Public Self-Focus and Sex Differences in Behavioral Self-Handicapping: Does Increasing Self-Threat Still Make it “Just a Man’s Game?”

The present study examined the effects of public self-focus and participants’ sex on self-handicapping behavior. Research in the area of self-handicapping has consistently shown that men alone tend to self-handicap behaviorally. Because conditions of public self-focus tend to make the evaluative imp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Personality & social psychology bulletin 2000-09, Vol.26 (9), p.1131-1141
Hauptverfasser: Hirt, Edward R., McCrea, Sean M., Kimble, Charles E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1141
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1131
container_title Personality & social psychology bulletin
container_volume 26
creator Hirt, Edward R.
McCrea, Sean M.
Kimble, Charles E.
description The present study examined the effects of public self-focus and participants’ sex on self-handicapping behavior. Research in the area of self-handicapping has consistently shown that men alone tend to self-handicap behaviorally. Because conditions of public self-focus tend to make the evaluative implications of per formance more salient, the authors hypothesized that people would self-handicap more when they are self-focused (as opposed to other-focused). Men and women were presented with an important intellectual evaluation and were allowed to practice for the upcoming test as much as they wanted. Results showed that men self-handicap more when they are self-focused but women do not behaviorally self-handicap under self-or other-focused conditions. Heightened concern over possible failure in self-focused conditions appeared to be the critical mediator in encouraging self-handicapping behavior among men.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/01461672002611009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60362429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_01461672002611009</sage_id><sourcerecordid>57579639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-c47121233ebbb5bb532a58ebbab1284dd2460a98770051e00d386ea882f16d3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d1q1UAQB_BFLHisPoB3i4J3qTv7mXgj2tovWhRar8MkmbRbc5LT3UT07tz7BIK-3HkS95BeiFKEhWVmf_-BZRh7BmIPwLlXArQF66QQ0gIIUTxgCzBGZk4r9ZAttu_ZFjxij2O8EUJoq-WCff84VZ2v-QV1bXY41FPk2Dep_MoPfNtSoL6myH3P39E1fvFDwG7Gx8n5Glcr31-95gdDUid9HQhjaszk8jqVI78Yfdfxc_xM3I98s_55OsWRY-r0m_WPyI9wSW82619P2E6LXaSnd_cu-3T4_nL_ODv7cHSy__YsQ23lmNXagQSpFFVVZdJREk2eCqxA5rpppLYCi9w5IQyQEI3KLWGeyxZsoyq1y17Oc1dhuJ0ojuXSx5q6DnsaplhaoazUsvgvNM64wqotfP4XvBmm0KdPlBJUUcjcQEIv7kNglQahCuOSglnVYYgxUFuugl9i-FaCKLerLv9ZdcrszZmIV_TH1HsDvwFEo6iz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1634103957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public Self-Focus and Sex Differences in Behavioral Self-Handicapping: Does Increasing Self-Threat Still Make it “Just a Man’s Game?”</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hirt, Edward R. ; McCrea, Sean M. ; Kimble, Charles E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirt, Edward R. ; McCrea, Sean M. ; Kimble, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study examined the effects of public self-focus and participants’ sex on self-handicapping behavior. Research in the area of self-handicapping has consistently shown that men alone tend to self-handicap behaviorally. Because conditions of public self-focus tend to make the evaluative implications of per formance more salient, the authors hypothesized that people would self-handicap more when they are self-focused (as opposed to other-focused). Men and women were presented with an important intellectual evaluation and were allowed to practice for the upcoming test as much as they wanted. Results showed that men self-handicap more when they are self-focused but women do not behaviorally self-handicap under self-or other-focused conditions. Heightened concern over possible failure in self-focused conditions appeared to be the critical mediator in encouraging self-handicapping behavior among men.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01461672002611009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSPBZZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Behavior ; College Students ; Factors ; Failure ; Gender differences ; Indiana ; Public domain ; Self Evaluation ; Selffocused attention ; Selfhandicapping behaviour ; Sex Differences ; Sexes ; Social Influence ; Social psychology ; Success ; Task Performance ; Threat</subject><ispartof>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin, 2000-09, Vol.26 (9), p.1131-1141</ispartof><rights>Copyright Sage Publications, Inc. Sep 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-c47121233ebbb5bb532a58ebbab1284dd2460a98770051e00d386ea882f16d3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-c47121233ebbb5bb532a58ebbab1284dd2460a98770051e00d386ea882f16d3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01461672002611009$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01461672002611009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27846,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirt, Edward R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrea, Sean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimble, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><title>Public Self-Focus and Sex Differences in Behavioral Self-Handicapping: Does Increasing Self-Threat Still Make it “Just a Man’s Game?”</title><title>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</title><description>The present study examined the effects of public self-focus and participants’ sex on self-handicapping behavior. Research in the area of self-handicapping has consistently shown that men alone tend to self-handicap behaviorally. Because conditions of public self-focus tend to make the evaluative implications of per formance more salient, the authors hypothesized that people would self-handicap more when they are self-focused (as opposed to other-focused). Men and women were presented with an important intellectual evaluation and were allowed to practice for the upcoming test as much as they wanted. Results showed that men self-handicap more when they are self-focused but women do not behaviorally self-handicap under self-or other-focused conditions. Heightened concern over possible failure in self-focused conditions appeared to be the critical mediator in encouraging self-handicapping behavior among men.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Factors</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Indiana</subject><subject>Public domain</subject><subject>Self Evaluation</subject><subject>Selffocused attention</subject><subject>Selfhandicapping behaviour</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Social Influence</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Task Performance</subject><subject>Threat</subject><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d1q1UAQB_BFLHisPoB3i4J3qTv7mXgj2tovWhRar8MkmbRbc5LT3UT07tz7BIK-3HkS95BeiFKEhWVmf_-BZRh7BmIPwLlXArQF66QQ0gIIUTxgCzBGZk4r9ZAttu_ZFjxij2O8EUJoq-WCff84VZ2v-QV1bXY41FPk2Dep_MoPfNtSoL6myH3P39E1fvFDwG7Gx8n5Glcr31-95gdDUid9HQhjaszk8jqVI78Yfdfxc_xM3I98s_55OsWRY-r0m_WPyI9wSW82619P2E6LXaSnd_cu-3T4_nL_ODv7cHSy__YsQ23lmNXagQSpFFVVZdJREk2eCqxA5rpppLYCi9w5IQyQEI3KLWGeyxZsoyq1y17Oc1dhuJ0ojuXSx5q6DnsaplhaoazUsvgvNM64wqotfP4XvBmm0KdPlBJUUcjcQEIv7kNglQahCuOSglnVYYgxUFuugl9i-FaCKLerLv9ZdcrszZmIV_TH1HsDvwFEo6iz</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>Hirt, Edward R.</creator><creator>McCrea, Sean M.</creator><creator>Kimble, Charles E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>Public Self-Focus and Sex Differences in Behavioral Self-Handicapping: Does Increasing Self-Threat Still Make it “Just a Man’s Game?”</title><author>Hirt, Edward R. ; McCrea, Sean M. ; Kimble, Charles E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a462t-c47121233ebbb5bb532a58ebbab1284dd2460a98770051e00d386ea882f16d3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Factors</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Indiana</topic><topic>Public domain</topic><topic>Self Evaluation</topic><topic>Selffocused attention</topic><topic>Selfhandicapping behaviour</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Social Influence</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Task Performance</topic><topic>Threat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirt, Edward R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrea, Sean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimble, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirt, Edward R.</au><au>McCrea, Sean M.</au><au>Kimble, Charles E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public Self-Focus and Sex Differences in Behavioral Self-Handicapping: Does Increasing Self-Threat Still Make it “Just a Man’s Game?”</atitle><jtitle>Personality &amp; social psychology bulletin</jtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1131</spage><epage>1141</epage><pages>1131-1141</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><coden>PSPBZZ</coden><abstract>The present study examined the effects of public self-focus and participants’ sex on self-handicapping behavior. Research in the area of self-handicapping has consistently shown that men alone tend to self-handicap behaviorally. Because conditions of public self-focus tend to make the evaluative implications of per formance more salient, the authors hypothesized that people would self-handicap more when they are self-focused (as opposed to other-focused). Men and women were presented with an important intellectual evaluation and were allowed to practice for the upcoming test as much as they wanted. Results showed that men self-handicap more when they are self-focused but women do not behaviorally self-handicap under self-or other-focused conditions. Heightened concern over possible failure in self-focused conditions appeared to be the critical mediator in encouraging self-handicapping behavior among men.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01461672002611009</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-1672
ispartof Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2000-09, Vol.26 (9), p.1131-1141
issn 0146-1672
1552-7433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60362429
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Behavior
College Students
Factors
Failure
Gender differences
Indiana
Public domain
Self Evaluation
Selffocused attention
Selfhandicapping behaviour
Sex Differences
Sexes
Social Influence
Social psychology
Success
Task Performance
Threat
title Public Self-Focus and Sex Differences in Behavioral Self-Handicapping: Does Increasing Self-Threat Still Make it “Just a Man’s Game?”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A51%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20Self-Focus%20and%20Sex%20Differences%20in%20Behavioral%20Self-Handicapping:%20Does%20Increasing%20Self-Threat%20Still%20Make%20it%20%E2%80%9CJust%20a%20Man%E2%80%99s%20Game?%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=Hirt,%20Edward%20R.&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1131&rft.epage=1141&rft.pages=1131-1141&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft.coden=PSPBZZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01461672002611009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57579639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1634103957&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01461672002611009&rfr_iscdi=true