Decisive Decision Making in the Executive Budget Process: Analyzing the Political and Economic Propensities of Central Budget Bureau Analysts
Some 50 years after V. O. Key first asked the central question of budget allocation, we still lack a general theory of microbudgeting. This article focuses on budgetary decision making by central budget bureau analysts and describes the framework of a theory of microbudgeting based on the notion of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public administration review 1995-09, Vol.55 (5), p.448-460 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 460 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 448 |
| container_title | Public administration review |
| container_volume | 55 |
| creator | Thurmaier, Kurt |
| description | Some 50 years after V. O. Key first asked the central question of budget allocation, we still lack a general theory of microbudgeting. This article focuses on budgetary decision making by central budget bureau analysts and describes the framework of a theory of microbudgeting based on the notion of budgets as multifaceted problems, requiring multiple rationalities for redress or solutions, and predicting that, when faced with a political imperative, budgeteers will recommend a politically rational alternative instead of one which is economically rational. The results from the experimental design and logistic regression models indicated that budgeteers do incorporate multiple rationalities into their decisions. Moreover, there is a significant difference in how inexperienced and "seasoned" budgeteers integrate various rationalities into their budget recommendations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/976769 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60399373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A17595403</galeid><jstor_id>976769</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A17595403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-16fdd5472fd1d8b1cf18dba17a806b27249a8b5d6c313f462553adc877c7a9343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ktv1DAQAOAIgcRS4DdYgDg14Ef84rZdlodURA9wjrz2ZPGStbd2gmj_A_8ZR1mBhFoV-WDL_jSa8UxVPSX4FWVYvtZSSKHvVQvCG1wLSvD9aoExYzVjnD6sHuW8w5hQ0qhF9estWJ_9D0DzIQb0yXz3YYt8QMM3QOufYMdhAmej28KALlK0kPMbtAymv7qe6OQuYu8Hb02PTHBobWOIe28nfYCQyxNkFDu0gjCkgo7BzsYEZpxD5SE_rh50ps_w5LifVF_frb-sPtTnn99_XC3Pa8sZHmoiOud4I2nniFMbYjui3MYQaRQWGyppo43acCcsI6xrBOWcGWeVlFYazRp2Ur2c4x5SvBwhD-3eZwt9bwLEMbcCM62ZZP8BqeaK4jshl6op7dB3QqY0pUpO8Nk_cBfHVD4qt0RLIiTToqDntyKGSSOxklNyp7Pamh5aH7pYemC3EKC0IgbofLleEsl1SXEqur6Bl-WgtPQmfyzJpphzgq49JL836aoluJ1Gsp1HssAXx2xNLpPSJRPKzP3RgpGSbPO3qF0eYrot2G-cAOjI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197167396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decisive Decision Making in the Executive Budget Process: Analyzing the Political and Economic Propensities of Central Budget Bureau Analysts</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Thurmaier, Kurt</creator><creatorcontrib>Thurmaier, Kurt</creatorcontrib><description>Some 50 years after V. O. Key first asked the central question of budget allocation, we still lack a general theory of microbudgeting. This article focuses on budgetary decision making by central budget bureau analysts and describes the framework of a theory of microbudgeting based on the notion of budgets as multifaceted problems, requiring multiple rationalities for redress or solutions, and predicting that, when faced with a political imperative, budgeteers will recommend a politically rational alternative instead of one which is economically rational. The results from the experimental design and logistic regression models indicated that budgeteers do incorporate multiple rationalities into their decisions. Moreover, there is a significant difference in how inexperienced and "seasoned" budgeteers integrate various rationalities into their budget recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/976769</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBARBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Society for Public Administration</publisher><subject>1130 ; 2600 ; 9130 ; 9190 ; 9550 ; Administrative decision ; Administrative science ; Analysis ; Branch libraries ; Budget ; Budget cuts ; Budgetary policy ; Budgetary process ; Budgeting ; Budgets ; Bureaucrats ; Climate change ; Decision making ; Economic Factors ; Economic theory ; Educational Equity (Finance) ; Educational Finance ; Evidence ; Executive advisory bodies ; Executive branch ; Executives ; Experimental/theoretical treatment ; Finance Reform ; Financial budgets ; Government budgets ; Influence ; Legislatures ; Libraries ; Management science/operations research ; Mayors ; Means of action of administration ; Microeconomics ; Planning ; Policy Analysis ; Policy making ; Public administration ; Public budgeting ; Public finance ; Public sector organizations ; Rationality ; Recommendations ; Regression analysis ; Resource Allocation ; School finance ; Studies ; Tools and Decisions ; USA</subject><ispartof>Public administration review, 1995-09, Vol.55 (5), p.448-460</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1995 The American Society for Public Administration</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1995 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Public Administration Sep 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-16fdd5472fd1d8b1cf18dba17a806b27249a8b5d6c313f462553adc877c7a9343</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/976769$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/976769$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12844,27868,27923,27924,30999,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6317034$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thurmaier, Kurt</creatorcontrib><title>Decisive Decision Making in the Executive Budget Process: Analyzing the Political and Economic Propensities of Central Budget Bureau Analysts</title><title>Public administration review</title><description>Some 50 years after V. O. Key first asked the central question of budget allocation, we still lack a general theory of microbudgeting. This article focuses on budgetary decision making by central budget bureau analysts and describes the framework of a theory of microbudgeting based on the notion of budgets as multifaceted problems, requiring multiple rationalities for redress or solutions, and predicting that, when faced with a political imperative, budgeteers will recommend a politically rational alternative instead of one which is economically rational. The results from the experimental design and logistic regression models indicated that budgeteers do incorporate multiple rationalities into their decisions. Moreover, there is a significant difference in how inexperienced and "seasoned" budgeteers integrate various rationalities into their budget recommendations.</description><subject>1130</subject><subject>2600</subject><subject>9130</subject><subject>9190</subject><subject>9550</subject><subject>Administrative decision</subject><subject>Administrative science</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Branch libraries</subject><subject>Budget</subject><subject>Budget cuts</subject><subject>Budgetary policy</subject><subject>Budgetary process</subject><subject>Budgeting</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Bureaucrats</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic Factors</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Educational Equity (Finance)</subject><subject>Educational Finance</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Executive advisory bodies</subject><subject>Executive branch</subject><subject>Executives</subject><subject>Experimental/theoretical treatment</subject><subject>Finance Reform</subject><subject>Financial budgets</subject><subject>Government budgets</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Management science/operations research</subject><subject>Mayors</subject><subject>Means of action of administration</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Policy Analysis</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public budgeting</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Public sector organizations</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Recommendations</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Resource Allocation</subject><subject>School finance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tools and Decisions</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0033-3352</issn><issn>1540-6210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ktv1DAQAOAIgcRS4DdYgDg14Ef84rZdlodURA9wjrz2ZPGStbd2gmj_A_8ZR1mBhFoV-WDL_jSa8UxVPSX4FWVYvtZSSKHvVQvCG1wLSvD9aoExYzVjnD6sHuW8w5hQ0qhF9estWJ_9D0DzIQb0yXz3YYt8QMM3QOufYMdhAmej28KALlK0kPMbtAymv7qe6OQuYu8Hb02PTHBobWOIe28nfYCQyxNkFDu0gjCkgo7BzsYEZpxD5SE_rh50ps_w5LifVF_frb-sPtTnn99_XC3Pa8sZHmoiOud4I2nniFMbYjui3MYQaRQWGyppo43acCcsI6xrBOWcGWeVlFYazRp2Ur2c4x5SvBwhD-3eZwt9bwLEMbcCM62ZZP8BqeaK4jshl6op7dB3QqY0pUpO8Nk_cBfHVD4qt0RLIiTToqDntyKGSSOxklNyp7Pamh5aH7pYemC3EKC0IgbofLleEsl1SXEqur6Bl-WgtPQmfyzJpphzgq49JL836aoluJ1Gsp1HssAXx2xNLpPSJRPKzP3RgpGSbPO3qF0eYrot2G-cAOjI</recordid><startdate>19950901</startdate><enddate>19950901</enddate><creator>Thurmaier, Kurt</creator><general>American Society for Public Administration</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FYSDU</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950901</creationdate><title>Decisive Decision Making in the Executive Budget Process: Analyzing the Political and Economic Propensities of Central Budget Bureau Analysts</title><author>Thurmaier, Kurt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-16fdd5472fd1d8b1cf18dba17a806b27249a8b5d6c313f462553adc877c7a9343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>1130</topic><topic>2600</topic><topic>9130</topic><topic>9190</topic><topic>9550</topic><topic>Administrative decision</topic><topic>Administrative science</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Branch libraries</topic><topic>Budget</topic><topic>Budget cuts</topic><topic>Budgetary policy</topic><topic>Budgetary process</topic><topic>Budgeting</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Bureaucrats</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic Factors</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Educational Equity (Finance)</topic><topic>Educational Finance</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Executive advisory bodies</topic><topic>Executive branch</topic><topic>Executives</topic><topic>Experimental/theoretical treatment</topic><topic>Finance Reform</topic><topic>Financial budgets</topic><topic>Government budgets</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Management science/operations research</topic><topic>Mayors</topic><topic>Means of action of administration</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Policy Analysis</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public budgeting</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Public sector organizations</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Recommendations</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Resource Allocation</topic><topic>School finance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tools and Decisions</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thurmaier, Kurt</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 07</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thurmaier, Kurt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decisive Decision Making in the Executive Budget Process: Analyzing the Political and Economic Propensities of Central Budget Bureau Analysts</atitle><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle><date>1995-09-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>448</spage><epage>460</epage><pages>448-460</pages><issn>0033-3352</issn><eissn>1540-6210</eissn><coden>PBARBM</coden><abstract>Some 50 years after V. O. Key first asked the central question of budget allocation, we still lack a general theory of microbudgeting. This article focuses on budgetary decision making by central budget bureau analysts and describes the framework of a theory of microbudgeting based on the notion of budgets as multifaceted problems, requiring multiple rationalities for redress or solutions, and predicting that, when faced with a political imperative, budgeteers will recommend a politically rational alternative instead of one which is economically rational. The results from the experimental design and logistic regression models indicated that budgeteers do incorporate multiple rationalities into their decisions. Moreover, there is a significant difference in how inexperienced and "seasoned" budgeteers integrate various rationalities into their budget recommendations.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Society for Public Administration</pub><doi>10.2307/976769</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-3352 |
| ispartof | Public administration review, 1995-09, Vol.55 (5), p.448-460 |
| issn | 0033-3352 1540-6210 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60399373 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Political Science Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | 1130 2600 9130 9190 9550 Administrative decision Administrative science Analysis Branch libraries Budget Budget cuts Budgetary policy Budgetary process Budgeting Budgets Bureaucrats Climate change Decision making Economic Factors Economic theory Educational Equity (Finance) Educational Finance Evidence Executive advisory bodies Executive branch Executives Experimental/theoretical treatment Finance Reform Financial budgets Government budgets Influence Legislatures Libraries Management science/operations research Mayors Means of action of administration Microeconomics Planning Policy Analysis Policy making Public administration Public budgeting Public finance Public sector organizations Rationality Recommendations Regression analysis Resource Allocation School finance Studies Tools and Decisions USA |
| title | Decisive Decision Making in the Executive Budget Process: Analyzing the Political and Economic Propensities of Central Budget Bureau Analysts |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T00%3A58%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decisive%20Decision%20Making%20in%20the%20Executive%20Budget%20Process:%20Analyzing%20the%20Political%20and%20Economic%20Propensities%20of%20Central%20Budget%20Bureau%20Analysts&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20review&rft.au=Thurmaier,%20Kurt&rft.date=1995-09-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=448&rft.epage=460&rft.pages=448-460&rft.issn=0033-3352&rft.eissn=1540-6210&rft.coden=PBARBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/976769&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA17595403%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197167396&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A17595403&rft_jstor_id=976769&rfr_iscdi=true |