What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory
In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theories to the history of philosophy. While Collins's macrosociology of knowledge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectual field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular, Co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociological Theory 2001-03, Vol.19 (1), p.92-101 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | Sociological Theory |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Goodman, Douglas |
description | In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theories to the history of philosophy. While Collins's macrosociology of knowledge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectual field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular, Collins's micro theory ignores the fundamental importance of social interpretations. This leads him to use a vague and unproductive notion of emotions. Nevertheless, we can usefully apply Collins's findings to sociological theory itself. As in philosophy, we see the same competitive appropriation and elaboration of accumulated intellectual capital and the same struggle over the limited resources necessary to intellectual production, especially over what Collins calls the intellectual attention space. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/0735-2751.00130 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60391940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>223294</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1111_0735-2751.00130</sage_id><sourcerecordid>223294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-9ed94a84214ee97323098679f0d508ee3bfbca3f26eadd13e076d0e21edbf5b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EEqUwM7BkgoW05498eEQVUESlIrWI0XKSS5PKrUucCOXfkxDUEbx48Hu-0yPkmsKEdmcKEQ98FgV0AkA5nJARFWHkyyCIT8no-HpOLpzbAkAUBmJEXj8KXXsza0y5d3fOWxforWxaWmM3rWdz760ojXX2UJTovJVunacT29RHqEy16S1btZfkLNfG4dXvPSbvT4_r2dxfLJ9fZg8LP-U0Bl9iJoWOBaMCUUaccZBxGMkcsgBiRJ7kSap5zkLUWUY5dqtmgIxiluRBIviY3A7_Hir72aCr1a50KRqj92gbp0LgkkoB_4JcAuNBHHfgdADTyjpXYa4OVbnTVasoqL6u6vupvp_6qdsZYjC-SoPtf7haLdfzQbsfNKc3qLa2qfZdqT-m3Az41tW2Ok5hjDMp-Dd4ZJGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>39023588</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Goodman, Douglas</creator><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Douglas</creatorcontrib><description>In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theories to the history of philosophy. While Collins's macrosociology of knowledge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectual field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular, Collins's micro theory ignores the fundamental importance of social interpretations. This leads him to use a vague and unproductive notion of emotions. Nevertheless, we can usefully apply Collins's findings to sociological theory itself. As in philosophy, we see the same competitive appropriation and elaboration of accumulated intellectual capital and the same struggle over the limited resources necessary to intellectual production, especially over what Collins calls the intellectual attention space.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-2751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9558</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/0735-2751.00130</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOTHEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Blackwell Publishers</publisher><subject>Creativity ; Emotion theories ; Emotions ; Empiricism ; Ethnomethodology ; Group interaction ; History of philosophy ; Philosophical analysis ; Philosophy ; Postmodern philosophy ; Randall Collins ; Rational choice theory ; Religious rituals ; Review Symposium on Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies ; Rituals ; Social Conflict ; Social interaction ; Social Philosophy ; Social theories ; Sociological Theory ; Sociology ; Sociology of Knowledge ; Solidarity ; Theoretical Problems</subject><ispartof>Sociological Theory, 2001-03, Vol.19 (1), p.92-101</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>2001 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>American Sociological Association 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-9ed94a84214ee97323098679f0d508ee3bfbca3f26eadd13e076d0e21edbf5b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-9ed94a84214ee97323098679f0d508ee3bfbca3f26eadd13e076d0e21edbf5b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/223294$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/223294$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,27920,27922,27923,33773,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Douglas</creatorcontrib><title>What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory</title><title>Sociological Theory</title><description>In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theories to the history of philosophy. While Collins's macrosociology of knowledge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectual field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular, Collins's micro theory ignores the fundamental importance of social interpretations. This leads him to use a vague and unproductive notion of emotions. Nevertheless, we can usefully apply Collins's findings to sociological theory itself. As in philosophy, we see the same competitive appropriation and elaboration of accumulated intellectual capital and the same struggle over the limited resources necessary to intellectual production, especially over what Collins calls the intellectual attention space.</description><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Emotion theories</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Empiricism</subject><subject>Ethnomethodology</subject><subject>Group interaction</subject><subject>History of philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophical analysis</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Postmodern philosophy</subject><subject>Randall Collins</subject><subject>Rational choice theory</subject><subject>Religious rituals</subject><subject>Review Symposium on Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies</subject><subject>Rituals</subject><subject>Social Conflict</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Philosophy</subject><subject>Social theories</subject><subject>Sociological Theory</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of Knowledge</subject><subject>Solidarity</subject><subject>Theoretical Problems</subject><issn>0735-2751</issn><issn>1467-9558</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EEqUwM7BkgoW05498eEQVUESlIrWI0XKSS5PKrUucCOXfkxDUEbx48Hu-0yPkmsKEdmcKEQ98FgV0AkA5nJARFWHkyyCIT8no-HpOLpzbAkAUBmJEXj8KXXsza0y5d3fOWxforWxaWmM3rWdz760ojXX2UJTovJVunacT29RHqEy16S1btZfkLNfG4dXvPSbvT4_r2dxfLJ9fZg8LP-U0Bl9iJoWOBaMCUUaccZBxGMkcsgBiRJ7kSap5zkLUWUY5dqtmgIxiluRBIviY3A7_Hir72aCr1a50KRqj92gbp0LgkkoB_4JcAuNBHHfgdADTyjpXYa4OVbnTVasoqL6u6vupvp_6qdsZYjC-SoPtf7haLdfzQbsfNKc3qLa2qfZdqT-m3Az41tW2Ok5hjDMp-Dd4ZJGw</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>Goodman, Douglas</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Blackwell Publishers, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory</title><author>Goodman, Douglas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-9ed94a84214ee97323098679f0d508ee3bfbca3f26eadd13e076d0e21edbf5b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Emotion theories</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Empiricism</topic><topic>Ethnomethodology</topic><topic>Group interaction</topic><topic>History of philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophical analysis</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Postmodern philosophy</topic><topic>Randall Collins</topic><topic>Rational choice theory</topic><topic>Religious rituals</topic><topic>Review Symposium on Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies</topic><topic>Rituals</topic><topic>Social Conflict</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Philosophy</topic><topic>Social theories</topic><topic>Sociological Theory</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of Knowledge</topic><topic>Solidarity</topic><topic>Theoretical Problems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Douglas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological Theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodman, Douglas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory</atitle><jtitle>Sociological Theory</jtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>92-101</pages><issn>0735-2751</issn><eissn>1467-9558</eissn><coden>SOTHEA</coden><abstract>In Collins's latest book, we see an attempt to apply his sociological theories to the history of philosophy. While Collins's macrosociology of knowledge provides important insights into the role of conflict in an intellectual field, his microsociology is more problematic. In particular, Collins's micro theory ignores the fundamental importance of social interpretations. This leads him to use a vague and unproductive notion of emotions. Nevertheless, we can usefully apply Collins's findings to sociological theory itself. As in philosophy, we see the same competitive appropriation and elaboration of accumulated intellectual capital and the same struggle over the limited resources necessary to intellectual production, especially over what Collins calls the intellectual attention space.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers</pub><doi>10.1111/0735-2751.00130</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-2751 |
ispartof | Sociological Theory, 2001-03, Vol.19 (1), p.92-101 |
issn | 0735-2751 1467-9558 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60391940 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Creativity Emotion theories Emotions Empiricism Ethnomethodology Group interaction History of philosophy Philosophical analysis Philosophy Postmodern philosophy Randall Collins Rational choice theory Religious rituals Review Symposium on Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Rituals Social Conflict Social interaction Social Philosophy Social theories Sociological Theory Sociology Sociology of Knowledge Solidarity Theoretical Problems |
title | What Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies Says about Sociological Theory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T08%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Collins's%20The%20Sociology%20of%20Philosophies%20Says%20about%20Sociological%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20Theory&rft.au=Goodman,%20Douglas&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=92-101&rft.issn=0735-2751&rft.eissn=1467-9558&rft.coden=SOTHEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/0735-2751.00130&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E223294%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=39023588&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=223294&rft_sage_id=10.1111_0735-2751.00130&rfr_iscdi=true |