Legitimacy in corrections
Research Summary To extend research on legitimacy to the correctional system, we study a sample of 202 adult inmates randomly assigned to serve their 6‐month sentence at one of two institutions—a traditional prison or a military‐style correctional boot camp. Findings show that perceptions of justice...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Criminology & public policy 2010-02, Vol.9 (1), p.89-117 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Criminology & public policy |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Franke, Derrick Bierie, David Mackenzie, Doris Layton |
description | Research Summary
To extend research on legitimacy to the correctional system, we study a sample of 202 adult inmates randomly assigned to serve their 6‐month sentence at one of two institutions—a traditional prison or a military‐style correctional boot camp. Findings show that perceptions of justice system legitimacy changed during the course of incarceration, that the prison (but not the boot camp) proved delegitimizing, and that certain regime characteristics explained why.
Policy Implications
Across academic disciplines, studies continue to link compliance with perceived legitimacy. Compliance with the law, for instance, is related closely to the legitimacy of the justice system and its actors. These findings suggest implementing legitimacy‐building policies such as procedurally fair treatment and decision making by police officers and judges. This article, by finding legitimacy to be malleable even at the final stage of the justice process, proposes the efficacy of similar policies in the correctional system. As research from England and Wales has shown, legitimizing strategies in this context could increase compliance both during and after incarceration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60352531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>60352531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-451f42fd771de60e95cbf152df3f9344d82831afbbac19e72c0493504ab0a2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMFOwzAMjRBIjMEHcNuJW0tcJ0174DBNsIEqGNIERytNU5TRraPptO3vaRmaL36y37P8HmMj4CF0db8MQQkZpIAYRrybch4DhvszNjgtzjssMQliofCSXXm_5BykBDlgt5n9cq1baXMYufXI1E1jTevqtb9mF6WuvL3570O2eHpcTGZB9jZ9noyzwIBKMBASShGVhVJQ2JjbVJq8BBkVJZYpClEkUYKgyzzXBlKrIsNFipILnXMdGRyyu-PZTVP_bK1vaeW8sVWl17beeoo5ykgidMSHI3HnKnugTdM93RwIOPU50JJ6u9TbpT4H-suB9jQZz-cd6vTBUe98a_cnvW6-KVaoJH2-Tgmyd_GiPmY0x1_lVmED</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>60352531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Legitimacy in corrections</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Franke, Derrick ; Bierie, David ; Mackenzie, Doris Layton</creator><creatorcontrib>Franke, Derrick ; Bierie, David ; Mackenzie, Doris Layton</creatorcontrib><description>Research Summary
To extend research on legitimacy to the correctional system, we study a sample of 202 adult inmates randomly assigned to serve their 6‐month sentence at one of two institutions—a traditional prison or a military‐style correctional boot camp. Findings show that perceptions of justice system legitimacy changed during the course of incarceration, that the prison (but not the boot camp) proved delegitimizing, and that certain regime characteristics explained why.
Policy Implications
Across academic disciplines, studies continue to link compliance with perceived legitimacy. Compliance with the law, for instance, is related closely to the legitimacy of the justice system and its actors. These findings suggest implementing legitimacy‐building policies such as procedurally fair treatment and decision making by police officers and judges. This article, by finding legitimacy to be malleable even at the final stage of the justice process, proposes the efficacy of similar policies in the correctional system. As research from England and Wales has shown, legitimizing strategies in this context could increase compliance both during and after incarceration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-6473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-9133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic Disciplines ; boot camp ; Correctional System ; Courses ; Imprisonment ; Justice ; Law ; legitimacy ; prison ; Prisoners ; Prisons ; procedural justice ; randomized experiments ; Wales</subject><ispartof>Criminology & public policy, 2010-02, Vol.9 (1), p.89-117</ispartof><rights>2010 by the American Society of Criminology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-451f42fd771de60e95cbf152df3f9344d82831afbbac19e72c0493504ab0a2c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1745-9133.2010.00613.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1745-9133.2010.00613.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,33775,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Franke, Derrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierie, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Doris Layton</creatorcontrib><title>Legitimacy in corrections</title><title>Criminology & public policy</title><description>Research Summary
To extend research on legitimacy to the correctional system, we study a sample of 202 adult inmates randomly assigned to serve their 6‐month sentence at one of two institutions—a traditional prison or a military‐style correctional boot camp. Findings show that perceptions of justice system legitimacy changed during the course of incarceration, that the prison (but not the boot camp) proved delegitimizing, and that certain regime characteristics explained why.
Policy Implications
Across academic disciplines, studies continue to link compliance with perceived legitimacy. Compliance with the law, for instance, is related closely to the legitimacy of the justice system and its actors. These findings suggest implementing legitimacy‐building policies such as procedurally fair treatment and decision making by police officers and judges. This article, by finding legitimacy to be malleable even at the final stage of the justice process, proposes the efficacy of similar policies in the correctional system. As research from England and Wales has shown, legitimizing strategies in this context could increase compliance both during and after incarceration.</description><subject>Academic Disciplines</subject><subject>boot camp</subject><subject>Correctional System</subject><subject>Courses</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>legitimacy</subject><subject>prison</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>procedural justice</subject><subject>randomized experiments</subject><subject>Wales</subject><issn>1538-6473</issn><issn>1745-9133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UMFOwzAMjRBIjMEHcNuJW0tcJ0174DBNsIEqGNIERytNU5TRraPptO3vaRmaL36y37P8HmMj4CF0db8MQQkZpIAYRrybch4DhvszNjgtzjssMQliofCSXXm_5BykBDlgt5n9cq1baXMYufXI1E1jTevqtb9mF6WuvL3570O2eHpcTGZB9jZ9noyzwIBKMBASShGVhVJQ2JjbVJq8BBkVJZYpClEkUYKgyzzXBlKrIsNFipILnXMdGRyyu-PZTVP_bK1vaeW8sVWl17beeoo5ykgidMSHI3HnKnugTdM93RwIOPU50JJ6u9TbpT4H-suB9jQZz-cd6vTBUe98a_cnvW6-KVaoJH2-Tgmyd_GiPmY0x1_lVmED</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Franke, Derrick</creator><creator>Bierie, David</creator><creator>Mackenzie, Doris Layton</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Legitimacy in corrections</title><author>Franke, Derrick ; Bierie, David ; Mackenzie, Doris Layton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-451f42fd771de60e95cbf152df3f9344d82831afbbac19e72c0493504ab0a2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academic Disciplines</topic><topic>boot camp</topic><topic>Correctional System</topic><topic>Courses</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>legitimacy</topic><topic>prison</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>procedural justice</topic><topic>randomized experiments</topic><topic>Wales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Franke, Derrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierie, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Doris Layton</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Criminology & public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Franke, Derrick</au><au>Bierie, David</au><au>Mackenzie, Doris Layton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Legitimacy in corrections</atitle><jtitle>Criminology & public policy</jtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>89-117</pages><issn>1538-6473</issn><eissn>1745-9133</eissn><abstract>Research Summary
To extend research on legitimacy to the correctional system, we study a sample of 202 adult inmates randomly assigned to serve their 6‐month sentence at one of two institutions—a traditional prison or a military‐style correctional boot camp. Findings show that perceptions of justice system legitimacy changed during the course of incarceration, that the prison (but not the boot camp) proved delegitimizing, and that certain regime characteristics explained why.
Policy Implications
Across academic disciplines, studies continue to link compliance with perceived legitimacy. Compliance with the law, for instance, is related closely to the legitimacy of the justice system and its actors. These findings suggest implementing legitimacy‐building policies such as procedurally fair treatment and decision making by police officers and judges. This article, by finding legitimacy to be malleable even at the final stage of the justice process, proposes the efficacy of similar policies in the correctional system. As research from England and Wales has shown, legitimizing strategies in this context could increase compliance both during and after incarceration.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1538-6473 |
ispartof | Criminology & public policy, 2010-02, Vol.9 (1), p.89-117 |
issn | 1538-6473 1745-9133 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60352531 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Academic Disciplines boot camp Correctional System Courses Imprisonment Justice Law legitimacy prison Prisoners Prisons procedural justice randomized experiments Wales |
title | Legitimacy in corrections |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A45%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Legitimacy%20in%20corrections&rft.jtitle=Criminology%20&%20public%20policy&rft.au=Franke,%20Derrick&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=89-117&rft.issn=1538-6473&rft.eissn=1745-9133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00613.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E60352531%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=60352531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |