory (discussed by Bandura in 1997), role ambiguity was negatively associated with role-related efficacy beliefs. Furthermore, consistent with theorizing by Kahn, Wolfe, Quinn, Snoek, and Rosenthal in 1964, a negative relationship between role conflict and role-related efficacy was mediated by role ambiguity. Nonstarters reported greater role ambiguity than starters; however, no differences were observed with regard to role conflict. The findings have implications for the future study of role ambiguity as a multidimensional construct and the relationship between role ambiguity and performance.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/104649640103200202</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1046-4964 |
| ispartof | Small group research, 2001-04, Vol.32 (2), p.133-157 |
| issn | 1046-4964 1552-8278 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60429710 |
| source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Applied psychology Biological and medical sciences Conflict resolution Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Group dynamics Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Role Ambiguity Role Conflict Social interactions. Communication. Group processes Social psychology Sports Sports Teams Sports. Leisure Team sports |
| title | Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict Within Interdependent Teams |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A44%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20Ambiguity%20and%20Role%20Conflict%20Within%20Interdependent%20Teams&rft.jtitle=Small%20group%20research&rft.au=Beauchamp,%20Mark%20R.&rft.date=2001-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=133-157&rft.issn=1046-4964&rft.eissn=1552-8278&rft.coden=SGREE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/104649640103200202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60429710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196406129&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_104649640103200202&rfr_iscdi=true |