Assessing Judicial Elections: Effects upon the Electorate of High and Low Articulation Systems
The argument is advanced that high articulation judicial electoral systems will produce among judicial election voters a higher level of participation, a higher level of information, and a greater degree of support for a balancing of democratic accountability and judicial independence than occurs in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Western political quarterly 1985-06, Vol.38 (2), p.276-293 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 293 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 276 |
| container_title | The Western political quarterly |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Lovrich, Nicholas P. Sheldon, Charles H. |
| description | The argument is advanced that high articulation judicial electoral systems will produce among judicial election voters a higher level of participation, a higher level of information, and a greater degree of support for a balancing of democratic accountability and judicial independence than occurs in low articulation systems. A high articulation jurisdiction involves a number of recruitment actors participating throughout a three-step recruitment sequence, while a low articulation system has but one or two actors operating during each stage. Data were collected from surveys of judicial candidates, local bar associations, and registered voters in six jurisdictions in Oregon and Washington in 1982 primary elections. Findings derived from these surveys provide support for the hypothesized beneficial results of high articulation electoral circumstances. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/106591298503800209 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60342971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>448630</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_106591298503800209</sage_id><sourcerecordid>448630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cb271061a99d5cfd7630be3df643a1a1019342304cbb5502bb8f6179e1ab59da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFLwzAUx4MoOKdfwFNA8Fb3krRJ422M6ZSBB_VqSdN06-ia2dci-_ZmbIehIJ4SyO_38t7_EXLN4I4xpUYMZKIZ12kCIgXgoE_IgAueRKlUySkZAMQiikGl5-QCcQUAQko-IB9jRIdYNQv63BeVrUxNp7WzXeUbvKfTsgx3pP3GN7Rbuv2bb03nqC_prFosqWkKOvdfdNx2le1rs1Pp6xY7t8ZLclaaGt3V4RyS94fp22QWzV8enybjeWQFhy6yOVdhBGa0LhJbFkoKyJ0oShkLwwwDpkXMBcQ2z5MEeJ6npWRKO2byRBdGDMntvu6m9Z-9wy5bV2hdXZvG-R4zCcHXiv0D5CKWQgbw5ge48n3bhCGykDNLBUsVBIrvKdt6xNaV2aat1qbdZgyy3Way35sJ0mgvoVm4o7J_GYdmVhjCP_4jhKKyOE5DYOIbHLqX1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1291831870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Judicial Elections: Effects upon the Electorate of High and Low Articulation Systems</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lovrich, Nicholas P. ; Sheldon, Charles H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lovrich, Nicholas P. ; Sheldon, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><description>The argument is advanced that high articulation judicial electoral systems will produce among judicial election voters a higher level of participation, a higher level of information, and a greater degree of support for a balancing of democratic accountability and judicial independence than occurs in low articulation systems. A high articulation jurisdiction involves a number of recruitment actors participating throughout a three-step recruitment sequence, while a low articulation system has but one or two actors operating during each stage. Data were collected from surveys of judicial candidates, local bar associations, and registered voters in six jurisdictions in Oregon and Washington in 1982 primary elections. Findings derived from these surveys provide support for the hypothesized beneficial results of high articulation electoral circumstances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-4078</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1065-9129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-8675</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-274X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/106591298503800209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: University of Utah</publisher><subject>Attorneys ; Bar associations ; Electorate ; Indexing in process ; Judges ; Judicial elections ; Jurisdiction ; Political candidates ; Voter registration ; Voter turnout ; Voting</subject><ispartof>The Western political quarterly, 1985-06, Vol.38 (2), p.276-293</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1985 The University of Utah</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cb271061a99d5cfd7630be3df643a1a1019342304cbb5502bb8f6179e1ab59da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cb271061a99d5cfd7630be3df643a1a1019342304cbb5502bb8f6179e1ab59da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/448630$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/448630$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27869,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lovrich, Nicholas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Judicial Elections: Effects upon the Electorate of High and Low Articulation Systems</title><title>The Western political quarterly</title><description>The argument is advanced that high articulation judicial electoral systems will produce among judicial election voters a higher level of participation, a higher level of information, and a greater degree of support for a balancing of democratic accountability and judicial independence than occurs in low articulation systems. A high articulation jurisdiction involves a number of recruitment actors participating throughout a three-step recruitment sequence, while a low articulation system has but one or two actors operating during each stage. Data were collected from surveys of judicial candidates, local bar associations, and registered voters in six jurisdictions in Oregon and Washington in 1982 primary elections. Findings derived from these surveys provide support for the hypothesized beneficial results of high articulation electoral circumstances.</description><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Bar associations</subject><subject>Electorate</subject><subject>Indexing in process</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Judicial elections</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Political candidates</subject><subject>Voter registration</subject><subject>Voter turnout</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0043-4078</issn><issn>1065-9129</issn><issn>2325-8675</issn><issn>1938-274X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0R3</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OC</sourceid><sourceid>~PQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFLwzAUx4MoOKdfwFNA8Fb3krRJ422M6ZSBB_VqSdN06-ia2dci-_ZmbIehIJ4SyO_38t7_EXLN4I4xpUYMZKIZ12kCIgXgoE_IgAueRKlUySkZAMQiikGl5-QCcQUAQko-IB9jRIdYNQv63BeVrUxNp7WzXeUbvKfTsgx3pP3GN7Rbuv2bb03nqC_prFosqWkKOvdfdNx2le1rs1Pp6xY7t8ZLclaaGt3V4RyS94fp22QWzV8enybjeWQFhy6yOVdhBGa0LhJbFkoKyJ0oShkLwwwDpkXMBcQ2z5MEeJ6npWRKO2byRBdGDMntvu6m9Z-9wy5bV2hdXZvG-R4zCcHXiv0D5CKWQgbw5ge48n3bhCGykDNLBUsVBIrvKdt6xNaV2aat1qbdZgyy3Way35sJ0mgvoVm4o7J_GYdmVhjCP_4jhKKyOE5DYOIbHLqX1w</recordid><startdate>198506</startdate><enddate>198506</enddate><creator>Lovrich, Nicholas P.</creator><creator>Sheldon, Charles H.</creator><general>University of Utah</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>University of Utah Press, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>~PM</scope><scope>~PQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198506</creationdate><title>Assessing Judicial Elections: Effects upon the Electorate of High and Low Articulation Systems</title><author>Lovrich, Nicholas P. ; Sheldon, Charles H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cb271061a99d5cfd7630be3df643a1a1019342304cbb5502bb8f6179e1ab59da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Bar associations</topic><topic>Electorate</topic><topic>Indexing in process</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Judicial elections</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Political candidates</topic><topic>Voter registration</topic><topic>Voter turnout</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lovrich, Nicholas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheldon, Charles H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JISC Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 4</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Western political quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lovrich, Nicholas P.</au><au>Sheldon, Charles H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Judicial Elections: Effects upon the Electorate of High and Low Articulation Systems</atitle><jtitle>The Western political quarterly</jtitle><date>1985-06</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>276</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>276-293</pages><issn>0043-4078</issn><issn>1065-9129</issn><eissn>2325-8675</eissn><eissn>1938-274X</eissn><abstract>The argument is advanced that high articulation judicial electoral systems will produce among judicial election voters a higher level of participation, a higher level of information, and a greater degree of support for a balancing of democratic accountability and judicial independence than occurs in low articulation systems. A high articulation jurisdiction involves a number of recruitment actors participating throughout a three-step recruitment sequence, while a low articulation system has but one or two actors operating during each stage. Data were collected from surveys of judicial candidates, local bar associations, and registered voters in six jurisdictions in Oregon and Washington in 1982 primary elections. Findings derived from these surveys provide support for the hypothesized beneficial results of high articulation electoral circumstances.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>University of Utah</pub><doi>10.1177/106591298503800209</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0043-4078 |
| ispartof | The Western political quarterly, 1985-06, Vol.38 (2), p.276-293 |
| issn | 0043-4078 1065-9129 2325-8675 1938-274X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60342971 |
| source | Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Attorneys Bar associations Electorate Indexing in process Judges Judicial elections Jurisdiction Political candidates Voter registration Voter turnout Voting |
| title | Assessing Judicial Elections: Effects upon the Electorate of High and Low Articulation Systems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T12%3A53%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Judicial%20Elections:%20Effects%20upon%20the%20Electorate%20of%20High%20and%20Low%20Articulation%20Systems&rft.jtitle=The%20Western%20political%20quarterly&rft.au=Lovrich,%20Nicholas%20P.&rft.date=1985-06&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=276-293&rft.issn=0043-4078&rft.eissn=2325-8675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/106591298503800209&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E448630%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1291831870&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=448630&rft_sage_id=10.1177_106591298503800209&rfr_iscdi=true |