Can work alter welfare recipients' beliefs?
A common argument in support of work-based welfare reform is that exposure to work will lead welfare recipients to revise their beliefs about how they will be treated in the labor market. This paper explores the analytical and empirical basis for this argument. The difficulty in testing the assumpti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of policy analysis and management 2005, Vol.24 (3), p.485-498 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 498 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 485 |
container_title | Journal of policy analysis and management |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Gottschalk, Peter |
description | A common argument in support of work-based welfare reform is that exposure to work will lead welfare recipients to revise their beliefs about how they will be treated in the labor market. This paper explores the analytical and empirical basis for this argument. The difficulty in testing the assumption that work leads to a change in beliefs is that there is an inherent simultaneity between work and beliefs. Welfare recipients who work may have different beliefs because they learn about the world of work once they enter the labor market. Alternatively, welfare recipients who have a more positive view of work are the ones who are more likely to work. We use a unique data set that helps solve this simultaneity problem. We find that exogenous increases in work induced by an experimental tax credit led to the predicted change in beliefs among younger workers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pam.20111 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60413862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ759332</ericid><jstor_id>30164060</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30164060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5681-4d861882584a321508017497f5555cf04f6cfb73585d072093c27d838e7d3f153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd1rFDEUxQdRcK0--K4w-KCITHuTm487T1K2tbVsVVDxMaSziWY7uzMms133vzfr6AqCaODmBs7vHpKconjI4JAB8KPeLg85MMZuFRMmOVRKEd0uJsC1qkhjfbe4l9ICACTUbFK8mNpVuenidWnbwcVy41pvoyuja0If3GpIz8or1wbn08v7xR1v2-Qe_OwHxcdXpx-m59Xs7dnr6fGsaqQiVok5KUbEJQmLnEkgYFrU2su8Gg_Cq8ZfaZQk56A51NhwPSckp-fomcSD4uno28fu69qlwSxDalzb2pXr1skoEAxJ8f8AOfFasX-CSKwmjiqDT_4AF906rvJrDedcIAFghp6PUBO7lKLzpo9haePWMDC7FExOwfxIIbMXIxtd75o9uGm3iwx9HsyNQctF3ra7Q44lt5ALc_W5BEkjajJfhmU2ezSauRh-e51eaFkj7r7jaJQ3oXXbv1_KvDu-_HW7x-PEIg1d3E8gMCVAQdarUQ9pcN_2uo3XRmnU0nx6c2ZOctKX789nZorfAbPcvug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222438003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can work alter welfare recipients' beliefs?</title><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Gottschalk, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Gottschalk, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>A common argument in support of work-based welfare reform is that exposure to work will lead welfare recipients to revise their beliefs about how they will be treated in the labor market. This paper explores the analytical and empirical basis for this argument. The difficulty in testing the assumption that work leads to a change in beliefs is that there is an inherent simultaneity between work and beliefs. Welfare recipients who work may have different beliefs because they learn about the world of work once they enter the labor market. Alternatively, welfare recipients who have a more positive view of work are the ones who are more likely to work. We use a unique data set that helps solve this simultaneity problem. We find that exogenous increases in work induced by an experimental tax credit led to the predicted change in beliefs among younger workers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-8739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pam.20111</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPAMD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>1200 ; 4230 ; 9172 ; Age Differences ; Attitude Change ; Attitudes ; Beliefs ; Canada ; Control groups ; Employment ; Employment Programs ; Instrumental variables estimation ; Labor market ; Labor markets ; Labour market ; Locus of control ; Personal taxation ; Policy studies ; Public assistance programs ; Public Policy ; Social policy ; Social psychology ; Social security ; Standard error ; Statistical significance ; Studies ; Subsidies ; Tax Credits ; Welfare ; Welfare Recipients ; Welfare reform ; Welfare Services ; Work Attitudes ; Work ethic ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Journal of policy analysis and management, 2005, Vol.24 (3), p.485-498</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><rights>2005 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><rights>Copyright © 2005 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5681-4d861882584a321508017497f5555cf04f6cfb73585d072093c27d838e7d3f153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5681-4d861882584a321508017497f5555cf04f6cfb73585d072093c27d838e7d3f153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30164060$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30164060$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,4008,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ759332$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/wlyjpamgt/v_3a24_3ay_3a2005_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a485-498.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gottschalk, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Can work alter welfare recipients' beliefs?</title><title>Journal of policy analysis and management</title><addtitle>J. Pol. Anal. Manage</addtitle><description>A common argument in support of work-based welfare reform is that exposure to work will lead welfare recipients to revise their beliefs about how they will be treated in the labor market. This paper explores the analytical and empirical basis for this argument. The difficulty in testing the assumption that work leads to a change in beliefs is that there is an inherent simultaneity between work and beliefs. Welfare recipients who work may have different beliefs because they learn about the world of work once they enter the labor market. Alternatively, welfare recipients who have a more positive view of work are the ones who are more likely to work. We use a unique data set that helps solve this simultaneity problem. We find that exogenous increases in work induced by an experimental tax credit led to the predicted change in beliefs among younger workers.</description><subject>1200</subject><subject>4230</subject><subject>9172</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Attitude Change</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Control groups</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment Programs</subject><subject>Instrumental variables estimation</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Labor markets</subject><subject>Labour market</subject><subject>Locus of control</subject><subject>Personal taxation</subject><subject>Policy studies</subject><subject>Public assistance programs</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Standard error</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Tax Credits</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Welfare Recipients</subject><subject>Welfare reform</subject><subject>Welfare Services</subject><subject>Work Attitudes</subject><subject>Work ethic</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0276-8739</issn><issn>1520-6688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd1rFDEUxQdRcK0--K4w-KCITHuTm487T1K2tbVsVVDxMaSziWY7uzMms133vzfr6AqCaODmBs7vHpKconjI4JAB8KPeLg85MMZuFRMmOVRKEd0uJsC1qkhjfbe4l9ICACTUbFK8mNpVuenidWnbwcVy41pvoyuja0If3GpIz8or1wbn08v7xR1v2-Qe_OwHxcdXpx-m59Xs7dnr6fGsaqQiVok5KUbEJQmLnEkgYFrU2su8Gg_Cq8ZfaZQk56A51NhwPSckp-fomcSD4uno28fu69qlwSxDalzb2pXr1skoEAxJ8f8AOfFasX-CSKwmjiqDT_4AF906rvJrDedcIAFghp6PUBO7lKLzpo9haePWMDC7FExOwfxIIbMXIxtd75o9uGm3iwx9HsyNQctF3ra7Q44lt5ALc_W5BEkjajJfhmU2ezSauRh-e51eaFkj7r7jaJQ3oXXbv1_KvDu-_HW7x-PEIg1d3E8gMCVAQdarUQ9pcN_2uo3XRmnU0nx6c2ZOctKX789nZorfAbPcvug</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Gottschalk, Peter</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Can work alter welfare recipients' beliefs?</title><author>Gottschalk, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5681-4d861882584a321508017497f5555cf04f6cfb73585d072093c27d838e7d3f153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>1200</topic><topic>4230</topic><topic>9172</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Attitude Change</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Control groups</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment Programs</topic><topic>Instrumental variables estimation</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Labor markets</topic><topic>Labour market</topic><topic>Locus of control</topic><topic>Personal taxation</topic><topic>Policy studies</topic><topic>Public assistance programs</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Standard error</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Tax Credits</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Welfare Recipients</topic><topic>Welfare reform</topic><topic>Welfare Services</topic><topic>Work Attitudes</topic><topic>Work ethic</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gottschalk, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of policy analysis and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gottschalk, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ759332</ericid><atitle>Can work alter welfare recipients' beliefs?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of policy analysis and management</jtitle><addtitle>J. Pol. Anal. Manage</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>485-498</pages><issn>0276-8739</issn><eissn>1520-6688</eissn><coden>JPAMD7</coden><abstract>A common argument in support of work-based welfare reform is that exposure to work will lead welfare recipients to revise their beliefs about how they will be treated in the labor market. This paper explores the analytical and empirical basis for this argument. The difficulty in testing the assumption that work leads to a change in beliefs is that there is an inherent simultaneity between work and beliefs. Welfare recipients who work may have different beliefs because they learn about the world of work once they enter the labor market. Alternatively, welfare recipients who have a more positive view of work are the ones who are more likely to work. We use a unique data set that helps solve this simultaneity problem. We find that exogenous increases in work induced by an experimental tax credit led to the predicted change in beliefs among younger workers.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/pam.20111</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0276-8739 |
ispartof | Journal of policy analysis and management, 2005, Vol.24 (3), p.485-498 |
issn | 0276-8739 1520-6688 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60413862 |
source | RePEc; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | 1200 4230 9172 Age Differences Attitude Change Attitudes Beliefs Canada Control groups Employment Employment Programs Instrumental variables estimation Labor market Labor markets Labour market Locus of control Personal taxation Policy studies Public assistance programs Public Policy Social policy Social psychology Social security Standard error Statistical significance Studies Subsidies Tax Credits Welfare Welfare Recipients Welfare reform Welfare Services Work Attitudes Work ethic Workers |
title | Can work alter welfare recipients' beliefs? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A38%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20work%20alter%20welfare%20recipients'%20beliefs?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20policy%20analysis%20and%20management&rft.au=Gottschalk,%20Peter&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=485-498&rft.issn=0276-8739&rft.eissn=1520-6688&rft.coden=JPAMD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pam.20111&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30164060%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222438003&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ759332&rft_jstor_id=30164060&rfr_iscdi=true |