Bias in the Social Science Publication Process: Are There Exceptions?

Explores the possibility that journals in the management area of the social sciences may not reflect the same degree of publication bias that has typically been found in other areas. Data from structured interviews & quantitative comparisons indicate that top-tier journals in the management area...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of social behavior and personality 2000-03, Vol.15 (1), p.1-18
Hauptverfasser: Martinko, M J, Campbell, C R, Douglas, S C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of social behavior and personality
container_volume 15
creator Martinko, M J
Campbell, C R
Douglas, S C
description Explores the possibility that journals in the management area of the social sciences may not reflect the same degree of publication bias that has typically been found in other areas. Data from structured interviews & quantitative comparisons indicate that top-tier journals in the management area (1) have lower acceptance rates than our comparison group, (2) generally require a greater number of reviewers than the comparison group, & (3) publish a higher % of articles by authors affiliated with the schools/disciplines of the editors than would be expected by chance. It is concluded that the management area is not immune from bias. It is suggested that continued research of this nature can be an important source of information for both contributors & editors enabling them to become aware of & manage the types of biases to which editors are most susceptible. 2 Tables, 3 Figures, 42 References. Adapted from the source document.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60390135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60390135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p212t-b2b665090f0efbbcee13cb9507b9d0a485e9af45a783d28bff213fd8464bfafa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjl1LwzAYhYMoWKf_ISB4V0jyplnijcxRP2DgYPO6JOkbllGb2rTgz3eiV96c5-I8HM4ZKQRXugSh4JwUTGtVciX5JbnK-cgYE5WRBakfo8009nQ6IN0lH21Hdz5i75FuZ9dFb6eYerodk8ec7-lqRLo_4CnrL4_DT5kfrslFsF3Gmz8uyPtTvV-_lJu359f1alMOgoupdMIpVTHDAsPgnEfk4J2p2NKZllmpKzQ2yMouNbRCuxAEh9BqqaQLNlhYkLvf3WFMnzPmqfmI2WPX2R7TnBvFwDAO1Um8_Sce0zz2p28NF0YAB5AKvgHQ61Vh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1292313346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bias in the Social Science Publication Process: Are There Exceptions?</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Martinko, M J ; Campbell, C R ; Douglas, S C</creator><creatorcontrib>Martinko, M J ; Campbell, C R ; Douglas, S C</creatorcontrib><description>Explores the possibility that journals in the management area of the social sciences may not reflect the same degree of publication bias that has typically been found in other areas. Data from structured interviews &amp; quantitative comparisons indicate that top-tier journals in the management area (1) have lower acceptance rates than our comparison group, (2) generally require a greater number of reviewers than the comparison group, &amp; (3) publish a higher % of articles by authors affiliated with the schools/disciplines of the editors than would be expected by chance. It is concluded that the management area is not immune from bias. It is suggested that continued research of this nature can be an important source of information for both contributors &amp; editors enabling them to become aware of &amp; manage the types of biases to which editors are most susceptible. 2 Tables, 3 Figures, 42 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-1641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-3263</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSBPE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Corte Madera, CA: Select Press</publisher><subject>Bias ; Editors ; Management ; Social Science Research ; Writing for Publication</subject><ispartof>Journal of social behavior and personality, 2000-03, Vol.15 (1), p.1-18</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,33775</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martinko, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, S C</creatorcontrib><title>Bias in the Social Science Publication Process: Are There Exceptions?</title><title>Journal of social behavior and personality</title><description>Explores the possibility that journals in the management area of the social sciences may not reflect the same degree of publication bias that has typically been found in other areas. Data from structured interviews &amp; quantitative comparisons indicate that top-tier journals in the management area (1) have lower acceptance rates than our comparison group, (2) generally require a greater number of reviewers than the comparison group, &amp; (3) publish a higher % of articles by authors affiliated with the schools/disciplines of the editors than would be expected by chance. It is concluded that the management area is not immune from bias. It is suggested that continued research of this nature can be an important source of information for both contributors &amp; editors enabling them to become aware of &amp; manage the types of biases to which editors are most susceptible. 2 Tables, 3 Figures, 42 References. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Editors</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Writing for Publication</subject><issn>0886-1641</issn><issn>2168-3263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjl1LwzAYhYMoWKf_ISB4V0jyplnijcxRP2DgYPO6JOkbllGb2rTgz3eiV96c5-I8HM4ZKQRXugSh4JwUTGtVciX5JbnK-cgYE5WRBakfo8009nQ6IN0lH21Hdz5i75FuZ9dFb6eYerodk8ec7-lqRLo_4CnrL4_DT5kfrslFsF3Gmz8uyPtTvV-_lJu359f1alMOgoupdMIpVTHDAsPgnEfk4J2p2NKZllmpKzQ2yMouNbRCuxAEh9BqqaQLNlhYkLvf3WFMnzPmqfmI2WPX2R7TnBvFwDAO1Um8_Sce0zz2p28NF0YAB5AKvgHQ61Vh</recordid><startdate>20000301</startdate><enddate>20000301</enddate><creator>Martinko, M J</creator><creator>Campbell, C R</creator><creator>Douglas, S C</creator><general>Select Press</general><scope>ACNBF</scope><scope>AGQHT</scope><scope>APEJR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>JQCIK</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~P6</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000301</creationdate><title>Bias in the Social Science Publication Process: Are There Exceptions?</title><author>Martinko, M J ; Campbell, C R ; Douglas, S C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p212t-b2b665090f0efbbcee13cb9507b9d0a485e9af45a783d28bff213fd8464bfafa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Editors</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Writing for Publication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martinko, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, S C</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 6 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 2 (2022)</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 33</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 6</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of social behavior and personality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martinko, M J</au><au>Campbell, C R</au><au>Douglas, S C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bias in the Social Science Publication Process: Are There Exceptions?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of social behavior and personality</jtitle><date>2000-03-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>1-18</pages><issn>0886-1641</issn><eissn>2168-3263</eissn><coden>JSBPE9</coden><abstract>Explores the possibility that journals in the management area of the social sciences may not reflect the same degree of publication bias that has typically been found in other areas. Data from structured interviews &amp; quantitative comparisons indicate that top-tier journals in the management area (1) have lower acceptance rates than our comparison group, (2) generally require a greater number of reviewers than the comparison group, &amp; (3) publish a higher % of articles by authors affiliated with the schools/disciplines of the editors than would be expected by chance. It is concluded that the management area is not immune from bias. It is suggested that continued research of this nature can be an important source of information for both contributors &amp; editors enabling them to become aware of &amp; manage the types of biases to which editors are most susceptible. 2 Tables, 3 Figures, 42 References. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>Corte Madera, CA</cop><pub>Select Press</pub><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-1641
ispartof Journal of social behavior and personality, 2000-03, Vol.15 (1), p.1-18
issn 0886-1641
2168-3263
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60390135
source Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bias
Editors
Management
Social Science Research
Writing for Publication
title Bias in the Social Science Publication Process: Are There Exceptions?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A01%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bias%20in%20the%20Social%20Science%20Publication%20Process:%20Are%20There%20Exceptions?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20social%20behavior%20and%20personality&rft.au=Martinko,%20M%20J&rft.date=2000-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=1-18&rft.issn=0886-1641&rft.eissn=2168-3263&rft.coden=JSBPE9&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E60390135%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1292313346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true