Religious Liberty and Abortion Policy: Casey as “Catch-22”
Recent Supreme Court decisions about abortion have raised substantive religious liberty issues without addressing them directly. Simmons postulates that the decision in one such case amounts to a 'Catch-22' for women whose decision to undertake an abortion, based on their personal understa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | A journal of church and state 2000-01, Vol.42 (1), p.69-88 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 88 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 69 |
| container_title | A journal of church and state |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | SIMMONS, PAUL D. |
| description | Recent Supreme Court decisions about abortion have raised substantive religious liberty issues without addressing them directly. Simmons postulates that the decision in one such case amounts to a 'Catch-22' for women whose decision to undertake an abortion, based on their personal understanding of morality, may be compromised by the activities or others who oppose abortion for religious or moral reasons. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jcs/42.1.69 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60421875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A61586898</galeid><jstor_id>23920125</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A61586898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-82128f1c89f37e3705d8fefa1643a1e5921c3eedec2d90b32c6354277bd0159c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ltrFDEUAOBBFFyrTz4Lg4IIOtucZCYXH4Rl0V5cbbEKxZeQzZxZs85OajIL7lt_iP65_hJTtrRWVi15COR8nEs4WfYQyBCIYttzG7dLOoQhV7eyASUlKUrJxe1sQAiFQnF1fDe7F-OcEIAUGGSvPmDrZs4vYz5xUwz9KjddnY-mPvTOd_mhb51dvczHJmIKxfzs9MfY9PZLQenZ6c_72Z3GtBEfXNxb2ac3rz-Od4vJwc7eeDQpbCV4X0gKVDZgpWqYQCZIVcsGGwO8ZAawUhQsQ6zR0lqRKaOWs6qkQkxrApWybCt7us57Evy3JcZeL1y02Lamw9S75qSkIEV1A0hFqcj_IZNSMlGSBB__Aed-Gbo0raaMEMaAQEJP_oaAERBQ0pJfpZqZFrXrGt8HY8_r6hGHSnKpZEIvNqAZdhhM6ztsXHr-nRcbeDo1Lpzd5J9d84n0-L2fmWWMeu_o_U2p3Jn8o-kLan3b4gx12oXxwTX-fM1t8DEGbPRJcAsTVhqIPt9knTZZl1SD5irpR2s9j70Pl5QyRQnQ6uoLXExFL-MmfNVcMFHp3ePPel8eiv13b_f1EfsF2I346g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1301714246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Religious Liberty and Abortion Policy: Casey as “Catch-22”</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>SIMMONS, PAUL D.</creator><creatorcontrib>SIMMONS, PAUL D.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent Supreme Court decisions about abortion have raised substantive religious liberty issues without addressing them directly. Simmons postulates that the decision in one such case amounts to a 'Catch-22' for women whose decision to undertake an abortion, based on their personal understanding of morality, may be compromised by the activities or others who oppose abortion for religious or moral reasons.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-969X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-4867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jcs/42.1.69</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waco, Texas: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>922110 ; Abortion ; Constitutional amendments ; Constitutional law ; Fetus ; First Amendment ; Freedom of religion ; Government regulation ; Human rights ; Law ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Morality ; Pregnancy ; Public policy ; Religious beliefs ; Religious freedom ; Supreme Court decisions ; Supreme Court-US ; U.S.A ; Violence against women ; Womens rights ; Zygotes</subject><ispartof>A journal of church and state, 2000-01, Vol.42 (1), p.69-88</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 J. M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies Winter 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-82128f1c89f37e3705d8fefa1643a1e5921c3eedec2d90b32c6354277bd0159c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23920125$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23920125$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,12824,27846,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SIMMONS, PAUL D.</creatorcontrib><title>Religious Liberty and Abortion Policy: Casey as “Catch-22”</title><title>A journal of church and state</title><addtitle>Journal of Church and State</addtitle><description>Recent Supreme Court decisions about abortion have raised substantive religious liberty issues without addressing them directly. Simmons postulates that the decision in one such case amounts to a 'Catch-22' for women whose decision to undertake an abortion, based on their personal understanding of morality, may be compromised by the activities or others who oppose abortion for religious or moral reasons.</description><subject>922110</subject><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Constitutional amendments</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Fetus</subject><subject>First Amendment</subject><subject>Freedom of religion</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Religious beliefs</subject><subject>Religious freedom</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>Supreme Court-US</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Violence against women</subject><subject>Womens rights</subject><subject>Zygotes</subject><issn>0021-969X</issn><issn>2040-4867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ltrFDEUAOBBFFyrTz4Lg4IIOtucZCYXH4Rl0V5cbbEKxZeQzZxZs85OajIL7lt_iP65_hJTtrRWVi15COR8nEs4WfYQyBCIYttzG7dLOoQhV7eyASUlKUrJxe1sQAiFQnF1fDe7F-OcEIAUGGSvPmDrZs4vYz5xUwz9KjddnY-mPvTOd_mhb51dvczHJmIKxfzs9MfY9PZLQenZ6c_72Z3GtBEfXNxb2ac3rz-Od4vJwc7eeDQpbCV4X0gKVDZgpWqYQCZIVcsGGwO8ZAawUhQsQ6zR0lqRKaOWs6qkQkxrApWybCt7us57Evy3JcZeL1y02Lamw9S75qSkIEV1A0hFqcj_IZNSMlGSBB__Aed-Gbo0raaMEMaAQEJP_oaAERBQ0pJfpZqZFrXrGt8HY8_r6hGHSnKpZEIvNqAZdhhM6ztsXHr-nRcbeDo1Lpzd5J9d84n0-L2fmWWMeu_o_U2p3Jn8o-kLan3b4gx12oXxwTX-fM1t8DEGbPRJcAsTVhqIPt9knTZZl1SD5irpR2s9j70Pl5QyRQnQ6uoLXExFL-MmfNVcMFHp3ePPel8eiv13b_f1EfsF2I346g</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>SIMMONS, PAUL D.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>J. M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies of Baylor University</general><general>J. M. Dawson Studies in Church and State, Baylor University</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P7</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Religious Liberty and Abortion Policy: Casey as “Catch-22”</title><author>SIMMONS, PAUL D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-82128f1c89f37e3705d8fefa1643a1e5921c3eedec2d90b32c6354277bd0159c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>922110</topic><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Constitutional amendments</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Fetus</topic><topic>First Amendment</topic><topic>Freedom of religion</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Religious beliefs</topic><topic>Religious freedom</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>Supreme Court-US</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Violence against women</topic><topic>Womens rights</topic><topic>Zygotes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SIMMONS, PAUL D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 7</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>A journal of church and state</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SIMMONS, PAUL D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Religious Liberty and Abortion Policy: Casey as “Catch-22”</atitle><jtitle>A journal of church and state</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Church and State</addtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>69-88</pages><issn>0021-969X</issn><eissn>2040-4867</eissn><abstract>Recent Supreme Court decisions about abortion have raised substantive religious liberty issues without addressing them directly. Simmons postulates that the decision in one such case amounts to a 'Catch-22' for women whose decision to undertake an abortion, based on their personal understanding of morality, may be compromised by the activities or others who oppose abortion for religious or moral reasons.</abstract><cop>Waco, Texas</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jcs/42.1.69</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-969X |
| ispartof | A journal of church and state, 2000-01, Vol.42 (1), p.69-88 |
| issn | 0021-969X 2040-4867 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60421875 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | 922110 Abortion Constitutional amendments Constitutional law Fetus First Amendment Freedom of religion Government regulation Human rights Law Laws, regulations and rules Morality Pregnancy Public policy Religious beliefs Religious freedom Supreme Court decisions Supreme Court-US U.S.A Violence against women Womens rights Zygotes |
| title | Religious Liberty and Abortion Policy: Casey as “Catch-22” |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T22%3A12%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Religious%20Liberty%20and%20Abortion%20Policy:%20Casey%20as%20%E2%80%9CCatch-22%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=A%20journal%20of%20church%20and%20state&rft.au=SIMMONS,%20PAUL%20D.&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=69-88&rft.issn=0021-969X&rft.eissn=2040-4867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jcs/42.1.69&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA61586898%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1301714246&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A61586898&rft_jstor_id=23920125&rfr_iscdi=true |