Youthfulness and agelessness: a comment
In recent years, we gerontologists have been forced to re-examine the conceptual base of our work – both in the wake of developments in postmodernist thought, and following the emergence of ageism as a media issue. Two particular problems have been addressed: one is how we recognise and define age i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ageing and society 2000-11, Vol.20 (6), p.781-789 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In recent years, we gerontologists have been forced to re-examine the
conceptual base of our work – both in the wake of developments in
postmodernist thought, and following the emergence of ageism as a
media issue. Two particular problems have been addressed: one is how
we recognise and define age in the context of the partly-disaggregated
individual human being: body, mind, self, identity, etc. The second is
how we relate to popular sentiments, judgements and objectives
regarding age: thinking positively, being prejudiced, remaining active,
being a burden, etc. On both fronts there has been a shift away from
emphasising the significance of age, and one often reads such arguments
as: people do not change, they remain the same; but they can continue
to develop; but there is a massive diversity; so we must not generalise
about age or prejudge older people; and so on. It is not difficult to
associate these trends with powerful ideological movements. There is a
third issue that lies just beneath the surface: how we gerontologists
theorise our own personal experience of ageing. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0144-686X 1469-1779 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0144686X01007954 |