Philosophical Doggedness

For example: responding to a rather large contingent of feminist and not-so-feminist theorists worried about the colonization of language and its implications for the suffocation of thought, imagination and desire, Patricia Yaeger, borrowing a phrase from Derrida and joining forces with the likes of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Hypatia 2006-11, Vol.21 (4), p.232-238
1. Verfasser:	Spelman, Elizabeth V.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Ambiguity Ambition Dogs Fecundity Homography Marking behavior Musings Philosophy Political power Sacred texts Semantics Thought Words
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	238
container_issue	4
container_start_page	232
container_title	Hypatia
container_volume	21
creator	Spelman, Elizabeth V.
description	For example: responding to a rather large contingent of feminist and not-so-feminist theorists worried about the colonization of language and its implications for the suffocation of thought, imagination and desire, Patricia Yaeger, borrowing a phrase from Derrida and joining forces with the likes of Malcolm X and Hannah Arendt, brings our attention to "the animality of the letter," the ever-present instability of meaning that provides leverage against discursive domination.
doi_str_mv	10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01140.x
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60209468</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4640036</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4640036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2812-222f9a2aa4fe72fab1dc943e25dfa89351ef250ae990efdb28c7e1343736ad6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUD1PwzAUtBBIlMLOwIA6sCXYz4kdsyAo0CJVUKECgsVyErtNSJsSp6L99zhK1YGNG-4N96GnQ6hHsE8cLnOfhMA9wJj4jphfx5iQAPvrPdTZSfuog6OIeyFl_BAdWZtjByJwB52OZ1lR2nI5yxJVnN-V06lOF9raY3RgVGH1yfZ20evD_aQ_9EbPg8f-zchLICLgAYARCpQKjOZgVEzSRARUQ5gaFQkaEm0gxEoLgbVJY4gSrgkNKKdMpSymXXTR9i6r8nulbS3nmU10UaiFLldWMgxYBCxyxt4fY16uqoX7TQKlAEJQ6kxXrSmpSmsrbeSyyuaq2kiCZbOYzGUzi2xmaYjJ7WJy7cLXbfgnK_TmH0k5_BjfAAXXcNY25LYuq11DwAKMKXOy18qZrfV6J6vqSzJOeSjfnwYyun35fBvhvpzQX_4difA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233229933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Philosophical Doggedness</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Spelman, Elizabeth V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spelman, Elizabeth V.</creatorcontrib><description>For example: responding to a rather large contingent of feminist and not-so-feminist theorists worried about the colonization of language and its implications for the suffocation of thought, imagination and desire, Patricia Yaeger, borrowing a phrase from Derrida and joining forces with the likes of Malcolm X and Hannah Arendt, brings our attention to "the animality of the letter," the ever-present instability of meaning that provides leverage against discursive domination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-5367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-2001</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01140.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Ambition ; Dogs ; Fecundity ; Homography ; Marking behavior ; Musings ; Philosophy ; Political power ; Sacred texts ; Semantics ; Thought ; Words</subject><ispartof>Hypatia, 2006-11, Vol.21 (4), p.232-238</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Hypatia, Inc.</rights><rights>2006 by Hypatia, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Indiana University Press Fall 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2812-222f9a2aa4fe72fab1dc943e25dfa89351ef250ae990efdb28c7e1343736ad6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2812-222f9a2aa4fe72fab1dc943e25dfa89351ef250ae990efdb28c7e1343736ad6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4640036$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4640036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,33751,33752,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spelman, Elizabeth V.</creatorcontrib><title>Philosophical Doggedness</title><title>Hypatia</title><description>For example: responding to a rather large contingent of feminist and not-so-feminist theorists worried about the colonization of language and its implications for the suffocation of thought, imagination and desire, Patricia Yaeger, borrowing a phrase from Derrida and joining forces with the likes of Malcolm X and Hannah Arendt, brings our attention to "the animality of the letter," the ever-present instability of meaning that provides leverage against discursive domination.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Ambition</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Homography</subject><subject>Marking behavior</subject><subject>Musings</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Sacred texts</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Thought</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0887-5367</issn><issn>1527-2001</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVUD1PwzAUtBBIlMLOwIA6sCXYz4kdsyAo0CJVUKECgsVyErtNSJsSp6L99zhK1YGNG-4N96GnQ6hHsE8cLnOfhMA9wJj4jphfx5iQAPvrPdTZSfuog6OIeyFl_BAdWZtjByJwB52OZ1lR2nI5yxJVnN-V06lOF9raY3RgVGH1yfZ20evD_aQ_9EbPg8f-zchLICLgAYARCpQKjOZgVEzSRARUQ5gaFQkaEm0gxEoLgbVJY4gSrgkNKKdMpSymXXTR9i6r8nulbS3nmU10UaiFLldWMgxYBCxyxt4fY16uqoX7TQKlAEJQ6kxXrSmpSmsrbeSyyuaq2kiCZbOYzGUzi2xmaYjJ7WJy7cLXbfgnK_TmH0k5_BjfAAXXcNY25LYuq11DwAKMKXOy18qZrfV6J6vqSzJOeSjfnwYyun35fBvhvpzQX_4difA</recordid><startdate>200611</startdate><enddate>200611</enddate><creator>Spelman, Elizabeth V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Indiana University Press</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200611</creationdate><title>Philosophical Doggedness</title><author>Spelman, Elizabeth V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2812-222f9a2aa4fe72fab1dc943e25dfa89351ef250ae990efdb28c7e1343736ad6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Ambition</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Homography</topic><topic>Marking behavior</topic><topic>Musings</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Sacred texts</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Thought</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spelman, Elizabeth V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Hypatia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spelman, Elizabeth V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Philosophical Doggedness</atitle><jtitle>Hypatia</jtitle><date>2006-11</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>232</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>232-238</pages><issn>0887-5367</issn><eissn>1527-2001</eissn><abstract>For example: responding to a rather large contingent of feminist and not-so-feminist theorists worried about the colonization of language and its implications for the suffocation of thought, imagination and desire, Patricia Yaeger, borrowing a phrase from Derrida and joining forces with the likes of Malcolm X and Hannah Arendt, brings our attention to "the animality of the letter," the ever-present instability of meaning that provides leverage against discursive domination.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01140.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0887-5367
ispartof	Hypatia, 2006-11, Vol.21 (4), p.232-238
issn	0887-5367 1527-2001
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60209468
source	Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects	Ambiguity Ambition Dogs Fecundity Homography Marking behavior Musings Philosophy Political power Sacred texts Semantics Thought Words
title	Philosophical Doggedness
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A36%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Philosophical%20Doggedness&rft.jtitle=Hypatia&rft.au=Spelman,%20Elizabeth%20V.&rft.date=2006-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=232&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=232-238&rft.issn=0887-5367&rft.eissn=1527-2001&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01140.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4640036%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233229933&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4640036&rfr_iscdi=true