History as a Strategic Weapon: The Korean and Chinese Struggle over Koguryo
Interpretations of history have been a source of tension in East Asia but usually involve Japan and the Second World War. Yet, in the past ten years, another controversy has been brewing over history, this time between South Korea and China over claims to ‘ownership’ of an ancient kingdom. This arti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden) 2010-02, Vol.45 (1), p.5-28 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 28 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 5 |
| container_title | Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden) |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Roehrig, Terence |
| description | Interpretations of history have been a source of tension in East Asia but usually involve Japan and the Second World War. Yet, in the past ten years, another controversy has been brewing over history, this time between South Korea and China over claims to ‘ownership’ of an ancient kingdom. This article is a case study that examines how states utilize reinterpretations of history for current and future strategic goals. The result has been a dispute that has resembled a security dilemma where China’s initial actions, deemed to be largely defensive by Beijing, were perceived in Seoul as offensive, provoking a counter-response that has in turn, alarmed China. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0021909610352675 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60352019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0021909610352675</sage_id><sourcerecordid>60352019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c211t-c3fa1674bb9c9adf5101937ec0c4400f0b2b531b2ed2ff10cdaad84bbd6d74f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LxDAUxIMoWFfvXoSevEXfS9pke5RFXWHBg4rHkOZj6bLb1qQ97H9vSj0J4unxmN8MzBByjXCHKOU9AMMKKoHASyZkeUIylEVJWcmXpySbZDrp5-Qixh2kn3ORkZt1E4cuHHMdc52_DUEPbtuY_NPpvmsvyZnX--iufu6CfDw9vq_WdPP6_LJ62FDDEAdquNcoZFHXlam09SUCVlw6A6YoADzUrC451sxZ5j2CsVrbZcKtsLLwnC_I7Zzbh-5rdHFQhyYat9_r1nVjVGIqNWX-B3LJpEj1EwgzaEIXY3Be9aE56HBUCGoaTP0eLFnobIl669SuG0ObOv_NfwMwu2i7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37276267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>History as a Strategic Weapon: The Korean and Chinese Struggle over Koguryo</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Roehrig, Terence</creator><creatorcontrib>Roehrig, Terence</creatorcontrib><description>Interpretations of history have been a source of tension in East Asia but usually involve Japan and the Second World War. Yet, in the past ten years, another controversy has been brewing over history, this time between South Korea and China over claims to ‘ownership’ of an ancient kingdom. This article is a case study that examines how states utilize reinterpretations of history for current and future strategic goals. The result has been a dispute that has resembled a security dilemma where China’s initial actions, deemed to be largely defensive by Beijing, were perceived in Seoul as offensive, provoking a counter-response that has in turn, alarmed China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-2538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0021909610352675</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAASCL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bilateral relations ; China ; Conflict ; Far East ; Foreign policy ; History ; Homeland ; Japan ; Korea ; National identity ; National security ; Peoples Republic of China ; Seoul, South Korea ; South Korea ; Strategic behaviour</subject><ispartof>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden), 2010-02, Vol.45 (1), p.5-28</ispartof><rights>2010 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c211t-c3fa1674bb9c9adf5101937ec0c4400f0b2b531b2ed2ff10cdaad84bbd6d74f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0021909610352675$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0021909610352675$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roehrig, Terence</creatorcontrib><title>History as a Strategic Weapon: The Korean and Chinese Struggle over Koguryo</title><title>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden)</title><description>Interpretations of history have been a source of tension in East Asia but usually involve Japan and the Second World War. Yet, in the past ten years, another controversy has been brewing over history, this time between South Korea and China over claims to ‘ownership’ of an ancient kingdom. This article is a case study that examines how states utilize reinterpretations of history for current and future strategic goals. The result has been a dispute that has resembled a security dilemma where China’s initial actions, deemed to be largely defensive by Beijing, were perceived in Seoul as offensive, provoking a counter-response that has in turn, alarmed China.</description><subject>Bilateral relations</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Far East</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Homeland</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>National identity</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Peoples Republic of China</subject><subject>Seoul, South Korea</subject><subject>South Korea</subject><subject>Strategic behaviour</subject><issn>0021-9096</issn><issn>1745-2538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1LxDAUxIMoWFfvXoSevEXfS9pke5RFXWHBg4rHkOZj6bLb1qQ97H9vSj0J4unxmN8MzBByjXCHKOU9AMMKKoHASyZkeUIylEVJWcmXpySbZDrp5-Qixh2kn3ORkZt1E4cuHHMdc52_DUEPbtuY_NPpvmsvyZnX--iufu6CfDw9vq_WdPP6_LJ62FDDEAdquNcoZFHXlam09SUCVlw6A6YoADzUrC451sxZ5j2CsVrbZcKtsLLwnC_I7Zzbh-5rdHFQhyYat9_r1nVjVGIqNWX-B3LJpEj1EwgzaEIXY3Be9aE56HBUCGoaTP0eLFnobIl669SuG0ObOv_NfwMwu2i7</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Roehrig, Terence</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>History as a Strategic Weapon</title><author>Roehrig, Terence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c211t-c3fa1674bb9c9adf5101937ec0c4400f0b2b531b2ed2ff10cdaad84bbd6d74f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bilateral relations</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Far East</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Homeland</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>National identity</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Peoples Republic of China</topic><topic>Seoul, South Korea</topic><topic>South Korea</topic><topic>Strategic behaviour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roehrig, Terence</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roehrig, Terence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>History as a Strategic Weapon: The Korean and Chinese Struggle over Koguryo</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden)</jtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>5-28</pages><issn>0021-9096</issn><eissn>1745-2538</eissn><coden>JAASCL</coden><abstract>Interpretations of history have been a source of tension in East Asia but usually involve Japan and the Second World War. Yet, in the past ten years, another controversy has been brewing over history, this time between South Korea and China over claims to ‘ownership’ of an ancient kingdom. This article is a case study that examines how states utilize reinterpretations of history for current and future strategic goals. The result has been a dispute that has resembled a security dilemma where China’s initial actions, deemed to be largely defensive by Beijing, were perceived in Seoul as offensive, provoking a counter-response that has in turn, alarmed China.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0021909610352675</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9096 |
| ispartof | Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden), 2010-02, Vol.45 (1), p.5-28 |
| issn | 0021-9096 1745-2538 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60352019 |
| source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Bilateral relations China Conflict Far East Foreign policy History Homeland Japan Korea National identity National security Peoples Republic of China Seoul, South Korea South Korea Strategic behaviour |
| title | History as a Strategic Weapon: The Korean and Chinese Struggle over Koguryo |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T11%3A08%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=History%20as%20a%20Strategic%20Weapon:%20The%20Korean%20and%20Chinese%20Struggle%20over%20Koguryo&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Asian%20and%20African%20studies%20(Leiden)&rft.au=Roehrig,%20Terence&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=5-28&rft.issn=0021-9096&rft.eissn=1745-2538&rft.coden=JAASCL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0021909610352675&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60352019%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37276267&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0021909610352675&rfr_iscdi=true |