Legitimacy in corrections

Research Summary To extend research on legitimacy to the correctional system, we study a sample of 202 adult inmates randomly assigned to serve their 6‐month sentence at one of two institutions—a traditional prison or a military‐style correctional boot camp. Findings show that perceptions of justice...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Criminology & public policy 2010-02, Vol.9 (1), p.89-117
Hauptverfasser: Franke, Derrick, Bierie, David, Mackenzie, Doris Layton
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 117
container_issue 1
container_start_page 89
container_title Criminology & public policy
container_volume 9
creator Franke, Derrick
Bierie, David
Mackenzie, Doris Layton
description Research Summary To extend research on legitimacy to the correctional system, we study a sample of 202 adult inmates randomly assigned to serve their 6‐month sentence at one of two institutions—a traditional prison or a military‐style correctional boot camp. Findings show that perceptions of justice system legitimacy changed during the course of incarceration, that the prison (but not the boot camp) proved delegitimizing, and that certain regime characteristics explained why. Policy Implications Across academic disciplines, studies continue to link compliance with perceived legitimacy. Compliance with the law, for instance, is related closely to the legitimacy of the justice system and its actors. These findings suggest implementing legitimacy‐building policies such as procedurally fair treatment and decision making by police officers and judges. This article, by finding legitimacy to be malleable even at the final stage of the justice process, proposes the efficacy of similar policies in the correctional system. As research from England and Wales has shown, legitimizing strategies in this context could increase compliance both during and after incarceration.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60352531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60352531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-451f42fd771de60e95cbf152df3f9344d82831afbbac19e72c0493504ab0a2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMFOwzAMjRBIjMEHcNuJW0tcJ0174DBNsIEqGNIERytNU5TRraPptO3vaRmaL36y37P8HmMj4CF0db8MQQkZpIAYRrybch4DhvszNjgtzjssMQliofCSXXm_5BykBDlgt5n9cq1baXMYufXI1E1jTevqtb9mF6WuvL3570O2eHpcTGZB9jZ9noyzwIBKMBASShGVhVJQ2JjbVJq8BBkVJZYpClEkUYKgyzzXBlKrIsNFipILnXMdGRyyu-PZTVP_bK1vaeW8sVWl17beeoo5ykgidMSHI3HnKnugTdM93RwIOPU50JJ6u9TbpT4H-suB9jQZz-cd6vTBUe98a_cnvW6-KVaoJH2-Tgmyd_GiPmY0x1_lVmED</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60352531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Legitimacy in corrections</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Franke, Derrick ; Bierie, David ; Mackenzie, Doris Layton</creator><creatorcontrib>Franke, Derrick ; Bierie, David ; Mackenzie, Doris Layton</creatorcontrib><description>Research Summary To extend research on legitimacy to the correctional system, we study a sample of 202 adult inmates randomly assigned to serve their 6‐month sentence at one of two institutions—a traditional prison or a military‐style correctional boot camp. Findings show that perceptions of justice system legitimacy changed during the course of incarceration, that the prison (but not the boot camp) proved delegitimizing, and that certain regime characteristics explained why. Policy Implications Across academic disciplines, studies continue to link compliance with perceived legitimacy. Compliance with the law, for instance, is related closely to the legitimacy of the justice system and its actors. These findings suggest implementing legitimacy‐building policies such as procedurally fair treatment and decision making by police officers and judges. This article, by finding legitimacy to be malleable even at the final stage of the justice process, proposes the efficacy of similar policies in the correctional system. As research from England and Wales has shown, legitimizing strategies in this context could increase compliance both during and after incarceration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-6473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-9133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic Disciplines ; boot camp ; Correctional System ; Courses ; Imprisonment ; Justice ; Law ; legitimacy ; prison ; Prisoners ; Prisons ; procedural justice ; randomized experiments ; Wales</subject><ispartof>Criminology &amp; public policy, 2010-02, Vol.9 (1), p.89-117</ispartof><rights>2010 by the American Society of Criminology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-451f42fd771de60e95cbf152df3f9344d82831afbbac19e72c0493504ab0a2c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-9133.2010.00613.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-9133.2010.00613.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33775,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Franke, Derrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierie, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Doris Layton</creatorcontrib><title>Legitimacy in corrections</title><title>Criminology &amp; public policy</title><description>Research Summary To extend research on legitimacy to the correctional system, we study a sample of 202 adult inmates randomly assigned to serve their 6‐month sentence at one of two institutions—a traditional prison or a military‐style correctional boot camp. Findings show that perceptions of justice system legitimacy changed during the course of incarceration, that the prison (but not the boot camp) proved delegitimizing, and that certain regime characteristics explained why. Policy Implications Across academic disciplines, studies continue to link compliance with perceived legitimacy. Compliance with the law, for instance, is related closely to the legitimacy of the justice system and its actors. These findings suggest implementing legitimacy‐building policies such as procedurally fair treatment and decision making by police officers and judges. This article, by finding legitimacy to be malleable even at the final stage of the justice process, proposes the efficacy of similar policies in the correctional system. As research from England and Wales has shown, legitimizing strategies in this context could increase compliance both during and after incarceration.</description><subject>Academic Disciplines</subject><subject>boot camp</subject><subject>Correctional System</subject><subject>Courses</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>legitimacy</subject><subject>prison</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>procedural justice</subject><subject>randomized experiments</subject><subject>Wales</subject><issn>1538-6473</issn><issn>1745-9133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UMFOwzAMjRBIjMEHcNuJW0tcJ0174DBNsIEqGNIERytNU5TRraPptO3vaRmaL36y37P8HmMj4CF0db8MQQkZpIAYRrybch4DhvszNjgtzjssMQliofCSXXm_5BykBDlgt5n9cq1baXMYufXI1E1jTevqtb9mF6WuvL3570O2eHpcTGZB9jZ9noyzwIBKMBASShGVhVJQ2JjbVJq8BBkVJZYpClEkUYKgyzzXBlKrIsNFipILnXMdGRyyu-PZTVP_bK1vaeW8sVWl17beeoo5ykgidMSHI3HnKnugTdM93RwIOPU50JJ6u9TbpT4H-suB9jQZz-cd6vTBUe98a_cnvW6-KVaoJH2-Tgmyd_GiPmY0x1_lVmED</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Franke, Derrick</creator><creator>Bierie, David</creator><creator>Mackenzie, Doris Layton</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Legitimacy in corrections</title><author>Franke, Derrick ; Bierie, David ; Mackenzie, Doris Layton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-451f42fd771de60e95cbf152df3f9344d82831afbbac19e72c0493504ab0a2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academic Disciplines</topic><topic>boot camp</topic><topic>Correctional System</topic><topic>Courses</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>legitimacy</topic><topic>prison</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>procedural justice</topic><topic>randomized experiments</topic><topic>Wales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Franke, Derrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierie, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Doris Layton</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Criminology &amp; public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Franke, Derrick</au><au>Bierie, David</au><au>Mackenzie, Doris Layton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Legitimacy in corrections</atitle><jtitle>Criminology &amp; public policy</jtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>89-117</pages><issn>1538-6473</issn><eissn>1745-9133</eissn><abstract>Research Summary To extend research on legitimacy to the correctional system, we study a sample of 202 adult inmates randomly assigned to serve their 6‐month sentence at one of two institutions—a traditional prison or a military‐style correctional boot camp. Findings show that perceptions of justice system legitimacy changed during the course of incarceration, that the prison (but not the boot camp) proved delegitimizing, and that certain regime characteristics explained why. Policy Implications Across academic disciplines, studies continue to link compliance with perceived legitimacy. Compliance with the law, for instance, is related closely to the legitimacy of the justice system and its actors. These findings suggest implementing legitimacy‐building policies such as procedurally fair treatment and decision making by police officers and judges. This article, by finding legitimacy to be malleable even at the final stage of the justice process, proposes the efficacy of similar policies in the correctional system. As research from England and Wales has shown, legitimizing strategies in this context could increase compliance both during and after incarceration.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-6473
ispartof Criminology & public policy, 2010-02, Vol.9 (1), p.89-117
issn 1538-6473
1745-9133
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60352531
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Academic Disciplines
boot camp
Correctional System
Courses
Imprisonment
Justice
Law
legitimacy
prison
Prisoners
Prisons
procedural justice
randomized experiments
Wales
title Legitimacy in corrections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A45%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Legitimacy%20in%20corrections&rft.jtitle=Criminology%20&%20public%20policy&rft.au=Franke,%20Derrick&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=89-117&rft.issn=1538-6473&rft.eissn=1745-9133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E60352531%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60352531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true