"Race": Still an Issue for Physical Anthropology? Results of Polish Studies Seen in the Light of the U.S. Findings

The racial paradigm, which became rooted in physical anthropology at its very beginning, was, for decades, treated as a concept needing no verification. It was only in the mid-20th century that the first attempts were made to question the usefulness of the race concept in describing our species vari...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American anthropologist 2003-03, Vol.105 (1), p.116-124
Hauptverfasser: Kaszycka, Katarzyna A., Strzałko, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 124
container_issue 1
container_start_page 116
container_title American anthropologist
container_volume 105
creator Kaszycka, Katarzyna A.
Strzałko, Jan
description The racial paradigm, which became rooted in physical anthropology at its very beginning, was, for decades, treated as a concept needing no verification. It was only in the mid-20th century that the first attempts were made to question the usefulness of the race concept in describing our species variation. Since then, an ever growing number of anthropologists, particularly in the United States, have rejected the concept (nearly seventy percent in 1999). In Poland, the situation is different--in the 2001 study, the race concept was rejected by only 25 percent; the remaining respondents differing widely as to the accepted meaning of race. Unlike the U.S. anthropologists, Polish anthropologists tend to regard race as a term without taxonomic value, often as a substitute for population. The discrepancy may stem from differences in the traditions of anthropological schools, the differing sociopolitical histories, education, semantics, and possible attitudinal factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1525/aa.2003.105.1.116
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60276842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3567320</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3567320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4306-3fc96ed67076b77e523c1d68c184882d407495739f13aed08845454cbe54b5663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEYhYMouFZ_gOBFWNC7GfOdjDeyFKuFVUvXXodsJrOTJZ1skxlk_70Zpih4U3IRDjzn5H1zAHiLUY054R-NqQlCtMaI17jGWDwDK8yZqjCj9DlYIYRIJUnDXoJXOR-LlILyFUjrW2Pd-hPcjT4EaAZ4nfPkYBcTvOnP2VsT4GYY-xRPMcTD-TO8dXkKY4axgzcx-NwX79R6l-HOuQH6AY69g1t_6MeZmcVdvavhlR9aPxzya_CiMyG7N4_3Bbi7-vLr8lu1_fn1-nKzrSyjSFS0s41wrZBl0r2UjhNqcSuUxYopRVqGJGu4pE2HqXEtUorxcuzecbbnQtAL8GHJPaX4MLk86nufrQvBDC5OWQtEpFCMPAlSxWijpCzg-j_wGKc0lCU0bhQWXDWoQHiBbIo5J9fpU_L3Jp01RnruShuj566K5hrr0lXxvH8MNrl8eJfMYH3-Z-QUcYLnScXC_fbBnZ8O1pvvmx_LA-8W4zGPMf01Ui4kJYj-AV2bqoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198165890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Race": Still an Issue for Physical Anthropology? Results of Polish Studies Seen in the Light of the U.S. Findings</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Kaszycka, Katarzyna A. ; Strzałko, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaszycka, Katarzyna A. ; Strzałko, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>The racial paradigm, which became rooted in physical anthropology at its very beginning, was, for decades, treated as a concept needing no verification. It was only in the mid-20th century that the first attempts were made to question the usefulness of the race concept in describing our species variation. Since then, an ever growing number of anthropologists, particularly in the United States, have rejected the concept (nearly seventy percent in 1999). In Poland, the situation is different--in the 2001 study, the race concept was rejected by only 25 percent; the remaining respondents differing widely as to the accepted meaning of race. Unlike the U.S. anthropologists, Polish anthropologists tend to regard race as a term without taxonomic value, often as a substitute for population. The discrepancy may stem from differences in the traditions of anthropological schools, the differing sociopolitical histories, education, semantics, and possible attitudinal factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-1433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/aa.2003.105.1.116</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMATA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: American Anthropological Association</publisher><subject>20th century ; Anthropologists ; Anthropology ; Attitudes ; Biological anthropology ; Cultural anthropology ; Ethnology ; Exchange Across Difference: The Status of the Race Concept ; Historical analysis ; Humanity ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary relations ; Physical anthropology ; Poland ; Polish language ; Population genetics ; Questionnaires ; Race ; Racism ; Respondents ; Semantics ; Sources and methods ; Species ; Specific concepts ; Studies ; U.S.A ; United States ; Universities ; Variance ; Verification ; World wars</subject><ispartof>American anthropologist, 2003-03, Vol.105 (1), p.116-124</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 American Anthropological Association</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Anthropological Association Mar 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4306-3fc96ed67076b77e523c1d68c184882d407495739f13aed08845454cbe54b5663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4306-3fc96ed67076b77e523c1d68c184882d407495739f13aed08845454cbe54b5663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3567320$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3567320$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27323,27903,27904,33753,33754,45553,45554,46387,46811,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15305212$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaszycka, Katarzyna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strzałko, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>"Race": Still an Issue for Physical Anthropology? Results of Polish Studies Seen in the Light of the U.S. Findings</title><title>American anthropologist</title><description>The racial paradigm, which became rooted in physical anthropology at its very beginning, was, for decades, treated as a concept needing no verification. It was only in the mid-20th century that the first attempts were made to question the usefulness of the race concept in describing our species variation. Since then, an ever growing number of anthropologists, particularly in the United States, have rejected the concept (nearly seventy percent in 1999). In Poland, the situation is different--in the 2001 study, the race concept was rejected by only 25 percent; the remaining respondents differing widely as to the accepted meaning of race. Unlike the U.S. anthropologists, Polish anthropologists tend to regard race as a term without taxonomic value, often as a substitute for population. The discrepancy may stem from differences in the traditions of anthropological schools, the differing sociopolitical histories, education, semantics, and possible attitudinal factors.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Anthropologists</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biological anthropology</subject><subject>Cultural anthropology</subject><subject>Ethnology</subject><subject>Exchange Across Difference: The Status of the Race Concept</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>Humanity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary relations</subject><subject>Physical anthropology</subject><subject>Poland</subject><subject>Polish language</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sources and methods</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Specific concepts</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Variance</subject><subject>Verification</subject><subject>World wars</subject><issn>0002-7294</issn><issn>1548-1433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEYhYMouFZ_gOBFWNC7GfOdjDeyFKuFVUvXXodsJrOTJZ1skxlk_70Zpih4U3IRDjzn5H1zAHiLUY054R-NqQlCtMaI17jGWDwDK8yZqjCj9DlYIYRIJUnDXoJXOR-LlILyFUjrW2Pd-hPcjT4EaAZ4nfPkYBcTvOnP2VsT4GYY-xRPMcTD-TO8dXkKY4axgzcx-NwX79R6l-HOuQH6AY69g1t_6MeZmcVdvavhlR9aPxzya_CiMyG7N4_3Bbi7-vLr8lu1_fn1-nKzrSyjSFS0s41wrZBl0r2UjhNqcSuUxYopRVqGJGu4pE2HqXEtUorxcuzecbbnQtAL8GHJPaX4MLk86nufrQvBDC5OWQtEpFCMPAlSxWijpCzg-j_wGKc0lCU0bhQWXDWoQHiBbIo5J9fpU_L3Jp01RnruShuj566K5hrr0lXxvH8MNrl8eJfMYH3-Z-QUcYLnScXC_fbBnZ8O1pvvmx_LA-8W4zGPMf01Ui4kJYj-AV2bqoQ</recordid><startdate>200303</startdate><enddate>200303</enddate><creator>Kaszycka, Katarzyna A.</creator><creator>Strzałko, Jan</creator><general>American Anthropological Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200303</creationdate><title>"Race": Still an Issue for Physical Anthropology? Results of Polish Studies Seen in the Light of the U.S. Findings</title><author>Kaszycka, Katarzyna A. ; Strzałko, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4306-3fc96ed67076b77e523c1d68c184882d407495739f13aed08845454cbe54b5663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Anthropologists</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biological anthropology</topic><topic>Cultural anthropology</topic><topic>Ethnology</topic><topic>Exchange Across Difference: The Status of the Race Concept</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>Humanity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary relations</topic><topic>Physical anthropology</topic><topic>Poland</topic><topic>Polish language</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sources and methods</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Specific concepts</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Variance</topic><topic>Verification</topic><topic>World wars</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaszycka, Katarzyna A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strzałko, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>American anthropologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaszycka, Katarzyna A.</au><au>Strzałko, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Race": Still an Issue for Physical Anthropology? Results of Polish Studies Seen in the Light of the U.S. Findings</atitle><jtitle>American anthropologist</jtitle><date>2003-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>116-124</pages><issn>0002-7294</issn><eissn>1548-1433</eissn><coden>AMATA7</coden><abstract>The racial paradigm, which became rooted in physical anthropology at its very beginning, was, for decades, treated as a concept needing no verification. It was only in the mid-20th century that the first attempts were made to question the usefulness of the race concept in describing our species variation. Since then, an ever growing number of anthropologists, particularly in the United States, have rejected the concept (nearly seventy percent in 1999). In Poland, the situation is different--in the 2001 study, the race concept was rejected by only 25 percent; the remaining respondents differing widely as to the accepted meaning of race. Unlike the U.S. anthropologists, Polish anthropologists tend to regard race as a term without taxonomic value, often as a substitute for population. The discrepancy may stem from differences in the traditions of anthropological schools, the differing sociopolitical histories, education, semantics, and possible attitudinal factors.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>American Anthropological Association</pub><doi>10.1525/aa.2003.105.1.116</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7294
ispartof American anthropologist, 2003-03, Vol.105 (1), p.116-124
issn 0002-7294
1548-1433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60276842
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects 20th century
Anthropologists
Anthropology
Attitudes
Biological anthropology
Cultural anthropology
Ethnology
Exchange Across Difference: The Status of the Race Concept
Historical analysis
Humanity
Humans
Interdisciplinary relations
Physical anthropology
Poland
Polish language
Population genetics
Questionnaires
Race
Racism
Respondents
Semantics
Sources and methods
Species
Specific concepts
Studies
U.S.A
United States
Universities
Variance
Verification
World wars
title "Race": Still an Issue for Physical Anthropology? Results of Polish Studies Seen in the Light of the U.S. Findings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A35%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Race%22:%20Still%20an%20Issue%20for%20Physical%20Anthropology?%20Results%20of%20Polish%20Studies%20Seen%20in%20the%20Light%20of%20the%20U.S.%20Findings&rft.jtitle=American%20anthropologist&rft.au=Kaszycka,%20Katarzyna%20A.&rft.date=2003-03&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=116-124&rft.issn=0002-7294&rft.eissn=1548-1433&rft.coden=AMATA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/aa.2003.105.1.116&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3567320%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198165890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3567320&rfr_iscdi=true