Perceptions of family-friendly policies: University versus corporate employees
This study adds to a growing literature examining the impact of family-friendly policies in a variety of industries by examining the differences between corporate and university employees in their subjective perceptions of work-family policies. Differences by gender and dependent care responsibility...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of family and economic issues 2002-04, Vol.23 (1), p.73-92 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 92 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 73 |
| container_title | Journal of family and economic issues |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | ANDERSON, Donna M MORGAN, Betsy L WILSON, Jennifer B |
| description | This study adds to a growing literature examining the impact of family-friendly policies in a variety of industries by examining the differences between corporate and university employees in their subjective perceptions of work-family policies. Differences by gender and dependent care responsibility in these perceptions in the university sample are examined and compared to results that have been found in corporate settings. Data collected in a university setting was compared to similar data of thirty-seven Business Week 1000 companies. The results show that the university sample employees were significantly more negative toward their workplace's work-family climate than were the corporate sample employees. In addition, significant gender and dependent care responsibility differences exist within the university sample. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1014229814271 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60427443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38551543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-8f6b9f56ad06f32629e46e43b557da6333799af91939869ba82815f29322110b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rZ69F0Fs1k68me1sWv2BRD-65pG0CWdKmJq3Qf2_VPXnxMu8cHgbmRegS8C1gQu_WK8DACFFyngUcoQXwguaUFfx43jGXOWaFOEVnKe0xxkoyvkAvbybWph9c6FIWbGZ16_yU2-hM1_gp64N3tTNple0692licsOUfeeYsjrEPkQ9mMy0vQ-TMekcnVjtk7k45BLtHu7fN0_59vXxebPe5jURbMilFZWyXOgGC0uJIMowYRitOC8aLSilhVLaKlBUSaEqLYkEbomihADgii7Rze_dPoaP0aShbF2qjfe6M2FMpcBzB4zRfyGVnAP_gVd_4D6MsZufKEHJuS8geEbXB6RTrb2NuqtdKvvoWh2nEigvGAegX6M7dzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198000120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions of family-friendly policies: University versus corporate employees</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>ANDERSON, Donna M ; MORGAN, Betsy L ; WILSON, Jennifer B</creator><creatorcontrib>ANDERSON, Donna M ; MORGAN, Betsy L ; WILSON, Jennifer B</creatorcontrib><description>This study adds to a growing literature examining the impact of family-friendly policies in a variety of industries by examining the differences between corporate and university employees in their subjective perceptions of work-family policies. Differences by gender and dependent care responsibility in these perceptions in the university sample are examined and compared to results that have been found in corporate settings. Data collected in a university setting was compared to similar data of thirty-seven Business Week 1000 companies. The results show that the university sample employees were significantly more negative toward their workplace's work-family climate than were the corporate sample employees. In addition, significant gender and dependent care responsibility differences exist within the university sample. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0476</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3475</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1014229814271</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFEIEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Careers ; College campuses ; College presidents ; Colleges & universities ; Corporations ; Data analysis ; Economics ; Employees ; Employers ; Employment ; Families & family life ; Family policy ; Family studies ; Family Work Relationship ; Females ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Higher education ; Human resources ; Onsite ; Perception ; Personnel Policy ; Social problems and social policy. Social work ; Sociology ; Studies ; Tenure ; Universities ; Worker Attitudes</subject><ispartof>Journal of family and economic issues, 2002-04, Vol.23 (1), p.73-92</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2002 Human Sciences Press, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-8f6b9f56ad06f32629e46e43b557da6333799af91939869ba82815f29322110b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27343,27923,27924,33773,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13574511$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ANDERSON, Donna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN, Betsy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILSON, Jennifer B</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions of family-friendly policies: University versus corporate employees</title><title>Journal of family and economic issues</title><description>This study adds to a growing literature examining the impact of family-friendly policies in a variety of industries by examining the differences between corporate and university employees in their subjective perceptions of work-family policies. Differences by gender and dependent care responsibility in these perceptions in the university sample are examined and compared to results that have been found in corporate settings. Data collected in a university setting was compared to similar data of thirty-seven Business Week 1000 companies. The results show that the university sample employees were significantly more negative toward their workplace's work-family climate than were the corporate sample employees. In addition, significant gender and dependent care responsibility differences exist within the university sample. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Careers</subject><subject>College campuses</subject><subject>College presidents</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family policy</subject><subject>Family studies</subject><subject>Family Work Relationship</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Onsite</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Personnel Policy</subject><subject>Social problems and social policy. Social work</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Worker Attitudes</subject><issn>1058-0476</issn><issn>1573-3475</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1LxDAQBuAgCq6rZ69F0Fs1k68me1sWv2BRD-65pG0CWdKmJq3Qf2_VPXnxMu8cHgbmRegS8C1gQu_WK8DACFFyngUcoQXwguaUFfx43jGXOWaFOEVnKe0xxkoyvkAvbybWph9c6FIWbGZ16_yU2-hM1_gp64N3tTNple0692licsOUfeeYsjrEPkQ9mMy0vQ-TMekcnVjtk7k45BLtHu7fN0_59vXxebPe5jURbMilFZWyXOgGC0uJIMowYRitOC8aLSilhVLaKlBUSaEqLYkEbomihADgii7Rze_dPoaP0aShbF2qjfe6M2FMpcBzB4zRfyGVnAP_gVd_4D6MsZufKEHJuS8geEbXB6RTrb2NuqtdKvvoWh2nEigvGAegX6M7dzA</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>ANDERSON, Donna M</creator><creator>MORGAN, Betsy L</creator><creator>WILSON, Jennifer B</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Perceptions of family-friendly policies: University versus corporate employees</title><author>ANDERSON, Donna M ; MORGAN, Betsy L ; WILSON, Jennifer B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-8f6b9f56ad06f32629e46e43b557da6333799af91939869ba82815f29322110b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Careers</topic><topic>College campuses</topic><topic>College presidents</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family policy</topic><topic>Family studies</topic><topic>Family Work Relationship</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Onsite</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Personnel Policy</topic><topic>Social problems and social policy. Social work</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Worker Attitudes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ANDERSON, Donna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN, Betsy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILSON, Jennifer B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of family and economic issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ANDERSON, Donna M</au><au>MORGAN, Betsy L</au><au>WILSON, Jennifer B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions of family-friendly policies: University versus corporate employees</atitle><jtitle>Journal of family and economic issues</jtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>73-92</pages><issn>1058-0476</issn><eissn>1573-3475</eissn><coden>JFEIEE</coden><abstract>This study adds to a growing literature examining the impact of family-friendly policies in a variety of industries by examining the differences between corporate and university employees in their subjective perceptions of work-family policies. Differences by gender and dependent care responsibility in these perceptions in the university sample are examined and compared to results that have been found in corporate settings. Data collected in a university setting was compared to similar data of thirty-seven Business Week 1000 companies. The results show that the university sample employees were significantly more negative toward their workplace's work-family climate than were the corporate sample employees. In addition, significant gender and dependent care responsibility differences exist within the university sample. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1014229814271</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1058-0476 |
| ispartof | Journal of family and economic issues, 2002-04, Vol.23 (1), p.73-92 |
| issn | 1058-0476 1573-3475 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60427443 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Careers College campuses College presidents Colleges & universities Corporations Data analysis Economics Employees Employers Employment Families & family life Family policy Family studies Family Work Relationship Females Gender Gender differences Higher education Human resources Onsite Perception Personnel Policy Social problems and social policy. Social work Sociology Studies Tenure Universities Worker Attitudes |
| title | Perceptions of family-friendly policies: University versus corporate employees |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T21%3A17%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20of%20family-friendly%20policies:%20University%20versus%20corporate%20employees&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20family%20and%20economic%20issues&rft.au=ANDERSON,%20Donna%20M&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=73-92&rft.issn=1058-0476&rft.eissn=1573-3475&rft.coden=JFEIEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1014229814271&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E38551543%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198000120&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |