What I learned at AEI

Too many people on the Right are panicking instead of thinking when it comes to same-sex marriage. If gay marriage is enacted, gay couples will get the same legal protections of marriage, but that's hardly the most of it. The straight world gets another irreplacable benefit: the stability that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Public interest 2004-07, Vol.156 (156), p.17-23
1. Verfasser: Rauch, Jonathan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue 156
container_start_page 17
container_title The Public interest
container_volume 156
creator Rauch, Jonathan
description Too many people on the Right are panicking instead of thinking when it comes to same-sex marriage. If gay marriage is enacted, gay couples will get the same legal protections of marriage, but that's hardly the most of it. The straight world gets another irreplacable benefit: the stability that comes from knitting people into families. Above all, the institution of marriage itself is a likely beneficiary of same-sex marriage. The fundamental principal for all Americans, straight or gay, ought to be that sex, love, and marriage go together, automatically. The ban on gay marriage favored by many conservatives won't stop societal recognition from flowing to these couples eventually. Over time, as the national consensus moves towards equality for homosexuals, there is a serious risk that marriage will be stigmatized and marginalized if it is legally demarcated as a discriminatory institution.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60152493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A119025425</galeid><sourcerecordid>A119025425</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g256t-a9cb5129c6e281dae85338450bf1846f1b5cbcfd2cfee477a4e236437d62c8873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFzD1PwzAQBmAPIFEKI3smmILs8_cYVQUiVWIBMUaOcw5BbgJx-v-xVMaq6IbTe3reuyArSjkvuZT6ilyn9EUpFVTZFbn7-HRLURcR3TxiV-RQbesbchlcTHj7t9fk_Wn7tnkpd6_P9abalT1ItZTO-lYysF4hGNY5NJJzIyRtAzNCBdZK3_rQgQ-IQmsnELgSXHcKvDGar8n98e_3PP0cMC3NfkgeY3QjTofUKMokCMv_hVxbbpRQGT6chQBAFVhFsyyPsncRm2EM0zI73-OIs4vTiGHI54oxS0EKkNk_nvB5OtwP_kThF3o6bvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222062960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What I learned at AEI</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Rauch, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>Too many people on the Right are panicking instead of thinking when it comes to same-sex marriage. If gay marriage is enacted, gay couples will get the same legal protections of marriage, but that's hardly the most of it. The straight world gets another irreplacable benefit: the stability that comes from knitting people into families. Above all, the institution of marriage itself is a likely beneficiary of same-sex marriage. The fundamental principal for all Americans, straight or gay, ought to be that sex, love, and marriage go together, automatically. The ban on gay marriage favored by many conservatives won't stop societal recognition from flowing to these couples eventually. Over time, as the national consensus moves towards equality for homosexuals, there is a serious risk that marriage will be stigmatized and marginalized if it is legally demarcated as a discriminatory institution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3557</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PUBIBV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: The National Affairs, Inc</publisher><subject>Aims and objectives ; Analysis ; Calculus ; Conservatism ; Couples ; Cultural studies ; Drug Addiction ; Family Law ; Gays &amp; lesbians ; Homosexuality ; Interpersonal relations ; Marriage ; Opportunities ; Political Attitudes ; Presidents ; Public interest ; Same sex marriage ; Social aspects ; Social Change ; Social policy ; Society ; Sociology ; United States of America</subject><ispartof>The Public interest, 2004-07, Vol.156 (156), p.17-23</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 The National Affairs, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright National Affairs, Inc. Summer 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,14658</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>What I learned at AEI</title><title>The Public interest</title><description>Too many people on the Right are panicking instead of thinking when it comes to same-sex marriage. If gay marriage is enacted, gay couples will get the same legal protections of marriage, but that's hardly the most of it. The straight world gets another irreplacable benefit: the stability that comes from knitting people into families. Above all, the institution of marriage itself is a likely beneficiary of same-sex marriage. The fundamental principal for all Americans, straight or gay, ought to be that sex, love, and marriage go together, automatically. The ban on gay marriage favored by many conservatives won't stop societal recognition from flowing to these couples eventually. Over time, as the national consensus moves towards equality for homosexuals, there is a serious risk that marriage will be stigmatized and marginalized if it is legally demarcated as a discriminatory institution.</description><subject>Aims and objectives</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Calculus</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Cultural studies</subject><subject>Drug Addiction</subject><subject>Family Law</subject><subject>Gays &amp; lesbians</subject><subject>Homosexuality</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Opportunities</subject><subject>Political Attitudes</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Same sex marriage</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social Change</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><issn>0033-3557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFzD1PwzAQBmAPIFEKI3smmILs8_cYVQUiVWIBMUaOcw5BbgJx-v-xVMaq6IbTe3reuyArSjkvuZT6ilyn9EUpFVTZFbn7-HRLURcR3TxiV-RQbesbchlcTHj7t9fk_Wn7tnkpd6_P9abalT1ItZTO-lYysF4hGNY5NJJzIyRtAzNCBdZK3_rQgQ-IQmsnELgSXHcKvDGar8n98e_3PP0cMC3NfkgeY3QjTofUKMokCMv_hVxbbpRQGT6chQBAFVhFsyyPsncRm2EM0zI73-OIs4vTiGHI54oxS0EKkNk_nvB5OtwP_kThF3o6bvQ</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Rauch, Jonathan</creator><general>The National Affairs, Inc</general><general>National Affairs, Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>What I learned at AEI</title><author>Rauch, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g256t-a9cb5129c6e281dae85338450bf1846f1b5cbcfd2cfee477a4e236437d62c8873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aims and objectives</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Calculus</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Cultural studies</topic><topic>Drug Addiction</topic><topic>Family Law</topic><topic>Gays &amp; lesbians</topic><topic>Homosexuality</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Opportunities</topic><topic>Political Attitudes</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Same sex marriage</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social Change</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Public interest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rauch, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What I learned at AEI</atitle><jtitle>The Public interest</jtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>156</volume><issue>156</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>17-23</pages><issn>0033-3557</issn><coden>PUBIBV</coden><abstract>Too many people on the Right are panicking instead of thinking when it comes to same-sex marriage. If gay marriage is enacted, gay couples will get the same legal protections of marriage, but that's hardly the most of it. The straight world gets another irreplacable benefit: the stability that comes from knitting people into families. Above all, the institution of marriage itself is a likely beneficiary of same-sex marriage. The fundamental principal for all Americans, straight or gay, ought to be that sex, love, and marriage go together, automatically. The ban on gay marriage favored by many conservatives won't stop societal recognition from flowing to these couples eventually. Over time, as the national consensus moves towards equality for homosexuals, there is a serious risk that marriage will be stigmatized and marginalized if it is legally demarcated as a discriminatory institution.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>The National Affairs, Inc</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3557
ispartof The Public interest, 2004-07, Vol.156 (156), p.17-23
issn 0033-3557
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_60152493
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Free E- Journals
subjects Aims and objectives
Analysis
Calculus
Conservatism
Couples
Cultural studies
Drug Addiction
Family Law
Gays & lesbians
Homosexuality
Interpersonal relations
Marriage
Opportunities
Political Attitudes
Presidents
Public interest
Same sex marriage
Social aspects
Social Change
Social policy
Society
Sociology
United States of America
title What I learned at AEI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A10%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20I%20learned%20at%20AEI&rft.jtitle=The%20Public%20interest&rft.au=Rauch,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=156&rft.issue=156&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=17-23&rft.issn=0033-3557&rft.coden=PUBIBV&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA119025425%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222062960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A119025425&rfr_iscdi=true