Afterword to "Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key": The Social Life of Human Rights

In this article, I argue for an ethnographic approach to human rights that recognizes the plural and fragmentary nature of the international rights regime and the ideological promiscuity of rights talk. Instead of determining in advance the social or political character of rights, anthropologists co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American anthropologist 2006-03, Vol.108 (1), p.77-83
1. Verfasser: Wilson, Richard Ashby
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 83
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
container_title American anthropologist
container_volume 108
creator Wilson, Richard Ashby
description In this article, I argue for an ethnographic approach to human rights that recognizes the plural and fragmentary nature of the international rights regime and the ideological promiscuity of rights talk. Instead of determining in advance the social or political character of rights, anthropologists could profitably draw from the insights of early-20th-century "legal realists" and look closely at the underlying assumptions and hidden practices of political and legal processes. Studying the "social life of human rights" would involve focusing on, inter alia, the performative dimensions of human rights, the dynamics of social mobilization, and the attitudinal changes of elite and nonelite social actors towards formulations of "rights" and "justice," both inside and outside the legal process. I conclude with a review of recent anthropological research on human rights epistemology and evaluate its implications for human rights policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.77
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60296628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3804733</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3804733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-d9dbb7226532407cc0fc7225bc3e9cf4bd87c42133386ee7b0093b6d306f2d443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9LwzAYhoMoOKd3Dx7CDt5a86tJ6q2IOnEq6Lx4CWmabh1dM5OOsf_e6ETQi6ePF57ng-97ATjFKMUZyS60TglCPMVIpjgVYg8McMZkghml-2CAECKJIDk7BEchLGIUnGYD8FbUvfUb5yvYOzgqun7u3cq1braFuqvgeL3UHXxuZvM-wKaDGj7aDby329ElnM4tfHGm0S2cNLWFrv6FH4ODWrfBnnzPIXi9uZ5ejZPJ0-3dVTFJDM2lSKq8KktBCM8oYUgYg2oTY1YaanNTs7KSwjCCKaWSWytKhHJa8ooiXpOKMToE57u9K-_e1zb0atkEY9tWd9atg-KI5JwT-S9IJaE5YzyCoz_gwq19F49QOI8QY4RGCO0g410I3tZq5Zul9luFkfqsRGmtPiuJWSqshIgK2ymbprXbf3lVPBSPX9rZTluE3vkfjUrERPzKB5jalWI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198234423</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Afterword to "Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key": The Social Life of Human Rights</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Wilson, Richard Ashby</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Richard Ashby</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, I argue for an ethnographic approach to human rights that recognizes the plural and fragmentary nature of the international rights regime and the ideological promiscuity of rights talk. Instead of determining in advance the social or political character of rights, anthropologists could profitably draw from the insights of early-20th-century "legal realists" and look closely at the underlying assumptions and hidden practices of political and legal processes. Studying the "social life of human rights" would involve focusing on, inter alia, the performative dimensions of human rights, the dynamics of social mobilization, and the attitudinal changes of elite and nonelite social actors towards formulations of "rights" and "justice," both inside and outside the legal process. I conclude with a review of recent anthropological research on human rights epistemology and evaluate its implications for human rights policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-1433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.77</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMATA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: American Anthropological Association</publisher><subject>20th century ; Anthropological research ; Anthropologists ; Anthropology ; Anthropology of law ; Collective rights ; Epistemology ; Ethnography ; Forensic anthropology ; Genocide ; Human rights ; human rights policy ; Ideology ; Ignatieff, Michael ; In Focus: Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key ; International human rights ; Justice ; Language rights ; legal anthropology ; Legal services ; Policy analysis ; Policy making ; Political anthropology ; Political debate ; Politics ; Positivism ; Promiscuity ; Social anthropology ; Social dynamics ; Social factors ; Social systems</subject><ispartof>American anthropologist, 2006-03, Vol.108 (1), p.77-83</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 American Anthropological Association</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Mar 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-d9dbb7226532407cc0fc7225bc3e9cf4bd87c42133386ee7b0093b6d306f2d443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-d9dbb7226532407cc0fc7225bc3e9cf4bd87c42133386ee7b0093b6d306f2d443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3804733$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3804733$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27323,27903,27904,33753,33754,45553,45554,46387,46811,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Richard Ashby</creatorcontrib><title>Afterword to "Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key": The Social Life of Human Rights</title><title>American anthropologist</title><description>In this article, I argue for an ethnographic approach to human rights that recognizes the plural and fragmentary nature of the international rights regime and the ideological promiscuity of rights talk. Instead of determining in advance the social or political character of rights, anthropologists could profitably draw from the insights of early-20th-century "legal realists" and look closely at the underlying assumptions and hidden practices of political and legal processes. Studying the "social life of human rights" would involve focusing on, inter alia, the performative dimensions of human rights, the dynamics of social mobilization, and the attitudinal changes of elite and nonelite social actors towards formulations of "rights" and "justice," both inside and outside the legal process. I conclude with a review of recent anthropological research on human rights epistemology and evaluate its implications for human rights policy.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Anthropological research</subject><subject>Anthropologists</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Anthropology of law</subject><subject>Collective rights</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Forensic anthropology</subject><subject>Genocide</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>human rights policy</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Ignatieff, Michael</subject><subject>In Focus: Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key</subject><subject>International human rights</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Language rights</subject><subject>legal anthropology</subject><subject>Legal services</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political anthropology</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Positivism</subject><subject>Promiscuity</subject><subject>Social anthropology</subject><subject>Social dynamics</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Social systems</subject><issn>0002-7294</issn><issn>1548-1433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9LwzAYhoMoOKd3Dx7CDt5a86tJ6q2IOnEq6Lx4CWmabh1dM5OOsf_e6ETQi6ePF57ng-97ATjFKMUZyS60TglCPMVIpjgVYg8McMZkghml-2CAECKJIDk7BEchLGIUnGYD8FbUvfUb5yvYOzgqun7u3cq1braFuqvgeL3UHXxuZvM-wKaDGj7aDby329ElnM4tfHGm0S2cNLWFrv6FH4ODWrfBnnzPIXi9uZ5ejZPJ0-3dVTFJDM2lSKq8KktBCM8oYUgYg2oTY1YaanNTs7KSwjCCKaWSWytKhHJa8ooiXpOKMToE57u9K-_e1zb0atkEY9tWd9atg-KI5JwT-S9IJaE5YzyCoz_gwq19F49QOI8QY4RGCO0g410I3tZq5Zul9luFkfqsRGmtPiuJWSqshIgK2ymbprXbf3lVPBSPX9rZTluE3vkfjUrERPzKB5jalWI</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Wilson, Richard Ashby</creator><general>American Anthropological Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>Afterword to "Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key": The Social Life of Human Rights</title><author>Wilson, Richard Ashby</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3987-d9dbb7226532407cc0fc7225bc3e9cf4bd87c42133386ee7b0093b6d306f2d443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Anthropological research</topic><topic>Anthropologists</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Anthropology of law</topic><topic>Collective rights</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Forensic anthropology</topic><topic>Genocide</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>human rights policy</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Ignatieff, Michael</topic><topic>In Focus: Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key</topic><topic>International human rights</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Language rights</topic><topic>legal anthropology</topic><topic>Legal services</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political anthropology</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Positivism</topic><topic>Promiscuity</topic><topic>Social anthropology</topic><topic>Social dynamics</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Social systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Richard Ashby</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>American anthropologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Richard Ashby</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Afterword to "Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key": The Social Life of Human Rights</atitle><jtitle>American anthropologist</jtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>77-83</pages><issn>0002-7294</issn><eissn>1548-1433</eissn><coden>AMATA7</coden><abstract>In this article, I argue for an ethnographic approach to human rights that recognizes the plural and fragmentary nature of the international rights regime and the ideological promiscuity of rights talk. Instead of determining in advance the social or political character of rights, anthropologists could profitably draw from the insights of early-20th-century "legal realists" and look closely at the underlying assumptions and hidden practices of political and legal processes. Studying the "social life of human rights" would involve focusing on, inter alia, the performative dimensions of human rights, the dynamics of social mobilization, and the attitudinal changes of elite and nonelite social actors towards formulations of "rights" and "justice," both inside and outside the legal process. I conclude with a review of recent anthropological research on human rights epistemology and evaluate its implications for human rights policy.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>American Anthropological Association</pub><doi>10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.77</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7294
ispartof American anthropologist, 2006-03, Vol.108 (1), p.77-83
issn 0002-7294
1548-1433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60296628
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Sociological Abstracts
subjects 20th century
Anthropological research
Anthropologists
Anthropology
Anthropology of law
Collective rights
Epistemology
Ethnography
Forensic anthropology
Genocide
Human rights
human rights policy
Ideology
Ignatieff, Michael
In Focus: Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key
International human rights
Justice
Language rights
legal anthropology
Legal services
Policy analysis
Policy making
Political anthropology
Political debate
Politics
Positivism
Promiscuity
Social anthropology
Social dynamics
Social factors
Social systems
title Afterword to "Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key": The Social Life of Human Rights
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A11%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Afterword%20to%20%22Anthropology%20and%20Human%20Rights%20in%20a%20New%20Key%22:%20The%20Social%20Life%20of%20Human%20Rights&rft.jtitle=American%20anthropologist&rft.au=Wilson,%20Richard%20Ashby&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=77-83&rft.issn=0002-7294&rft.eissn=1548-1433&rft.coden=AMATA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.77&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3804733%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198234423&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3804733&rfr_iscdi=true