Technologies of Servitude: Governmentality and Indonesian Transnational Labor Migration

This paper examines the techniques and networks that enable the transnational movement of migrant laborers from Indonesia. Theoretically, the paper argues that governmentality is an effective concept through which to understand political economic relations across national borders and outside state i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anthropological quarterly 2004-07, Vol.77 (3), p.407-434
1. Verfasser: Rudnyckyj, Daromir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 434
container_issue 3
container_start_page 407
container_title Anthropological quarterly
container_volume 77
creator Rudnyckyj, Daromir
description This paper examines the techniques and networks that enable the transnational movement of migrant laborers from Indonesia. Theoretically, the paper argues that governmentality is an effective concept through which to understand political economic relations across national borders and outside state institutions. The concept is useful not only in analysis of abstract policy prescriptions, but also in the apparently mundane methods that are intended to rationalize the training, delivery and security of migrant laborers. The intervention herein is in part methodological, in so far as the paper argues that the concept is useful in analyzing the everyday practices that are a frequent focus of ethnographic fieldwork. Empirically grounded in interviews and observational fieldwork in Indonesia, the paper describes the networks that facilitate transnational labor migration from the country and demonstrates the interconnection of the "global" economy with localized moral economies. Thus, the paper argues that transnational flows of migrant laborers are in fact dependent upon supposedly traditional patron-client networks. Furthermore, I suggest that some NGOs advocating for the rights of migrant workers are not inimical to state power, but in fact work to enhance it. Strategies to protect the rights of migrant laborers may bring about greater state intervention in their lives. The paper proposes two technologies deployed by non-state entities, specifically human resources companies and NGOs, that facilitate transnational labor migration. The first are termed technologies of servitude and are intended to impart the skills and attitudes necessary to conduct domestic labor. The latter are technologies for rationalizing labor flows to wealthier countries of the Indian and Pacific Ocean regions.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/anq.2004.0045
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60207317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3318228</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3318228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-6693dcc6e05efb3eebe912ec3e2a91cf70c87416e8c79727f2495da48b04ec373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFr2zAUh8VYoVnbY287mMF2cybpyZK92whdW8jooSk9CkV-7hQcKZHsQP_7yUtpYZcehNDje7_H00fIJaNzBhV8N34_55SKeT7VBzJjFYiSVaz-SGaUUigr0bBT8imlTX7mOszI4wrtHx_68OQwFaEr7jEe3DC2-KO4DgeMfot-ML0bngvj2-LWt8FjcsYXq2h88mZwwZu-WJp1iMVv9xT_Vc7JSWf6hBcv9xl5-HW1WtyUy7vr28XPZWmh4kMpZQOttRJphd0aENfYMI4WkJuG2U5RWyvBJNZWNYqrjoumao2o11RkSsEZ-XbM3cWwHzENeuuSxb43HsOYtKScKmDvgyBrXkPNM_jlP3ATxphXTJozKZRQaoLKI2RjSClip3fRbU181ozqSYbOMvQkQ08yMv_1JdQka_ouf5116a1JMgpKycyJ1-EbtMN2TPg2nykuJOj7SezklQqggqop_vOxbZOGEF9jAVjN81Z_AZ2uo6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216474772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technologies of Servitude: Governmentality and Indonesian Transnational Labor Migration</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Rudnyckyj, Daromir</creator><creatorcontrib>Rudnyckyj, Daromir</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the techniques and networks that enable the transnational movement of migrant laborers from Indonesia. Theoretically, the paper argues that governmentality is an effective concept through which to understand political economic relations across national borders and outside state institutions. The concept is useful not only in analysis of abstract policy prescriptions, but also in the apparently mundane methods that are intended to rationalize the training, delivery and security of migrant laborers. The intervention herein is in part methodological, in so far as the paper argues that the concept is useful in analyzing the everyday practices that are a frequent focus of ethnographic fieldwork. Empirically grounded in interviews and observational fieldwork in Indonesia, the paper describes the networks that facilitate transnational labor migration from the country and demonstrates the interconnection of the "global" economy with localized moral economies. Thus, the paper argues that transnational flows of migrant laborers are in fact dependent upon supposedly traditional patron-client networks. Furthermore, I suggest that some NGOs advocating for the rights of migrant workers are not inimical to state power, but in fact work to enhance it. Strategies to protect the rights of migrant laborers may bring about greater state intervention in their lives. The paper proposes two technologies deployed by non-state entities, specifically human resources companies and NGOs, that facilitate transnational labor migration. The first are termed technologies of servitude and are intended to impart the skills and attitudes necessary to conduct domestic labor. The latter are technologies for rationalizing labor flows to wealthier countries of the Indian and Pacific Ocean regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-5491</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1534-1518</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-1518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/anq.2004.0045</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANQUAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: George Washington University Institute for Ethnographic Research</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Attitudes ; Borders ; Business structures ; Development Strategies ; Domestic workers ; Economic migration ; Ethnographic research ; Ethnography ; Ethnology ; Field work ; Fieldwork ; Focus ; Global economy ; Global Local Relationship ; Globalization ; Government ; Governmentality ; Housework ; Human ecology, environment ; Human resources ; Human settlements ; Indonesia ; International migration ; Interviews ; Labor economics ; Labor Migration ; Labour migration ; Migrant labor ; Migrant Workers ; Migrants ; Migrations ; Morphological source materials ; NGOs ; Non-governmental organizations ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Physical anthropology, ethnobiology ; Political power ; Politics ; Rights ; Scott, James C ; State ; State intervention ; State power ; Training ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>Anthropological quarterly, 2004-07, Vol.77 (3), p.407-434</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 The Institute for Ethnographic Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2004 Institute for Ethnographic Research.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Ethnographic Research Summer 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-6693dcc6e05efb3eebe912ec3e2a91cf70c87416e8c79727f2495da48b04ec373</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3318228$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3318228$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27321,27901,27902,33751,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16103776$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rudnyckyj, Daromir</creatorcontrib><title>Technologies of Servitude: Governmentality and Indonesian Transnational Labor Migration</title><title>Anthropological quarterly</title><description>This paper examines the techniques and networks that enable the transnational movement of migrant laborers from Indonesia. Theoretically, the paper argues that governmentality is an effective concept through which to understand political economic relations across national borders and outside state institutions. The concept is useful not only in analysis of abstract policy prescriptions, but also in the apparently mundane methods that are intended to rationalize the training, delivery and security of migrant laborers. The intervention herein is in part methodological, in so far as the paper argues that the concept is useful in analyzing the everyday practices that are a frequent focus of ethnographic fieldwork. Empirically grounded in interviews and observational fieldwork in Indonesia, the paper describes the networks that facilitate transnational labor migration from the country and demonstrates the interconnection of the "global" economy with localized moral economies. Thus, the paper argues that transnational flows of migrant laborers are in fact dependent upon supposedly traditional patron-client networks. Furthermore, I suggest that some NGOs advocating for the rights of migrant workers are not inimical to state power, but in fact work to enhance it. Strategies to protect the rights of migrant laborers may bring about greater state intervention in their lives. The paper proposes two technologies deployed by non-state entities, specifically human resources companies and NGOs, that facilitate transnational labor migration. The first are termed technologies of servitude and are intended to impart the skills and attitudes necessary to conduct domestic labor. The latter are technologies for rationalizing labor flows to wealthier countries of the Indian and Pacific Ocean regions.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Development Strategies</subject><subject>Domestic workers</subject><subject>Economic migration</subject><subject>Ethnographic research</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Ethnology</subject><subject>Field work</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Focus</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Global Local Relationship</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Governmentality</subject><subject>Housework</subject><subject>Human ecology, environment</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Human settlements</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>International migration</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Labor Migration</subject><subject>Labour migration</subject><subject>Migrant labor</subject><subject>Migrant Workers</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Migrations</subject><subject>Morphological source materials</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Non-governmental organizations</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Physical anthropology, ethnobiology</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Scott, James C</subject><subject>State</subject><subject>State intervention</subject><subject>State power</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>0003-5491</issn><issn>1534-1518</issn><issn>1534-1518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFr2zAUh8VYoVnbY287mMF2cybpyZK92whdW8jooSk9CkV-7hQcKZHsQP_7yUtpYZcehNDje7_H00fIJaNzBhV8N34_55SKeT7VBzJjFYiSVaz-SGaUUigr0bBT8imlTX7mOszI4wrtHx_68OQwFaEr7jEe3DC2-KO4DgeMfot-ML0bngvj2-LWt8FjcsYXq2h88mZwwZu-WJp1iMVv9xT_Vc7JSWf6hBcv9xl5-HW1WtyUy7vr28XPZWmh4kMpZQOttRJphd0aENfYMI4WkJuG2U5RWyvBJNZWNYqrjoumao2o11RkSsEZ-XbM3cWwHzENeuuSxb43HsOYtKScKmDvgyBrXkPNM_jlP3ATxphXTJozKZRQaoLKI2RjSClip3fRbU181ozqSYbOMvQkQ08yMv_1JdQka_ouf5116a1JMgpKycyJ1-EbtMN2TPg2nykuJOj7SezklQqggqop_vOxbZOGEF9jAVjN81Z_AZ2uo6o</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Rudnyckyj, Daromir</creator><general>George Washington University Institute for Ethnographic Research</general><general>Catholic University of America</general><general>Institute for Ethnographic Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Technologies of Servitude: Governmentality and Indonesian Transnational Labor Migration</title><author>Rudnyckyj, Daromir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-6693dcc6e05efb3eebe912ec3e2a91cf70c87416e8c79727f2495da48b04ec373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Development Strategies</topic><topic>Domestic workers</topic><topic>Economic migration</topic><topic>Ethnographic research</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Ethnology</topic><topic>Field work</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Focus</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Global Local Relationship</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Governmentality</topic><topic>Housework</topic><topic>Human ecology, environment</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Human settlements</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>International migration</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Labor Migration</topic><topic>Labour migration</topic><topic>Migrant labor</topic><topic>Migrant Workers</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Migrations</topic><topic>Morphological source materials</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Non-governmental organizations</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Physical anthropology, ethnobiology</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Scott, James C</topic><topic>State</topic><topic>State intervention</topic><topic>State power</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rudnyckyj, Daromir</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Anthropological quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rudnyckyj, Daromir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technologies of Servitude: Governmentality and Indonesian Transnational Labor Migration</atitle><jtitle>Anthropological quarterly</jtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>407-434</pages><issn>0003-5491</issn><issn>1534-1518</issn><eissn>1534-1518</eissn><coden>ANQUAT</coden><abstract>This paper examines the techniques and networks that enable the transnational movement of migrant laborers from Indonesia. Theoretically, the paper argues that governmentality is an effective concept through which to understand political economic relations across national borders and outside state institutions. The concept is useful not only in analysis of abstract policy prescriptions, but also in the apparently mundane methods that are intended to rationalize the training, delivery and security of migrant laborers. The intervention herein is in part methodological, in so far as the paper argues that the concept is useful in analyzing the everyday practices that are a frequent focus of ethnographic fieldwork. Empirically grounded in interviews and observational fieldwork in Indonesia, the paper describes the networks that facilitate transnational labor migration from the country and demonstrates the interconnection of the "global" economy with localized moral economies. Thus, the paper argues that transnational flows of migrant laborers are in fact dependent upon supposedly traditional patron-client networks. Furthermore, I suggest that some NGOs advocating for the rights of migrant workers are not inimical to state power, but in fact work to enhance it. Strategies to protect the rights of migrant laborers may bring about greater state intervention in their lives. The paper proposes two technologies deployed by non-state entities, specifically human resources companies and NGOs, that facilitate transnational labor migration. The first are termed technologies of servitude and are intended to impart the skills and attitudes necessary to conduct domestic labor. The latter are technologies for rationalizing labor flows to wealthier countries of the Indian and Pacific Ocean regions.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>George Washington University Institute for Ethnographic Research</pub><doi>10.1353/anq.2004.0045</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-5491
ispartof Anthropological quarterly, 2004-07, Vol.77 (3), p.407-434
issn 0003-5491
1534-1518
1534-1518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60207317
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Anthropology
Attitudes
Borders
Business structures
Development Strategies
Domestic workers
Economic migration
Ethnographic research
Ethnography
Ethnology
Field work
Fieldwork
Focus
Global economy
Global Local Relationship
Globalization
Government
Governmentality
Housework
Human ecology, environment
Human resources
Human settlements
Indonesia
International migration
Interviews
Labor economics
Labor Migration
Labour migration
Migrant labor
Migrant Workers
Migrants
Migrations
Morphological source materials
NGOs
Non-governmental organizations
Nongovernmental organizations
Physical anthropology, ethnobiology
Political power
Politics
Rights
Scott, James C
State
State intervention
State power
Training
Transnationalism
title Technologies of Servitude: Governmentality and Indonesian Transnational Labor Migration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A43%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technologies%20of%20Servitude:%20Governmentality%20and%20Indonesian%20Transnational%20Labor%20Migration&rft.jtitle=Anthropological%20quarterly&rft.au=Rudnyckyj,%20Daromir&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=407-434&rft.issn=0003-5491&rft.eissn=1534-1518&rft.coden=ANQUAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/anq.2004.0045&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3318228%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216474772&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3318228&rfr_iscdi=true