Intergroup relations in a changing political context: the case of veiled and unveiled university students in Turkey
The present study investigated (a) the underlying dimensions of different measures related to identification, categorization, ingroup bias and contact conditions; and (b) relations between two groups related to an important social controversy over time. Questionnaires were administered to veiled (mi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of social psychology 2000-09, Vol.30 (5), p.733-744 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 744 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 733 |
| container_title | European journal of social psychology |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | HORTACSU, Nuran |
| description | The present study investigated (a) the underlying dimensions of different measures related to identification, categorization, ingroup bias and contact conditions; and (b) relations between two groups related to an important social controversy over time. Questionnaires were administered to veiled (minority) and unveiled (majority) Turkish female university students during the fall of 1996 and the spring of 1998. Results of factor analysis revealed three factors, namely: tolerance, including perceived outgroup homogeneity, ingroup bias, and individuation; identification, including identification and perceived ingroup homogeneity; and contact conditions, including ratings of pleasantness, frequency and feelings of anxiety. Comparison of groups over time revealed that although the minority group reported lower tolerance for outgroups than the majority the pattern was reversed in 1998. In addition, the majority reported greater negative contact conditions of contact in 1998 than in 1996. No time‐related differences were revealed for the minority with respect to reports of contact conditions. Results were discussed with respect to sensitivity of group relations to social context and to Social Identity Theory. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:5<733::AID-EJSP21>3.0.CO;2-M |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60398461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877055475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4961-171af8dda420495003d7bde4bb267533482b1dc47f2b8ec367134099cf7372193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVku9r1DAch4soeE7_h4Ai-qJnfjbtbQjjNs-TzRN2_nj3JU3TW7YuPZN2ev-9qT0miDAMhJDkk-dL8iRJDgmeEozpG4KLIo2dvqI4tiIuvGZ4Jo4kY7PZ8fIkPf1w8YmSt2yKp_PVIU3PHySTu1MPkwnGPEuplPRx8iSEqwGSZWyShKXrjN_4tt8ibxrV2dYFZB1SSF8qt7Fug7ZtYzurVYN0G9M_uxnqLg3SKhjU1ujW2MZUSLkK9W4_6Z29NT7YbodC11fGdb-h695fm93T5FGtmmCe7ceD5PO70_X8fXq2Wiznx2ep5kVGUiKJqvOqUpxiXgiMWSXLyvCypJkUjPGclqTSXNa0zI1mmSSMx-vqWjJJScEOkpcjd-vb770JHdzYoE3TKGfaPkCGWZHzjNwbFFKIHBNxb5DlhaA0lzH4_K_gVdt7F28LJJcSC8HlgLsYU9q3IXhTw9bbG-V3QDAM4mFQCINCGMUPGwyDgCgeIIqHUTwwwDBfAYXzSH2xr61ClFZ75bQNf9CCECmG1_kyxn5EY7v_q_zPwvuVCE5HsA3xs9yBlb-GLJoR8PXjAr5xThdreQKC_QI0PtqX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877055475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intergroup relations in a changing political context: the case of veiled and unveiled university students in Turkey</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Online service)</source><creator>HORTACSU, Nuran</creator><creatorcontrib>HORTACSU, Nuran</creatorcontrib><description>The present study investigated (a) the underlying dimensions of different measures related to identification, categorization, ingroup bias and contact conditions; and (b) relations between two groups related to an important social controversy over time. Questionnaires were administered to veiled (minority) and unveiled (majority) Turkish female university students during the fall of 1996 and the spring of 1998. Results of factor analysis revealed three factors, namely: tolerance, including perceived outgroup homogeneity, ingroup bias, and individuation; identification, including identification and perceived ingroup homogeneity; and contact conditions, including ratings of pleasantness, frequency and feelings of anxiety. Comparison of groups over time revealed that although the minority group reported lower tolerance for outgroups than the majority the pattern was reversed in 1998. In addition, the majority reported greater negative contact conditions of contact in 1998 than in 1996. No time‐related differences were revealed for the minority with respect to reports of contact conditions. Results were discussed with respect to sensitivity of group relations to social context and to Social Identity Theory. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-2772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:5<733::AID-EJSP21>3.0.CO;2-M</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJSPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; College Students ; Factor structures ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Group dynamics ; Group Identity ; In-group ; Intergroup Relations ; Majority Groups ; Measures ; Minority Groups ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social Environment ; Social psychology ; Students ; Tolerance ; Turkey ; Veils ; Women</subject><ispartof>European journal of social psychology, 2000-09, Vol.30 (5), p.733-744</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4961-171af8dda420495003d7bde4bb267533482b1dc47f2b8ec367134099cf7372193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F1099-0992%28200009%2F10%2930%3A5%3C733%3A%3AAID-EJSP21%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F1099-0992%28200009%2F10%2930%3A5%3C733%3A%3AAID-EJSP21%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27869,27924,27925,31000,33775,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1511759$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HORTACSU, Nuran</creatorcontrib><title>Intergroup relations in a changing political context: the case of veiled and unveiled university students in Turkey</title><title>European journal of social psychology</title><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><description>The present study investigated (a) the underlying dimensions of different measures related to identification, categorization, ingroup bias and contact conditions; and (b) relations between two groups related to an important social controversy over time. Questionnaires were administered to veiled (minority) and unveiled (majority) Turkish female university students during the fall of 1996 and the spring of 1998. Results of factor analysis revealed three factors, namely: tolerance, including perceived outgroup homogeneity, ingroup bias, and individuation; identification, including identification and perceived ingroup homogeneity; and contact conditions, including ratings of pleasantness, frequency and feelings of anxiety. Comparison of groups over time revealed that although the minority group reported lower tolerance for outgroups than the majority the pattern was reversed in 1998. In addition, the majority reported greater negative contact conditions of contact in 1998 than in 1996. No time‐related differences were revealed for the minority with respect to reports of contact conditions. Results were discussed with respect to sensitivity of group relations to social context and to Social Identity Theory. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Factor structures</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Group Identity</subject><subject>In-group</subject><subject>Intergroup Relations</subject><subject>Majority Groups</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Minority Groups</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Tolerance</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Veils</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0046-2772</issn><issn>1099-0992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVku9r1DAch4soeE7_h4Ai-qJnfjbtbQjjNs-TzRN2_nj3JU3TW7YuPZN2ev-9qT0miDAMhJDkk-dL8iRJDgmeEozpG4KLIo2dvqI4tiIuvGZ4Jo4kY7PZ8fIkPf1w8YmSt2yKp_PVIU3PHySTu1MPkwnGPEuplPRx8iSEqwGSZWyShKXrjN_4tt8ibxrV2dYFZB1SSF8qt7Fug7ZtYzurVYN0G9M_uxnqLg3SKhjU1ujW2MZUSLkK9W4_6Z29NT7YbodC11fGdb-h695fm93T5FGtmmCe7ceD5PO70_X8fXq2Wiznx2ep5kVGUiKJqvOqUpxiXgiMWSXLyvCypJkUjPGclqTSXNa0zI1mmSSMx-vqWjJJScEOkpcjd-vb770JHdzYoE3TKGfaPkCGWZHzjNwbFFKIHBNxb5DlhaA0lzH4_K_gVdt7F28LJJcSC8HlgLsYU9q3IXhTw9bbG-V3QDAM4mFQCINCGMUPGwyDgCgeIIqHUTwwwDBfAYXzSH2xr61ClFZ75bQNf9CCECmG1_kyxn5EY7v_q_zPwvuVCE5HsA3xs9yBlb-GLJoR8PXjAr5xThdreQKC_QI0PtqX</recordid><startdate>200009</startdate><enddate>200009</enddate><creator>HORTACSU, Nuran</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200009</creationdate><title>Intergroup relations in a changing political context: the case of veiled and unveiled university students in Turkey</title><author>HORTACSU, Nuran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4961-171af8dda420495003d7bde4bb267533482b1dc47f2b8ec367134099cf7372193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Factor structures</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Group Identity</topic><topic>In-group</topic><topic>Intergroup Relations</topic><topic>Majority Groups</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Minority Groups</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Tolerance</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Veils</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HORTACSU, Nuran</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HORTACSU, Nuran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intergroup relations in a changing political context: the case of veiled and unveiled university students in Turkey</atitle><jtitle>European journal of social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. J. Soc. Psychol</addtitle><date>2000-09</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>733</spage><epage>744</epage><pages>733-744</pages><issn>0046-2772</issn><eissn>1099-0992</eissn><coden>EJSPA6</coden><abstract>The present study investigated (a) the underlying dimensions of different measures related to identification, categorization, ingroup bias and contact conditions; and (b) relations between two groups related to an important social controversy over time. Questionnaires were administered to veiled (minority) and unveiled (majority) Turkish female university students during the fall of 1996 and the spring of 1998. Results of factor analysis revealed three factors, namely: tolerance, including perceived outgroup homogeneity, ingroup bias, and individuation; identification, including identification and perceived ingroup homogeneity; and contact conditions, including ratings of pleasantness, frequency and feelings of anxiety. Comparison of groups over time revealed that although the minority group reported lower tolerance for outgroups than the majority the pattern was reversed in 1998. In addition, the majority reported greater negative contact conditions of contact in 1998 than in 1996. No time‐related differences were revealed for the minority with respect to reports of contact conditions. Results were discussed with respect to sensitivity of group relations to social context and to Social Identity Theory. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:5<733::AID-EJSP21>3.0.CO;2-M</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0046-2772 |
| ispartof | European journal of social psychology, 2000-09, Vol.30 (5), p.733-744 |
| issn | 0046-2772 1099-0992 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60398461 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library (Online service) |
| subjects | Bias Biological and medical sciences College Students Factor structures Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Group dynamics Group Identity In-group Intergroup Relations Majority Groups Measures Minority Groups Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Social attribution, perception and cognition Social Environment Social psychology Students Tolerance Turkey Veils Women |
| title | Intergroup relations in a changing political context: the case of veiled and unveiled university students in Turkey |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A26%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intergroup%20relations%20in%20a%20changing%20political%20context:%20the%20case%20of%20veiled%20and%20unveiled%20university%20students%20in%20Turkey&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=HORTACSU,%20Nuran&rft.date=2000-09&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=733&rft.epage=744&rft.pages=733-744&rft.issn=0046-2772&rft.eissn=1099-0992&rft.coden=EJSPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:5%3C733::AID-EJSP21%3E3.0.CO;2-M&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877055475%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877055475&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |