Rules Used by Brazilian Students in Systematic and Nonsystematic Reward Allocation
The use of distributive rules was compared in systematic and nonsystematic allocation. Two hypotheses were tested: (a) Systematic divisions will increase the proportion of equity responses, and (b) Equal distributions will be justified on the basis of the sameness of the characters' effort or a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of social psychology 1994-06, Vol.134 (3), p.331-338 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 338 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 331 |
| container_title | The Journal of social psychology |
| container_volume | 134 |
| creator | Hutz, Claudio S. de Conti, Luciane Vargas, Silvia |
| description | The use of distributive rules was compared in systematic and nonsystematic allocation. Two hypotheses were tested: (a) Systematic divisions will increase the proportion of equity responses, and (b) Equal distributions will be justified on the basis of the sameness of the characters' effort or ability. The subjects were 742 Brazilian undergraduates. The results indicated that the equity rule was used most often when it resulted in the equal division of resources. When allocations were systematic, there were significant increases in the proportion of equity, in some conditions. The second hypothesis was supported only for effort. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00224545.1994.9711737 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60210776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1290732943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dda4f7df6079681fa35be87d17831bb5a64084d73b24d7302c478e64633cff823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtLHDEYhkOx0FX7EwpDW3o3a87J3HnAE0iFtV6HTA4wkk1sMoNsf70Zdq1QsOYiCR_P-35f8gLwBcElghIeQYgxZZQtUdfRZScQEkR8AAvUUdgiJMkeWMxMO0OfwH4pD7Au0aEFWK2m4EpzX5xt-k1zmvWfIQw6NnfjZF0cSzPU-6aMbq3HwTQ62uZniuW1snJPOtvmJIRkaiHFQ_DR61Dc5915AO4vzn-dXbU3t5fXZyc3raGMj621mnphPa-DcIm8Jqx3UlgkJEF9zzSnUFIrSI_nHWJDhXScckKM9xKTA_Bj6_uY0-_JlVGth2JcCDq6NBXFIUZQCP4uyATjGBFYwa__gA9pyrE-QtWvlWSetELf3oRwBwXBHSWVYlvK5FRKdl495mGt80YhqObU1EtqszVVu9Sq7vvOXRejg886mqH8FVNUtYJV7HiLDdGnvNZPKQerRr0JKb9oyP87PQO1yajr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290732943</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rules Used by Brazilian Students in Systematic and Nonsystematic Reward Allocation</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hutz, Claudio S. ; de Conti, Luciane ; Vargas, Silvia</creator><creatorcontrib>Hutz, Claudio S. ; de Conti, Luciane ; Vargas, Silvia</creatorcontrib><description>The use of distributive rules was compared in systematic and nonsystematic allocation. Two hypotheses were tested: (a) Systematic divisions will increase the proportion of equity responses, and (b) Equal distributions will be justified on the basis of the sameness of the characters' effort or ability. The subjects were 742 Brazilian undergraduates. The results indicated that the equity rule was used most often when it resulted in the equal division of resources. When allocations were systematic, there were significant increases in the proportion of equity, in some conditions. The second hypothesis was supported only for effort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4545</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-1183</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1994.9711737</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSPSAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Behavior. Attitude ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brazil ; College students ; Dining Facilities ; Distributive justice ; Egalitarianism ; Equality ; Expectation ; Feedback (Response) ; Females ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gender differences ; Indexing in process ; Personality ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Questionnaires ; Resource Allocation ; Restaurants ; Rewards ; Rules ; Social psychology ; Students ; Urban Universities ; Use</subject><ispartof>The Journal of social psychology, 1994-06, Vol.134 (3), p.331-338</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 1994</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Heldref Publications Jun 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dda4f7df6079681fa35be87d17831bb5a64084d73b24d7302c478e64633cff823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dda4f7df6079681fa35be87d17831bb5a64084d73b24d7302c478e64633cff823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,27323,27848,27903,27904,30978,30979,33753,33754</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4110875$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hutz, Claudio S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Conti, Luciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Silvia</creatorcontrib><title>Rules Used by Brazilian Students in Systematic and Nonsystematic Reward Allocation</title><title>The Journal of social psychology</title><description>The use of distributive rules was compared in systematic and nonsystematic allocation. Two hypotheses were tested: (a) Systematic divisions will increase the proportion of equity responses, and (b) Equal distributions will be justified on the basis of the sameness of the characters' effort or ability. The subjects were 742 Brazilian undergraduates. The results indicated that the equity rule was used most often when it resulted in the equal division of resources. When allocations were systematic, there were significant increases in the proportion of equity, in some conditions. The second hypothesis was supported only for effort.</description><subject>Behavior. Attitude</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Dining Facilities</subject><subject>Distributive justice</subject><subject>Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Expectation</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Indexing in process</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Resource Allocation</subject><subject>Restaurants</subject><subject>Rewards</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Urban Universities</subject><subject>Use</subject><issn>0022-4545</issn><issn>1940-1183</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0R3</sourceid><sourceid>ACFII</sourceid><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OC</sourceid><sourceid>~PJ</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtLHDEYhkOx0FX7EwpDW3o3a87J3HnAE0iFtV6HTA4wkk1sMoNsf70Zdq1QsOYiCR_P-35f8gLwBcElghIeQYgxZZQtUdfRZScQEkR8AAvUUdgiJMkeWMxMO0OfwH4pD7Au0aEFWK2m4EpzX5xt-k1zmvWfIQw6NnfjZF0cSzPU-6aMbq3HwTQ62uZniuW1snJPOtvmJIRkaiHFQ_DR61Dc5915AO4vzn-dXbU3t5fXZyc3raGMj621mnphPa-DcIm8Jqx3UlgkJEF9zzSnUFIrSI_nHWJDhXScckKM9xKTA_Bj6_uY0-_JlVGth2JcCDq6NBXFIUZQCP4uyATjGBFYwa__gA9pyrE-QtWvlWSetELf3oRwBwXBHSWVYlvK5FRKdl495mGt80YhqObU1EtqszVVu9Sq7vvOXRejg886mqH8FVNUtYJV7HiLDdGnvNZPKQerRr0JKb9oyP87PQO1yajr</recordid><startdate>19940601</startdate><enddate>19940601</enddate><creator>Hutz, Claudio S.</creator><creator>de Conti, Luciane</creator><creator>Vargas, Silvia</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Heldref</general><general>Clark University Press</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0R3</scope><scope>ACFII</scope><scope>ANHVI</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OB</scope><scope>~OC</scope><scope>~OG</scope><scope>~PJ</scope><scope>~PM</scope><scope>~PN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940601</creationdate><title>Rules Used by Brazilian Students in Systematic and Nonsystematic Reward Allocation</title><author>Hutz, Claudio S. ; de Conti, Luciane ; Vargas, Silvia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dda4f7df6079681fa35be87d17831bb5a64084d73b24d7302c478e64633cff823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Behavior. Attitude</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Dining Facilities</topic><topic>Distributive justice</topic><topic>Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Expectation</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Indexing in process</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Resource Allocation</topic><topic>Restaurants</topic><topic>Rewards</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Urban Universities</topic><topic>Use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hutz, Claudio S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Conti, Luciane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Silvia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1 (2022)</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 1</collection><collection>PAO Collection 1 (purchase pre Feb/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Foundation Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JISC Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 1</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hutz, Claudio S.</au><au>de Conti, Luciane</au><au>Vargas, Silvia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rules Used by Brazilian Students in Systematic and Nonsystematic Reward Allocation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of social psychology</jtitle><date>1994-06-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>331-338</pages><issn>0022-4545</issn><eissn>1940-1183</eissn><coden>JSPSAG</coden><abstract>The use of distributive rules was compared in systematic and nonsystematic allocation. Two hypotheses were tested: (a) Systematic divisions will increase the proportion of equity responses, and (b) Equal distributions will be justified on the basis of the sameness of the characters' effort or ability. The subjects were 742 Brazilian undergraduates. The results indicated that the equity rule was used most often when it resulted in the equal division of resources. When allocations were systematic, there were significant increases in the proportion of equity, in some conditions. The second hypothesis was supported only for effort.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/00224545.1994.9711737</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-4545 |
| ispartof | The Journal of social psychology, 1994-06, Vol.134 (3), p.331-338 |
| issn | 0022-4545 1940-1183 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60210776 |
| source | Sociological Abstracts; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Behavior. Attitude Biological and medical sciences Brazil College students Dining Facilities Distributive justice Egalitarianism Equality Expectation Feedback (Response) Females Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gender differences Indexing in process Personality Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Questionnaires Resource Allocation Restaurants Rewards Rules Social psychology Students Urban Universities Use |
| title | Rules Used by Brazilian Students in Systematic and Nonsystematic Reward Allocation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A22%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rules%20Used%20by%20Brazilian%20Students%20in%20Systematic%20and%20Nonsystematic%20Reward%20Allocation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Hutz,%20Claudio%20S.&rft.date=1994-06-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=331-338&rft.issn=0022-4545&rft.eissn=1940-1183&rft.coden=JSPSAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00224545.1994.9711737&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1290732943%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290732943&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |