Racial Blind Spots: Black-White-Latino Differences in Community Knowledge
This article explores racial/ethnic differences in community knowledge as a contributing mechanism through which residential segregation in U.S. cities is perpetuated. If whites, blacks, and Latinos are familiar with different communities, and that familiarity is influenced by community racial/ethni...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.) Calif.), 2009-11, Vol.56 (4), p.677-701 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 701 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 677 |
container_title | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.) |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Krysan, Maria Bader, Michael D. M. |
description | This article explores racial/ethnic differences in community knowledge as a contributing mechanism through which residential segregation in U.S. cities is perpetuated. If whites, blacks, and Latinos are familiar with different communities, and that familiarity is influenced by community racial/ethnic composition, then these "blind spots" may constitute one barrier to integrative mobility. We address three questions: (1) Do blacks, whites, and Latinos have different community blind spots?; (2) Do blacks, whites, and Latinos of the same social, economic, and geographic backgrounds still have different blind spots?; and (3) Do the racial/ethnic characteristics of the community predict a racial/ethnic difference in blind spots, net of the respondent's and the community's other characteristics? Employing logistic regression and hierarchical linear models with data from the 2004–2005 Chicago Area Study, we explore how whites, blacks, and Latinos differ in their knowledge of actual communities in the Chicago metropolitan area and whether differences persist after controlling for social class characteristics. Results show strong evidence that community knowledge is shaped by race—both of the resident and of the target community. Policy implications of the results are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.677 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60314784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.677</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5bd61c58cbb57a56c2876d23deea0375b7f51b9591bde26cd9235bf225b98bdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctLxDAQxoMouK7ePRZBb615NEnrTdcnLgg-8BiSNNWs3aQmXWT_e7Ps4sGLzmGGgd98zMcHwCGCBaKYnsa-wBDWBWVFWTDOt8AIUULyKrVtMIKQ8JzzGu2CvRhnMBXieATuHqW2sssuOuua7Kn3QzxLi9Qf-eu7HUw-lYN1Pru0bWuCcdrEzLps4ufzhbPDMrt3_qszzZvZBzut7KI52MwxeLm-ep7c5tOHm7vJ-TTXJYRDTlXDkKaVVopySZnGFWcNJo0xMv1IFW8pUjWtkWoMZrqpMaGqxZiqulKNImNwstbtg_9cmDiIuY3adJ10xi-iYJCgklflP0BIMEF1Ao9-gTO_CC6ZEBixmkAMWYLgGtLBxxhMK_pg5zIsBYJilYCIvVglICgTpUgJpJPjja6MWnZtkE7b-HOHcQlZMpe4fM3N4uDD37rfAImTfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216930206</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Racial Blind Spots: Black-White-Latino Differences in Community Knowledge</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Krysan, Maria ; Bader, Michael D. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Krysan, Maria ; Bader, Michael D. M.</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores racial/ethnic differences in community knowledge as a contributing mechanism through which residential segregation in U.S. cities is perpetuated. If whites, blacks, and Latinos are familiar with different communities, and that familiarity is influenced by community racial/ethnic composition, then these "blind spots" may constitute one barrier to integrative mobility. We address three questions: (1) Do blacks, whites, and Latinos have different community blind spots?; (2) Do blacks, whites, and Latinos of the same social, economic, and geographic backgrounds still have different blind spots?; and (3) Do the racial/ethnic characteristics of the community predict a racial/ethnic difference in blind spots, net of the respondent's and the community's other characteristics? Employing logistic regression and hierarchical linear models with data from the 2004–2005 Chicago Area Study, we explore how whites, blacks, and Latinos differ in their knowledge of actual communities in the Chicago metropolitan area and whether differences persist after controlling for social class characteristics. Results show strong evidence that community knowledge is shaped by race—both of the resident and of the target community. Policy implications of the results are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-7791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.677</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOPRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley, CA: University of California Press</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Black communities ; Childrens health ; Communities ; Community ; Community power ; Constraints ; Cultural differences ; Cultures and civilizations ; Economics ; Ethnic relations. Racism ; Ethnicity ; Hispanic Americans ; Hispanics ; Housing ; Knowledge ; Latin American Cultural Groups ; Metropolitan areas ; Modeling ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Neighborhoods ; Optic disk ; Preferences ; Racial Differences ; Residences ; Residential segregation ; Retirement communities ; Segregation ; Social research ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.), 2009-11, Vol.56 (4), p.677-701</ispartof><rights>2009 by Society for the Study of Social Problems, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2009 by Society for the Study of Social Problems, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5bd61c58cbb57a56c2876d23deea0375b7f51b9591bde26cd9235bf225b98bdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5bd61c58cbb57a56c2876d23deea0375b7f51b9591bde26cd9235bf225b98bdb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,33773,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22406235$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krysan, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bader, Michael D. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Racial Blind Spots: Black-White-Latino Differences in Community Knowledge</title><title>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</title><description>This article explores racial/ethnic differences in community knowledge as a contributing mechanism through which residential segregation in U.S. cities is perpetuated. If whites, blacks, and Latinos are familiar with different communities, and that familiarity is influenced by community racial/ethnic composition, then these "blind spots" may constitute one barrier to integrative mobility. We address three questions: (1) Do blacks, whites, and Latinos have different community blind spots?; (2) Do blacks, whites, and Latinos of the same social, economic, and geographic backgrounds still have different blind spots?; and (3) Do the racial/ethnic characteristics of the community predict a racial/ethnic difference in blind spots, net of the respondent's and the community's other characteristics? Employing logistic regression and hierarchical linear models with data from the 2004–2005 Chicago Area Study, we explore how whites, blacks, and Latinos differ in their knowledge of actual communities in the Chicago metropolitan area and whether differences persist after controlling for social class characteristics. Results show strong evidence that community knowledge is shaped by race—both of the resident and of the target community. Policy implications of the results are discussed.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Black communities</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community power</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Cultures and civilizations</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ethnic relations. Racism</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Hispanic Americans</subject><subject>Hispanics</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Latin American Cultural Groups</subject><subject>Metropolitan areas</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Optic disk</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Racial Differences</subject><subject>Residences</subject><subject>Residential segregation</subject><subject>Retirement communities</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0037-7791</issn><issn>1533-8533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctLxDAQxoMouK7ePRZBb615NEnrTdcnLgg-8BiSNNWs3aQmXWT_e7Ps4sGLzmGGgd98zMcHwCGCBaKYnsa-wBDWBWVFWTDOt8AIUULyKrVtMIKQ8JzzGu2CvRhnMBXieATuHqW2sssuOuua7Kn3QzxLi9Qf-eu7HUw-lYN1Pru0bWuCcdrEzLps4ufzhbPDMrt3_qszzZvZBzut7KI52MwxeLm-ep7c5tOHm7vJ-TTXJYRDTlXDkKaVVopySZnGFWcNJo0xMv1IFW8pUjWtkWoMZrqpMaGqxZiqulKNImNwstbtg_9cmDiIuY3adJ10xi-iYJCgklflP0BIMEF1Ao9-gTO_CC6ZEBixmkAMWYLgGtLBxxhMK_pg5zIsBYJilYCIvVglICgTpUgJpJPjja6MWnZtkE7b-HOHcQlZMpe4fM3N4uDD37rfAImTfA</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Krysan, Maria</creator><creator>Bader, Michael D. M.</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Racial Blind Spots: Black-White-Latino Differences in Community Knowledge</title><author>Krysan, Maria ; Bader, Michael D. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-5bd61c58cbb57a56c2876d23deea0375b7f51b9591bde26cd9235bf225b98bdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Black communities</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community power</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Cultures and civilizations</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ethnic relations. Racism</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Hispanic Americans</topic><topic>Hispanics</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Latin American Cultural Groups</topic><topic>Metropolitan areas</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Optic disk</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Racial Differences</topic><topic>Residences</topic><topic>Residential segregation</topic><topic>Retirement communities</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krysan, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bader, Michael D. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krysan, Maria</au><au>Bader, Michael D. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Racial Blind Spots: Black-White-Latino Differences in Community Knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>677</spage><epage>701</epage><pages>677-701</pages><issn>0037-7791</issn><eissn>1533-8533</eissn><coden>SOPRAG</coden><abstract>This article explores racial/ethnic differences in community knowledge as a contributing mechanism through which residential segregation in U.S. cities is perpetuated. If whites, blacks, and Latinos are familiar with different communities, and that familiarity is influenced by community racial/ethnic composition, then these "blind spots" may constitute one barrier to integrative mobility. We address three questions: (1) Do blacks, whites, and Latinos have different community blind spots?; (2) Do blacks, whites, and Latinos of the same social, economic, and geographic backgrounds still have different blind spots?; and (3) Do the racial/ethnic characteristics of the community predict a racial/ethnic difference in blind spots, net of the respondent's and the community's other characteristics? Employing logistic regression and hierarchical linear models with data from the 2004–2005 Chicago Area Study, we explore how whites, blacks, and Latinos differ in their knowledge of actual communities in the Chicago metropolitan area and whether differences persist after controlling for social class characteristics. Results show strong evidence that community knowledge is shaped by race—both of the resident and of the target community. Policy implications of the results are discussed.</abstract><cop>Berkeley, CA</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.677</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0037-7791 |
ispartof | Social problems (Berkeley, Calif.), 2009-11, Vol.56 (4), p.677-701 |
issn | 0037-7791 1533-8533 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60314784 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | African Americans Black communities Childrens health Communities Community Community power Constraints Cultural differences Cultures and civilizations Economics Ethnic relations. Racism Ethnicity Hispanic Americans Hispanics Housing Knowledge Latin American Cultural Groups Metropolitan areas Modeling Multiculturalism & pluralism Neighborhoods Optic disk Preferences Racial Differences Residences Residential segregation Retirement communities Segregation Social research Sociology |
title | Racial Blind Spots: Black-White-Latino Differences in Community Knowledge |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A58%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Racial%20Blind%20Spots:%20Black-White-Latino%20Differences%20in%20Community%20Knowledge&rft.jtitle=Social%20problems%20(Berkeley,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Krysan,%20Maria&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=677&rft.epage=701&rft.pages=677-701&rft.issn=0037-7791&rft.eissn=1533-8533&rft.coden=SOPRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.677&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.677%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216930206&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.677&rfr_iscdi=true |