What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory

In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theories to the history of philosophy. While Collins's macrosociology of knowledge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectual field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular, Co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociological Theory 2001-03, Vol.19 (1), p.92-101
1. Verfasser: Goodman, Douglas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue 1
container_start_page 92
container_title Sociological Theory
container_volume 19
creator Goodman, Douglas
description In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theories to the history of philosophy. While Collins's macrosociology of knowledge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectual field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular, Collins's micro theory ignores the fundamental importance of social interpretations. This leads him to use a vague and unproductive notion of emotions. Nevertheless, we can usefully apply Collins's findings to sociological theory itself. As in philosophy, we see the same competitive appropriation and elaboration of accumulated intellectual capital and the same struggle over the limited resources necessary to intellectual production, especially over what Collins calls the intellectual attention space.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/0735-2751.00130
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60391940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>223294</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1111_0735-2751.00130</sage_id><sourcerecordid>223294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-9ed94a84214ee97323098679f0d508ee3bfbca3f26eadd13e076d0e21edbf5b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EEqUwM7BkgoW05498eEQVUESlIrWI0XKSS5PKrUucCOXfkxDUEbx48Hu-0yPkmsKEdmcKEQ98FgV0AkA5nJARFWHkyyCIT8no-HpOLpzbAkAUBmJEXj8KXXsza0y5d3fOWxforWxaWmM3rWdz760ojXX2UJTovJVunacT29RHqEy16S1btZfkLNfG4dXvPSbvT4_r2dxfLJ9fZg8LP-U0Bl9iJoWOBaMCUUaccZBxGMkcsgBiRJ7kSap5zkLUWUY5dqtmgIxiluRBIviY3A7_Hir72aCr1a50KRqj92gbp0LgkkoB_4JcAuNBHHfgdADTyjpXYa4OVbnTVasoqL6u6vupvp_6qdsZYjC-SoPtf7haLdfzQbsfNKc3qLa2qfZdqT-m3Az41tW2Ok5hjDMp-Dd4ZJGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>39023588</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Goodman, Douglas</creator><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Douglas</creatorcontrib><description>In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theories to the history of philosophy. While Collins's macrosociology of knowledge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectual field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular, Collins's micro theory ignores the fundamental importance of social interpretations. This leads him to use a vague and unproductive notion of emotions. Nevertheless, we can usefully apply Collins's findings to sociological theory itself. As in philosophy, we see the same competitive appropriation and elaboration of accumulated intellectual capital and the same struggle over the limited resources necessary to intellectual production, especially over what Collins calls the intellectual attention space.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-2751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9558</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/0735-2751.00130</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOTHEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Blackwell Publishers</publisher><subject>Creativity ; Emotion theories ; Emotions ; Empiricism ; Ethnomethodology ; Group interaction ; History of philosophy ; Philosophical analysis ; Philosophy ; Postmodern philosophy ; Randall Collins ; Rational choice theory ; Religious rituals ; Review Symposium on Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies ; Rituals ; Social Conflict ; Social interaction ; Social Philosophy ; Social theories ; Sociological Theory ; Sociology ; Sociology of Knowledge ; Solidarity ; Theoretical Problems</subject><ispartof>Sociological Theory, 2001-03, Vol.19 (1), p.92-101</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>2001 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>American Sociological Association 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-9ed94a84214ee97323098679f0d508ee3bfbca3f26eadd13e076d0e21edbf5b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-9ed94a84214ee97323098679f0d508ee3bfbca3f26eadd13e076d0e21edbf5b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/223294$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/223294$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,27920,27922,27923,33773,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Douglas</creatorcontrib><title>What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory</title><title>Sociological Theory</title><description>In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theories to the history of philosophy. While Collins's macrosociology of knowledge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectual field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular, Collins's micro theory ignores the fundamental importance of social interpretations. This leads him to use a vague and unproductive notion of emotions. Nevertheless, we can usefully apply Collins's findings to sociological theory itself. As in philosophy, we see the same competitive appropriation and elaboration of accumulated intellectual capital and the same struggle over the limited resources necessary to intellectual production, especially over what Collins calls the intellectual attention space.</description><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Emotion theories</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Empiricism</subject><subject>Ethnomethodology</subject><subject>Group interaction</subject><subject>History of philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophical analysis</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Postmodern philosophy</subject><subject>Randall Collins</subject><subject>Rational choice theory</subject><subject>Religious rituals</subject><subject>Review Symposium on Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Social Conflict</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Philosophy</subject><subject>Social theories</subject><subject>Sociological Theory</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of Knowledge</subject><subject>Solidarity</subject><subject>Theoretical Problems</subject><issn>0735-2751</issn><issn>1467-9558</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EEqUwM7BkgoW05498eEQVUESlIrWI0XKSS5PKrUucCOXfkxDUEbx48Hu-0yPkmsKEdmcKEQ98FgV0AkA5nJARFWHkyyCIT8no-HpOLpzbAkAUBmJEXj8KXXsza0y5d3fOWxforWxaWmM3rWdz760ojXX2UJTovJVunacT29RHqEy16S1btZfkLNfG4dXvPSbvT4_r2dxfLJ9fZg8LP-U0Bl9iJoWOBaMCUUaccZBxGMkcsgBiRJ7kSap5zkLUWUY5dqtmgIxiluRBIviY3A7_Hir72aCr1a50KRqj92gbp0LgkkoB_4JcAuNBHHfgdADTyjpXYa4OVbnTVasoqL6u6vupvp_6qdsZYjC-SoPtf7haLdfzQbsfNKc3qLa2qfZdqT-m3Az41tW2Ok5hjDMp-Dd4ZJGw</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>Goodman, Douglas</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Blackwell Publishers, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory</title><author>Goodman, Douglas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-9ed94a84214ee97323098679f0d508ee3bfbca3f26eadd13e076d0e21edbf5b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Emotion theories</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Empiricism</topic><topic>Ethnomethodology</topic><topic>Group interaction</topic><topic>History of philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophical analysis</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Postmodern philosophy</topic><topic>Randall Collins</topic><topic>Rational choice theory</topic><topic>Religious rituals</topic><topic>Review Symposium on Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Social Conflict</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Philosophy</topic><topic>Social theories</topic><topic>Sociological Theory</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of Knowledge</topic><topic>Solidarity</topic><topic>Theoretical Problems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Douglas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological Theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodman, Douglas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory</atitle><jtitle>Sociological Theory</jtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>92-101</pages><issn>0735-2751</issn><eissn>1467-9558</eissn><coden>SOTHEA</coden><abstract>In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theories to the history of philosophy. While Collins's macrosociology of knowledge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectual field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular, Collins's micro theory ignores the fundamental importance of social interpretations. This leads him to use a vague and unproductive notion of emotions. Nevertheless, we can usefully apply Collins's findings to sociological theory itself. As in philosophy, we see the same competitive appropriation and elaboration of accumulated intellectual capital and the same struggle over the limited resources necessary to intellectual production, especially over what Collins calls the intellectual attention space.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers</pub><doi>10.1111/0735-2751.00130</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-2751
ispartof Sociological Theory, 2001-03, Vol.19 (1), p.92-101
issn 0735-2751
1467-9558
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60391940
source Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Creativity
Emotion theories
Emotions
Empiricism
Ethnomethodology
Group interaction
History of philosophy
Philosophical analysis
Philosophy
Postmodern philosophy
Randall Collins
Rational choice theory
Religious rituals
Review Symposium on Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies
Rituals
Social Conflict
Social interaction
Social Philosophy
Social theories
Sociological Theory
Sociology
Sociology of Knowledge
Solidarity
Theoretical Problems
title What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Collins's%20The%20Sociology%20of%20Philosophies%20Says%20about%20Sociological%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20Theory&rft.au=Goodman,%20Douglas&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=92-101&rft.issn=0735-2751&rft.eissn=1467-9558&rft.coden=SOTHEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/0735-2751.00130&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E223294%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=39023588&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=223294&rft_sage_id=10.1111_0735-2751.00130&rfr_iscdi=true