Unsettling Engagements: On the Ends of Rapport in Critical Ethnography
The authors attempt to frame the essays in this issue of Qualitative Inquiry by arguing that an increasing emphasis on forms of “critical ethnography” in a variety of ethnographically informed disciplines has significantly complicated the notion of ethnographic rapport. Rapport, as a methodological...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Qualitative inquiry 2001-08, Vol.7 (4), p.403-417 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 417 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 403 |
| container_title | Qualitative inquiry |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Springwood, Charles Fruehling King, C. Richard |
| description | The authors attempt to frame the essays in this issue of Qualitative Inquiry by arguing that an increasing emphasis on forms of “critical ethnography” in a variety of ethnographically informed disciplines has significantly complicated the notion of ethnographic rapport. Rapport, as a methodological trope and relational strategy of the ethnographic habitus, has, in some circles, already been undergoing reconsideration and revision. But too often, it has simply been ignored. This refusal to locate rapport has been particularly problematic for ethnographers informed by technologies of critical theory. Critical ethnographers, including the contributors to this issue, inscribe a range of contrasting perspectives variously regarding the (im)possibility, desirability, ambiguity, and legitimacy of rapport. This issue allows ethnographers of human practice and meaning to seriously ponder the suggestion that they must indeed “forget” rapport. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/107780040100700401 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60416330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_107780040100700401</sage_id><sourcerecordid>81338356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-9279ab15bf46508c4f9df1e0783dbafb57f5cdc0b89f8c2d23f3c1b41f9ecd5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPw4G1t_m6y3qS0KhQKYs9LNptst2yza5Ie-u1NrSAo2Lm8Yfi9BzMDwC1GDxgLMcFICIkQQxgh8aVnYIQ5J5ngOT9PfQKyA3EJrkLYoFQSsRGYr1wwMXata-DMNaoxW-NieIRLB-PapFkdYG_hmxqG3kfYOjj1bWy16uAsrl3feDWs99fgwqoumJtvHYPVfPY-fckWy-fX6dMi07QgMSuIKFSFeWVZzpHUzBa1xQYJSetK2YoLy3WtUSULKzWpCbVU44phWxhdc03H4P6YO_j-Y2dCLLdt0KbrlDP9LpQ5YjinFJ0EuZAYEU5OglRylm6bJ_DuF7jpd96lbUtCcM44xjxB5Ahp34fgjS0H326V35cYlYdPlX8_lUyToymk8_-k_uP4BLo2keY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221645115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unsettling Engagements: On the Ends of Rapport in Critical Ethnography</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Springwood, Charles Fruehling ; King, C. Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Springwood, Charles Fruehling ; King, C. Richard</creatorcontrib><description>The authors attempt to frame the essays in this issue of Qualitative Inquiry by arguing that an increasing emphasis on forms of “critical ethnography” in a variety of ethnographically informed disciplines has significantly complicated the notion of ethnographic rapport. Rapport, as a methodological trope and relational strategy of the ethnographic habitus, has, in some circles, already been undergoing reconsideration and revision. But too often, it has simply been ignored. This refusal to locate rapport has been particularly problematic for ethnographers informed by technologies of critical theory. Critical ethnographers, including the contributors to this issue, inscribe a range of contrasting perspectives variously regarding the (im)possibility, desirability, ambiguity, and legitimacy of rapport. This issue allows ethnographers of human practice and meaning to seriously ponder the suggestion that they must indeed “forget” rapport.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-8004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/107780040100700401</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QUINFS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Ethnography ; Interpersonal relations ; Methodological Problems ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative research ; Rapport ; Research methodology ; Research methods ; Researcher Subject Relations ; Social interaction</subject><ispartof>Qualitative inquiry, 2001-08, Vol.7 (4), p.403-417</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Aug 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-9279ab15bf46508c4f9df1e0783dbafb57f5cdc0b89f8c2d23f3c1b41f9ecd5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-9279ab15bf46508c4f9df1e0783dbafb57f5cdc0b89f8c2d23f3c1b41f9ecd5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/107780040100700401$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/107780040100700401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,30998,33772,33773,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Springwood, Charles Fruehling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, C. Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Unsettling Engagements: On the Ends of Rapport in Critical Ethnography</title><title>Qualitative inquiry</title><description>The authors attempt to frame the essays in this issue of Qualitative Inquiry by arguing that an increasing emphasis on forms of “critical ethnography” in a variety of ethnographically informed disciplines has significantly complicated the notion of ethnographic rapport. Rapport, as a methodological trope and relational strategy of the ethnographic habitus, has, in some circles, already been undergoing reconsideration and revision. But too often, it has simply been ignored. This refusal to locate rapport has been particularly problematic for ethnographers informed by technologies of critical theory. Critical ethnographers, including the contributors to this issue, inscribe a range of contrasting perspectives variously regarding the (im)possibility, desirability, ambiguity, and legitimacy of rapport. This issue allows ethnographers of human practice and meaning to seriously ponder the suggestion that they must indeed “forget” rapport.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Rapport</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Researcher Subject Relations</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><issn>1077-8004</issn><issn>1552-7565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPw4G1t_m6y3qS0KhQKYs9LNptst2yza5Ie-u1NrSAo2Lm8Yfi9BzMDwC1GDxgLMcFICIkQQxgh8aVnYIQ5J5ngOT9PfQKyA3EJrkLYoFQSsRGYr1wwMXata-DMNaoxW-NieIRLB-PapFkdYG_hmxqG3kfYOjj1bWy16uAsrl3feDWs99fgwqoumJtvHYPVfPY-fckWy-fX6dMi07QgMSuIKFSFeWVZzpHUzBa1xQYJSetK2YoLy3WtUSULKzWpCbVU44phWxhdc03H4P6YO_j-Y2dCLLdt0KbrlDP9LpQ5YjinFJ0EuZAYEU5OglRylm6bJ_DuF7jpd96lbUtCcM44xjxB5Ahp34fgjS0H326V35cYlYdPlX8_lUyToymk8_-k_uP4BLo2keY</recordid><startdate>200108</startdate><enddate>200108</enddate><creator>Springwood, Charles Fruehling</creator><creator>King, C. Richard</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200108</creationdate><title>Unsettling Engagements: On the Ends of Rapport in Critical Ethnography</title><author>Springwood, Charles Fruehling ; King, C. Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-9279ab15bf46508c4f9df1e0783dbafb57f5cdc0b89f8c2d23f3c1b41f9ecd5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Rapport</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Researcher Subject Relations</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Springwood, Charles Fruehling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, C. Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Qualitative inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Springwood, Charles Fruehling</au><au>King, C. Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unsettling Engagements: On the Ends of Rapport in Critical Ethnography</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative inquiry</jtitle><date>2001-08</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>417</epage><pages>403-417</pages><issn>1077-8004</issn><eissn>1552-7565</eissn><coden>QUINFS</coden><abstract>The authors attempt to frame the essays in this issue of Qualitative Inquiry by arguing that an increasing emphasis on forms of “critical ethnography” in a variety of ethnographically informed disciplines has significantly complicated the notion of ethnographic rapport. Rapport, as a methodological trope and relational strategy of the ethnographic habitus, has, in some circles, already been undergoing reconsideration and revision. But too often, it has simply been ignored. This refusal to locate rapport has been particularly problematic for ethnographers informed by technologies of critical theory. Critical ethnographers, including the contributors to this issue, inscribe a range of contrasting perspectives variously regarding the (im)possibility, desirability, ambiguity, and legitimacy of rapport. This issue allows ethnographers of human practice and meaning to seriously ponder the suggestion that they must indeed “forget” rapport.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/107780040100700401</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1077-8004 |
| ispartof | Qualitative inquiry, 2001-08, Vol.7 (4), p.403-417 |
| issn | 1077-8004 1552-7565 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60416330 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Anthropology Ethnography Interpersonal relations Methodological Problems Qualitative analysis Qualitative research Rapport Research methodology Research methods Researcher Subject Relations Social interaction |
| title | Unsettling Engagements: On the Ends of Rapport in Critical Ethnography |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A10%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unsettling%20Engagements:%20On%20the%20Ends%20of%20Rapport%20in%20Critical%20Ethnography&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20inquiry&rft.au=Springwood,%20Charles%20Fruehling&rft.date=2001-08&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=417&rft.pages=403-417&rft.issn=1077-8004&rft.eissn=1552-7565&rft.coden=QUINFS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/107780040100700401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E81338356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221645115&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_107780040100700401&rfr_iscdi=true |